A letter from State Rep. Christine Sinicki to Milwaukee County DA John Chisholm requesting that DA Chisholm investigate possible fraud committed by an energy lobbying group that was lobbying on behalf of increases to the state's energy rates.
Original Title
Rep. Christine Sinicki's letter to MKE DA John Chisholm regarding utility rates
A letter from State Rep. Christine Sinicki to Milwaukee County DA John Chisholm requesting that DA Chisholm investigate possible fraud committed by an energy lobbying group that was lobbying on behalf of increases to the state's energy rates.
A letter from State Rep. Christine Sinicki to Milwaukee County DA John Chisholm requesting that DA Chisholm investigate possible fraud committed by an energy lobbying group that was lobbying on behalf of increases to the state's energy rates.
Milwaukee County 821 W. State Street, Rm. 405 Milwaukee, WI 53233 Dear District Attorney Chisholm: As a result of findings by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) and the news media that a fossil fuel lobby group from Houston calling itself the Consumers Energy Association (CEA) misrepresented Wisconsin citizens as supporting the We Energies rate case proposal, I am writing to request that you conduct an investigation of potential illegal activity. Mr. Ryan Scott of CEA submitted these names under oath in support of the We Energies proposal on October 8, 2014 at the Wilson Senior Center, 2601 W. Howard Ave, Milwaukee. They submitted an identical list of names in support of the Madison Gas & Electric (MG&E) proposal. In a news story published October 21, 2014, Capital Times reporter Mike Ivey reported that several individuals listed on the CEA document did not, in fact, support the We Energies or MG&E proposals. Other news outlets followed up and found similar results, with multiple individuals falsely listed as supporting the utility proposals. My own husband, Mike Sinicki, was falsely listed as a supporter of the We Energies proposal. He was not contacted by CEA and does not support the We Energies proposal. Further, he does not support raising fixed fees on utility bills in way that harms homeowners, seniors, and clean energy development. In an order issued October 31, 2014, the PSC Administrative Law Judge threw out the list of names from CEA containing 2,500 signatures and purporting to support the We Energies rate hike proposal. The order questioned the validity of the signatures and stated they provided inadequate and incorrect information. The PSC took no further action to protect the integrity of their deliberative process from such fraudulent actions in the future. I am deeply concerned that such fraudulent actions are a corruption of the public process and need to be thoroughly investigated so we know exactly who was involved and if there was any coordination with We Energies. As this took place under your jurisdiction, I request that your office investigate. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Best regards,
Christine Sinicki State Representative 20th Assembly District