Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 INTRODUCTION
he global increase in demand for broadband communications has led to the development of new and
enabling technologies to support the conventional
methods such as the coaxial cable, copper, microwave and
radio frequency (RF) systems. Optical Wireless Communications(OWC) has benefited from the developments in
optoelectronics and can be a key technology for achieving
cost-effective high-speed optical links. The Optical Wireless Communications (OWC) is the technology in which
modulated optical signal is propagated over free space
without using optical fiber medium [1,2].
There are several significant advantages offered by
FSO technology: 1)FSO technology is very high bandwidth availability. 2) low cost per bit 3) Not require digging and permissionfrom authorities for installation.
4)No licensing or frequency allocating is required. 5) FSO
terminals are portable and quickly deployable. 6) The
narrow beam of the laser makes detection, interception
and jamming verydifficult. 7) free-space optical communication is faster than fiber-optic communication because
the light travels faster through air (at approximately
300,000 km/s) than it does through glass (approximately
200,000 km/s). 8) low power consumption [2,3,4,5].
The factors limiting the performance of FSO communication systems are:1)FSO has a very crucial drawback which is highly attenuated by weather condition like
fog ,rain and snow that causes scattering and absorption .
2)FSO communication systems can also be affected by
pointing errors due to weak earthquakes, strong winds,
and thermal expansion and cooling. 3)The radiated power
must not exceed the limits established by the International Electro-technical Commission Standards.4)The light
beam of FSO communications can't penetrate trees, hills
or buildings. A clear line-of-sight path must exist between
the light transmitter and the receiver. 5)Heated air rising
from the ground or rooftops creates temperature variations among different air pockets. As a consequence, the
refractive index may vary in a time dependent and randomness manner along the line of sight of the link, giving
rise to scintillations over the beam cross section. These
scintillations appear as power fluctuation in the receiver
[6,7,8,9,10].
Fog and snow are the most important atmospheric
attenuators influencing the optical signals transmission in
free space . In fog, the attenuation is nearly independent
of the wavelength.Generally, the severe attenuation
caused by dense fog results in poor availability of the FSO
links [11,12].
Another important attenuating factor is snow that
causes reduced the link availability. The amount of light
attenuation is proportional to number and size of snow
particles .A large snowflake can cause link failure if laser
beam is narrow[13].
Multiple transmitters/receivers (TX/RX) system is
the proposed architecture that can be used to improve the
quality of FSO link . In case of heavy atmospheric attenuation such as fog attenuation in the path of data
processing, multiple TX/RX system with travelling wave
semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) is better performance of FSO link [14].
This technology can be used to improve the performance of FSO link under heavy dry snow weather
condition.
Commercially available FSO equipment tends to
operate in two frequency bands; 780- 900 nm and 15001600 nm. Lasers in the 780-900 nm band are less expensive and therefore usually selected for applications over
moderate distances, while the 1550 nm wavelength is arguably the most attractive for reasons including the low
absorption characteristic of air in this wavelength, and the
availability of more transmittable optical power compared to the 800 nm wavelength under the eye safety
standards [2,15].
2 OPTICAL AMPLIFIER
Optical amplifiers have become essential components in optical communication systems and have successfully replaced electrical repeaters as a means of
compensating for optical signal loss. An advantage offered by optical amplifiers over repeaters include the
fairly large gain bandwidth offered by the optical amplifier which makes it practical for Wavelength Division
Multiplexing (WDM) whereby a singleamplifier can amplify multiple signals on different wavelengths simultaneously, while without the optical amplifier separate
repeaters would be needed for each wavelength. Additionally, optical amplifiers are easily adaptable for many
bit rates and signal modulation formats without a need
to replace the amplifier, while the repeaters are designed
to work at a particular bit rate (or at around only one
wavelength) and modulation format[16,17] .
Similarly FSO communication systems can benefit
from using an optical amplifier in various ways. The optical preamplifier configuration can be used to boost optical signal strength which has been degraded due to various atmospheric phenomena, to overcome the eye-limit
restrictions on transmitted laser power, to suppress the
limiting effect of the receiver thermal noise generated in
the electronic amplifier, as well as to effectively improve
receiver sensitivity[18,19].
Basically there are two types of optical amplifiers
that can be used in wireless optical communication systems: semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) and amplifier Erbium doped fiber (EDFA) . SOA is better than
EDFA for small area networks due to its various properties 1) SOA is compact and easily integrated with other
devices. 2) The much smaller size and weight of the
SOAs than the EDFAs. 3) High-speed capability, and low
switching energy. 4) SOA amplifiers have Large BW. 5)
SOA can operate at 800, 1300, and 1500 nm wavelength
regions(unlike the EDFAs which are restricted mainly to
the C-band . 6)The cost of SOA is also low compared
with the EDFAs. 7). The pump power requirement of
SOA is also low it is less than 400 ma[20,21].
10 log
13
( )
550
(1)
(2)
(4)
TABLE 1
PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE TX/RX SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE WITH
TRAVELLINGWAVE SOA IN FSO LINK
value
parameters
value
2.5 Gb/s
15cm
ter
Number
of
WDM
16
channel
Transmitter
optics
effi-
0.8
ciency
Frequencies of WDM
(193.1-194.6)THz
Without SOA
With SOA
0.55
parameters
0.45
0.8
0.35
channels
Frequency spacing
100GHz
260 dB/km
0.25
10
Modulation Type
NRZ(Non Return
260 dB/km
850 nm
Additional losses
12 dB
15cm
Photodetector Type
PIN diod
to Zero)
Transmitter Wavelength
Transmitter
aperture
14
16
18
Transmitter power[dBm]
20
22
24
diameter
Injection Current of travellingWave SOA
12
0.209 A
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
10
12
14
16
18
Transmitter power[dBm]
20
22
24
Max.transmission range[km]
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
5
6
Number of TX/RX
10
Max.transmission range[km]
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
5
6
Number of TX/RX
10
6 CONCLUSION
The results of implementation and simulation of
our system proved the performance improvement of 16channel DWDM FSO system by using multiple TX/RX
system with travelling wave semiconductor optical amplifier under dense fog and heavy dry snow weather
conditions.
This paper investigated that maximum transmission range and Q factor increases for both increasing of
transmitter power or number of TX/RX of system under
these weather conditions.
This study provides designers with a wide range of
system conditions that can be applied practically and
maybe failed the system.
References
[1] D. Killinger, "Free Space Optics For Laser Communication Through The Air", Optics and Photonics News, vol. 13, pp. 36-42, Oct. 2002.
[16] R. Ramaswami and K. N. Sivarajan, Optical networks- a pratical perspective, Second Edition,
Academic Press, London, 2002.
[17] M. J. Yadlowsky, E. M. Deliso, and V. L. Da Silva,
"Optical fibers and amplifiers for WDM systems,"
Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 17651779, Nov. 1997.
[18] M. Razavi and J. H. Shapiro, "Wireless optical
communications via diversity reception and optical preamplification," IEEE Transactions on
Wireless Communications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 975983, May 2005.
[19] M. Abtahi, P. Lemieux, W. Mathlouthi, and L. A.
Rusch, "Suppression of turbulence-induced scintillation in free-space optical communication systems using saturated optical amplifiers," Journal
of Lightwave Technology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp.
4966-4973, Dec. 2006.
[20] Juan-de-Dios Sanchez- L pez, Arturo Arvizu M,
Francisco J. Mendieta and Ivan Nieto Hip lito,"
Trends of the Optical Wireless Communications",
InTech, February, 2011.
[21] Charu Sharma, Sukhbir Singh,"Investigations on
Bit error rate performance of DWDM Free space
optics system using Semiconductor Optical Amplifier in Rain Environment",International journal of computers & technology Vol 8, no 3,2013.
[22] F. Nadeem, E. Leitgeb , M. S. Awan, G. Kandus,"
Optical Wavelengths Comparison for Different
Weather Conditions", IEEE, 2009.
[23] Michael Gebhart, Erich Leitgeb ,Maher Al Naboulsi, Herve Sizun, Frederique de Fornel," Measurements of light attenuation at different wavelengths in dense fog conditions for FSO applications", COST 270 Short Term Scientific Mission 7
Report (2004).
[24] M. S. Awan," Statistical-Dynamical Channel
Modeling of Outdoor Optical Wireless Links",
PhD. Thesis, Graz University of Technology,
Austria,May 2010.