REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MANILA. CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CONDUCT OF MASTER PLAN AND FEASIBILITY STUDY OF FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE PROJECTS OF SELECTED RIVER BASINS NATIONWIDE, PACKAGE 4 [ runnca raver casi bal |SILWAY- APOPONG -SINAWAL RIVER BASIN VOLUME IA: MASTER PLAN STUDY LIPADAS RIVER BASIN O PROCONSULT ENGINEERS CO. Rs JF. CANCIO AND ASSOCIATESVolume IA: Master Plan Study Lipadas River Basin (Davao City) Title Pages BASEMAPS — - ‘Tumaga River Basin Lipadas River Basin Silway-Apopong-Sinawal River Basin Executive Summary Chaptert Introduction 11.4 Project Background it 1.2 Project Description, Locations 1 1.3 Objective of the Project 412 1.3.1 Objectives 12 4.4 Composition of the Final Report 412 Chapter2- Natural Condition of the Study Area (Environmental Character) 2.1 Geographical Location 2.2 Topography 2.3 Geology and Geomorphology 2.3.1 Regional Tectonic Setting and Structures 23.2 Stratigraphy 2.4 Meteorology and Hydrology 2.4.1 Cimate 2.4.2 Principal Air Stream 2.4.3 Rainfall 2.4.4 Wind Directions 2.4.5 Temperature 2.4.6 Relative Humidity 2.4.7 Dew Point 2.4.8 Tropical Cyclones 249 Tide 2.5 Hydrology and Hydrogeology (existing water use) 2.5.1 Hydrologic Setting 25.2 Existing Water Source 2.5.3 River Conditions and River Water Use 2.5.4 Water Quality 2.6 Terrestrial Biology 2.6.1 Terrestrial Wildlife SYRCGRARRGEGES List of Figures Figure 2.3-1 Geologic Map of the Lipadas River Basin Figure 2.3-2 Rock Types in the Lipads River Basin Vicinity Figure 2.3-3 Landslide Risk Map of Lipadas River Basin Figure 2.3-4 Flood Hazard Map of Lipadas River Basin Figure 2.4-1 Climate Map of the Philippines Figure 2.4-2 Average Monthly Rainfall Recorded in Davao city Station from 1993- 2008 Figure 2.4-3 Annual Average Rainfall and Number of Rainy Days in Davao City from 1999 to 200¢ Figure 2.4-4 Wind: Directions (January 1999-December 2009) Figure 2.4-5 Average Monthly Temperature of Davao City from 1999-2004 Figure 2.4-6 Average Monthly Temperature of Davao City from 2005-2009 Figure 2.4-7 Relative Humidity and Maximum Temperature of Davao City from 1999 to 2004 Figure 2.4-8 Average Dew Point of Davao City from 1999-2009 Figure 2.4-9 Location and Frequency of Tropical Cyclone in the Philippines Figure 2.5-1 Groundwater Map of Lipadas Watershed Figure 2.5-2 Groundwater Potential Map of Lipadas Watershed Figure 2.5-3 Well Location Map in Davao CityChapter 3 Chapter 4 List of Tables ‘Table 2.4-1 Total Amount of Rainfall in Davao City by Month from 1993-2004 ‘Table 2.4-2 Wind Speed (kph) from January 1989 to December 2009 Table 2.4-3 Temperature Data of Davao City, 1999-2004 ‘Table 2.4-4 Temperature Data of Davao City, 2005-2009 Table 2.4-5 Worst Typhoons of Mindanao, Philippines from 1997-2009 Table 2.4.6 Times & Heights of High & Low Waters (Tide & Current Tables 2009) Table 2.5-1 Groundwater Data of Davao City Table 2.5-2 Water Quality Data of Lipadas River from 2001 to 2008 (Source: DENR EMB Region XI) ‘Table 2.6-1 Habitat and Vegetation Cover of Davao Del Sur Table 2.6-2 Endemic and Rare Plant Species found in Liadas Watersh ‘Table 2.6-3 List of Plants found in Lipadas Watershed Table 2.6-4 Lists of Threatened, Endangered and Vulnerable Piant Species in Lipadias Watershed Table 2.6.1-1 Taxonomic Listing of Birds that are known to occur within the Lipadas Watershed Table 2.6.1-2 Taxonomic Listing of Mammals that are known to occur within the Lipadas Watershed Table 2.6.1-3 Taxonomic of Amphibians that are known to occur within the Lipadas Table 2.6.1.4 Taxonomic Listing of Reptiles that are known to occur within the Upadas Watershed Socio-Economic Condition in the Study Area 3.4 Population BA 3.11 Barangay within the Lipadas River Basin 3.2 Economic Profile 3 3.2.1 Family Income and Expenditures 3 3.2.2 Labor Force and Employment 3 3.2.3 Employed person by Type of Industry Urban and Rural 3: 3.3 Development Direction 3 3.4 Economy. 3 3.5 Infrastructure and Social Services 3 3.6 Drainage Sewerage, Flood Control 3 3.7 Economic Activities 3 3.8 Public Hazard 3 3.8.1 Drainage and Flood-Related Problem 3 3.8.2 Solid Waste 3 List of Figure Figure 3.1-1 Barangay within the Lipadas River Basin List of Tabies ‘Table 3.1-1 Population Distribution, Land Area and Density, Davao City 1990 Table 3.2-1 Family Income and Expenditures by Income Class Table 3.2-2 Labor Force and Employment, Davao City, 1993-1985 Table 3.2-3 Employed Person by Type of Industry, Urban and Rural Davao City, 1993-1995 (Values are in Thousands) Table 3.4-1 Agricultural Production, 2008 Table 3.7-1 Land Use, Selected Barangays, Toril District, Davao City Table 3.8-1 Flood/Orainage Probiems, Affected Puroks, Interventions in Selected Barangays Analysis on Future Population and Land Use in the Study Area 4.1 Existing Land Use and Classification 4 4.2 Population Projection 45 4.3 Physical Planning Standards 45 4.4 Future Land use Plan of Davao City 46 List of Figures Figure 4.1-1 Land Cover Map of Lipadas River Basin Figure 4.1-2 Land Classification Map of Lipadas River Basin Figure 4.4-1 Future Land Use MapList of Tables Table 4.1-1 Land Uses in the Lipadas Watershed Tabie 4.2-1 Projected Population Chapters Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis 5.1 Flooding Information 5 5.2 Features of the Lipadas River Basin 53 5.3 Hydrological Analysis (HEC-HMS) 5 5.3.1 Method of Determination of Design Discharge 5 5.3.2 Preparation of Model Inputs 5 5.3.3 Flood Discharge Computations 5 5.3.4 Comparison of Discharge Computations 5-25 5 5.4 Hydraulic Analysis (HEC-RAS) 5-26 5.4.1 HEC RAS Computer Program -26 5.4.2 Existing Flow Capacity of the River 5-26 5.4.3 Water Level at the River Mouth 5-27 5.4.4 Design Discharge 527 5.45 Alternative Study 5-27 List of Figures Figure 5.2-1 Lipacias Sub-Basin Divides and Reach Numbering Figure 5.3.2-1 Lipadas Watershed and River Network with Contour Lines, Sub- Basin Dividers and Reach Numbers Figure 5.3.2-2 Best Fit curve for Davao RIDF Figure 5.3.2-3 Design Hourly Hyetographs from RIDF Curves for Davao City Figure 5.3.4.1 Estimates of Flood Discharge Computation (m/s) vs. Return Period (Yrs.) for Lipadas River Basin List of Tables ‘Table 5.2-4 River Cross-Sectional Features Lipadas River Basin Table 5.3.2-1A Topographic Parameters for Lipadas River Basin Table 5.3.2-1B Topographic for Lipadas River Basin Derived from Topographic & ‘and Land Use Maps ‘Table 5.3.2-2 Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequencies Analysis Oata Table §.3.3-4 SCS Curve Number Table (from SCS TR 55) ‘Table 5.3.3-2 Flood Design Discharge Computation for Lipadas ‘Annex "A" Flood Flow Frequency Analysis of Ungauged Watershed by Uldarico H. Trawon Chapter6 - Existing Approach to flood Mitigation 6.1 General 61 6.2 Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan 2001-2004 64 6.3 National Framework for Physical Planning 2001-2030 (NFPP) 61 6.4 Existing Organization Setup for flood Mitigation 6-2 6.5 Budget for Fiood Mitigation Project 64 6.5.1 National Budget 64 6.5.2 Budget of Local Government Units (LGUs) 64 6.6 Past and Ongoing Activities Relevant to Flood Mitigation in the Study Area 64 6.6.1 Maintenance of River and Drainage Structures 65 6.7 Planned Davao City Urban and Drainage and Flood Control Projects in the CPD 1996-2021 65 Chapter? Basic Concept of the Planning Framework 7.1 General 7A 7.2 Formulation of Master Plan 72 7.2.1 Planning Condition 72 List of Figure Figure 7.2-1 Lipadas River Basin iiiChapters ‘Structural Mitigation Plans 8.1 General 8 8.2 Existing Development in the Vicinity of Lipadas River. 8 8.3 Estimated Flood Run-off along the River Channel 8 8.4 Alternative Structural Mitigation Measures Identified 8 8.4.1 Improvement Alternatives No. 1 8 8.4.2 Improvement Alternatives No. 2 813 8.5 Magnitude Cost Estimate of Alternative Improvement Measures 14 8.5.1 Construction Items Required on Proposed Improvements Bt 8.5.2 Estimated /Applicable Unit Cost of Construction Item 8.5.3 Estimated Quantity for each Proposed Structures Improvement Measures 815 8.5.4 Estimated Construction Cost for each Improvement Alternatives. 815 8.5.5 Estimated Project Cost B45 List of Figures. Figure 8.2-2 to Figure 8.2-4 Existing Developments Lipadas River Figure 8.3-1 Lipadas Watershed’s river Network Figure 8.3-2 River Boundary Conditions Figure 8.4.2-1 to Figure 8.4.2-3 Proposed Lipadas River Basin Cut-off Channel List of Tables Tobe 83-1 Times & Heights of High & Low Waters (Tide & Current Tables 2009) Table 8.4.1-1 Proposed Full-Scale River Width Widening Improvement Alternative No.1 Table 8.5.3-1 Lipadas River Structural Improvement Measures (Alternatives No. 1) ‘Table 8.5.3-2 Lipadas River Structural Improvement Measures (Alternatives No. 2) Table 8.5.4-1 Estimated Construction Cost Lipades River Structural Improvements Measures (Alternative 1) Table 8.5.4-2 Estimated Construction Cost Lipadas River Structural Improvements Measures (Alternative 1) Chaptero Non-Structural Mitigation Measures 9.1 General oa 9.2 Publication of Flood Risk Map 3 9.3 Introduction of Food Proofing of Existing Houses/Buildings 9 9.4 Enforcement of Emergency Activities 9 5-5 Encroachment of Houses/Other Structures along the River Sides 9 List of Tables Table 9.1-1 Non-Structural Flood Mitigation Measures Chapter 10 10.1 Introduction 10-4 10.1.1 Necessity of 1EE 10-4 10.1.2 Scope of Works of IEE 10-1 10.1.3 Baseline Environmental Conditions 10-4 ° 10.1.4 Alternative Projects 10-1 10.2 Identification of Environmental Elements for Assessment 10-1 10.2.1 Methodology 10-4 10.2.2 Identified Environmental Elements 10-2 10.3 Objective of Environmental Elements of Impact Assessment 40-2 10.4 Impact Assessment and Possible Mitigation Measures of Proposed Projects. 10-2 10.4.4 Impact Assessment without Project 10-7 10.5 Identification of Necessary Monitoring Items 10-7 10.6 Results of Stakeholder Meetings and Actions taken in the Study 10-8 List of Figure Figure 10.14-1 Locations of the Proposed Cut-off Channel along the Lipadas River Basin ivChapter 11 List of Tables Table 10.4-1 Summary of the Predicted Impacts and Proposed Mitigating Measures Table 10.6-1 Fiood/Drainage Problems, Affected Puroks, Interventions in Selected Barangays Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Flood Mitigation Plan (Structural) and Formulation of Optimums Plan (Both Structural and Non- Structural) 11.1 General det 411.2 Results of the Preliminary Comparative Evaluation 14.3 Selection of Optimum Structural Mitigation Plan 11.4 Selected Optimum Structural Flood Mitigation Plan 11.4.1 Priority Project for Structural Mitigation Measures 11.4.2 _ Priority Projects for Non-Structural Measures 11.5 Implementation Pian List of Figures Figure 11.5-1 Implementation Schedule for the Optimum Structural Flood Mitigation Measures Figure 11.5-2 Implementation Schedule of Setting-up a Non-Structural Flood ‘Mitigation Programme Figure 11.5-3 Organizational Chart Flood Mitigation Committee (FMC) Figure 11.5-4 Functional Flood Mitigation Committee (FMC) List of Tables Table 11.2-1 Preliminary Evacuation of Alternative Structural Flood Mitigation Plans Tumaga River Basin ‘APPENDIX I Existing River Cross-Sections and Flood Heights at 10 Year and 25 Year Frequencies Figure: 5.2-2-Figure 5.2-42“FLOOD CONTROL PROIECT OF : is NATION BASE MAP ae LIPADAS RIVER BASIN ‘Drroconsutt Engineers Co. Sanco & AnodesFLOOD GONTROL PROJECT OF T ‘SELECTED RIVER BASIN NATIONWIDE. | UNDER PACKAGE: | PiPreconsut Engineers Co. fh J.F. Cancio & Associates 1FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT OF ‘SELECTED RIVER BASIN NATIONWIDE BASE MAP UNDER PACKAGE4 'TUMAGA RIVER BASIN “DiProconeuit Engineers Co. AIF. Cando & AssocsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background of the Study 1 General ‘The Lipadas River Basin is located near the southern boundary of Davao City’s territorial jurisdiction and it has a catchment area of 159 sq. km. draining from Mt. Talomo down to Barangays Toril and Marapangi and then finally towards the river’s mouth at Barangay Lizada, Refer to Figure 1.1-1, for an illustration of the catchment area and the flood hazard map of the Lipadas River Basin. 1.2 Existing Features of the Lipadas River Basin. Lipadas River is the main conveyance of storm run-off of the 159 km? Lipadas River watershed which has 97 sub-basins and 194 overland flow units, refer to the figure shown below: Lipadas Sub-Basin Divides and Reach Numbering 128° 30 res: eal Scent “wr a= | Lipadas River Basin DAVAO ULF Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN stost NISva 2aAry SvavarT 1p abeyped “opimuoney suiseg sonny parzajas jo spalory aBeUIEIT (hans NY Td 22LSVH) VI IWNTOA (Bue 12U09 poy 40 Apnas Ayngysees Ue Weld 12A5Eh JO PUD ‘ulseg aang sepedr] Jo dey psezey poopy pur vary WwaUIyDIWD +1-1T 9aNBoEJ ferms of existing structares road inftastructured along. and across the main channel of Lipadas River, there are: * Four (4) bridges across the river, viz: ~ Lipadas Bridge (Sta. 2+ 700) ~ Marapangi Bridge (Sta. 4 + 200) ~ Piedad Bridge (Sta. 5 400) ~ Lubogan Bridge (Sta. 6 + 900) Refer to the attached Lipadas River Cum Existing Road Infrastructures, * Very insignificant stretch of the river has bank protection * Refer to appended site-pictorials hereafter Conduct of Master Plan and Feasiblty Stay of Hood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS: RIVER BASIN =~“Condlict of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME IA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN o4Barangay Sirawan Lipadas River near the river mouth (Sta. 0+300) facing downstream Lipadas River (Sta. 0+300) facing upstream showing the existing revetment structure. Lipadas River (Sta. 245 coured portion left bank of the river. Flood water over flowed at the existing river channel of about 1.0m above the barangay road. Lipadas River (Sta. 2+500) several houses were damage during the heavy rain period of the month of August ~ September 2009 Gandiuct of Master Pan and Feasibility Study of Food Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 ~ “VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS RIVER BASIN: FsLipadas Bridge (Sta. 2700) Lipadas Bridge, viewing the downstream side of Upstream side of Lipadas Bridge flood water the bridge. almost touches the soffit of girder during flood. Lipadas River taken at the downstream side of Marapangi Bridge showing the existing river bank riprap protection within the Mango Juice Factory Elevation photo of Marapangi Bridge. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibilty Stady oF Flood Control and VOLUME IA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN F5-6Portion along Lipadas River located at Sta, 44200 Local residents pointing to the highest flood mark reportedly often overflow about 1.0-2.0m from the that which within sta, 4+200 vicinity river bank during heavy rains. Elevation Photo of Piedad Bridge. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Cantrol and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Granage Pets of ste Rver Bsns Nation, Package 4 Iipapas river oasin ae FS-7Elevation photo of Lubogan Bridge showing, unremoved temporary traffic diversion structure. Notice also the sudden drop of river bed of about 2.0m Scour Protection block along river bed. underneath Piedad Bridge (still not able) hold. pstream view of Lipadas River taken from the Lubogan Bridge ~ Ganaluct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Food Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN re2.0 Objectives of the Study Consistent with the Government's Development Plans based on the Medium Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP), the objectives of the Master Plans and Feasibility Studies are the following: 1. To establish the flood contr policy, strategy, target design food magnitude and main Works for the river basin\: To identify alternative flood mitigation measures; To formulate flood control project implementation plan: and To prioritize projects based on technical, economic, social and environmental Feasibility BLN 3.0 Structural Mitigation Plans 3.1 General Potential structural mitigation plans against river overflow caused by storm run-off and high tide may consist of 8) Full-Scale River Channel Improvement (River Width Widening and Improved River Bed Longitudinal Profile.) ) Construction of Flood Diversion Channel ©) Construction of Off-Site Flood Retarding Basin 4) Construction of On-site Flood Regulation Pond, Jn the selection process of identifying and evaluating the most applicable option or their Combination, existing morphology ofthe objective river system, the optimum design seale (in the short and long-term), socie-economic impacts, natural environmental impacts, nancial coustain’s Gin both construction and maintenance) and technical viability are carefully ‘amined. 32 Bxisting Development In the Vicinity of Lipadas River Figure 3.2-4 10 3.2-5 indicate the existing developments in the general vicinity of subject river, viz * Existing Flouses / Populated Areas © Road Infrasiructures Conduct of Master Plan anc Feasibility Study of oad Cont ot and VOLUME EE (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASINors3 misve Ary svavarT + a0eyped ‘epmwuoneN suseg sony paras so spolery abeUIEKD (ONES NVId Y2LSVH) VE IMNTOA ‘Bile jORUOD Pools J0 ABMS ANNEISERy Due Leja Laseyy 40 2EUCDnusva waAns svavart CAGNLS NTA HALSVH) VI IHITION _pie jong pods domes ait Pu ab eyseq “spusuonen suIseg JanTy pswvaRS, paloiy a6_uiexa jJ0 37PUODors nasva waAry svavdrT # s62ypeg ‘opmuonety anus Nita Y3LSVH) ¥I IHIION 7 _ ble sequen poois 40 Aras Aayarseay pe Ueks 2341 40 npLED SINSWaoTaRIa ONULSHG eaeersa wisva azar svavarT 2b e\De4 ‘eponeY suse J2%Iy paraas Jo spate aBEuIE; (AGNLS NivTd 2ALSVHN) VE THINTOA Bue janvog pooty Jo domes Aaistag bue Uejg 23524140 2N@UOD aary svavan SuNIUi40T9N30 ONLLSIKG peveaunowPEST wisva 47AR svavdrT pF a6eyDe9 ‘epiwoney suiseg Jory PsIve!26 40 saIOIY BbELIED (AGUS NWId UALSYIN) VI IHMTOA ‘Bue joniuo9 poo 40 ADNNS AYIMISP2Y DUE UEid sh JO SOU, wana svavant SuN3WAOTHAZGSNUSHG sequnow (aa, Ye SNIT HOLY3.3 Estimated Flood Run-off along the River Channel Based on the Lipadas watersheds River Network below, the estimated run-off (discharges) along the river channel and tributaries for design return periods of 2. 5. 10, 25. 50 and 100 years (as generated from HEC-HMS runs) are diagrammatically illustrated with corresponding estimated run-off as shown below LIPADAS WATERSHED’S RIVER -NETWORK. Lipadas River iB Ls ue bs te : 4 es ae Ee Lal Tt i ltt 1FT iff lt f BOE T ELE d veean a ee er oes Greek creek fe Cres in un-t i ter id) a ee a eae sce] OTIC RAS waterway | seument| 2 es lipadas River i | mpl e spe Lubogan River ‘L66 89 161. 2 303 369 Lipadas River aT | ae | as | S| | Piedad Creek Los 5 9 15 » Lipadas River too [125 [22a ia [0s [3 lBayabas Creek De = | 6 10s | 36 [6 Lipadas River Li 234 S19) 629 739) Lizada River is 2 a0 | 2 Lipadas River 193] 1 | 296 sp | as 167 |IMcarinf Creek Lot 3 6 i 13 15 River 10) Lipadas River_ 195 165, 302 550 666 782, River 11 Sirawan Creek we) 6 3 1 B 15__| River 12 Lipadas River ToT | 508 a sero 87 | Riera ‘Candet of Mater Pan and Pes Stay of Pood Control and TOLUME TA (WASTER PLAN STUDY) ranage Projets of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LipADAS RIVER BASIN 5-15Data Input for the HEC-RAS modeling consist of as follows 1. River Geometi vin: + Topographic (length longitudinal profile) Configuration of the River * River Cross-Sectional Data 2. River Steady Flow Data * Discharges derived from HEC-HMS Modeling for 2 yrs, 5 yrs, 10 yrs, 25 yrs, 50-yrs and 100 yrs return periods, 3. River Boundary Conditions * River Tide Surge (High and Low Waters) * Effect of Wind Also attached is the Flood Potential Areas (Extent of Flooding) for Design Return Period of 19) years and 25 years. 34 Alternative Structural Mitigation Measures Identified Duly considering the existing developments in the general vicinity of Lipacias River. ithas become apparent that the only remaining options (o mitigate floodings are: . Full-scale/ Partial Channel Improvement, viz: ~ River Width Widening cum dike Construction and Improved Channel Bed Longitudinal Profile, ~ Construction of Diversion Channel and Partial River Width Widening. Teis noted that downstream of the river, where Lubogan River joins Lipadas River hore will be significant increase in anticipated/ calculated flood run-off, A cut-ofl channel to divert part of the run-off in a south-easterly direction towards the Gulf of Davao, has been considered as an option Basotl on the foregoing, two improvement measures shall be evaluated, viz: [Improvement Alternative No.1 Full-seale River Width Widening Cum Dike Construction with Modified Channel Bed Longitudinal Profile 2. Improvement Alternative No.2 Partial River Width Widening Cum Dike Construction in combination with the Construction of a Diversion/Cut-off-Channel. 3.4.1 Improvement Alternatives No. 1: Full-scale Width Widening with Modified Channel Bed Longitudinal Profile and Dike Consiruction. Based on the results of HEC-RAS Modeling, the following, improvement proposals are explained, below viz: For design return period of 25 years, the impraved channel dimensions vary from a channel width of 58 meters with a river bed width of 50.0 meter (at the vicinity of Davao Gulf), Upstream beyond STA. 34800 where no channel widening is needed, channel improvements are limited to river bank trimming only Conduct of Master Pian and Feasibility Study of Flaad Control a7 VOLURE TA (WASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN £S-16L082 ase searefsvavara # a6oyzeg ‘eomuoney suseg samy perajas Jo siafold a6euRLg Hanes Mid 21SVH) YE INITION aoe yaauay pools o doris Aas UE UES SEL 50 FMDUED‘The envisioned improvement measures are embodied typically in Rigare 3.4,t-1 Kt should be noted that the improved cross-sectional dimensions for a design return period of 10 years are not significally different for a design return period of 25 years. 342 Improvement Alternatives No. 2: Partial River Width Widening Cum Dike Construction in combination with the construction of a Diversion/Cut-off channel described as follows ic A 2.620 km. diversion/out-off channel running towards the Gulf of Davao in a soulh-casterly direction deviates from Sta. 4+400 of Lipadas River. Refer to atlached illustrated diversion channel layout Projected to be conveyed to the diversion channel is 40% of 413.70 ou. m or 165.50 cu. m runoff at design period of 25 years upstream from the point of diversion. This denote that 355.12 cu, m shall still be conveyed downstream of Lipadas River from the point of diversion, Refer to tabulation of estimated rane off below. A consequence of this proposed diversion channel is the need to construct four (4) bridges across existing ‘proposed roads crossed. hie Cine tee snd ee _ a i a a an is i TE orne cu =. ae Cee Te ya rn a t t t t “yer a ad Diversion Channet pina Rn-OW Galle meienpersecondy [> Waterway [Semon] PITH [Few [Osea [2s ear Jaycar ona] ME ipadas River [| sae ae lubogan River Lae [89 | a6n [aah [308] 309 ative Lipadas River Lot [130 | as | 395_| 399 | asd] an Piedad creek [aa] 3 9 [2 [ser Uipadas River 1 | 135 | ana [308 | wae a S| Rivers Diversion Channel i = ae 18 ipadas River aa = [3 [2s as ae Bayabas Creek 0a ite ae ae ee Lipadas River [to | s7 |e 3 [38 as pe Lzada River [a ie a9 a a ee ltipadas River tos [1G a9 [295 [ a aT a ed Mearinf Creek maf 3 6 [a an jp 15] River To ipadas River 198 [168 | 30a 387 | 38 | S00] ne ert Sirawan Creek | 6 ee) 18 lipades River (7108 |S] a at HECRAS Maveting eared ot resulted in the following channel dimensions af the eaolT channel and fw onsen Felina enact. vz Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Stidy of Flood Conta! ond Vole iA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Naomi, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN susora wisva sare svavart + abeypeq ‘spiuoney suisag Jonty parejas so sweloig 2beureAT Canis vid 2215YH) WE IION ‘pie (2u09 pony J0 Apnas Aung/SEe PUB Weld J2RSeH4 JO NPC) SMASVSW ANAWSAONINI WOIdAL HH skintLIPADAS DIVERSION CHANNEL ~“Condiuct of Master Plan and Feasibil j Control and VOLUME IA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) (Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 5-20Width varies from 10.0 meters at the point of diversion to 20.0 meters wide at its mouth with the Gulf of Davao, * The height varies from 2.61na. at the Gulf of Davao to 2.0 meters at the end of the 2.62 km. long cut-off channels (avhere it deviates from Lipaclas River) There will still be minor improvements of the channel upstream of Lipadas River from the point of diversion, Channel improvement downstreams of Lipadas River from the point of diversion will be significantly reduced considering a lessen volume of run-off (£248.20 eum ) to be conveyed. 3.5 Magnitude Cost Estimates of Aliernative Improvement Structural Measures Construction tems Required on Proposed Improvements. Generally the following, items of work shall form part of the proposed improvements under consideration: A. Construction Tem Excavation (ou.1) = Dredging - Revetment Footing = Gabion © Lean Concrete (cum) Granolar Fill (en.m) Weephole + Graded Gravel (cum) + 75 mm dia x 400 aim (pes) Sub-Grade Material (cu.m) © Geo-Textile (sq.m) ‘The acquisition of river right-of-way and the removed of existing structures including the relocations of size occupants affected (character refer to as House Relocation) shall also form part of the total project cost. ‘Gondlict of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUNIE Th (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 5-213.5.2 Ustimated/Applicable Unit Cost of Construction Item, The following unit prices of specific construction items are deemed applicable in pursuing the construction of required improvements: Construction tem Unit [Unit Cose xcavation: | Revetment Footing 276.00 Gabion 276.00 Gabion 3508.64 Revetment: Conerete mi 4,733.00 RSB kg. 57.00 Formworks m 100.00 Lean Concrete ny? 3,893.00 Granular Fill m 726.00 Weephole Graded Gravel m 1,150.00 75mm diax400mm pes. 67.69 Sub-Grade mn? 30.76 Geo-Tentile mn 185.00 RCP 460 mm dia. each 1,750.00 Disposal m 110.79 ROW m 300.00 Relocation each 200,000.00 Clearing & Grubbing mt 4.98 3.5.3 Estimated Quanti y for cach Proposed Struetural Improvement Measures Based on Preliminary/Indicative Plans prepared for each alternative structural improvement measures under consideration, the estimated quantities and costs have been accordingly generated as shown in the following tabulations. ‘Table 3.5.3-1 indicates the generated quantities and costs for the Tumaga River Structural Improvement Measures (Alternatives No. 1) ‘Table 3.5.3-2 indicates the generated quantities and cost for the Tumaga River Structural Improvement Measures (Alternatives No. 2) 3.5.5 Estimated Project Cost The total project cost for each of the altern following: fives under consideration shall consist of the © Construction Cost ‘+ Engineering Cost ~ Detailed Engineering (6% of total Construction Cost) ~ Construction Supervision (10% of Total Construction Cost) Condit of Master Pan and Feasibity Stody of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Easins Nationwice, Package # LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 5-22Contingency Cost (10% of Construction & Engineering Costs) Taxes (12% VAT) House Relocation Cost Land Acquisition Cost TABLE 3.5.3-1: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST LIPADAS RIVER STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT MEASURES (ALTERNATIVE NO. 1) Kem | Tem Description Unit ‘Quantity Unit Cost —_[ Total Coste No. 10 Excavation/Dredging cum | 249,603.01 | 276.00 68,890,428 2.0) Excavation: 21 Reyetment Footing | cum | 5,700.00 276.00 1575,200 22 Gabion cum | 7,480.00 276.00 [2.063.480 3.0) Gabion cum | 7,480.00 3,508.64 26,248,627 40) Revelment: [a Concrete cum [23,561.30 [4,733.00 Ti,515,213, a2 RSB kg) 987.183.15__ | 57.00 36,269,431 a3 Formwvorks sqn_| 477.93 100,00, F730 3.0) Tean Concrete cum | 190.00 3,893.00 739,670 6.0 Granular Fill 8,547.00 726.00 6.205,122 7.0 Weep hole Ti Graded Gravel cum | 205.20 7,150.00 233,750 [72 75mm diaxd00mm | pes. | 3,800.00 O70 257,222 8.0) ‘Sub-Grade’ sqm__| 2,736.00 30.76 84159 9.0 Geo-Textile 10,400.00 | 185.00 1,924,000 ee (1% Total Coss 2,700,501 “Total Cost 78.811,603 ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN VOLUME IA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) 5-23‘TABLE 3.5.3.2: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST LIPADAS RIVER STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT MEASURES, (ALTERNATIVE NO. 2) A. Diversion Channel Intersection [Item [Item Description [Unit | Quantity | Unit Cost Total Cost No. | 1.00 | Revetment _ 110 Conerete m | 265.68 4,733.00 1,257,463.44 1.20 RSB Kg__ {7,994.76 | 57.00 455,701.32, 2.00 | Formworks “am? __ [156.96 100.00 __ [15,696.00 3.00 __| Gabion mv | 30.00 3,508.64 105,259.20 4.00 | Concrete Weir mm | 93.11 4,733.00 440,689.63 5.00 | RCP 460mm Dia Pes__| 8.00 1,750.00 14,000.00 6.00 | Apron (Conerete) m | 640.50 4,733.00 3,031,486.50 7.00__| Sub-grade m [117.75 30.76 3,621.99 8.00 | Geo-textile m | 776.00 185.00 143,560 9.00 | Lean Concrete m {7.55 3,893.00 29,392.15 10.00 | Granular Fill m [113.40 726,00 82,328.40 11.00 _ [Excavation m [1,042.18 | 276.00 | 287,641.68 Sub-Total 5,866,840.31 B. 3.8 Km Lipadas River 1,00 | Excavation/Dredging am 7,070, 706.00 2.00 | Levee im 41,186,560.00 3.00__| Excavation (Levee) m 2,373,876.00 4.00___| Trimming 506,311.42 Sub-Totaif | 51,137,453.42 Conduct af Master Plan and Feasially Study oF Food Control and VOLUnE TA (WASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN p24C. Diversion Cut-off Channel ie io] ee Seon eric On| Foie N het sg me Pen Omt | Fem 1a [seater jai | —aRaa| elegy | aso} ea | aa 2] feiss a | |) gangs | sss | re sa 22 talon fd | to [anes | Fran 2 3.0 nin ses 3 [7.80 [abt eo asain] ar aan] ee} 40 Pecinee “| if Goree —fas_| a | as | aga | anes | sas] a] 8 lx |—oe.n0 | "sl ——rastuten| ——~“sarrace |e ps 3 Fowl “1 aaa Su a6 5.0m Goeres Jo} 19) Sa “aun | amano | a 9 acm Fo Tas [el ars aetna | ane | spe] [no ssi 71 Ge Geel a [ 3] “i tae | is| eae | aa] ap Tal Tones Sino | — free) aaa 7360/9 aan | a 0 rae ins | a5] soa) “a 35.6 m9 [ag gn [at 2.0 |Get n-| —Toco6 | — i 15149 [Tainan | aaa | ate] co 100 ne S500. ig | sor | as) a | Seon isis,01 | amis] Soar —arsisaie| ae come faa] am | ws | setae om tao ie Ras [ws banger Tia por SiR 3.6 Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Flood Mitigation Plans (Struetural) 3.6.1 Goneral In the Comparative Evaluation of Aitematives Flood Mitigation Plans under consideration, the following evaluation criteria including their relative weights are defined as follows: 1) Economic Factor (50%) a) Construction Cost - 35% ©) Cost of Additional River Easement (ROW) - 15% 2) Environmental factor (35%) “made environment i.e. land use (institutional/cultural), municipal ties power lines, roads ete.) b) Neighborhood Impacts (family displaced; parks church and school and local transportation) 3) Engineering Factor (15%) ~ Refers to design complexity in terms of alignment geometrics (horizontal & vertical) and overall lengzh. ‘Cindi of Master Pan and Fessbity Study of Fload Control and VOLUME TA (ASTER PLAN STUDY) Droinage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationvvce, Package 4 LEPADAS RIVER BASIN eosEach alternative plan was relatively rated on the basis of the above criteria on a seale of 1 to 5, with 5 as the more preferred rating. A most S system was adopted. 3.6.2 Results of the Preliminary Comparative Evaluation i ‘The results of the evaluation are presented in Table 3.6.2-1, a summary of which is presented hereunder. Result of Preliminary Comparative Evaluation (presented in the order of Ranking) © Alternative No, 1 ® Altemative No. 2 a ar Fe TA TTT REAR SET ne eet es“sa wise wzary svavart | abeyped ‘spmwonely suseg san ponapes 10 swelog abeutelg Gans niTd 231S¥H) ¥E BTA (Ble czyie pact, Jo Apmis Auase24 pe Wig Jes J0 NPE z z wee wonenen ave oor cea renin | | sBomumann yuea sou fuo seynbes woe reuenppe | Wenoidut ofe09 ovo |__| wy soz yeueyo voysionp jouer | ozo |» sony oujoueT + | oo's yous) Splepuels cagerdeooe ungun fyeauyew00 ponordu eg 0) net) Ce ‘218 jue Uo}sJenp ayn 0 sjuswiuby feoQIen 8 019201099 (eonien 9 rewozvoy) swiowudye ci ° “aldo wealen @ I seumenur jo 101 ya sInBau iruozso} 8 oso | _s_|_senlorog onwowusye soap Suyang + sy ouubye peor sens Buysie3 sfoWUeUD sossa000 Avess20su ou sptno1d yous fue edu yj ssomve sebpug. Jouueyo uorenp e004 cro |e up Aq yno ag reus Sesseacy/syur)_« essenpe 04 0) Nenu roeduy stoqulien “syeuigjgord ewosea ‘ew sjeusjow poreneoxe jo 81s dung ‘pounbel 8} :uewesee s,ouueyo sony eu) Jo ABI. pepouy seunonijs Buys Jo uoyeoois oun! ° poulionny oo | palbeye spue}esnynoube wow _« 2 suljgord wooo S807 anew uel Tenby Sepa J — upayce oy3 Buowe Mow ; seu 06 fen so | s open oy)soy MOY pereuiss + z sey 661 MOY levonppy paIewnss eye Toqarjsubo exp vara BuveR GET Topanijsvee exp pile eyo Tenn “on eed ue favueyo Loren 0g jeuve4o peypow ‘Buepia 4o wojonisuo0 uoyonisuoa so adoos « oi jeuteyo uoorssuoe yo dos suwow co’ voqon.su0> S¥e-O3H uORDNUsuO0 ep pUe 40 uojerp pue (seijoniys aujoud feujmabuey p9q ouuEYo sinuous ‘Boug jonssueo 0} $09 [euoNppe JO (a 8) uoyonieueo Jo uoneunp pue 05 oxo | 2 _|_smsnere) weredyd i809 pereunss ewyezdg 800 vonarasucg perewsS + voyonssue © yeureyo Ho-ang joing jo wopannsu0y oyons}suog eq wnD wb % ‘yyoug jeuypryBuo7 peg jevUueYD Palj/pow annerey | Buney nye Bupuopyns meu sonrs ef NS “oN eanewealy SNV1d NOLLVDLLIW O07 WHNLINULS AALLVNYALT dO NOLLWNTVAA AUVNIWI Td TTOE TIL3.6.3 Selected Optimum Structural Food Mitigation Plan The selected optimum structural flood mitigation plan, as a result of the foregoing is the Fuil-scale Channel Width Widening with Modified Channel Bed Longitudinal Profile Cum Dike Construction, ‘The salient features of the optimum plan are: Minimum number of house demolitions along the alternatives studied/considered No significant adverse natural environmental impacts Most likely high EIRR (to be validated in the Feasibility Study Phase of the project) 3.64 Priority Project for Structural Mitigation Measures ‘The subject optimum flood mitigation plan both addresses its Short-Term (10 Year Design Return Period) and Long-Term (25-Year Design Retum Period) projects. The priority projects aim to mitigate the overflow of Lipadas River from Sta. +000 to Sta, 5+400. 3.6.5 Priority Projects for Non-Structural Measures All components of “normaily of adopted non-structural flood measures” are priority projects, These consist of: Clean-up of Waterway = Removal of drifting materials at critical siretches along the river channel - Information and Evaluation Campaign (IEC) Prevention of Encroachment to Established River Easements (existing andor proposed!) Control of Excessive Land Development: Land use Controls shall have to be monitored/pursued along the iniTuenced of the riverine. Development Regulation for mandatory regulation that new subdivisions proposed shall have (o be supplemented with an on-site retention pond Flood Warning and Evacuation ‘A prototype flood hazard map shall have to be collaboratively developed by concerned local public and private entities. 3.7 Impact Assessment and Possible Mitigation Measures of Proposed Projects ‘The two alternative flood mitigation plans being considered for the Lipadas River Basin are, © Alternative 1 refers to the full scale river width widening with modified channet bed longitudinal profile and dike construetion. = Alternative 2 refers to partial widening and construction of a 2.62 km Jong diversion channel which will divert about 40% of the existing river runoff for a Conduct of Master Plan and Peasibilly Study of Food Control and Drainage Projects of Selected fiver Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN VOLURE ta (RASTER PLAN STUDY) £5.28design period of 25 years, Table 3.7-1, presents the predicted impacts and corresponding proposed mitigating measures for the two altentatives understudy, 3.7.1 Impact Assessment without the Project © Land Use and Classification Without the proposed alternative flood mitigation plans, land uses in the lower portions of the Lipadas River basin are expected to remain the same. © Geology and Geomorphology Riverbank erosion and scouring of the river bank is expected (0 continue without the proposed flood mitigation interventions. 2 Hydrology and Hydro-geology ‘The foot slope of Mount Apo which contains extensive pyroclastic materials is ‘expected to remain as the main water bearing formation in the arca, Springs and deep wells will remain as the main water sources of communities without access to the Davao City Water District. © Terrestrial Heology The existing land cover and habitats in the lower reaches of the Lipadas River basin are expected to persist within the proposed flood mitigation plans. = Wildlife ‘The existing land cover and habitat characteristics im the arca are already developed which is currently oceupied by farmlands and human settlements. These areas are devoid of variable types af species while species composition typical in disturbed landscapes. Unless the area is allowed to regenerate a habitat similar to a closed canopy forest, species diversity will remain low. Ecologically sousitive wildlife and high diversity can only occur in areas with habitat complexity and minimal disturbance. © Meteoroiogy and Climate Meteorological and climatological conditions in the lower portion of the Lipadas River basin will remain the same even without the flood mitigation plans. ‘2 Socio-economic Condition Development of the Taril District as alternate central business district of Davao City will continue even without the proposed Mood mitigation plans. The commercial and industrial areas of Toril District are currently expanding and this is expected fo continue as the central business district of Davao City becomes more congested. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibity Sty of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwict, Package ¢ LIPADAS RIVER BASIN es.29oE-S3 Nisve wzAre svavarT Gans wid ¥iLS¥I) ¥E INTO 267269 ‘eninuoney suseg s2Hyy ponejes 40 spoloNs BBEUIET [Be 30 pocty 40 Apnas Aamgsee4 pe Wee sense 40 2NpUCD) isoq sonny sopedy tod 10180} 241 num afueqosp [eas jauuexp uo}si9aqp oy aroyas tod 2up 70 powaxo ag j§ Byep 124 Mou Y M1940 24 oy pojedxe are syuetuypas oxo soma lauutpag S01 0 St SIE ppue Stymoas woyy yu ‘up yoajoxd 01 pajonustoo Aqqussod pire moos Sean jauueyp s2a4t oy eq ‘SBoyoydornoes pure AB0}095 J 9q ys seare pur spuepuuey 129Qe \uoy vorsroarp v BuNeex) joy 09 ast simboe "WOW oq onworisse|9 pue 2sn puey spnduiy 2f0., apt sporduy wafoag paynupT ha yaa qwoUUayaT 1 UEDA oy “saansvoqy St 4g 94) yo Kacunung -T-4'¢ TEL,Jesa NIsva w3Ary svavart Chanas ww 2315¥H) VE IUNTON > abiey2ee ‘epinuogen suseg ony peeps o safes 26200 _ ue anu poy yo Aonis Ameseey Bue Wes nse 40 DUE eQHye plnoo yeu s2n isn {yynoum s944 pyo oup 98 vax aox8uenr ap spresion oy iss zoyeaysey ruororygns 3e4p ammsuo pymoys jauuey> ‘SONI 4} JO UISOp SULT mow 4081 pjo UE Mog s9IEsA ‘eutrome ur asparouy IysHO¥p pL ood (1 SH, oro axp yanosip parreasp st aoqea 31 %0F pumore £q esee00p es vare atosfuem Bunssvd sayeawyso4y JO BUENO que soars arp Jo AscBore reused ‘ajqissod se 80) on sos Sout Sar soya 01 PEO} Joo s9y2N aif UH 1woB.AXo poAjosstp pesnpat 04 Pea] Aqnanbasuos pue amyesodwiay {2aqem asearaun “2OeJMS L981 ‘up ye uonpiper repos 26e01241 A su, “ou02 wepsedts em [yo Aujszaarp pooper 04 Btuprey yeurvdur Jo yBaotter ue) ABojooo eusautey paproae 9g pjnoys sfjou “MOTE mnoy ap silos doag pue yauisiq, J2qeN 94} 0} Sse09E MOTPIAL ssoyjguntutt9 107 seamos Ja}0A\ OUp Jo duo aq osye Som sfuudg “vost ainseayy Suntan srovduay palo1g PaUuAEPL aanseayy Sue spavduy afr p TaAneUY 1 aaneUsaHy | qawayg usUIUOIAUG,Nisva ARE svavarT Chants 167d SBSYM) VE INTOA abeysed ‘epmuodey suiseg sony panees 10 sve a6EviE%g ‘2ue jonuen pooy Jo dara Age ey pu Weld J2Sehy JO DPUCD 1002-01905 rengey weeds emeN, saman|ge toNons}stOS ip soye Bare op 0} payvedxa are ‘sease Aqrvau ur yoda Areiodiiar & St Sy]. * spiiq SunBtsoy aye [ss wore exfop amp wr ergy messed emyeu yoursiz0 Jo jexomay « seoue exouSuear tt Suosot] pure sya ‘Sroys1ySUry a5I vane oyy wt sazgads WoUTUHOD Aqueous J SopEsHoe uonoNISUOD) © He 31) spuiqazoysypueyiess ‘amos 2q jst satseds rode Jo 290—11090 ‘ySty ayquqord yp vare oxy ‘dow rexoo puny a4 wo paseg, SaUPLA yoedauy aogyse 2q EAN aunseayy Sunes spavduy aforg poynwopy —|__aanseayy Sunes ZaayeMoyy Taney quota] [ewOULO.TATT£689 Nisva watry svavar Ghanas wita 43LSVEN) VE 3E40TOA abieypey ‘epviuoden suiseg «any panes jo svalorg ab2UEIT ue jequeg pac yo Annas Anigisey pue ued Jee Jo 22700) ‘oa-jo-nyBuu st ansst sof vO MOY apse u srdaig A119 ose, o qwuoye ue se pose sta] sanitary [euonveroayps0sar “Susnoy “eo1A32s yuo] So8ueg sepedr] up J 14.09 2quun ses jos yemusozur M109 apISIOAtT ‘amos pus uioaoo pu spuvy ‘wemeng Sedueseg tI] enapiso: pue p yest axe Stn porseye ‘epenry] Avsueseg uy © ey my sadoug -uoweng pue sodoug pOMoffOy 99 ysnut sampaooud [uO Aesweg ysnom ‘pamorfoy oq yster sammpodo.dL [Hoy , oy tung apyorg empmauoy pog PouEPOW, Ms iN PIAL BART OOS-IIMY V aseya wore uowa;duny oO 6 8 L 9 5 + £ UVIA ‘SoANSEOIY UOHUBNIN POOL png umundg ap aS woHLIUsUI|dUT 218°CFigure 3.8-2: Implementation Schedule of Setting-Up a Non-Structural Flood Mitigation Program Program Phase 1 2 3 4 A. Clean-Up of Waterway © Prepare Program © Excoute Implementation/Educational Campaign MEC B, Prevention of Encroachment to River Area Define On-site Riverrine Area Be ae Formulate and Execute Management Plan EBEEEBEES — |— C. Land Use Control © Review Existing Land Use and put in-place Bees @g,)—> | — ordinances for its control * Monitor Development in accordance with the Defined Land Use D, Establish Flood Warnings! Evacuation System © Organize/Activate Local Disaster Coordination Committes '* Develop Flood Hazard Maps. © Set-up Disaster Operation /Evacuation Center Formulate Calamity/Disaster Prevention Plan. LEGEND: ——> ——> ——> Continuing Activity Conduct of Master Pan and Feastbilly Study af Flood Control and ‘VOLUME Ta (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LiPADAS RIVER BASINCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Lt Project Background ‘The Department of Public Works and Highways under its Medium ‘Term Public Investment Program (MTPIP) seeks to develop its pipeline of projects nationwide for implementation under local funding and/or possible external financial assistance. As part of the initial stage through the project development cycle, river basin master planning and feasibility studies assessing the technical and economic merits as well as environmental and social aspects of investing in the proposed pipeline projects are required. The Japan International Cooperation Agency (SICA) — Assisted Study on Nationwide Flood Risk Assessment and the Flood Mitigation Plan for the Selected Areas in the country has ranked about 120 priority river basins based on natural conditions and socio-economic parameters. DPWH through its Project Management Office ~ Flood Control and Sabo Engineers Center (PMO-FC SEC), was tasked to implement the conduct of the Master Plans and Feasibility Studies of an initial twelve (12) river basins grouped into four (4) packages, one of which is Package 4 encompassing the three (3) river basins in Mindanao ‘The Master Plan and Feasibility Studies are expected to determine the extent and nature of required improvement/construction aspects based on the project's economic, environmental, social and the development of suitable and optimal investment plans. 12 Project Deseriptions / Locations Generally described in tabulated form are the river basins encompassed under Package 4 as shown below: Packages iver Basia Name Region [Catchment ‘Observed Probiems Area Tunage Zamboanga Ci Ds 38.00 FiashfloodTiank Collapse Lipadas Dayao City XT 159) Flashfload/Overflow/Bask ‘Silway-Apopong: Gnawal_—|- Goneral Sanos Ci XL 745, FlashoodiOverfiow, ‘Tumaga River B: “The Tumaga River has a drainage catchment area of 238 sq. km. covering the Pasonanca watershed along the northern part of Zamboanga City and a 17 km. main stream length traversing in a southeasternly direction passing through the heart of the City towards the Tictuan Channel confluence. Lipadas River Basin ‘The Lipadas River Basin is located near the southern boundary of Davao City’s territorial jurisdiction and it has a catchment area of 159 sq. km. draining from Mt, Talomo down to Barangay Toril, Marapangi and then finally towards the rivers mouth at Barangay Lizada. Silway-Apopong-Sinawal River Basin ‘The Silway-Apopong-Sinawal River System has a total catchment area of chart 745 sq. km. The area is actually affected by the presence of volcanoes in adjoining provinces. Tiboli on the western part of the City has Mt. Parker, while Polomolok in South Cotabato nas Mt. Matutum on the northwestern part. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibiliy Study of Flood Control anc VOLUME TA (HASTER PLAN STUD) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 Erpnons piven asin13 Objective of the Project 13.1 Objectives Consistent with the Government’s Development Plans based on the Medium ‘Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP) projects under the State of the Nation Address (SONA) of the President, Comprehensive and Integrated Infrastructure Program (CIIP) and the 10-point Agenda of the present Administration, the objectives of the Master Plans ‘and Feasibility Studies are the following: 1. To established the flood control policy, strategy, target design flood magnitude and main works for the river basin; 2. To identify alternative flood mitigation measures; 3. To formulate flood control project implementation plan; and 4. To prioritize projects based on technical, economic, social and environmental feasibility 44 Composition of the Final Report ‘The Final Report is to be submitted in three (3) distinct report coverage containing; ©The optimum flood igation measures proposed in the Master Plan ‘© The proposed priority projects as examined in the Feasibility Study ‘The Final Report consists of the following volumes: Vorumes Tie Contents Volume 1 ‘Master Plan Study (Lipadas River Basin) ‘Main Reports presenting the summary of all the study results, Volume 1B Master Plan Study details of the project formulation (Sitway-Apopong-Sinawal River Basin) processes conclusion and Fecommendation, Volume IC River Basin Master Plan Sty (Tumaga River Basin) Volume Tix Feasibility Stady (Lipadas River Basin) Main Reports presenting the summary of all the study results, ‘Volume 1B Feasibility Study details of the project formulation (Silway-Apopong- Sinawal River Basin processes conclusion and recommendation, Feasibiny Sud Volume iC (Tumaga River Basin) cd TA | Supporting Reports and Data Book “Technical Details “Toposraphic/tydrosraphielCross- ‘Volume tt Supporting Details and Data Book Section Surveys, Geotechnical Engineering investigation, Volume i __| Supporting Details and Data Book Engineering Drawings, cic. ‘The foregoing river basins are generally shown in the appended base maps. This report covers the results of the study on the Lipadas River Basin, Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibiliy Study of Fiood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 VOLUME TA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 42CHAPTER 2: NATURAL CONDITION OF THE STUDY AREA (ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTER) 24 Geographical Location The Lipadas River system is located in Davao City, the largest city in the Philippines with an aggregate land area of 244,000 hectares. Davao City is located in the northwest shore of Davao Gulf in southwest Mindanao, It is bownded on the north by Davao del Norte, on the east by Davao Oriental and Davao Gulf, on the south by Davao del Sur and on the east by North Cotabato, Extensive mountain ranges make up a substantial part and delimit the western boundary of Davao City, The mountain ranges include the Philippines highest peak, Mount Apo, which is a semi active voleano that is located at the junetion of North Cotabato, Davao del Sur and Davao City. ‘Topography The Lipadas River System lies in the contiguous lowland areas of Davao City. consisting of coastal plains and valleys extending inland as gently-rising valleys. The Lowland areas are level to nearby plain with slopes ranging from 0 to 3 percent. The plains and valleys merged gradually into the uplands and the uplands in turn into the mountains, 23 Geology and Geomorphology 23.1 Regional Tectonic Setting and Structures The Mindanao Ceniral Cordillera, where Davao del Sur and eastern part of South Cotabato are ocated, separates the Agusan-Davao lowlands from the Western Mindanao Highlands. Tt is generally underlain by erystalline metamorphic rocks of pre-Cretaceous age and by Cretaceous to Tertiary rocks partly covered by Quaternary Voleanics from Mis, Apo, Talomo and Boribing. which represent recent volcanic centers. The older volcanic and sedimentary rocks were intruded by pericotite, gabbro and diorite, which commonly occur along the axis of cordillera and form part of the Mindanao Central Corditlera Belt The Lipadas Watershed siretched north of Mt, Apo Volcanic Complex which forms part of the Central Mindanao. Four quaternary sirata-volcanioes coalesce in the area, namely: Apo, Boribing, Talomo and Sibulan Mountains. The rocks which underlie the broad slopes of these mountains consist of volcanic flows and pyroclastic rocks. Similarly, the lithology which could be found sunderlying the watershed is primarily made up of volcanic mainly derived from volcanic centers surrounding the area. 23.2 Stra phy ‘The Lipadas Watershed is mainly underlain by pyroclastic and tufts and andesite and dacite units particularly on its western boundary. ‘On the south where the broad slopes of Mt. Apo Volcanic Complex Nank voleanic flows and pyroclastics racks chiefly agglomerates and tufts can be found. The agglomerates consist chiefly of fragments of basaltic andesite and pyroxene andesite commented by a tuffaccous matrix. Mt ‘Apo consisis of basaltic flows cut and overlain by more recent andesites in the northeastern portion, Beds of ash tulT are horizontal to moderately dipping (Peia 2008), Flows of andesite porphyry are found at the municipality of Sta, Cruz, Davao del Sur and at Barrio Sirawan in Davao City. Concluct of Master Plan and Feasibiiy Study of Flood Control and VeLUEE ia NSTER PLAN STE Drainage Projects of Selected! River | Basins Nationwide, Package 4 rae er eleSand and gravel represents the alluvial deposits dominant along the shoreline on the eastern boundary of the watershed. Figures 2.3-1 and 2.3-2 are geologic maps of the area while Figures 23-3 and 23-4 are Iendslide and flood hazard maps of the Lipadas River Basin, respectively, As showst in Figure 2.3-3, landslide prone areas are located in Mt. Talomo and its flanks while low-lying areas are not prone to this hazard. Figure 2.3-4 indicates that riverbank erosion and overflow occurs in the tributaries of Lipadas River Basin. The frequently flooded areas are found in the Toril District and in the northeast portion of the river basin. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control anc TOLIRET Tk [RASTER PLAN SH Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4abeped ‘spimuogeny suiseg sony pex@es Jo salo1y abeUEIT Pure (01]U09 pont so Apras AlyiqtSEe-/ Due Uefd 13}52h/ JO PNPUOD seg. 29Any supedyT ayp Jo dupy 9B0p0ag [-¢°z Sundeve sea wanry svavery + abeypey ‘spmMuOneNY suseg J0NrY paI29I95 Jo spafoLy abeuIEI GONLS NTd 4IASYH) VI IWNIOA ue (0.409 poor 40 ADMAS AipgPSEO] PUL ULId -f9SEIy JO JNPUCD AUPIA PUR UIseg ADARY sepedyy ayD UY Sod YOY Z-€°z DNB,fe enemy 1 abeped ‘apmuoney suseg 2M pores J0 soelay abeutes Ganss nvid ¥34SVH) WI BINION _ _pue aque? panty Jo Aoras AiNASe2 PuUe Weld 422SeH JO INPUT seg s9ARy supmdyy Jo dupy >stx apHSpuey ¢-¢°z 94ndel eee rey » ableyped ‘spmMuoneN) suseg JONIY pEIs9,ES Jo SelaK aBeuIEIg anus nv ssn) V1 aMOA _ ure yao poces 40 Aras AUNGISE2Y PUE Ueld Je152H 40 FPA av Alman.aaosns aooTsHSv74 GNV GoO14 “uistg_ s9ary supudyy] yo depy pavzeyy pooja p-€°z andi,24 Meteorology and Hydrology 24d Climate Davao City, like other municipalities in the southeastern Mindanao is situated in an area where Type IV climate of the Modified Corona’s Classification System exists (Figure 2.4-1). This climate type has no clearly defined dry season and rainfall is more or less evenly distributed throughout the year. Much of the rainfall received comes from the effect of monsoon seasons, tradewinds and cyclonic storms that have crossed the ares. Climatelogical data for 1999 to 2004 included in this report is based on the PAGASA Synoptic Station in Davao City Airport, posted on the web by the National Statistics Coordination Board in 2007. Additional and recent data on rainfall, temperature, rainfall, wind direction and Precipitation is based on the cumulative records of Davao City’s weather profile as posted on the ‘web by Weatheronline.co.uk and Wunderground.com. 242 Principal Air Stream The climate of Davao City and the Philippines in general, is being shaped by the complex interaction of various climatic controls including geography and topography, principal air streams, linear systems (ic., intertropical convergence zone), and tropical eyclones, classified according to intensities. Principal air streams that affect Davao City, as well as, the project site are the Northeast Monsoon (Amihan), the North Pacific Trades (easterly winds) and the Southwest Monsoon (Habegat) ‘The NE monsoon reaches Davao City from the northeast and east direction. It starts over Siberia as a cold, dry air mass but gathers moisture as it travels across the Pacific Ocean before reaching, the easter sections of the Philippines. The northeast monsoon is characterized by widespread Cloudiness with rains and showers but is less humid than the southwest monsoon regime. This air stream usually prevails during months of December and January bringing rain to most paris of the city, (Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibiliy Study of Flood Control and VOLUME (asTeR PCAN STED Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 27Figure 2.4-1 Climate Map of the Philippines SOUTH CHINA SEA CELEBES , , Project Site wl PoP bo do bop og a | Poiog bf tot fof bd ft Climate Map of the Philippines camce rasata B Eee Bf Cahoon Another air stream is the North Pacific Trade which is the southern portion of the North Pacific anticyclone. The trade winds or the inter monsoon winds oriented north to south from the cast is 4n extremely warm air stream that prevails over the entire country in March, April and early May. May is the transition period between the trade wind season and southwest monsoon season. The Cccurrence of thunderstorms is generally associated with this air stream as the mousoon trough approaches. (Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibilly Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (RASTER PLAN STUDY Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 ‘LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 28‘The Southwest Monsoon blows from the southwest and south direction, This air stream originates ‘fom the north side of the Indian Ocean anticyclone during the Southern Hemisphere eeiee Siguicent eens Caustor over the Philippines from the southwest direction after undergoing Sanificant temperature modifications. This aic stream brings substantial rain to the city wee June to October. Although rainfall is evenly distributed throughout the yeas, the peak of wpe Sv ronson occurs during October depending upon the presence of weather disturbances such ae typhoons. 243 Rainfall Tn Davao City, annual rial ranges fom 1,423.4 mm. to 2,161.3 mm. with an average rainfall of 1,808.9 mm. a year fe 2.4-1). Although rainfall distribution in the area is more or less wnfonm, ‘maximum rainfall occurs during September and October brought about by the intensification of the southwest monsoon, Average monthly rainfall is 150.74 mm. with the PRonth of October having the highest rainfall received (Figure 2.4-2). Meanwhile, April has the lowest average monthly rainfall at 118.6 millimeters being the transition period hetwees she Tauheast monsoon and the North Pacific trade winds. Months with the lowest monthly rainfall (ésiest months) during the 12-year period occurred in 1998 and 200) which ean be attrbated to the warldwide El Niffo Souther Oseillation (ENSO) phenomenon (Table 24-1) From 1999-2006, the city recorded a total of 1,087 rainy days with an average of 181.2 rainy days during the 6-year period (Table 24-1). Figure 24-3 shows the difference between the mark annval rainfall distributions against the number of rainy days. The trend shows that the amount of ‘ainfall received is less compared to the number of rainy days occurring in a year, Homers during 2004, an equal trend between mean rainfall and stimber of rainy days is observed ‘Table 2.4-1 Total Amount of Rain all in Davao City by Month from 1993 to 2004 a ar pee ee | is | wa] oes | tae aon, sis) er eee tse Ge tos Tae | aaea [asst [ seo [ame iia | tees] ane [vee eset : a Toor pet eras F460 0. | 98 | 98 [tess aoze | aa | zane [are ae = fog | tie | tia {sae rer | soo soos | asa iroa | was] ste} rhe ee Tee ae en | aaa | ans aa | ont | zone [me | aes | it — a Te Sort eee ae sts | ose | 96a aa 75.0 asr2 sas | arm |e ee Sort ee ee srs | ora ass sez ae |e ast] eet oe aor | ize | ions | sea | aoe | iors | aor7| sit | aoap | ass | ais | ost eet T384"| 1580 pee fae | ras | aos | iiss | ane | 1at2 [one | twas soa] atte | aaso | Bet eet 178.0" zee | toot | tee2 | iver | iris | 742 | 94240 [ 102] gana} sas} ea tse id. | 101.8 | 1820 [Total | ¥e06 6 | ¥e942 [450.0] taza.a | ta7as | Toa57 | ye58 + e183 | 21629 | 21613 | 7631.4 | 1030.7 [Di708.s | 408.9 | Toero (Mel eer wiz [tai] vee | ise wees] wes7 tess rrea trent iso set ee TS07 | 184.2) Condiuct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Food Control and VOLImE TA (ASTER PLAN STUDY Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 aan aaa 29Figure 2.4-2 Average Monthly Rainfall Recorded in Davao City Sta dan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Ave. [me Wonthiy Ranta (om) Figure 2.4-3 Annual Average Rainfall and Number of Rainy Days in Davao 2004 ity from 1999 to 20.00 200.00 480.00 100.00 & 50.00 0.00 #999 2000» 2001 «2002-2003» «2004TokllAve, I Annual Ave. Raintall(mm) Ml No. of Rainy Days. ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME IA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 Gtcalaratd, er244 Wind Directions ‘There are two prevailing wind directions in Davao City. Thirty-nine percent (39%) of the surface wind blows from the north direction during the northeast monsoon regime from December to January (Figure 24-4). The northerly wind with the cool sea air of the Davao Gulf reaches the city replacing the warm air mass at a maximum velocity of 9.2 kilometers per hour. From June to October, the prevailing wind direction is southward from Davao Gulf with 69 kilometers per hour maximum wind velocity. The mean speed rate during the two monsoon seasons is 7.0 kilometers per hour (Table 24-2) Figure 2.4-4, Wind-direction (January 1999 - December 2009) 9.2 3 62 63 59. 56 63 76 ‘Average wind speed TO kph 245 ‘Temperature The country’s climate is tropical and maritime and is characterized by a relatively high temperature and high humidity. In Davao City, the temperature is generally warm with annual ‘mean temperature of 28.07 °C, ranging from a mean high of 35.08°C to a mean low of 21.65°C (Table 2.4-3). Weather is extremely hot in the city and nearby areas during months of January, May and July when maximum temperature reaches 33.0 to 35.9 °C with May, having the highest temperature (Figure 24-5). Meanwhile, weather is coldest during months of November and February with minimum temperatures of 22.1 °C and 21.7 °C, respectively. During summer months in the country, Davao City “s mean monthly temperature ranges from 28.3 to 29.6 °C, reaching its peak temperature in April Based on the 2005-2009 temperature data obtained from the Weatheronline.co.uk website, Davao City has annual mean temperature of 28.01°C, comparatively no significant change from the figure of previous years (Table 2.4-4). Annual mean temperature varies from a mean high of 31,68°C to a mean low of 24.33°C. Weather in the city is usually warmer during March to May ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 MDAC ROR AASNand October when the average monthly temperatures reach 32.12 to 32.86 °C (Figure 2.4-6). The climate is coldest in January when temperature drops at 23.9°C. Table 2.4-3. Temperature Data of Davao City, 1999-2004 cron ‘Temperature (°C) Ro Cea Humidit A seo] 355] 218] 28.1 82.0 2000 | 342 | 222 27.2 | 820 poor | 347 |__24.3| 280] 81.0 2002 | 350] 219 | 284 [ 795 203 | 35.2 | 24.0 | 28t| 848 2004 | 359| 24.7 | 286793 van|359{ 226 | 283| 78.0 Fab 27) 7a] 800 Mar| 339 | 228] 263( 79.0 Apr] 344232 | 296] 750 May | 359 [23.2 [286 | 820 wun 341 | 23.4) 292 | 780 dul 35| 22.8 | 286| 820 Aug | 345 [231 [284780 Sept | 33.3] 22.8] 28 | 820 Oct | 344] 238) ai [78.0 Nov | 345 | 22] 283 [ 78.0 Deo} 346) 235] 2a| 81.0 ‘AnnualAve.| 35.08 | 21.65 | 28.07 | 00.88 Figure 2.4-5. Average Monthly Temperature of Davao City from 1999-2004 £ q E Jen Feb Mar Apr May Jun ul Aug Sept Oct Nov Deo Monthly Ave Max ——Min ‘Mean Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 ae ra 22‘Table 2.4-4. Temperature Data of Dayao City, 2005-2009 rere) perature (°C) ea 1999-2004 | 35.08 2005-2009 | 31.68 | 24.33, Jan | 3058 | 23.9 Feb | 31.18 24 Mar | 3212[ 2412 ‘Apr | 32.86 | __2464 May |_3224| 245 Jun [31.68 | 24.54 ul | 3132243 Au 31.25 [24.4 | [Sept [31.75 | 244 Oct | 32.1] 2452 Nov| 31.78 | 2427 Dec | 31.35 | 2437 Figure 2.4-6. Average Monthly Temperature of Dayao City from 2005-2009 Temperature (Celsius) dan Feb Mer Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Mo. Ave, Max —e—Min Mean 24.6 Rel Humidity Davao City has an annual relative humidity of 79.4% with an average monthly value varying from a low 78% to as high as 82%. High relative humidity occurs during months of May, July, September and December with values ranging from 81% to 82%. Relative humidity is considered ow in January, June, August, October and November at 78% with April at the lowest with 75%. Figure 2.4-7 shows the relative humidity prevailing in the city as temperature changes. It is usually very uncomfortable in the city and in the project site when temperature and humidity are at their maximum levels. ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasbiliy Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY, Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 oeFigure 24-7, Relative Humidity and Maximum Temperature of Davao City from 1999 ¢0 2004 Max. Temp, (Celsius) FES CSS I PF Og ge £ a [ee=RatHum 247 Dew Point All air contains water vapor of varying quantities. The dew point indicates the amount of moisture in the air. The higher the dew point. the higher the moisture content of the air at a given temperature. During the period, Davao City has an average dew point of 24.14 °C with a mean high of 24.8°C and a mean low of 23.4°C recorded in May and February, respectively Dew point remained more or less constant during the rest of the year (Figure 2.4-8). Figure 24-8, Average Dew Point of Davao City from 1999-2009 25.00 ~ 24.50 2400) * . . 2350 * 23.00 $$$ 1999 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Qct Nov Dee 2003 ~=-—=Dew Point (Celsius) | Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME-TA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 2424.8 Tropical Cyclones The Philippines is located in one of the most eyelone-prone arcas in the world. An average of 20 tropical exclones of various intensities occurs each year. From 2000-2007, a total of 148 tropical cyclones have already hit the country. of which 43 are classified as tropical depression, 39 as, tropical storm and 66 as typhoons. The location of tropical cyclone prone areas in the Philippines and frequency of cyclone occurrences from PAGASA is shown in Figure 24-9. Mindanao is one of the areas in the Philippines frequented by at least one cyclone every year. The southeastern part of Mindanao where Davao City is located, occurrence of typhoons is usually once in every 12 vears, 9, Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibiliy Study of Flood Control and VOLUME Ta (ASTER PLAN STUBY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 MPAOAS RIVER BASIN2.4.9 Annual frequency of typhoons passing through Davao City and the Philippines in general. depends on the direction of movement of the steering wind current of tropical eyelones in the Pacific Ocean, influenced by the seasonal movement of the Inter-tropical Convergence Zone, monsoon trough and by other systems, such as, low pressure systems, high pressure systems. ‘warm fronts, and cold fronts, In 2009, around 20 tropical eyclones have entered the country. Table 24-5 presents the list of recent typhoons and the worst typhoons that have directly affected Mindanao from 1962 to 2009, Tropical Storm Ondoy (international codename: Kefsana) and Typhoon Frank (international codename: Fengshen) are among the strongest typhoons to have hit the Davao province causing, Mash floods and swelling of the rivers; destruction of houses and displacement of families. The southwest monsoon season prevailing during the period aggravated the destructive effect of the typhoons in various places in the Davao region. A weak tropical depression, Typhoon Tonyo (Gatemational codename: Noul) with a speed of 75kph passed by Davao City on 13 November 2008, causing minor flooding in the area. ‘Table 2. Worst Typhoons of Mindanao, Philippines from 1997-2009. ‘Ondoy (Kelsane)* Luzon, Bicol Region, Zamboanga Frank “ie 19-20, 2008 165 Luzon, Visayas and Northern and (Fengshen)* Southern Mindanao ‘Nanang (Linging) | November 69, 2007 EW ‘over water Paring (Nel) December 25:28, 1959 150 ‘Surigao, Davao, Agusan, Misamis Oriental tang (ke) August 31-Septenber4, 2 Surigao 1984 Bising (Nelson) | March 39-28, 1982 700 Maasi Titang (Kate) { October 16-23, 1970 095 Cuyo Island ‘Bebeng (Sally) | March 7-4, 1967 120 Surigao Tide ‘The Davao Port is the primary tidal station which shall bo referred to in the study ‘Table 2.4-6 indicated the 2009 tide record at the Port of Davao Hydrology and Hydrogeology (existing water use) Hydrologic Setting Climate at the Lipadas watershed! falls under Type TV based on the Coronas Classification wherein rainfall is distributed evenly throughout the year. Based on the Climatological Normals (1970-2000) data from PAGASA, mean annval rainfall depth is 1773mm, Average annual temperature is 27.3°C while average annual humidity is 81%, Surface Water ‘The Lipadas Watershed is situated at the southwestern part of Davao City. It is situated at the astern slopes of the Mount Apo-Mount Talomo volcanoes, which dominate the tapography of Davao City. The watershed area is about 133km’, It is drained mainly by the Lipacas River Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Fiood Controvand Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 eel VOLUWETA (HASTER PLAN STUD) 246Tahte 24-6 DAVAO FORT; DavaAD LAT OP OSILONG 15a ‘THNIS AND FIGITTS OF IH AND LOW WATERS TRAN CURRENT ARLES 209) zaDas Davao Gun ssany Penitay ane pare [ony [roa Teton oa [oar] amie [aa] one [oar [ame ima leces—2M® )s|_ i _ao a | 159 u i {yt [tf ar 1a) a] _—_ ile ial oat alm as] an _| pal a3) I ‘frit ia] anf Tt Lowes] C L | L Tt i —) nay Ne ay part _|_ one [re Tieton | oare [ony [rine [amar pate [bar | aa Tima Tea ; i alae 6x] 19a a_i ul uci “I M0 |i aad ae a a ila aa os + t—+ tt | L som ocmoam ovine bre Pate cay | ne fiir are bay [nv [uae] pare [bar [rine [RRR ome [oar | Tae THe uciesr| 2B ssi sho Feit] aie fea isi a1 t { st wa ox) to aaa) tn Tala [aia owns] 20 os) 3] We ra I I pt fuori | bare [bar | ie [aor oserveo uckesripe buy 2 at [vont [one [ pay [Tine [ae asexvep lowest rine fiawan nf aia Condiact of Master Plan and Feasibiity Study of Flood Control and OLURTE Ta RASTER BAW SPOBY Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationvvdle, Package 4 2u7which originates from Mt Talomo Mows eastwvard and empties into the Davao Gulf, Several sube parallel creeks also originating from the mountain join the Lipadas River Thore is a gauging station operated by the DPWHL along Lipacas River. It is located at Lizada Barangay Toril. Available records {rom DPWH between the periods January 2000 to December 2003 and January 2009 to December 2009 indicate thee Fiver discharge varies from 4 to 12 m‘s, Groundwater The watershed area is generally underlain Quaternary volcanic pyroclasties and volcanic flows related to the volcanic activity of Mount Talomo art Mount Apo. These volcanic deposits serve ar fe main source of the water bearing layers and water Source for the wells in the area, NWRC. (1982) classifies about 90% of the western section of watershed area as difficult area in terms of well drilling and development. The coastal aren of the watershed is considered as shallow well areas, where groundwater is easier obtained (Figure 21 ). Tn 1997, an aquifer characterization in Davao City conducted by Asia GeodhySne, Ine for World Bank showed that the aquifers are characterized by the following: © Merlayers of reworked voleanic pyroclastic forming tnconfined and semi-confined aquifers of varying permeabilities and capped by impervious horizons £ differing staic and piezometric water levels in wells * spring discharges along the coastal area atthe toe of Mount Talomo The 1997 study also classified the groundwater development potential into tow. medium, and High potential at the Lipadas Watershed by using the characteristics of dhe underlying rocks landforms and slopes. The low groundwater potesticl ic found at the upper steep slopes above 400 mast, where both voleanie flows and pyvocinstice racka and steep gradients dominate, The saetigonmations inthis area have low infiltration eapacitee dha 0 steep gradients. The aroas with Vera Potential are found between elevations 400) to 200 noe and generally undertain. by volcanic pyrociastios and reworked sequences, "The High ground water potential occurs along the coast al elevation lower than 200 masl (Figure 2.5.2 Groundwater in the Talomo-Lipadas watershed (TLW) is the primary source of tap water in Pei, City since the establishment ofthe water csiit an 1975 (PCEEM 2006). Groundwater in Shas classiied according to depth with deep well areas found at depths greater than 200m, Shallow weil areas are those found less than 10m erm the surface, These are more vulnerable to 252 Existing Water Source 2 Ss face Water Source hate is n0 reported domestic surface water source in the Lipadas Watershed Area, Spring Sources Springs are reported to occur at the lower Slopes and near the coast of the Lipadas Watershed! ‘There is no data on the actual mumber of their Securrence as well as the volunie or discharge in the area, © Wells Data obtained from the NWRC (1982) and LWUA ‘groundwater data show that the main aipaystic walet source come trom groundwater through welie Based on the LWUA records (Table 2.5-1), there are at least 385 shallow and despwells providing the grounchwater source ‘ie,Nell depths vary fom 6 to 140m while wel dscharee uate {rom jess than 1 liter per second {ot shallow wells to as such as 126 liters per second. the wae with high yields are generally {ocated in the Talomo Area which is classified as aren with igh groundwater potential. Most of the wells are located east of the Lipadas Watershed, Welle 4: the Lipadas watershed area are at Gouuct of Master Plan and Feasiblty Stacy of Food Control sad COANE TA (ASTER Plan TOBY; Drainage Proy Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 UPADAS RIVER, 218the edues. There are reported wells atthe upper slopes no records of its focations (Figures 2.5-2 and 2, River Conditions and River Water Use ‘Tie Lipadas River system is approximately 30km long and originates from Mount Talomo. The Trgrmneanders through Toril District fowards the river month at Sirawan. lis tributaries include [2elso River, Kilate River and Bato River which eventually merge into Labogan Rives meeting, ribades River at Barangay Lubogan, Smaller tributaries include Macaring ane Bavabo Crock Lipadas River is classified as Class AA in its upper reaches, Class A and Class 8 mnie aide ‘aches and Class C in the lower reaches. Class AA walers are those leested in watershed ting ve uninhabited or declared as protected areas and require only disinfection te mect the Philippine piional Standards for Drinking Water (PNSDW). Class A waters are intended ay cower Prpue water supply that requires conventional treatwent such as coagulation, sedivontaron, Etvation and disinfection. Class B waters are intended for primary contact recreation rch ng swimming and bathing, Class C waters can be used for the propagation of Tre meas, for boating and fishing or as source of icigation water for livestock and agricultons ‘The water classification of Lipadas River in various locations is presented in ihe following matrix. Class AA. ‘Upstream Mount Apo National Park to Bray. flaracayo Class A Midstreara Bray. Baracayo to Brgy. Bangkas Class 8 Midstream’ Brgy. Bangkas to Gray. Alambre Class C Downstream Brgy. Alambre to confluence wits Davao Gulf Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Food Control and VOLE TA (rasTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 eee 249wuisva wana svavar? (hans nivta ¥BiSYA) WI TOA _ F abeyped @pimuonely suiseR Jey peme/es Jo sjraloLy abeuIeig pure 013103 booty Jo ADMs AMVASER.] PU Ue} ASEH JO YNDUOD dv waLvmaNnouDsCD # a0peq “spmuogel suiseg Jen paras Jo sa{04y a0 EUR (AGRLS NW Td UILSVA) WI IHITTOA ple jones poor so ADMS AU[GISEA-J PUP Ufc 42)5}y JO FNUCD oo sano AV ih gv UNALOA SaLyRoNNONDwe abby ‘apuvonen suse uy papers Jo soefod A5eUeIT ams wea nisind eran tOn De ranteg poco Aprs Aygse pUe Weld ISH 40 3NBUCD o1oz “vn 7 spy wones07 lem 5 s061a pembig SS alg oeneg SM g ZO up onse( uy deoyy HORI] AX E-S'T SANTIae + abeypeg “opmuoney suiseg Janty pay79;95 Jo salou S6eUeIg ussva wanry svavel Gants mera ate) VESTN ure ans boats so dors ANS24 UE Ue tseH1J0 PMBUOD ~ Gre WOON SON eA sex prod | an hip oe%e0 ery doo | .t0s.ves2h _vawi| sam| ve ere oboe | — am tip vere EGE. Z0610 Bevo | ean | 8 ene | aM fig oBNea. Ze 1p 0.10, evan [eae | se —ouieieL | onto oeiec 28.20.10 Lvamcr| Zain |e aa [OM Tag sever 95.20.10 Svnw | eae | ee Teng | am fap ote “SEI, 60.00 Svnwt| Sama = Say BURBS oer 61, £0410, eynany | pans 9962.60.10, Tevnnr [sand ZETEE. E0410 zynnn [ead Tynan | 18d Ze aie ae = eee aL saibueg = Tobie eaAL AWE oem) seo] oo» vou | amd ooo wweocseses |_emtamoa | aioson| zz a ‘boson o» ove yogin Keveksuew ows | amo cemea | og svec.cou0 | _evsrezses | _imiomoa} syoeoni| _ Bu 08 376 Soom Aig eanec | —— se 507.20. SWS. 6821 | TE ON SA maU | — Leal | 02 #26. | 08% Ozh “ni Rig-eenea_| 61 —e2"ON S4meu| oe wna | oe oz [2 oF “amhio 9eneg |~—9e | ~ 82 F070 — SevoMT| a ez - OM io OBC | eS cogs ze.szt |] es-wnwi | 2 ri oe — OF <0BUZ. 96.52 wenn | 8 C | = <0 90.98.52 evn we 08 ~ ese “| se 0905. 56.521 i Zs 08h eoeoes | GwiRig-eereg | ~~ oF OSEE.EEECE we 08 = TareBueRN | aM Alo o2k8C |e P67. 90410 SSL OBL —— Sve, | — aM hig oeneg_ | Eb ~ [97 Bee | eno |S SE 00% | aay 6 omeg | oe ws 00% SHOOT oenea | 99. “ISELP L010 ce 006: “aaiereL | ‘area $ 5629010 008. aaa ‘oan | 36 [-—~ ‘008 oem |Z z Fo 007 = ON TSM. oF Tawi sere | ——es— EONTISM, ea 007, ‘Onn io oenec oor sz GN Aig oenec EE eve ere eo Aug ovavg Jo weg BEApUNOID 1-372 QE,we + abeped ‘spiuogeN suse JaAes p2i2—S Jo s}afold abewelg sv Chonus wis saisen) YEIMnTOA 2 _ pe raneg poo Jo Apnis Annes) pe Ue 215eH 10 27PUCD 006 zi Taine 00 08 on DOE, eano0 [er 008 | ——Fsr ouioje] “eseudey Jao oBred) 0020.2 _ 306 ey [ease rey seno7 | —anTeo oorea ‘DO ——,, ra ough Wend [G/M THD Bere baz 9 | oo zzi | _cereq ‘owore ‘10 K88 cove 26.821 i oor | __zzi |__oereg woe ‘se0 Aue ae oo Tz] —< |__08¢ _ OM Mg obAeG 006 ann ig neg 099 | er | ‘aMAig oenea oF Oe deaeveg 16G_|—aM Tip oarea ot oat ueBuept BG | ayy id vere ‘0p | sz aM ig ea O8F 32 ca id ene ez ow 5 a0 Osh _ OM ig oBnec ‘82 ON Sa mou oF oa Mig re) Sz Ow Samat | or | ‘nM TD o8rC. 2 ON 3 He0 05%. _ ‘EZ ON Si Ma 35% Des. 50.10 Zz ON Sa Nau a5 Tamers ear | a hin oeiew ‘B12 80.00 TZ ONAL oa | Sad OM Rig 880 SELL 010 o2ON Fh Os = IIA OPES. 689 1.60.0 61 ON FM ‘asp | 38 ‘aP80.80.10_ a LE “oor [aig oetea. ‘seps.c0u0 ri 8% = ‘Mig eRe Z19p.20.10 “3 oom = aM ig one clei8 20.00, Fi OOF cm Rig oe I~ ra¥0.60.00 ‘i cor ‘s¥er 20.0 ri oor i oun 861,200 zi or SER ORG SSE ‘Bron z0u0 7 Ze UOSBNVZ » zor ueooved 6a | afro oerea “si vow ee Zar. TaeTaeS Tn odopan | om Mg oeneG, 8S VAN eiaod wea | OMIM oe [syn = ypelaod “epelea | aM AN osnea. E SVN, ae oe aque aN | — MAID oereG. 1% Dal svn ser ig eoeaes [GMT cena | 508. $9.L0 isa Zit Tee woere | GrA RO oehec 10.80.10 avin t Tae WEG wy oe uaioBuehn «1659.50.10 van "shi uur uelC if : Seca PT ie. Cee eeLt aisve sanz svavart Gans nits 2315vH)] VE IHIION 4 abe»ped ‘spimuoney suiseg Jeniy panzajas yo salud abeUeKy Pup jantiog pool. so Apms Alvarsee.j DUE Ueld 42)5@H) 40 PNPUOD el buna C = Teena |i 7 eobunat zisormaa | _cevnam ————sobinal | Haoses yonsdou | C Se srvnan aba iad isin Tia ~a692.9e.szs [ eeynam c — ale 26.Szb evn rey 26.821 | Sewn wes tivo | saz on gessz [seen 602.210" | 08.26.82. - vn ana eveunyy 2097-140. | a arn ng 2S eS |W Ez. Chal TFiewenas —“eneing Bereren | tai Tebueeg 22968. 2hal0 Lae Nel Tig Gekeg “Anlung Hoes | OM AD ORREG — [— walieo oBeg pane resis | —ONF¥O Fred | — | psze I iz ot GM Tip oBneG Gn Ti eee — = ‘ann fig ceKeG —T GAN RIO BBIeC | - [am ig oenecr = ‘avo eenea fgeeneg | oe 00" AEAS2 sramoa| 1 améeooereg | oe 00/0» 064621 eiamoo | __o amb cera | ob ov'se.co0 | .oo'ss.ze.szt | Bi vas ooverdosaneesna | amAiooeta| 2 .0o'bv 20.10 | 00's. ee SID 7 7 ofeg-dais sawewersng | Z 0012.48.82) _ ovamoa | ue “Silas “OBuaBee — camo | al ‘Beg254 Water quality Semi-annual monitoring of water quality is conducted in the downstream portion of Lipadas River. Water quality data for 2008 was obtained from the Environmental Management Bureau in DENR Region 11. The data is presented in Table 2.5-2. Table 2 Water Quality Data of Lipadas River from 2001 to 2008 (Source: DENREMB Region XI) DEIN mt ‘Station 1 aoe a pecan Lipages Hoos Stns 3008 002 7 5 os ts—es-—| 5 e Staton Gor [9s 19 | 8 —f es — 9 1 Footot [Boos 73 183 —Te 3 Stns 38 Fi — a 53 3 Snr “Hi 73 $4 a 308 5 eS ‘8 aor es Tes 7% [2002 25 79 18.0, 42 Same fae 35 te—ts ie F | statons | Soge ts 3 3 —7——[08 a fo, Paes 3 7 tao i | Pledad Br. F008 Ta. 24 74 |?2 17138 | oar? 34 — [eo a 55 Stott a 338 it Sat Hs ze 1753 z (20026 24 Bi [84 7 36. 1 sone (2005 to 35 3s —08 si station | Boor t6 3 iste 193s | Rot cam |S 3 3 fas 3 205 [2 ‘a za— [39's 2 2007 | 4 24 78 8.0 og - 16 Bone & 3 te — 38h or B 207 T20 8 3s 7 ae a $1 ter stations [200580 28 72s ——tos —_ 2m aoe HB a 53 —s —t5- 0 Geteam ot [20052 a 17 —32—foe 18 Sta 4 2006 [3 24 75 7.2 4 [45 2007 [3 24, 78 7.8 09 16: Sane t 35 fa—tte——T ar i DENR No abnormal | <3°C tise 65-85 | 5.0 17 (10) <30 mg/L Standard deosortion eas incenee As gleaned from the table, all parameters have complied with the DENR water quality standard for Class C waters with the exception for DO and TSS which did not comply with the DENR standard in some years. Decrease in dissolved oxygen concentration is attributed to the presence of oxygen depleting substance or organic wastes in the water body. Organic wastes come from residential areas, piggery farms and industries that are located near the Lipadas River. ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibillty Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 226Increase in total suspended sediment concentration is attributed to heavy rainfall, erosion from agricultural areas and possibly presence of construction activities near the river banks. DENR Region XI listed the following recommendations to inprove water quality of Lipadas River, ‘Trees and cover crops should be planted along river banks and in areas prone to soil erosion, Proper quarrying procedure should be observed by quarry operators end strictly ‘imposed by regulatory agencies. Agricultural activities that cause soil erosion should be discouraged and concepts of soil and water conservation should be imparted to farmers. Septic tanks should be provided in all residential and commercial buildings location along the river bank, ‘Wastewater treatment facilities of industries along the river bank monitored, + Sewerage system should be provided. + Proper solid waste management should be observed. ld be strictly PCEEM studies in 2002 indicate that Lipadas River has high total coliform content (PCEEM 2006) 26 Terrestrial biology Terrestrial Vegetation Habitat and vegetation cover Region 11 has a total land area of 1,967,183 hectares, Of the total Iand area, only 16% is covered with natural forests. Its different vegetation cover, totalling 884,877 hectares, is distributed as follows: 7% is old growth/virgin forest; 26% are second growth or residual forest; 2% is mossy forest, 1% are mangroves, 9% are plantation forests; 19% brush lands, 4% is open/erassland and 32% are cultivated areas for permanent and annual agricultural crops, Large-scale banana plantation is a major land uso in the region. The region has three proclaimed watershed forest reserves with one located in Davao City: the 235-ha Malagos Watershed Reservation, In particular, the forested area of Davao del Sur including Davao City, which has a total land area of 637,762 hectares, only represents 8.1% of its terrestrial ecosystem, About 31% of the province’s (otal iand area is cultivated for permanent and annual agricultural ctops. Brush lands and grasslands together account for 15% of the total Jand area of the province, as shown below. ‘Table 2.6-1 Habitat and Vegetation Cover of Davao Del Sur (Old Growth Residual Forest “Moss; ‘Mangroves Plantations ‘Brushlands Open/ Grassland Cultivated Areas 798,281 Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and WOLUHTE TA (ASTER PLAN STUDD Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 —Floral diver Flora of the mountain forest ecosystem are composed of the premium Dipterocarps such as White Lauan (Shorea contorta), Natta (Pterocarpus indicus), Igem (Dacrycarpus imbricatus, Almaciga) Paguringon (Cratoxylum sumatn Pitcher plant (Nephenthes sp), Rafflesia, (CAgathis philippinensis), Tree Ferns (Cyathea sp) ranum), several species of Ficus, Mecaranga, Bamboo and Rattan, In Mt. Apo alone, 629 species under 148 families of vascular end non- vascular plants ‘were recorded. Of this number, 572 species and 124 families of ferns and angiosperms while 57 species and 24 families of bryophytes or mosses. Among the high value tree species are the endangered Agathis philippinensis (almaciga) and dipterocarps such as Shorea guiso, the rare Shorea polita and Vatica mangachapoi, also a tare species. These tree species are threatened due to overlogaing, Several species of Ficus provide food to many species of birds and mammals, Other economically important species include Kalingeg (Cinnamommum mereadoii and C. mindanensis), Ulayan (Lithocarpus Uanosii), the wild betel mut (Areca catiso), Saging-bundok Musa belbasian), Kalingag, Hagimit (Ficus minahassae) and Hamindang (Macaranga bicolor). Plantations of forest species dominated by Faleata (Aibizzia falcataria) and Gmelina (Gmelina arborea) can also be found in the area. ‘The mangroves are composed of individuals belonging to genera Rhizophora, Sonneratia, Avicennia, Ceriops and Nypa, among others. A number of endemic and presented in Table 2.6-2. Table 2.6-2 Endemic and Rare Plant Sp Fainily rare species of ars whynanthus miniaceous plants can also be found in the forest of the region as in Lipadas Watershed Ne endemi ‘Againyla persimiis [eniemie | Araucariaceae | Agathis philopinensis endemic ‘Araceae ‘Alocasia zebrina endemic ‘Anacardiacsae | Bushanania nia endemic, ‘Arecaceae Calamus meri endemi ‘Arecaceae | Calamus ometus var_philppinensis | endemic | [‘Cauraceae Ginnamomum mereadol ‘endemic Ofnigaceae | Dencrobium sanderae var. surigaense | endemie Dilleniaceae | Bilania philppinonsis endemic | Ebenaceae Diospyros philppinensis [endemic [Asclepiadacoae Melastomataceaa Hoya bulusanensis /panchol ‘Medinilla coming ‘endemic | Melastortacese | Medinila magnifica endemic | ‘Melatomatacese | Medinila malindangenaie endemic Myrisficacese | Myristica philppinensis endemic Nepentheceas | Nepenthes alata ‘endemic ["Nepentnaceae | Nepenthes argent —[endemie Nepentheceae | Nepenthes belli endemic [[Nepentnaceae | Nepenhes copslandi ‘endemic ‘Nepentiacess | Nepenthos mira ‘endemic Orchidaceae | Paphiopecum adam endemic | Orchidaceae | Paphiopedilum cliolare endemic Polypodiacess | Platyeerium coronarium endemic Ericaceae Rhododendron Kochi ‘endemic ‘ipterocarpaceae | Shorea astyiosa —Tendemie Dipterocarpacene | Shores contorta endemic Dipterocarpaceae | Shoroa quiso endemic [Dipterocarpaceae | Shorea negrosensis endemic | Condluct of Master Plan and Feasibity Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationvvide, Package 4 VOLUME TA (WASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 228Dipterocarpaceae: Shorea polysperma Tendemic Gneteceae Gnetum iatfofum (rare Nepenthaceas | Nepentfies maxima rare Psiiotacose | Pstotum complanatu rare Psilotaccae. Pesiotum nudum ——~T rare ‘Schizaeacese | Schizaea inopinala [rare | Schizaeeceae | Schizaoa malaccana (rare Aside from the endemic and rare species, some of the other flora that can be found in the forested areas of the region are listed in Table 2.6-3 below. Table 2.6-3 List of Plants found in Lipadas Watershed Senne! "[Melesaging [Meliacese | Aiseadephne philpamensis | Boga Lauraceae ‘Areca eaiso Wie beter mak ‘Arecaceae ‘Artocarpus sp; ‘Antipolofimes ‘Moraceae | Genarium g Pil Burseraceae Cinnamammum mikdanensis | Mindanao Cinnanon [Lauraceae Cypholophus miorophylue | Remivrami Urticaceae Dacryearpus sp. Banyas Bodocarpaceas Ficus minahassae | Hagimit Moraceae Ficus sp. Ficus Moraceae Gleichenia 3 ——T cieioheriaceas [Cimperata cyiindica —TPoscess ‘Leptospermum sp. Wytaceae Lithocarpus lanosiT — Fagaceao Lithocarpus submoniicolus —| Tapotasa Fagacoae Macaranga bicolor “Hemingang — Euphoroaceae ‘fecha sp. Kapa-kapa Wielasiomstaceae Musa babbasiana ['Saging-bundok Nepenthes copeland | Copelanc’s pitcher plant | Nepenthaceae ic: - Giant pandan Pandanaceae (Biperomia epoanum Manikstapay Piperaceae Piperomia elmer ner tit —TPiperaceae Pipturus 8 Dalunot Uriicacese Podocarpus spp ‘gem Podocarpaceae oiliospermu Hanopol Moraceae Rhododendron spp._ [Mslagos Ericaceae: Saccharum spontaneum | Talahib Poaceae Survie pi ——aimug Actinidiaceas Shorea amon ‘Aimon ——T bipierocarpaceas ‘Shores pola aleanonang — Dipierocarpaceae Syzygium panduriforme | Lauiglauigan [Myrtaceae Syzygium spo Maiarunat Wytacese Temstroemia § ‘Apin —~}iheaceas Vacsinium spp. Dusong Ericacoae Vanda senceriana ‘Waiing-walng Grenidaceae Vatica mangachapal ‘Narig Dipterocarpaceaa! In grassland ecosystem, dominant flora includes cogon (Jmperata cylindrica) and hagonoy (Chromolaena odorata). In the lowland, agricultural crops like banana, pomelo, durian, corn, coconut as well as cash crops like string beans, eggplant, squash, pechay and okra, among others, can also be found. Plantations of industrial forest tree species dominated by Falcata (A(bizzia falcataria) and Gmelina (Gmelina arborea) can also be found in the area “Conduct of Master Plan and Feasbilly Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 VOLUMETA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 229Conservation status of vegetation cover and Flora Old-growth, mossy ane mangrove forests are protected by law from any form of logging and are placed under continuous and strict protective condition, Mangroves, in particular, are prohibited from cutting whether it is natural state or in reforestation/plantation area Table 2.6-4 shows some 22 plant species recorded in the area that are listed in the 2007 National List of Threatened Plants (DAO 2007-01), a list of Philippine plant species that are considered threatened due to overharvesting, Table 2.6-4 List of Threatened, Endangered and Vulnerable Plant Species in Lipadas Watershed al Sas SAIS Gesneriaceas | Aasenynanthus miniacoous Vulnerable Gesnerieceas | Agalinyla persimilis Vulnerable 7 | Araucariaceae | Agathis philppinensis [Vuinerabie ‘Arcane ‘Alocasie zebrine Endangered “| “Lauraceae Ginnamomum mereadol Vulnerable Orhidaceae Dendrobium senderee var. surigaense | Vulnerable Ebenaceae | Diospyros philippinensis Endangered Asclepiadaceae | Hoye bulusanensis “pancho Endangered ‘Anacardiaceae | Mangifera altissima Vulnerable 7 Melastomataceas | Medhilla magnifica [Endangered [-Myrisicacese | Myrstica philpoinensis ‘Other threatened Nepenthacsae | Nepenthes bell Endangered — [Nepenthaceae | Nepenthes copelanaf Griicaly endangered [[Orehisaceas | Paotiopeatum aaducturm Gwe endangered | ‘Orchidaceae | Paphiopedilum cifolare Endangered Poiyposiaceae | Platyeerium coronarium Critically endangered_| Ericaceae Rhododendhon Kochi Critically endangered Dipterocarpaceae | Shorea astyiosa Critically endangered Dipterocarpaceae | Shorea conto rable | [Dipterocarpaseae | Shorea guiso Vuinerab Dipterocerpaceae | Sliorea negrosensis ——TWuinerabie | Dipteracarpaceae | Shorea polysperma ~_[Gricaly endangered DENR DAO 2007-01 defines the different conservation eategories for threatened species as “Critically Endangered Species” which are species or subspecies facing exiremely high risk of extinction in the wild in the immediate future. “Endangered Species” on the other hand refers to a species or subspecies that is not critically endangered but whose survival in the wild is unlikely if the causal factors continue operating. “Vulnerable Species” is one that is net critically cadangered or endangered but is under threat from adverse factors throughout its range, facing. high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future and is likely to move to the endangered category in the future. Other Threatened Species are species that is likely to move to the “Vulnerable” category in the future if harvesting pressure continues unabated Terrestrial Wildlife The Lipadas River obtains its water source from the Mt. Apo ranges particularly Mt. Talomo (2,674 masl) on the easter portion of the range. Much of the lowland dipterocarps in this range has been denuded by logging and cultivation thus the remaining habitats are montane to mossy forests which are situated at higher elevations (500 to 2,954 masl). These arcas consisting of 72,113 hectares wers mostly part of te protected area of Mt. Apo Natural Park (Proclamation No, 882). The Lipadas River becomes more apparent outside the Park and traverses the lower areas of Davao del Sur and Davao City which are mostly cultivated and built-up areas. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (ASTER Fi Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 VOLUME Ta (MASTER PLANSTUDY) 230Table 2.6.1-1 Taxonomic listing of birds that are known to oc © Birds There are about 236 species of birds belonging to 61 families that are known to occur in the Lipadas Watershed based on regional data (Table 2.6.1-1). Much of these species are found in the higher elevations along the boundaries of Mt, Apo and are basically montane forest dwellers ‘These include the Mindanao endemic Black-and-cinnamon Fantail, Apo Myna, Cinnamon Tbon and Black-masked White-eye. Endemism is relatively high in this area at about 42% since numerous species are confined to higher altitude areas of the ranges. It is predicted that less than 30% of the total avian fauna can be found on the low-lying areas traversed by the Lipadas River since that they are already disturbed due to land conversion of original forest into plantations and built-up areas. Thirty-four species or 14% of the total bird species in the Lipadas Watershed are considered threatened based on TUCN standards. Most notable of these birds are the Philippine Eagle, Philippine Hawk-eagle, Philippine Cockatoo, Mindanao Brown-dove and Silvery Kingfisher. All of the above species requires a significant cover of forest which can only be found in higher elevation areas of Mt. Apo Natural Park which is the source (headwaters) of Lipadas River. The exception is the Silvery Kingfisher which occurs only in lowland habitats. This species is recorded in some isolated forests in Davao del Sur such as in Malagos Watershed (near Talomo River) and probably in patchy lowland forests in Toril, Davao City. There are about 5 to 6 pairs of Philippine Eagle in Mt. Apo and probably one pair covers the upstream basin of the Lipadas Watershed. Eagle sightings and nesting has been documented through the years in Baracaten, Toril District, Davao City (Philippine Eagle Foundation) within the Lipadas Watershed CII Golder-belied fyeatar Teast concern | ‘Accipiridae Piecophaga jeter] [[Phitpoine Eegie endemie —| eilcaly endangered Accptics Spizeetvs pilopensi Philppine Hewieagle endemic [~~ least concern] ‘Accpitidae ‘esptor tvrgatus Grested goshawi resident [least eoncert ‘Accpiidae Solomis chesie Crested serpet eagle resident —| least concern ‘copie ‘Avcods ardent sJerdon's baza = resident | —lesst concer | Pains ptioriyncbus ‘Oriental honey Buzzard resident —| least concert Acsbiigae Barred honey buzzard resident —| least concer [Aceipiridae Biaclewinged i resident —| least concer Acopidae Hatestur ince Srahiny ie fesident | least eoncem Accra ‘Aeaptervrgatus Seera | “resigent | least concern Acsiican Spizeetus ofratiz— Changeable Ravcaagie resident | least eoncom ‘Alaudidae ‘fs avanica Horsfids bushierc resident | least concern Aiaudidee Aloud uigule ‘Oriental siya resident | least concer ‘eedinisae Todiramphus efor Golared kingfisher resigent | ~—least con ‘Aicedniae | Polargopsis capensis | Sirk bled ngaar resident | least concer —| ‘Neecnisae Feleyon smymensis Whit-tivosted kinghshier resident | Teast concer [Aedinizae Cay opidus ‘ati dart Kingfisher resident ~| least concert Aicedinidae “Aclonaides nombrohl Sue-capped kigisher enderie wunerabe ‘Alcedlnidae Tediramphus vincholl Rufous iored kinlisher | Tendeme: ‘uinerabis——] ‘Algedlaitas | Cex melanuris Philippine dart Kngshar endenic wuinerabie Alcodo argentata Sivery Kingfisher [Cendemie wuinerabie | Dencrosygne arcuate Wandering whiting au resicent concern ‘Analgae ‘nas juzorioa Palippine duck endemic vulnerable] Anhingidae Anhinga melenogaeer “Date ‘esident | east concer ‘Apodidae Colocata troglodytes Pygmy eet ——|Fendemic—[~Teast concern Apodidae ‘Aerodramus moarrst Phiippine sna endemic | — east concern ‘Apodidae | Aerodremus whitehead ‘Whitehead's switet ~ [endemic Teast concem ‘Apodiéae Collecala esculenta “[Siossy ewitet resident | leest concer —] ‘Apodidae ‘Aerodramus vanikeranais | Tland svt —— Tresicent [least concer —| odicee “Hnundapus celebensis | Purple needletal | Mresicent—| Teast concern ‘Apodidae Gypsuris baleseinsis ‘sien pain sit resident [aposidae ‘Meamsia pica Priippine spelled Sa endemic ‘Atdetéae | greta abba — Great egret ~ rrigeart | leeet concern ‘Ardeldee Egrotia intermedia Inlerediate grat [migrant Teast concer [Ardeicae Egrtia garzeta Tie earet ‘migrant Teast concern Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and ae At MASTER } ee Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 251Zs Sc eine. ‘Distribution: Pe ‘Arveldae Inobryohus sinensis Yellow bien resident_|' least concern ‘rdeidae inobiychus Ginameriezs | Cinnamon Stara resident — [least concer ‘Aideidae Dupotor favcolis {Black bitter resident —| least eoncem ‘Gorsachius melandlgphus | Maieysian night heron. resident ‘east concem | ‘Nyclicorex caledonicus “Rufous night heron “fesident | least concem Butorides striata Gittie heron “resident | least concem_ ‘Arioole speciosa m | 20 [ow [afar] aw far|- > 35 [aa [ ae [a aa a= = FE 5 3] | sao ata past 7 [am | ana ar ae a i seen [sof par bar 7 «| 3090 | Tea aera ae aT ET [coe bara pare po " f¢[ gato [800 [oo De ar i [aon | 000 [Pas [aoa Sr 7 6 [ caso | a0 are a af ne : fen | a6 a asa [oat = | Cemo[s CaaOaC| COOEED [can [ Pes a ea : [casa [ae : sfc ea ; gos [ pg a a : en Dank Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibilly study of ood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 ‘ght Dank VOLUMETE (MASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS RIVER BASIN B12Channel Widening Plans: Drawigg No. IP-01 to Drawing NoJP-11 2, Modified Channél Bed Longitudinal Profile (Drawing No. IP-01 to Drawing No.IP-11), 3. Improved Channel Cross-Sections (Drawing No. CS-01 to Drawing No.CS-21 The referred drawings above are in Volume IILA-Supporting Reports and Data, A2 Design Return Period of 10 years with River Bank Trimming coupled with Dike Construction and Modified /lmproved Channel Bed Longituclinal Profile. By proportion, the preliminary channel bed widths for a design return period of 10 Years shall be estimated as shown below: - 25388 Food 10 yrs Fiona Aus (BH, } (H.) th Given: 8 HH, Ai? (BH )(H) = Given: A H ‘The Modified/Improved Channel Cross-Sections shall have to be applied along the slopping low land area side of the channel away from apparent developments It should be noted, refer to Drawing No. CS-01 to Drawing No. CS-21 (in Volume MIA: Supporting Reports and Data) that the differences in cross-sectional dimensions for the design return periods of 10 year and 25 year are not significant. ‘This denotes that the improvements proposed for a full-scale channel improvement may as well adopt the improvements’ required for a design return period of 25 years Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibilty Study of Flood Control and (Tote Te nsTan Lan OT) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 =842 Improvement Alternatives No.2: ! ' Partial River Width Widening Cum Dike Construction ix combination with the construction of a Diversiorveut-off which deviates from Ste, 4-400 of Lipadas River. A, A 2.620 km. diversion/cut-off channel ruining towards the Gulf of Davao in a south- casterly direction deviates from Sta, 4+400 of Lipadas River. The inclicative plan (refer of subject diversion generally illustrated in Figure 8.4.2-1 and on the Google-earth generated plans Figure 8.4.2-2 and Figure 8.4.2-3 these are correspondingly translated in plan (plan & profile). As shown in to Drawing No.IP-12 to Drawing No. IP-15), The referred drawing above are in Volume IILA: Supporting Reports and Data, Projected to be conveyed to the diversion channel is 40% of 413.70 eu, m or 165.50 cu. m run-off at design period of 25 years upstream from the point of diversion. This denote that 355.12 cu, m shall still be conveyed downstream of Lipadas River from the point of diversion, Refer to tabulation of estimated run-off below. A consequence of this proposed diversion channel is the need to construct four (4) bridges across existing /proposed roads crossed. Diversion Chanel Lalas Rie rst Lips River __ b ler Les La Lo ies 15 ToT Davao Gu s > a = = > = Vg | a va re au ie hogan ied Buysbss Lida == Mactring Sivan “oe Cat iver Greek Grek Grek Diversion Channel Ge Estonia aon (cubic meter per second) | rc-nas Waterway | suannel years | 10-years a Lipadas River m9 [a | # 3 ais [ase T [Lubogan River 166 7 161 2 305 [309 | a7 z Lipadas River ter 130 | ms | 293 | 399-488) 870] River 3 Piedad Creek ws | 5s | 9 | 12 ~ 22 | Rivers Lipadas River _ La 15 228 305 aa 505, 393 | Rivers Diversion Channel = -_ | im | 166 | 16 | 106 : Lipadas River Lea - - 183) 248 337 427 River 5a Bayabas creek | _190_| 38 T05_[as |e | River Lipadas River i | _is7 33 465 373__| River? Lizada River im | 5 Fa 38 [Rivers Lipadas River | L93 296. 279 373 487 oy River 9 Mearinf Creek om] 3 . B 18 | River 10 Lipadas River 195 165 302 500 @i6__| River 1 irawan Creek ise [5 6 8s Rher2 Lipadas River 197 | 168 308 a3 631 River 13 | Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and ae ASTER SPT Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 e-14: HEC-RAS Modeling cariedout resulted in channel dimensions of the cut-off channel and its consequential funotibnal character, viz: U ‘Width varies fom 10.0 meters at the point of diversion to 20.0 meters wide at its mouth with the Gulf of Davao. ‘The height varies from 2.61m, at the Gulf of Davao to 2.0 meters at the end of the 2.62 km. long cut-off channels (where it deviates from Lipadas River) ‘There will still be minor improvements of the channel upstream of Lipadas River from the point of diversion. Channel improvement downstreams of Lipadas River from the point of diversion will be significantly reduced considering a lessen volume of run-off (£248.20 cum ) to be conveyed, In term of improved cross-sections, Drawing Nos. CS-01 to Drawing, CS -21 (refer to Volume IIA: Supporting Reports and Data Book) along Lipadas River illustrate the improvements required considering the foregoing, “Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Controland —~—~—~S*«OLUME TG (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LLIPADAS RIVER BASIH osFigure 8.4.2-1 Proposed Lipadas River Basin Cut-off Chann slombadanes Ht tee, NOTES (1) relieve backflow of Beyabas Creek, at the confluence of Lipadas River and the overfiow on urban Toril (2) relieve the backfiow/overfiow of Linadas River over Sirawan Area + ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Contral and VOLUME TC (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 Ceisva wanry svavart anus wid u21S¥H) VI IINTONursva wanna svavart -b abeyped ‘epmuonen suiseg JaNy papas Jo Spefaly aBeueLg Ghanas wid 334S¥M) VE HNION (pe jason pons Jo Aomas Aimqse24 Due Ud 421Se $0 22NDUCD Pre)8.5 | Magnitude Cost Estimates of Altergative Improvement Structural Improvement Measures 8.5.1 Construction Items Required on Proposed Improvements. Generally the following items of work shall form part of the proposed improvements under consideration: A. Construction Item © Excavation (cu.m) - Dredging ~ Revetment Footing + Gabion + Lean Concrete (cu.m) © Granular Fill (eum) © Weephole - Graded Gravel (cu.m) ~__ 75 mm dia x 400 rum (pes) 75 mum © x 400 mm PVC Pipe (pes) © Sub-Grade Material (cu.m) © Geo-Textile (80) ‘The acquisition of river right-of-way and the removed of existing structures including the relocations of size occupants affected (character refer to as House Relocation) shall also form part of the total project cost, 8.5.2 Estimated/Applicable Unit Cost of Constru jon Item. The following unit prices of specific construction items are deemed applicable in pursuing the construction of required improvements: Construction Item Unit ‘Unit Cost ‘Exeavatioi Revetment Footing, mi 276.00 Gabion me 276.00 Gabion mv 3508.64 Revetment Concrete im 4,733.00 RSB kg. 57.00 Formworks m 100.00 Lean Concrete im 3,893.00 Granular Fill oP 726.00 Weephole Graded Gravel m 1,150.00 75mm diaxd00mm pes. 67.69 Sub-Grade m 30.76 Geo-Textile mt 185,00 RCP 460 mm dia. each 1,750.00 Disposal mt 110.79 ROW m? 300.00 Relocation each, 200,000.00 Clearing & Grubbing mm 4.98 Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibi ‘of Food Control and TLD TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River pains Notonaets Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 5198.5.3 Estimated Quantity for each Proposed Structural Improvement Measures \ \ ' ‘Based on Preliminary/Indicative Plans prepared for each alternative structural improvement measures under consideration, the estimated quantities have been accordingly generated. Table 8.5.3-1 indicates the generated quantities for the Lipadas River Structural Improvement ‘Measures (Alternatives No. 1) Table 8.5.3-2 indicates the generated quantities for the Lipadas River Structural Improvement Measures (Alternatives No, 2) 8.5.4 Estimated Construction Cost for each Improvement Alternative © Table 8.5.4-1 (Alternative No. 1) + Table 8.5.4-2 (Altemative No.2) 8.5.5 Estimated Project Cost ‘The total project cost for each of the alternatives uncer consideration shall consist of the following: © Construction Cost © Engineering Cost - Detailed Engineering (6% of total Construction Cost) - Construction Supervision (10% of Total Construction Cost) + Contingency Cost (10% of Construction & Engineering Costs) + Taxes (12% VAT) # House Relocation Cost + Land Acquisition Co TABLE 8.54-1: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST LIPADAS RIVER STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT MEASURES (ALTERNATIVE NO. 1) Tem No, | Tem Deseription Tait juantity | Unit Cost] Total Cost 10) Excavation/Dredging cum | 249,603.01 | 276.00 68,890,428 2.0 Excavation: 21 Reveiment Footing | eam [3,700.00 776.00 1373200 22 Gabion cum | 7,480.00 276.010 2,064,480, 30 Gabion cum | 7,480.00 3,508.67 26,244,627 40 Revelment: a1 Conereté cum | 25,561.30 | 4753.00 Ti s13215 42 RSB ‘eg 987,183.15 [57.00 36,369,451 43 Formwork sq.m [477.93 100.00 47,800 3.0 Lean Concrete eum | 190.00 3,893.00 739,670 60 Granular Fil B547.00 726.00 6,205,122 70 Weep hale 7 Graded Gravel cam | 20520 1,150.00 5,750 72 Tum diaxdOGnie | pos. | 3,800.00 37.9 257,222 8.0 Sub-Grade ‘aq. | 2,736.00 30.76 $4159 5.0 Geo-Textile 10,400.00 [185.00 1,924,000 See (1% Total Cost) 2,760,501 Total Cost 276,811,603 Conduct of Master Plan and Feast OF Fload Control and VOLUN TA (HABTER PLAN STUDY, Drainage Projects of Selected River. Dosis atone Package 4 LPADAS RIVER BASIN 820jee Misva waar svavart + abeyped @piiuoneN suiseg savy 22120125 J0 S]7alOld abevierT hans ni 3611501) YI ININIOA (pure joqquoy pooty 40 dons Aynaisee.y pue Weld 42252 0 FrBUOD TON FALLYNYA.LTY) STINSVAW LNINTAOUINY TWUNLINYLS AAATY SVOVAT ALLLNVNO GaLVINILST 78 TTaVL.es 20erpag fpmwogery suseg sexy poraes jo s2efeu ebeUIe1g sva wzare svavert oonus nis saison) v1 aaron fue nuog poor 40 Apnis Aeaseey pue Ue s2Sey 40 39npUeD mows oouee ovis ota 2 f ot a a z i 1 a i a ca 5 ot 1 i 5 z a z tor a a os o 7 oe oes a 7 3 z a a z Te a apa z a a x a on a) z z i z = z z oe z CEST Tee | ee ae a FE [area | er Toor = z oar eo _| eee ae z Tear | er ae oe oa = ola ea | reese aa Fe [ora rae z WOT wae ome iee__| see | ae a Fe a ZT 7am wearer [oom wo _| Si | F ai a a marae [Fae [ooee |» | — aes Te [ee = FE [ease | aaa oer ase | ear [come | oe | weer Lear eae | rr wen owas | urns | owns | owns | arms sara |curbs | arma | cw] urna ens sues suns | wee ‘neso'pe9) SPEE Yuoweo=a| asa] sisiauop agana uss weneoa | Bupeaquonenena) waco | uem sons uinon sorau03 Mesh em ene o> oss vonereoa 3] wwe | eH : ponyee # abeyeg pmuaney sused Jerry pees Jo s2elold above rsea wants svavary hands nvr #iiStH)) V1 STOR ue jaquoy poo Jo Aomas Aynqysee.] BUC UEld -275C}y JO PNPUOD T T ere T = + is as = = ee } oon — 7 aoe — zz ere TE aa t as| te + i = cad i = " = t = = = t BEE ze Ee = ea = 7 = ee fase ara ee fi c Ez. ee t rs Bez eae Pe == +t eal TON GAILYNUBLTV) SAMASVAN LNAWIAOUANT TVUNLONALS VIAN SVAN ALLINVAD CALYWLLS TSS TIGVL,A Div ‘TABLE 8.5.4.2: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST. LIPADAS RIVER STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT MEASURES (ALTERNATIVE NO. 2) n Channel Intersection Tiem No. [Item Description | Unit Quantity Unit Cost 1.00 Revelment Lio Concrete nm 265.68 4733.00 T 357 A63 1.20 RSB Kg 7,994.76 37.00 455,701.32 2.00 Formworks mt 156.96 Too 15,696.00 3.00 Gabion mi 30.00 3,508.64 105,259.20 4.00 Conerete Weir ae 93.11 4,733.00 | 440,689.63, 3.00 RCP 460mm Dia Pes 8.00 1,750.00, 14,000.00, 6.00 ‘Apron (Conerete) oP 640,50 4,733.00 3.031 48650 7.00 ‘Sub-grade me 7.75 [30.76 3,621.99 8.00 (Geo-textile ‘ im 776.00 [ass 143.560 9.00 ‘Lean Concrete a 7.53 3,893 29,392.15 10.00 | Granular Fill a 113.40 726.00 $2,328.40 11007 | Excavation nt 1,042.18 276.00 287,641.68 Sub-Total [5,866,840.31 B. 3.8 Km Lipadas River 1.00 Excavation/Dredging a 7,070,706.00 2.00 Levee ne 1,186,560.007 3.00 Excavation (Levee) my 2,373,876.00 4.00 Trimming Sub-Total C. Diversion Cut-off Channel fe] tasty [a nt | Sets Tent | Fao 19 [escaionDeedgig Ins | 2i503| aio] eons [agate | Taam | amas |e 2.0 ENcovaton 2] Revwinent Ins [S70 7 30700 Sato 165300 | Tan900 [1300 22) Gabon ies | 1480] 279 109.80 Tiss aiama0 | 147.360 | 2.05, 0 30 [Gabon Mavesss [nd | 7480] 35086 u5,09[sraiur | _asnn,sa[ a ananie| asatkar 41 [Rett Il Cores jos [ager] ar 06785.405[ Teast | visarace | ___ asa |_nsiaais a2] sa Iss [onntes | si) satan BSSTAGI [5923008 | 50.4693 28.134 143) Formvorks 78] 0 ait saat Sud 22.786 300 5.0 flea Conor io] 3.99 Int 232.370 HR0 GaU0 79.000 60 ran Fa saat 7a sons 102i wo.565 | S338a86[ Gaus 7.0 Wheels _ 2a Graded Ged nd 20] 150 iam ipiaca ET nase Ba 72] Tinunda00nmm pss | _aa00 | 67. is7.70 72560, 7.500 20,660 Bm ius [2.36 [sno Sot 23.6 9,009 75.13 3159 2. Geosesile jw2| 0.00 | 185 197,60 13,100 2,000 | T6000] 152000 10.0 Tanning Se30200 | Si 5-301 7060 (1% of wl ean ison 30099 ama aca] ~~ aonsor ROW Coming yas Tinie "| 088 | s.i3000 Howe Rebcaion | ea batano 18,500 jroral ISEB IOIS] dH ITAA | BIAoRaRAI.TH|_WOAWONTTS | —37150.00000 ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 ‘VOLUME TA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 8-2494 92 CHAPTER 9: Non-Structural Mitigation Measures General There are various non-structural measures, as shown in Table 9.1 A. In a developing municipality, it is has been recognized that run-off retention and storage Aimetions of rivers have deteriorated and peak discharge has increased as these areas developed/urbanized. The urbanization of flood prone areas, on account of the concentration of population and property along the river corridor, have the consequence of “increased flood damage potential” Considering that the subject river basin are in the" process of just starting to develop, the implementation of Jand use regulation and/or conservation may be deemed still tenable. The existence of the aforementioned in subject municipalities shall be confirmed with the concerned ‘municipalities in the process of imperative coordinations with the concemed municipality. These shall be done during the site inspection to be done by the DPWH Project Director with the Consultant in the need of project familiarization of the present conditions of the Project Area Such familiarization shall be done, as the improvement propose, under study are already deemed essentially complete. Flood insurance which will enable an individual property owner to spread potentially large loss uniformly over a longer period of time is deemed not applicable to generally “non-responsive inhabitants”. All thing considered, the following non-structural measures are deemed recommendable, viz: © Publication of Flood Risk ‘© Introduction of Flood Proofing Measures * Enforcement of Emergency Activities. Publication of Flood Risk Map Flood risk map hes to be published and disseminated (o the inhabitants and government agencies concerned, The publication of flood risk map shall aim to achieve the flowing effects: + Inhabitants shali know the flood risk of their locality. ~ Inhabitants shail be prepared for the flood with the establishment of evacuation routes and ‘evacuation arcas, ~ Inhabitants shall have a greater understanding on the significance of flood control and their enhancing cooperation. : ~ New occupancy in flood prone areas shall be discouraged, ‘The extent and depth of potential floods in the Project Area has been simulated in Chapter 5 and Chapter 8 herein. In earlier studies undertaken for DPWH, the flood risks areas have been preliminarily assumed as there submerged to a depth of more than 50 om. It may be noted that the heights of flood in subject project as gleamed, are the flood heights indicated on the cross- sections shown in Chapter 5, i.e. Flood Heights for Floods for a 10 year and 25 Year Return Period. Such potentially flooded areas have been estimated as: Condluct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Food Control and VOLUME Th (WASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN Ht* 10 Year Flood; Left Lateral: 21.94 Hectares Right Lateral: 17.70 Hectares, ‘* 25 Years Flood: Left Lateral: 38.00 Hectares Right Lateral: 29.09 Fiectaros Total: ~~ 67.09 Hectares FIGURE 9.1-1; NON-STRUCTURAL FLOOD MITIGATION MEASURES COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD PRI NTION AND MANAGEMENT * RETARDATION OF RUNOFF - CONSERVATION OF AREAS - REGULATION OF DEVELOPMENT - AFFORESTATION * FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT LAND USE REGULATION - REGULATION OF DEVELOPMENT. - REGULATION OF RECLAMTION - FLOOD PROOFING OF BUILDINGS - FLOOD INSURANCE - DISSEMINATION OF FLOOD RISK MAP * EMERGENCY ACTIVITIES - FLOOD FORECASTING/WARNING - FLOOD FIGHTING - EVACUATION/RESCUE ‘Conctict of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (ASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN 9293 Introduction of Flood Proofing of Exis ng Houses! Buildings To reduce the flood damage to existing houses and building on the inhabited arcas along the river channel, the raising of buildings foundation or the floor elevation and the construction of a sheet pile revetment in front of low doors or windows of building/houses are under consideration 94 Enforcement of Emergency Activities ‘The emergency activities may consist of Mood warning, flood fighting and evacuation/rescue activities. The end views of resorting to these activities are to reduce potential losses and relieve the distress of flood victims. The following has been the established procedures for flood warning and evacuation. The basic concept of a step-wise flood warning and evacuation is as follows; (1) Step-1 (Standby): all focal concerns are convened for the execution of their respective assignments when PAGASA issues Public Storm Warning Signal No. | which indicates that a s tropical cyclone which a wind velocity of 30 to 60 km/hr will prevail over the study area within 36 hours, (2) Step-2 (Alert Stage): The available human resources, equipment and materials for flood warning and evacuation are checked, and the necessary river patrol started. This is resorted to when ‘+ PAGASA release Storm Signal No. 2, denoting that a tropical cyclone with wind velocity of 60 ¢o100 kan/hr, will prevail over the study area within 24 hes, + The accumulated rainfall of 5 minutes gauged in the study area, reaches the probable rainfall intensity of a 2 year return periods (3) Step-3 (Warning Stage); The flood warning is isstied to the residents to prepare for flood evacuation. This is resorted to when; ‘+ Storm Signal No. 3 indicating a tropical cyclone with wind velocity of 100 to 185 km/hr will prevail over the study area within 18 brs. The river water levels at designated monitoring locations reach the pre- determined critical levels-indicating that the river channels will be already bank-full within one hour. * The accumulated rainfall within 30 minutes gauged in the study area reaches the probable rainfall intensity of a 2 year return period. (4) Step-4 (Evacuation Stage): The order of flood evacuation is issued to the residents, This is resorted to when: Storm Signal No. 4 will prevail over the study area with 12 hours. The river levels at designated monitoring stations reach predetermined critical level. + The accumulated rainfall within 36 minutes gauged in the study area reaches the probable rainfall intensity of a 2 year return period. It is should be noted in the foregoing, that the monitoring of accumuiated rainfall is resorted (o only when a rainfall gauging station exists in the study aren. Concduct oF Master Plan and Feasibility Stady of Flood Control and VOLGNE TA (MASTER PLAN STUD) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 9395 Encroachment of Houses/Other Structures along the River Sides In accordance with Presidential Decree No. 1067, no body shall be allowed from the bank of the river to reside within the “water body” (bank to bank) of the rivers and the river corridor within 3m, in urban area, 20m. in agricultural area and 40m in forest area Along Lipadas River there are virtually no encroachments on the water body or the “no built corridor” along the river, which per information from the regional district office, DPWH is a3 ‘meter zone from the banks of the river. It may be prudent to assume a much wider of “no built zone” of between 3.00m to 20 meters (say 6 meters) considering that the corridor is apparently agricultural in character. ‘The Consultant indicates the 3.00 meters normal easement provided by the local authorities and the perceived 6.0 meter river right-of way limit along the river’s corridor. Refer to the appended improved cross-sections (Drawing No. CS/01 to CS 21), Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibiliy Study oF Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LUPADAS RIVER BASIN VOLUME TA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) 410.1 10.1.1 10.1.2 10.1.3 10.14 102 10.2.4 Chapter 10: Environmental and Social Considerations on the Alternative Flood Mitigation Plan Introduction This assessment of the environmental and social considerations on altemative flood mitigation plan for the Lipadas River Basin in Davao City is part of the Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package IV, The assessment is being done to ensure that environmental and social considerations are taken into account during project planning and implementation. Necessity of IEE Based on the project grouping matrix of DENR as shown in Annex 2-1b of the Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of 2003 or the Implementing Rules and Regulations for the Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System, flood control projects arc required to submit an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) if the flooded area is greater than 25 heclares or an Initial Environmental Examination Report (IEER) if the flooded area is less than 25 hectares. Considering that this project is still in the master planning stage, an Initial Environmental Examination is being conducted to characterize the baseline environmental conditions of the Lipadas River basin; assess the environmental impacts of the proposed flood mitigation measures and/or structures; and recommend appropriate environmental ‘management or mitigating measures to address and minimize the project’s impacts on the ‘environment. Scope of Works of IEE The scope of works of the Initial Environmental Examination of the Flood Mitigation Plan for the downstream portion of the Lipadas River includes the following: © Characterization of existing environmental conditions at the Lipadas River basin ‘* Assessment of environmental and social impacts of the flood mitigation schemes © Recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures to address project impacts Bascline Environmental Condi ns The baseline environmental conditions of the Lipadas River Basin are presented in Chapter 2 (Natural Conditions of the Study Area) of the Master Plan Studly. Chapter 2 contains a description of the physical environmental conditions (lopography, geology and geomorphology, meteorology and hydrology, river water quality, terrestrial ecology (plants and animals), and socio-economic conditions. Alternative Projects ‘Two alternative flood mitigation plans are being considered for the Lipadas River Basin. Alternative 1 refers to the full scale river width widening with modified channel bed longitudinal profile and dike construction, The improved channel conditions will vary from a channel width of 58 meters with a river bed width of 50 meters. Alternative 2 refers to partial widening and construction of a 2.62 km long diversion channel wiich will divert about 40% of the existing river runoff for a design period of 25 years (see Figure 10.1.4-1), Identification of Environmental Elements for Assessment (Scoping) Methodology Scoping of environmental elements that should be included in the Initial Environmental Examination of the Flood Mitigation Plan for the Lipadas River Basin is based on the EIA scoping checklist developed by DENR and on the Consultants assessment of environmental elements that may be affected by the proposed flood mitigation plans. Canc of Master Plan and Peasy Stay of Flood Control and’ OLE Ta STR PLAN SBT Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS BASIN LIPADAS RIVER 10-110.2.2 10.3 104 Identified Environmental Elements The following environmental elements are deemed to be essential components of the Initial Environmental Examination of the Flood Mitigation Plan for the Lipadas River Basin: Land use and classification Geology and geomorphology Hydrology and Hydrogeology ‘Terrestrial ecology ‘Meteorology and climate Socio-economic conditions These environmental elements were considered and are part of the environmental characterization of the Lipadas River Basin. In addition, results of the geotechnical ‘ssessment conducted for the Lipadas River Basin flood control master plan are. also integrated in the assessment of subsurface soil conditions of the project site Objective of Environmental Elements of Impact Assessment The environmental cloments that were identified t0 be part of the initial environmental examination will either be affected by the flood mitigation plan for the Lipadas River Basin or will play a role inthe evaluation of the feasibility of the masterplan, For example, land uses within the river basin will be identified to determine the type of land uses that are normally affected by Mooding, On the other hand, geologic conditions will be identiied to elermine the stability of foundation in areas where flood control structures will he built Terrestrial ecology will involve a study on plants and animals / wildlife that will be affected by the proposed flood control structures. A siucly on socio-economic conditions will Setermine the population mostly affected by flooding and will therefore be benefited by the flood mitigation plan. Tmpact Assessment and Possible Mitigation Measures of Proposed Projects ‘Two alternative flood mitigation plans are being considered for the Lipedas River Basin. Altemative I refers to the full seale river width widening with modified chennel bed longitudinal profile and dike construction, The improved chanel conditions will vary Gow a channel width of 58 meters with a river bed width of 50 meters. Altemative 2 refers to Partial widening and construction of a 2.62 km long diversion channel which will divert about 40% of the existing river runoff for a design period of 25 years, Table 10.4-1, presens the predicted impacts and corresponding proposed mitigating measures for the two alternatives understudy. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibilty Study oF Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide Package 4 VOLUMETA (HASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS BASIN LIPADAS RIVER 10-2£0 ” wanna svover utsva saver? -p abled ‘opmuoney suised seAry pe1725 40 Siefold aBeureld ‘pue jo.qua? pools 40 ADMAS AmsG'Se2-} PUE Uetd 487S@H JO PNPUCD (ans Nita USLSYH) VE IHNTOA crmevaor VauV G3HSUaLVM SvavdIT -uyseg aoagy sepedy atp Buope pouuryy9 4yo-mg posodo.d yp Jo WoNEDOT T-F OT HMBLLam, + abe3peq “apimuoney suseg Janly peIa2|es Jo sjefoly abeuiesT Gangenrne Wstard VEaNnOn. (pe aque pools Jo Aoms Aicpse2y Ue UPd $2)5@) JO 33DUOD jpn TSTEMNSSH MOWUIAS | SIUM IT Yor punam Aq SsvaIDSp ‘OT aOP aq PINOUS THNAHY | _Jo ANSIOAIp paonpar oy SuIpea| j eunsua pynoys jouuoyo | [pss voxe ososHuem amp ySno.p ‘uopeyofon uouredis Jo yeaouas SJOAIP Qty JO UBISEP OL ussed JoyBANySayp JO STATO, 0} nse ow Binyuepiar jaureeyy) ‘ABojooe Jeysexte, sundg ‘ware orp ut uD ©] Sinteaq soyeas urece op one syqun asamp pe ooo sjei9}ear asoda jfts auop 29 [1a ONSeIDOIKA aatsuaIxe arty pound ayp Jo twoumasiye nox erat saumids | ody pmoyy Jo odoys 100y om Te sopedr amp posodosd oxy Suoqe stjans (00 ~scomos Sundg © | sive ayy ‘sunjonns pound ‘ur sijam dap doop pur sfimnds jo souamac0 suo yoodunt Siqeqosd ‘ip Buoye mono suds tad wt foAay so4eas FOE Sip AJLOA 0} paou v st axoyE | BM MOF uoIseAIp pauuyjd ay] | —_JLAMHOA OY Poot stasoyy | _AeuLJoueyo teaLsjo BuuaprAy | ABojooFospAy pre ABO}OAH “FD ova ‘on aBrostp fiat youreyo uuowsraaip oup aroqss urod on pawaxo yp JoAL AoW ‘poronuysuos st ywanmjanas ‘uu J9A0 ape|NUEMODE ‘axrpooroxd ou yr ames eq 0} posode are squatmpas a2ay i Ajqissod pue moos sousysedx> somanoe ‘yynow sox oy ve SurSpaup Tnorsors | Aeon ourtreyo so44 oy pu TOISOI ‘SuiSposp syBax q payesorur | syenssooou A s|y TopMO sost | poe SuLMoos mow yueqrants | yuEq asnED AyjeMATOAS TL STL 9q Avi yom faan pjo | pjooyy Jo ymnom amp av smog ‘ip joojoxd 0} paronsjsuco | “Siayeaxpooy Jo MOU J0 Aito0 je SuUOSt Yad ap Jo Aylowdea | —_9q pmnoys wrowyosou ods pte justpea asvasour (iat Sunysnig poompor eq jRM oxy], | _20/pue uoNsojaxd yueqreary | —_jpueyo roatrayn jo SuwepLM | AHojoydsomo0s pue AFoj0ap ‘SUNG TPP Te pamoyyoy 9q ¥sNUm seore | sampoaoid uonrsimber MOY | -sdo.o jemaue puw sdo1o jermuared sodoig ‘payesirur 9q jouw | dn yymq pu spuoyuyy joagye | sodoag “pared ren aq rowrues ‘sooxe di 10g }0gF IEA pue jondur ponpisore st sy, | yp fourmeyo uoIsio4xp v Sunvor | _pue joudey jenpisoxe stsmyz | __youureyo saatrayT jo Suwaply | _woHvOWsseyO pue asm pueT SHS SURETY SHEMUI Malo PAVOPT STO AY SUNESHT dui iafOa PHUHUIPT duouoyy peouamoayauy TaAUTY Tasnen: saansuapy Suyesyniyy pasodorg puw siedwiy poraypasg ayp Jo LrcvwUIUINg :1-f-OT 21GEL,S01 anne svovart nisva svavart Gans nivtg S21SYH) ¥I aNINTOA + abeyDeg “pmuoney suIseg Jeny pe29R5 JO siaeloly aOPUIET Bue jagLOD pooty Jo ADNAS Ayqisee4 Pue Ueld 42152H JO J2NDUED ‘PInoo si] ‘seare puvjiam ea sueigrydue 30] TENEY Sv aAI9S Pjnoo svare podvospre] Jo uorsts01g served Jemjeu yeurBu0 Jo yeaownay, « 19s Kyjeorfojoca | seNgey Meued EN] & ‘seare axoxGUeU HH SuOIay] (Sue 3) spmqaroysypuepion. ssvaxe Aqseau ut od somiagoe woronssuos pue sjeua ‘S10 Hos 24 JEM Sexaeds srengey zapuns r2ygo 0} 3aysuen | addy preqoxo pue dn ying 2q TM ug aye ware xp, veoue o1p ut sotoads ome uerodrt Jo aotrenms00 oy paroadxe ere payoage | payee seaze yeyp ory ous yo | 01 tumyax oy payoadxa are yey axe yor sqecanre Bry 2iqeqoud yma ease om 2q ye 3emp seiceds se poptacid | asneaaq ttiaauo9 v you st jaueyp | sofoods oAouSuser uourHoD Aqwau ysnig Auseiodure; | ‘dear sonoo pure atp uo poseg stamseau Sugesqna on | _uorsianip 2 jo wononnsion ayy | yoxdory Aresodmay e sismyy, «| feat sontange uoNansHO) & FUPIA smu ome qunid more [EAT Suoye svare uodo 3 moyaaro sexu paonpos ‘0y onp juourytrequia BuOTe quejd Jo mors soxwy Sotm oofous POISATTT og TN sip ‘poroage 04 [a seare euuoyp worszoarp Temynouse pue dn ymq Apso soedy penprsax 8 st sty, ‘Ayanonpoxd ju yoage pinoo seu sorenomred pepuodsas azn 124 suey ysnp Jo wo}stsong ‘otp Buta sjeurue pure symojd oagge Ajoxne ou [E8 low Jean pro ur A‘ 22HE8 22a pjo orp ye eau eaosBuvur auf Spresioy NOT, poms ou yon “uopqunydorsyd 8 (Jo yMou8 pooweypa 0} Peay EAL SY, "WUMyOD s9}eA8 ey UT poajosstp paonpa: 03 pea} seg aut 30 Som [omar poforg poumpy sped wats, PEO Tanay uowiayg eruauNosrsnggor uanre svaveri isva svavart Gans ivi 8315¥04) VESNATOA 6 aGexDed ‘epmMuOReY SUISeR Janry p2}22Ias JO S2af044 BOeUIEIQ ue ronuan poo so oms Aivaseey pue Ue tse 0 LNPUCD amoyjog oq nur sampaooud jyrg pue spueyurmy wo yooduary sje pinoo yy 0489} pe ‘sy rpreueto9 0} eotreq sip Sinsne0 woy apise uomsinbse Aons-Jo-14Su St onsst sofeta vradorg 419 oeaeg onrouisicy ssousng pestua;) ‘qsay[e te $e poe st 7] ‘qeusnpur “ferozomtET09 SOY] oF saqad weqin yeUNsiq v Jo aor ‘9y) pautsse weoq seq YorS younsiq HOY SuzpMEqM pu paertegm Aqprdex ety jo ued are sXeSuereq ¢ or AvSuezeg yo ved ‘un ype gy] 9p sodorg Toy Avduereg ySnonp ews) epezry “tadoug [0] sub sAeBireseq parooyye oy, © ou snusoso: nq pute spureummy uo Joey poioege ‘epezry Avsuereg Uy ‘ements pu sadoxg sodong Hoy, vBrerwg in sOATy sop ed] amp Jo wowses a1 0} ajqeum seat wea} aM, © easyer Saxpnysur murtno9 apisroa14 10s pun ‘parsagge aq Aout 30 pure eureweg 03 ponreyd spue] ‘uemwng Aeduereg Ul «© ROUT Ayes st epezy] ut sosudiojua ssomtsng 205 onsinboe ‘Aeas-go-mpBts yeyp pres suremnoput Aoy ‘sorysnput ‘peseq-pooy pure ‘mu0309 uw wuewreg se yons sdozo pure “Sutmou8 sty [onuourens0 se ‘yons sentanoe ortnouooe ‘sere pIsar pure pueymazey spire] JPuweys s0str supedy 0 Buruopins amp JO g/Z « suo puos onmmawe92-0100§ odin aarysod sry eseorour ‘maisAsooe puod v o7 xe]IaN1S segey epeut-uem v ausos0q jo wore ayy ut SuyBesoy | _safoods ormos £q pozaran stp Sava BUDS Soeduy paloxr paynwapy Sasa BUTEDIAL spudaiy paload pi Pg Taanvanenny quowiayg yewusuiuostAng10.4.1 105 Impact Assessment without Project © Land Use and Classification Without the proposed aliemnative flood mitigation plans, land uses in the lower portions of the Lipadas River basin are expected to remain the same. * Geology and Geomorphology Riverbank erosion and scouri ood mitigation interventions. of the river bank is expected to continue without the proposed * Hydrology and Hydro-geology The foot slope of Mount Apo which contains extensive pyroclastic materials is expected to remain as the main water bearing formation in the area. Springs and deep wells will remain as the main ‘water sources of communities without access to the Davao City Water District © Terrestr I Eeology ‘The existing tand cover and habitats in the lower reaches of the Lipadas River basin are expected {o persist within the proposed flood mitigation plans The existing land cover and habitat characteristics in the area are already developed which is currently ocoupied by farmlands and human settlements. These areas are devoid of variable types of species while species composition {ypical in disturbed landscapes. Unless the area is allowed to regenerate a habitat similar to a closed canopy forest, species diversity will remain low. Ecologically sensitive wildlife and high diversity can only occur in areas with habitat complexity and minimal disturbance, * Meteorology and Climate Meteorological and climatological condi remain the same even without the flood s in the lower portion of the Lipadas River basin will igation plans. © Socio-economic Conditions Development of the Toril District as alternate central business district of Davao City will continue even without the proposed flood mitigation plans. The commercial and industrial areas of Toril District are currently expanding and this is expected to continue as the central business district of Davao City becomes more congested. Identification of Necessary Moni 12 tems The following matrix presents a summary of the parameters for monitoring of selected environmental elements during the construction and operation phases of the flood mitigation projects. Environmental Blement Construction Phase Operation Phase Geology and geomorphology Assess stability of riverbanks and recommendation on appropriate slope protection measures Vistal observations to determine stability of slope and bank protection and presence of scouring in frequently flooded portions of the Lipadas river basin Fiydrology and hydro-geology Key informant interview to assess changes in water level in springs and wells Key informant interview to assess changes in water level in springs and wells Terrestrial ecology Listing of species removed during channel widening or diversion, Listing of species used for partial rehabilitation of riparian habitat along the river channel Wildlife Site observations to determine presence of birds and olher Site observations to determine presence of birds and other Conduct of Master Plan and Feasiblity Study of Food Contrat and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 VOLORETA (ASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS BASIN LIPADAS RIVER 10-7Environmental Klement Construction Phase wildlife ‘wildlife Socio-economic conditions| List of private and public lands | Status of compensation given to affected by river channel owners of private land that were widening or channel diversion | affected by right of way acquisition ‘Operation Phase 10.6 Results of Stakeholder Mcetings A ions taken in the Study A rapid socio-economic characterization of Davao City and parts of the downstream area of the Lipadas River Basin was conducted on 11-15 May 2010. It aims to identify relevant social, economic, and institutional aspects that significantly impact on the ecological situation of the Lipadas River, which in turn affects the socio-economic well being of the watershed comnnunities, and which may need to be considered in the Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control ‘and Drainage Projects for the Lipadas River Basin ‘The socio-economic study was largely based on relevant secondary data on Region XT, Davao City, and downstream barangays of the Lipadas river basin namely: Crossing Bayabas, Lizada, Marapangi, Sirawan and Toril Proper. Ocular inspections gave the team a general appreciation of the Lipadas watershed in Davao City especially the downstream areas which are all located in the Toril District. Key informant interviews were also done, largely to gather information on Lipadas River-related flooding problems/issues, and what local government authorities and communities soe as necessary and effective interventions. Problems shared by key informants proscnted in Table 10,6-1 deal with flash floods coming from higher ground caused by hours of heavy rain. High water volume and strong pressure have caused barring down of riverbanks and diversion of river flow from the original pathways, Lack of sufficient drainage system and obstruction of river flow caused by building of structures and the non-observance of the 3-meter river bank easement rule were also noted Informants surmise that flash floods have much to do with deforestation and the change of vegetation in the upland areas from forest tree species to agricultural crops like coconut and fruits (especially banana, mango, and durian). Most commonly affected by the flashfloods and river overflow are low-lying areas, river bank ‘communities, and coastal areas, Quick remedial measures point towards urgently building proper drainage systems and flood control dikes in flood prone areas. Suggestions for dredging, and desilting certain portions of the river, and even ro-channeling were mentioned but informants could not provide any’ furthor details. Informants also suggested that quarrying activities (manual gathering of stones and pebbles) in any part of Lipadas River should be prohibited so as not to worsen the scouring, or erosion of the riverbanks. Table 10.6-1: Flood/Drainage Problems, Affected Puroks, Interventions in Selected Barangays eee tn Crossing | Flash flood | 1,2,3,5 Nomajor [Attemptio | Ni Bayabas | in2009 | Waistdeepin | owners; impact on | relocate think problem is not 20 houses Purok 6 Informal economic Informal urgent. of informal } Lasting 3 hours settlers activities settlers Flash floods subside Settlers but they: easily. washed out; refused Before tobe floods relocated occurred ‘every 10 years, now. every 2 years; overflow is ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (ASTER PLAN STUDY) ‘BASIN LIPADAS RIVER Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 PAPAS fon50 meters. from the river bank Crossing | A few fect | 2,5, 6 Taformal Tree planting Bayabas | of erosion settlers along river of river bank bank due to strong water flow during heavy rains, and disturbance fiom small- scale illegal quarrying by informal settlers Tizada | Recent Severely affected | House Water ‘Construct necessary floods by I week owners; logging in drainage system and happened —_| flooding were: Small-scale | low-lying flood control dikes." on June 29 | Samuel Village, | ornamental | areas such and August | Fishermen's fish growers; | as 15, 2009. | Village, School Matatabis. Several | Gutierrez, children; areas were | Malatabis, Lawis, | food-based | Loss of submerged | Lizada proper” | Firms livelihood in leg-deep | and Lizada cg. level of | Beach. ‘omamental water for 2- fish 7 days Moderately growing, because of | affected were: the Curvada, Babisa, swelling of | JV Ferriols, Dona Submerging the river. } Rosa, of ‘Tambacan, subdivisions | Before, | Punong, and and other flooding | Globaca residential was areas. experienced, every 2-3 years (ag95, 1997) Strong Lizada Proper Lossof | Inspection by | City and national ‘water flow property | barangay | governments should eroded the (houses and | authorities, | provide the funds for river banks; Tots, City to rehabilitate gabion was agricultural | engineer's | washed out barangay washed out; and). and the road, river DPWH. changed Livelihood course by was Barangay several affected. | officials hundred ‘wrote to the "This was also recommended environmen nthe Lizade Barangay Profle, 2005 ‘Condiuct of Master Plan and Feasibiliy Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 VOLOMETA (RASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS BASIN LIPADAS RIVER 10-9‘meters lasted for 3 hours. flood was from its original report the route. flooding incident and Houses to request were assistance for ‘washed out; road 1km of rehabilitation. barangay road was Estimated lost; cost to Private rebuild the lands were road from eaten up by Samuel the flood Village to waters. Lizada poroper is P28 miltion. Morapangi [June 29, | Puroks 1,2,3,9 | Banana Temporary | Drainage Building of 2009. plantations; | disturbance | project and | protection dikes Hashflood | A small area House tovillage | riprapping —_| especially in iow due to called Judar was | owners life, (Paroks 2 and | lying areas where the overflow of | also flooded 3) in 2008 | Marangi creek and a theriver; | because the and 2009 portion of the flood was | building of a worth almost | Lipadas river waist-deep | mango juice 500,000, | converge. for 9 hours. | factory partially Water blocked the river reached | channel/floodway 700 meters from the banks of the Marapangi creck, Marapangi | Roads, | Most areas in the Construction of open generally | barangay canals, at the very have no Teast drainage canals Sirawan|Lastflood [Puroks 10,11, | Barangay | Disturbance | A dike was was in 12,13, 14 residents, | to informal _| built in Purok November House settlers in | 12. 2009. owners; Paroks 10, Overflow Informal U1, 12. reached 25 settlers ‘meters from the river bank, Flash flood * Borangay Profile of Marapangi ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STUDY) LIPADAS BASIN LIPADAS RIVER 10-10Chapter 11: Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Flood Mitigation Plan (Structural) and Formulation of Optimums Plan (both Structural and Non-Structural 111 General In the Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Flood Mitigation Plans under consideration, the following evaluation criteria including their relative weights are defined as follows: 1) Boonomie Factor (50%) a) Construction Cost S 35% b) Cost of Additionat River Easement (ROW) - 15% 2) Environmental factor (35%) a) Man-made environment (ie. land use (institutional/cultural), municipal facilities power lines, roads ete) 4) Neighborhood Impacts (family displaced; parks church and school and local (transportation) 3) Engineering Factor (15%) ~ Refers to design complexity in terms of alignment geometrics (horizontal & vertical) and overall length. Each alternative plan was relatively rated on the basis of the above criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 as the more preferred rating, A most 5 system was adopted. 112 Results of the Preli inary Comparative Eyal ion ‘The results of the evaluation are presented in Table 11.2-1, a summary of which is presented hereunder. Result of Preliminary Comparative Evaluation (presented in the order of Ranking) © Alternative No. 1 © Alternative No. 2 11.3 Selection of Optimum Structural igation Plan Supplementary to the comparative elevation of alternatives under study, the following preferences shall be considered in the final examination and selection of the best optimum plan: 1)_A full-scale river improvements, ic. river channel widening cum dike constriction and modification of the channel beds” longitudinal profile shall be considered as the first preference if such proposition will not adversely impact on’ © Number of existing houses along the river area/eorridor, * Other existing environmental features, ic. forms lands, trees, road infrastructures, et. The foregoing, in essence, espouses that it is best to adopt an improvement plan with the least impact on the natural environment along subject riverine. Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibily study of Food Control and WOLUnGE TA (RASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 aniaeit 6 aOeyDe4 ‘spmuonEY SuIseg Jarry p2]28195 Jo Spalaly aBeUIeEIg sea warty svavent Goanus wig stn HENDON ‘pre nue poy jo dons Aatstoy pue Ue seh Jo zDUED id i ee opener oe 00% 21098 peniens | bunny yueq oonnsvoo 2% @ unioe's SBN soup Auo seunbs1 wy96'¢ feuonppe : uy uy og uowonarcuy jog | ovo_|_z__| wyize'z jeuueyo wosienpy0 tt ozo |» | -mnsoriaotans reuueus sens 0 udue7 + | 00's 61814 | Gy) pe | ‘spuepueys 6uyooutbug argerdeooe u pponoiduy 0q 0) ane ve yeu sivewubity aan 8 jeIuO2UOH WOR + 099 (eomen 9 rewuozvo}) sjuouUbye UL + ‘kddouo juewubye eOWEA + ene sainyenino jojo yj Jeu uozoH Je ovo | s | seeyeqowouutye sony buys | ozo | 2 srqvewubye yewoeuoy sven Buysreg + | ovo. | meinouueuy Avesseoou oy) epnaid yeys ouuey9 | ppeduy ay) ssoe sodpug Jouvoy9 uo!sionp Poot ovo | au fg na ag feus sesseooysmn _»| svo | __esianpe 0 01 omy ou weds» | ooh 20082 4 |g) 00g ‘ewojgaxd euro00q rewetuvoyAus ‘ew sjeusyew poyonoxa jo oy clung, « ‘paynbou 5} woweseo s,ouveyo sony oy 0 AyUDIA pavoyy seunjonus Buysixo Jo uonedoja sour)» ‘uy un pouyuco ave sjueworcidy yvowuoin ooo | ajeye spue} emnoube eon +| oo | > | se sulejard uoteoora! $507 | op'oz apeuvey 2 TaN Seped To [RULED OAT | suysixe oxy Buoge niOu feuCNPpe ON ey 0€°9 youueyo seo_| uoisionp exnsosmou parewiss «| oro | 2 | seve6z mow sevonpny poreupss + | oot 4 ‘UOROTI;SUOD exp und BulLepIM yipIA ‘Toporujsuoo @x[p pue aiyoud jeuipryBuo] (03) soe4 “ani feqyed pue auveyo uo}ssonp aq jouveuo payypous ‘Buuopin woueo3 40 uoparijsuod ‘uoyorujsu0o jo adoos « pve ouueyo uononuisuod jo adoog + sujuow 09 2 uoyarysueo ‘S¥24-03H :uofonsjsuco ov pue jo uoneanp pue (samnjanus yard eupnyuo] pea jaueyo s4yv0Us | 6 pug yorujsuoa 0} $s09 jeuowippe Jo | (00°81 :vogonysuca jo uopesnp pue 3809 | oro | 2 | ansmove) weredus 1900 parounes «| srt | ¢ | uezduesyse0 uonannaveo poreunsy + | oo'se | uoanatuog “2 reueu wong juossanig yo uoponssueg uojonjsuog oNg wg % | ay ym uogeUqWog UW) voHonysuED MA ‘you jeupmy6u07 peg jeuuey peypoyy Bupew | ayia ung Burwopye iia seme reed " ‘gm BulUepIM URPIaJonty 1296-17. UOLOV NOLLNTWAS "20M amjeUoyy "4 ON aanewony | ~ NISVa UaATY SvavaTI SNV1d NOLLVOLLIW d0014 TWHNLONULS AALLYNUALTY JO NOLLVNIWAR ANVNIWITIUd TCT “avChapter 11: Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Flood Mitigation Plan (Structural) and Formulation of Optimums Plan (both Structoral and Non-Structural 11 Generat In the Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Flood Mitigation Plans under consideration, the following evaluation criteria including their relative weights are defined as foliows: 1) Economic Factor (50%) a) Construction Cost - 35% b) Cost of Additional River Easement (ROW) 5 15% 2) Environmental factor (35%) 4) Man-made environment i.c. land use (institutional/cultural), municipal facilities power lines, roads ec.) 6) Neighborhood Impacts (family displaced: parks church and school and local transportation) 3) Engineering Factor (15%) ~ Refers to design complexity in terms of alignment geometrics (horizontal & vertical) and overall length, Each alternative plan was relatively rated on the basis of the above criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 as the more preferred rating. A most 5 system was adopted, 11.2 Results of the Preliminary Comparative Evaluation The results of the evaluation are presented in Table 11.2-1, a summary of which is presented hereunder. Result of Preliminary Comparative Evaluation (presented in the order of Ranking) © Alternative No. 1 © Alternative No. 2 11.3 Selection of Optimum Structura Mitigation Plan Supplementary (0 the comparative elevation of alternatives under study, the following preferences shall be considered in the final examination and selection of the best optimum plan: 1) A full-scale river improvements, ie. river channel widening cum dike construction and modification of the channel beds’ longitudinal profile shall be considered as the first preference if such proposition will not adversely impact on: © Number of existing houses along the river area/eorridor. © Other existing environmental features, ic. forms ands, trees, road infrastructures, ete. ‘The foregoing, in essence, espouses that it is best to adopt an imp with the Wwement plan ast impact on the natural environment along subject riverine. Concluct of Master Plan and Feasibilty Study of Flood Control and “VOLUME Ta [MASTER PLAN STUDY Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 UPADAS RIVER BASIN2Ir isva waary svavarT ands wig UaSYH) VI ININTOA b abeyped ‘epimuogey suiseg Jarry peIz2j2 Jo Sefaxy abeuIeLa ‘pie januag pony Jo dans Aama'se2y pure ued JepSeh JO BNPUCD b AUER uoRenyen: —_ oor ees penieng Byun yw0q | Loyonnauco exp woe ‘s6unsuny oun fuo seanbes wig feuonppe | eg 0} tans feuueye send 0 4pBue7 Uy wy og'E eulonoidiy aos ovo | z_| wyize'e yeueyovosienpiousuey «| ozo |» | -mnyorjoolang rouvous Jonay jo cue7 + | 00's _ wow | (gy) eyes SplepuerS BuseoutouS eygexdeooe penordiw 29 0} eney 210 jouueY9 Uo : soujowoe (eapien 9 equozuoH) 5) - ‘dgouo wwsuuiBye eonon + rey seanenano jo 31 yn e701 rewozuoye | oso | | sede oqojuowutye omy beng «| ozo | 2 sy uewubye ejuezuoy sen Busx3 + | o0'0L eu 2 seasen0e Aesseoeu ayy) epinaid yyeys BUUeY 94) ssane sebpg jouuey9 uojsienp wo | ¢ aunég ne oa ieus sesseoovsnun + | sro | _s esienpe 09 0) Mey ov edi) + | o0'sh lye ‘syeulejgoud 61u0eq puedes, ‘Aw sjuejow peyeacoxe o ous dung + pannb 8) | jueweses sjeuueyo sony ou) Agia peweny sasnonin Buse o vogecore! our)» ur tam peusico ere fon seo | _¢ | _vosionpeysrmoy poewiss +| cco | 2 | _seyeez mow reuowppy pereunss | ov south a Tojpmysuoe ap wana Bulepen yim ‘ojomsueo Sip pus aor feu nIGUaT (os) wees TOnis eed pue JauUeYo UO}sEND eq Jouueyo payjpolu ‘Butiepn |“ ajwous3 | uojonysuoo uojonsuce jo edoos * gpm ouueyo uorprasuco o adoas.« suwow 09 Fe uononsuos | S¥a-O3H “uohonssuo® eH pue 0 voneinp pur (seine youd yeuppmbuy peg fouueyo sijuou! | atpug jnsuvs 0 909 eu0RIppE jo oo'e1 uoponjauco jo vojeinp pue | 1809 oo z eaysnoxe) “we pedue 3809 peyeusy «| gut s Uugzdug -Is09 oHonNsuO peIeUNST _¢ | 00'se uoyongsuog & |PUUEYD Yorn UOISIONIg Jo UoHFNASUeD ogongsueg oyic wig qBIEM % jusOD Uy) UORINSUCD were % ‘2[YOrg jeulprysBuo7 pag ;euueYD pay!poyy 1w5!eM Bu umm ionesremeg | onyejoy | Buney | quis Buyopyy youM tony easing | oaneiey yolovs NouvnTvAa 2 ON anyewsayy 5 ON annewety NISV9 Y3ATY SVGWdIT SNV1d NOLLVDLLIW GOO14 TVUNLONULS AALLYNYALT 4O NOLLVN TWAS AUWNIWI1Yd Te" TT ATG114 Selected Optimum Structural Flood Mitigation Plan ‘The selected optimum structural flood mitigation plan, as a result of the foregoing is the Full-scale Channel Width Widening with Modified Channel Bed Longitudinal Profile Cum Dike Construction ‘The salient features of the optimum plan are: * Minimum number of house demolitions along the altematives studied/considered ‘+ No significant adverse natural environmental impacts + Most likely high EIRR (to be validated in the Feasibility Study Phase of the project) 11.4.1 Priority Project for Structural Mitigation Measures ‘The subject optimum flood mitigation plan both addresses its Short-Term (10 Year Design Return Period) and Long-Term (25-Year Design Return Period) projects. The priority projects aim to mitigate the overflow of Lipadas River from Sta. 04000 to Sta 5+400, 114.2 Priority Projects for Non-Structural Measures All components of “normally of adopted non-structural flood measure projects. These consist of: re priority © Clean-up of Waterway - Removal of drifting materials at critical stretches along the river channel = Information and Evaluation Campaign (IEC) ‘+ Prevention of Encroachment to Established River Easements (existing and/or proposed) + Control of Excessive Land Development © Land use Controls shall have to be monitored/pursued along the influenced of the riverine, * Development Regulation for mandatory regulation that new subdivisions proposed shall have to be supplemented with an on-site retention pond ¢ Flood Waming and Evacuation: A prototype flood hazard map shall have to be collaboratively developed by concerned local public and private entities 11.5 Implementation Plan ‘The structural and non-siructural implementation components of the optimum flood mitigation plan shall be implemented as explained hereafter. A. Structural Flood Mitigation Measures The construction of structural flood mitigation measures for the optimum plan ie: the construction for the full-scale improvements of critical stretches starches of Lipadas River from Sta, 0+000 to Sta. 54400. The implementation of the necessary constructions shall be carried out through the following sequence of activities, viz; ‘* Detailed Engineering Design of the Optimum Structural Mitigation Plans ‘Conciuct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLUMETA (WASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 CLT TD+ Construction of the Full-scale River Width Widening with Modified Channel Bed Longitudinal Profile Cum Dike Construction, ‘The overall implementation time for pursuing the above is estimated at thirty six (36) calendar months. This is illustrated in Figure 11.5-1. B. Non-Structural Flood Mitigation Measures There shall be implemented concurrent with the conduct of detailed engineering designs and in close coordination with concerned stakeholders (specifically the “Flood Mitigation Committee”, if already organized ) or concerned staffs from DPWHs District Engineering Office and the Barangays During the stakeholder meetings to be carried out by the Consultant, the need to organize the “Flood Mitigation Committee” shall be endorsed/recommended. If a flood mitigation group is already organized, this shall be reviewed in terms of organization staffing and it’s fimetions clearly deliberated upon. The JICA- recommended organizational set-up on similar project (attached herewith as Figure 11.5-3- and Figure 11.5-4, alc) is deemed ccan excellent reference guide in this respect, ‘Tentatively, the implementation schedule of setting-up a non-structural flood mitigation programme is illustrated in Figure 11.5-2 ‘Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Flood Control and VOLURETA THASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 7“mt isva waary svavert (AQns WT NBLSWN) VE BHINTON + abepeq ‘Spuiuaneyy suIsed JeAry pares Jo swaladg aGeurerT pu j2.909 pont Jo Apras AyMqpSeeS PUE UEId 42282h JO TPUOD on aseqg wont ywouoyduy UvaA saunseayy WoReBNTY poopy Teampn.ng windy axp oy ajnpayag wor euapdeuy :]-STT anyFigu implementation Schedule of Setting-Up a Non-Structural Flood Mitigation Program YEAR Program Phase 1 2 ne 5 A. Clean-Up of Waterway Prepare Program * Execute Implementation/Educational Campaign MEC B, Prevention of Encroachment to River Arca © Define On-site Riverrine Area © Formulate and Execute Management Plan C. Land Use Control | + Review Existing Land Use and pat in-place ordinances for its control ‘+ Monitor Development in accordance with the Defined Land Use a a aS ——+ | + D. Establish Flood Warnings/ | Evacuation System Committee Develop Flood Hazard Maps. Set-up Disaster Operation /Evacuation Center © Formulate Calamity/Disaster Prevention Plan | * Organize/Activate Local Disaster Coordination | ‘ — LEGEND: ——> ——» ——» Continuing Activity Conduct of Master Plan and Feasibility Stady of Flood Control and VOLUME TA (MASTER PLAN STOBY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 ae eee nage 6or NISVa 2IATY SYaVaIT b abeypeg ‘opniuonen suiseg sony panes yo Spefoid abouie%g (LONLS NY Td YLLSYH) VE IHIOTON Bue aqua poots 40 Apmis Ayiqiseed pUE UE 27h JO PLE wo9a1 WIL wos] Pardope SION, (vormdartg 244) Daigo Eunseesieg usta Hiner wines) 140 wCOTRAeG nui uIAasE (Oa) eNNUWOD vORVayTA Pool MneyD feuonezMEsIQ :¢-S°TT 84ndum isa uzATd SVOVETT + aGeypeq ‘opumuoney suiseg Jory peq29)95 Jo s}7e[o1g abeuIeIT Goanus wri istsvid ot BInGOn ‘pu remuen pony 40 Aoras Aaarse2y Due Ved sel JO npwED wontingg pookg posed uonrsinboy pUPT Jo von teuycint pus onBUpIOG) HOM POH, Boye pool aon HIN soma FOUNTDE POOH (QW) enHMWOD BoREsHYA POOL yauyD uOMIUN sf-<'TT AaNBLyFlood Mitigation Implementation Controls FMC-to be Coordinated/Guided Implementation Aspect Relevant Concerned Agencies/Organization (Government and Local DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central /Project-FCSEC Provincial Engineering Office DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central/ Project Office-FCSEC DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central /Project Office-FCSEC Provincial Engineering Office ‘Municipal Engineering Oftice Resident Associations DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central/Project Office-FCSEC Provincial Engineering Office PNP Government Service Office PPCC, CDCC/MDCC and BDCC PNP PHUDP ‘Task Force for Relocation of Informal_Settlers PPDO, CPDD, MPDO ‘A-Land Acquisition for Structural Mitigation Structures/Facilities B. Construction of Sinichural Flood Mitigation Measures C. Operation and Maintenance (O#M) of Flood Mitigation Structures. D. Management of Flood Waring and Evacuation E. Control or River Area Encroachment F. Control of Excessive Land Development s NIA G Cleaning of Waterway DENR PG-ENRO MENROS | Acronym: PPDO - Provincial Planning and Development Office DPWH - Department of Public Works and Highways PNP : Philippines National Police PHUDO - Provincial Housing and Urban Development Office cppo - City Planning and Development Office MPDO - Municipal Planning and Development Office PDCC - Provincial Disaster Coordination Council cpcc - City Disaster Coordination Council MDCC - Municipal Disaster Coordination Council BDC - Barangay Disaster Coordination Council PG-ENRO - PG- Environmental and Natural Resources Office PRO - Provincial Engineering Office NIA - National Irrigation Authority Note: Adopted from JICA recommendations on similar project "Condit oF Master Plan ad Feasibility Sud oF Pood Control and ~~ VLU Ta (ASTER PLAN S7OBT) — Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 LIPADAS RIVER BASIN ugAPPENDIX I: “EXISTING RIVER CROSS-SECTIONS AND FLOOD HEIGHTS AT 10 YEAR AND 25 YEAR FREQUENCIES”saiowanoaud GOO SOY GODT WIA! JV SINOIIH (00074 ONY NOID3S-SSO¥O UAAIY SNILSOS ees auno E sare ee COO AE woes (e001 AO} :0N3037 ved meme ween weed ee eel ed Oe dE 3 1.a007! 6¢ ONY GOO7E EVA} LY SLHDISH (GOO74 GN NOLLDAS-SSOUD HSNY ONILSIXG ‘SHHONANDIY eee aunsls 200% BASE, coo wAo an3937coe eee ee oe oes eh oo on on 7 LasaoNano3¥s GOO Sz GNY GOOTS HVAA OF AV SLHOIIH (GOO NY NOLDaS-SSOHO Hany ONUSIXS fe) E a SS coow tase _ ° vane coo thos aa ‘onz0%1 .| Goo" Guy NoLLO3s-Ss0u0 Yan ONLSIXa ezsaunDTors14 WV2A 0} LY SLHDISH, “99089 HSN DNILSIXS ———— ‘aooTs AS2 aaa ‘00014 BAOr ON3031STE a ono Ee ee ‘gooTs UAC on307Go014 $2 aNY GOO14 BVZA.} 1 SIHDIIH GOO GNY NOLLDaS-S80H9 HALE DNS ores sunot mers Eat | | | SONSOST vod a secadaadas ——— Sasaionanoea coo sw aon urat1Y Suva coow ens Nowose aso UN OMAGH sacs ee 90072 HAST . — avons at ; nso : ie eesalonanoats GOO sz GNY GOO HV3A 0} 4 SLHDIIH (00073 ONY NOLLORS-SSOHD HEALS ONILSIKA ‘eres aunts en 00S USE ‘an3o37s3IONzNOSUS OOTY $2 GNY GOs HV3A 01 L¥ SUHDISH 20074 ORY NOILOaS-SSOWO HANI ONILSIXA sreesunols wre a 000 A PON3031‘saIONaNO3L (001 $2 ONY GOO HWA 01 LV SLI (900713 OY NOUO3S-SSOUO WIA OI es 25nd fer eee(G007 GN¥ NOLLD36-SSOHO SAI DNILSDS shes aun0ldecocrerce cr ccc ss i —pe pe ope =Lecaer ere] Sa] * ano Be *SaIONaNDU 00% s anv 0% {90072 ONY NOLO kee ae BOOTS BASE . ee 001d HAO ” t pe grPasay. ee ee essa © pinay ee isa Se ee ee‘s3}0NaND3US G00 sz ONY GOONS Bz (d0074 GNY NOLLD3S-SSOHO Y:a 0001S BASE‘saIONaNOSH 200142 ANY OOOH Uv3K O} LY SLHOISH {0007 GN NOLLO3E-SSOH YENI DILLSHA sees aun —— coo ASE wee coos #A0! * onan “ exes emule me ee OL CL OLE EE ee 1sy siHoaH USD em OOOH BASE * sooo 00% uA0! * raNz081 op ed ed we oe DUD TTS 2 esCe ee eessionanoata aooisse anv 00's uvak Ob LY Sun qooru atv Ho!1936-S600 H3NI4 DNIISHKS cevesino E E sana E = i E == a coo — coo Hho a gon .001 sean 11 s1HDIaH 007d aH WO! wants BNLSDA im = = Ly "es oS,axzo71 aq oq Sy pg oe OR OS a a Oe‘oNs027a eee ee aesaN3031 of of of LE LE SO EL| | eee eeeoal4s2 any GOH Hv3A OF G001S GNY NOUDIS-SSOHD U2 Salonga serssunol aan OOO UAE =~ 900% BAO xan0073 $¢ ANY GOOTH BvBA Ob sa1onanoaua | a ‘oor aA sz ——— oo whos P0N2037 cereal aed atl) aed eel ceed edFlood Mitigation Implementation Controls FMC-to be Coordinated/Guided Implementation Aspect Relevant Concerned Agencies/Organization (Government and Local DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central /Project-FCSEC Provincial Engineering Office DPWH District Engincering Office DPWH Central/ Project Office-FCSEC DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central /Project Office-FCSEC Provincial Engineering Office Municipal Engineering Office Resident Associations: ‘A. Land Acquisition for Structural Mitigation Structures/Facilities. B. Construction of Structural Flood Mitigation Measures C. Operation and Maintenance (OFM) of Flood Mitigation Structures, 1D. Management of Flood Waring and Evacuation DPWH District Engineering Office DPWH Central/Project Office-FCSEC Provincial Engineering Office PNP. Government Service Office PPCC, CDCC/MDCC and BDCC PNP PHUDP. ‘Task Force for Relocation of Informal Settlers E. Control or River Area Encroachment F Control of Excessive Land Development s PPDO, CPDD, MPDO NIA G. Cleaning of Waterway DENR PG-ENRO MENROS ‘Acronym: PPDO - Provincial Planning and Development Office DPWH - Department of Public Works and Highways PNP - Philippines National Police PHUDO - Provincial Housing and Urban Development Office PDO - City Planning and Development Office MPDO - Municipal Planning and Development Office PDCC - Provincial Disaster Coordination Council epee - City Disaster Coordination Council MDCC - ‘Municipal Disaster Coordination Council BDCC - Barangay Disaster Coordination Councit PG-ENRO - PG- Environmental and Natural Resources Office PRO - Provincial Engineering Office NIA - National Irrigation Authority Note: Adopted from JICA recommendations on si ilar project Condhct of Master Plan and Feasibility Study of Food Control and VOLUME TA (WASTER PLAN STUDY) Drainage Projects of Selected River Basins Nationwide, Package 4 a eer aaa