Group Work and Website Evaluation Rubric

CATEGORY

Group Cooperation Worked together with

rest of group based on
their own abilities and
knowledge to make the
group work come
together.

They worked together

most of the time. They
were willing to help
others when needed.

They worked together

some of the time,
helping only a few
times.

They copied other

members work and
did not contribute
any other their own
thoughts. They did
not help others at
all.

Distribution of
Group Tasks

Were excellent at their Did their jobs to a

jobs. Went above and satisfactory rating.
beyond what was
necessary for them.

Followed part of their

job, but did really
keep on what their
job was.

Did not complete

any of the work.
Did not follow job
description at all.

Presentation

The site is attractive

and user friendly.
Navigation is made
simple with single step
links and hyperlinks.

The site's design and

layout takes away
from the navigation.
With 3-4 multiple
step links and
hyperlinks.

The sites design is

difficult to navigate
and leaves the user
frustrated with
more than 4
multiple step links
and hyperlinks.

Purpose

The site has a stated

The site has a stated
purpose/theme that is purpose/theme but 1-2
carried out throughout aspects do not follow.
the site.

The site has a stated The site does not

purpose/theme but 3- have a stated
4 aspects do not
purpose/theme.
follow.

Information

All information is
accurate and up-todate. Reference and
citation are included.
No or few grammatical
mistakes in spelling
and grammar.

All information is
accurate. Reference
and citation are
somewhat included.
Some grammatical
mistakes in spelling
and grammar.

Most of the
information is
accurate. Reference
or citation is missing.
Many grammatical
mistakes in spelling
and grammar.

Information is
inaccurate.
Reference and
citation are
missing. Too many
grammatical
mistakes, difficult
to understand.

Technical Aspects

All links and

hyperlinks are active.

Most links and

hyperlinks are active,
1-2 are broken

2-3 links or
hyperlinks are
broken.

4 or more links or
hyperlinks are
broken.

The site is attractive

and user friendly.
Navigation is alright
with 1-2 multiple step
links and hyperlinks.

Task Completeness Completed below 25% Completed below 50% Completed below
75%

Completed 76% to
100%

Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric

Category
Organization
(15 points)

Content
(45 points)

Presentation
(40 points)

Score

Scoring Criteria

Total
Points

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and

audience.

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and

establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for

the target audience.

Presentation contains accurate information.

10

Material included is relevant to the overall message/purpose.

10

Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made

reflect well their relative importance.

10

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is

appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice.

Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not

distracting.

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

Information was well communicated.

10

Total Points

100

Score