Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
A
series
of
experiments
are
presented
which
have
provided
rigorously
quantified
and
carefully
analyzed
data
on
the
behaviour
of
small,
fluorescent,
plastic
cubes
of
varying
size
and
weight
in
an
environment
of
organic
complexity.
These
variables
have
been
studied
as
to
their
effects
on
the
psychomotor
activity
of
the
cubes,
on
the
social
behaviour
of
the
basic
units,
and
on
the
evolution,
the
affinities,
drives
and
Intelligence
of
the
cubes.
A
new
point
of
view
regarding
the
behaviour
of
richly
connected
systems
is
expressed.
The
data
suggest
that
there
are
errors
caused
by
the
dogmatic
separation
of
scientific
disciplines
and
strongly
favours
a
metagoal
of
trans-‐
cultural,
trans-‐world
unity
of
science.
INTRODUCTION
The
series
of
experiments
reported
here
represent
more
than
eight
years
of
research.
However,
none
of
the
data
have
been
published
previously.
The
work
has
been
carried
cut
with
difficulty
in
that
the
necessary
funds
were
from
personal
contributions
of
the
author
and
motivated
graduate
students.
An
initial
tentative
grant
request
in
regard
to
the
project
was
not
permitted
to
pass
beyond
the
chairman’s
desk
and
caused
such
emotional,
vindictive
and
threatening
behaviour
on
the
part
of
the
establishment
that
much
of
this
work
has
had
to
be
carried
out
secretly.
Only
the
virtues
of
the
tenure
system
permitted
the
analysts
and
presentation
of
this
data.
This
laboratory
has
been
engaged
for
many
years
in
studies
on
mouse
behaviouri,ii.
A
serious,
no-‐nonsense
consideration
of
the
concepts
on
which
our
behavioural,
theories
were
based
promoted
the
investigation
reported
here.
In
our
everyday
conversations
in
the
laboratory
we
had
a
natural
enough
tendency
to
let
the
concepts
of
our
professed
field
(behaviour)
soul
over
to
our
descriptions
of
the
behaviour
of
“inanimate”
things;
and
we
found
ourselves
deep
in
information
theory,
systems
theory,
Gestalt
theory,
etc.
when
we
tried
to
establish
the
validity
of
the
assumptions
underlying
our
initial
points
of
view
and
to
pin-‐point
the
rationale
behind
the
classical
constructs
of
animal
psychology
which
we
used
to
speak
about
the
mice
under
investigationiii.
We
came
to
view
the
organism
as
a
behavioural
system
that
mirrored
aspects
of
the
environmental
reality;
and
we
began
to
wonder
which
was
the
reflection
of
which,
e.g.,
did
the
adaptive
intelligent
animal
reflect
the
environment
or
did
the
environment
reflect
the
animal?
Feedback
apparently
was
involved
in
the
simplest
motor
act.
The
mice
acted
upon
things
as
a
result
of
things
acting
upon
them;
and
the
stimulus
was
modified
by
the
actions
of
the
mouse-‐actions
that
it
(the
stimulus)
caused.
An
on-‐going
developmental
situation
existed
for
which
there
was
neither
a
be-‐ginning
nor
an
end
but
rather,
in
most
cases,
there
was
a
dyadic
relation-‐ship
as
follows:
Environment
Mouse
A
B
A
is
an
event
(or
series
of
events)
of
a
system
external
to
the
mouse
and
affecting
it,
and
B
is
an
event
(or
series
of
events)
within
the
mouse
affecting
the
other
system
so
as
to
modify
A.
The
experiments
reported
here
were
conceived
with
only
a
slight
change
in
reference
or
point
of
view.
This
change
in
reference
seemed
reasonable
because
it
appeared
to
us
that
there
was
only
a
convention
directing
us;
and,
possibly,
new
insights
would
be
gained
if
we
ignored
our
conventional,
egocentric,
Judeo-‐
Christian
philosophy.
The
philosophy
treats
the
world
as
divided
into
animate
and
inanimate
objects
and
maintains
itself
by
rigorously
indoctrinating
us
from
infancy
that
this
dichotomy
has
some
validity.
The
validity
is
enforced
by
suitable
separation
of
terminologies,
concepts,
and
hypotheses
in
use
in
separate
disciplines
studying
one
or
the
other
category.
We
jokingly
referred
to
our
studies
as
the
founding
of
a
new
science
-‐
“cubology,”
the
study
of
the
behaviour
of
cubes
in
a
complex
organic
medium.
After
we
began
our
research
and
discovered
that
this
was
indeed
a
new
science,
we
began
to
worry
about
its
implication.
In
what
way
were
the
conclusions
that
we
reached
more
silly
and
irrelevant
than
those
of
scientific,
behavioural,
life
sciences
orthodoxy?
The
measurements
are
accurate
and
valid.
The
hypotheses
are
simple,
clear,
and
not
devious;
but
the
overall
implications
are
alarming
in
that
the
principles
and
the
logic
of
cubology
are
those
of
economics,
sociology,
psychology,
or
any
of
the
model-‐constructing
sciences
of
the
artificial.
MATERIALS
AND
METHODS
I
Animals
The
animals
used
in
these
experiments
were
wild-‐trapped,
male,
domestic
mice,
Mus
musculus
domesticus.
After
a
two-‐week
quarantine
period
in
the
environmental
chamber
of
the
laboratory,
the
animals
were
admitted
into
the
cube
chamber
described
below.
They
were
not
further
studied.
The
number
of
male
animals
was
maintained
at
thirty
individuals
in
the
chamber
throughout
each
experiment.
Food
and
water
were
available
ad
libitum
at
the
sides
of
the
chamber
in
small
containers.
II
Cubes
The
work
reported
here
dealt
with
the
behaviour
of
solid
polyethylene
plastic
cubes.
Control
cubes
for
this
study
were
1.5
cm.
on
a
side,
all
the
same
weight
and
solid.
During
certain
studies
either
the
dimensions
or
the
weights
of
the
cubes
were
changed.
If
the
cube
dimensions
were
the
parameter
under
consideration,
2
sizes
of
cubes
differing
from
the
1.5
cm
on
a
side
control
cubes
were
constructed.
These
were
either
1.2
or
1.8
cm
on
a
side.
The
smaller
cubes
were
weighed
with
lead
inserts
re-‐covered
with
plastic
and
were
of
the
same
weight
as
the
control
cubes.
The
larger
ones
were
partially
hollow
so
that
their
weights
also
equalled
the
control
cubes.
Thus
in
studies
on
the
effect
of
size
on
behaviour,
all
cubes
weighed
the
same.
For
those
studies
involving
the
effect
of
weight
on
behaviour,
the
control
cubes
of
1.5
cm.
dimension
were
hollowed
or
weighed
and
then
recovered
to
all
look
identical
although
they
now
weighs
2,
3
or
4
grams.
All
cubes
were
impregnated
with
fluorescence
that
was
activated
strongly
by
a
dark
light
of
385
milli-‐microns
and
emitted
fluorescent
light
at
435
milli-‐
microns.
The
latter
radiation
could
be
recorded
by
means
of
a
camera
as
described
below.
At
the
beginning
of
each
experiment
34,560
cubes
were
admitted
to
the
chamber
described
below
and
placed
equidistant
from
one
another
on
the
floor.
IV
Experimental
paradigm
The
basic
experiment
has
already
been
indicated
above.
The
chamber
was
emptied
and
cleaned.
The
34,560
cubes
were
admitted
to
the
chamber
and
placed
equidistant
from
one
another
on
the
floor.
The
mice
were
admitted
to
the
chamber
at
6.00
a.m.
and
the
filming
was
begun
at
this
time
at
the
rate
of
1
frame
every
5
minutes.
Each
experiment
lasted
thirty
days.
Experiments
were
run
using
control;
light,
heavy,
large
and
small
cubes.
Some
experiments
were
also
run
using
an
equally
distributed
population
of
the
three
differently
weighed
cubes
or
the
three
different
sized
cubes.
Mixture
of
weighted
and
sized
cubes
were
not
studied.
The
experiments
were
essentially
simple
in
concept,
although
very
tedious
to
execute.
From
the
motion
pictures
of
each
experiment,
measurements
were
taken;
and
three
basic
kinds
of
behaviour
were
studied:
activity,
ethnology
or
social
behaviour
and
psychology.
The
qualitative
difference
between
these
behaviours
and
the
effects
of
changing
the
two
parameters
of
weight
and
size
on
these
three
behaviours
are
reported
in
the
results
section
below.
RESULTS
I.
Psychomotor
Activity.
A.
Control
Cubes.
These
studies
pertained
to
the
overall
amount
of
activity
shown
by
the
control
cubes
without
consideration
of
the
quality.
The
estimates
were
derived
by
super
positioning
with
the
computer
a
fine
grid
over
each
frame
of
the
serial
sequence
of
film
and
analyzing
the
number
of
cubes
crossing
a
line
of
the
grid
within
each
five
minute
unit
of
time.
The
procedure
was
similar
to
that
used
to
record
the
psychomotor
behaviour
of
animals.
The
general
overall
activity
of
the
cubes
analyzed
in
this
way
showed
several
interesting
features.
The
activity,
for
example,
showed
diurnal
rhythm,
an
orientation
reflex
(this
is
a
period
of
heightened
activity
early
in
the
experiment
when
the
cubes
are
unfamiliar
with
the
environment
and
becoming
acquainted
with
each
other),
and
a
tendency
to
stabilize
at
a
certain
constant
activity
level.
(Thermodynamic
equilibrium?)
The
average
daily
psychomotor
activity
taken
from
ten
studies
of
control
cubes
is
shown
in
Figure
1.
There
is
a
clear
indication
that
the
cubes
become
increasingly
frenzied
until
around
the
fifth
day
at
which
time
the
overall
daily
activity
settles
down
to
what
might
be
considered
the
energy
level
of
the
total
population
of
controls.
The
activity
of
the
first
five
days
is
the
orienting
reflex.
Figure
2
shows
a
more
detailed
hour-‐by-‐hour
analysis
of
an
average
day’s
activity
from
such
studies.
Data
from
the
first
five
days’
activity
or
orientation
period
have
been
withheld
from
this
analysis.
The
cubes
show
two
distinct
peaks
of
activity
-‐
one
at
8.00
pm.
and
another
at
4.00
a.m.
Night
time
activities
average
considerably
higher
than
those
during
the
day
when
cubes
appear
to
rest.
III.
Intelligence.
The
above
data
and
that
which
follows
is
admittedly
difficult
to
quantify.
After
the
investigators
had
developed
a
familiarity
with
the
behaviours,
the
entire
sequences
of
film
were
reviewed
and
the
number
of
times
in
each
experiment
a
particular
strategy
was
observed
was
recorded.
The
observations
and
generalities
presented
in
this
pilot
study
are
based
on
these
analyses.
Intelligence
was
estimated
on
the
basis
of
the
frequency
and
degree
of
improbable
and
complex
behaviour.
As
has
been
noted,
the
activity
of
the
small
and
the
light
cubes
was
often
very
great
-‐
but
it
appeared
random,
almost
like
Brownian
movement.
However,
other
cubes
as
they
moved
about
seemed
to
gather
information,
to
attempt
strangely
unlikely
acts
for
example;
and
(this
was
most
noted
among
the
control
cubes)
the
cubes
occasionally
assumed
three-‐dimensional
configurations.
E.g.,
one
cube
mounted
another
and
rested
on
it.
Even
piles
of
three
cubes,
a
very
improbably
event,
were
observed.
Most
rarely,
but
on
several
occasions,
arches
were
observed
two
or
three
layered
levels;
that
is,
two
columns
were
bridged
over
at
the
top
with
a
cube.
During
every
experiment
the
emergence
and
temporal
duration
of
these
columns
or
improbable
three-‐
dimensional
structures
were
recorded.
Intelligence
was
estimated
on
the
basis
of
the
frequency
and
degree
of
improbable
and
complex
behaviour.
On
such
a
scale,
in
terms
of
our
evaluation,
the
variables
have
the
following
effect
on
intelligence:
Either
increasing
or
decreasing
the
weights
lessened
the
likelihood
of
intelligent
behaviour.
Increasing
or
decreasing
the
size
lessened
the
likelihood
of
intelligent
behaviour.
In
other
words
it
would
appear
that
in
the
case
of
either
size
or
weight
there
had
to
be
a
critical
amount
of
plastic
present
for
the
generation
of
mood
and
complex
behavioural
stratagems.
There
was
a
non-‐linear
complexity
involved
here.
In
spite
of
our
clear
definition
of
intelligence
in
terms
of
the
behaviour
of
the
cubes
(their
readiness
to
form
complex
associations)
the
internal
factors
responsible
for
their
behavioural
traits
in
this
matter
have
escaped
us.
Why
should
the
removal
of
a
small
plug
of
material
from
the
centre
of
the
cube
render
it
more
stupid?
Why
should
a
different
bodily
dimension
cause
either
sluggish,
unimaginative
or
hyperactive,
unstable
behaviour?
DISCUSSION
It
must
be
understood
that
this
is
a
new
field
of
exploration,
and
that
the
work
presented
here
is
a
pilot
study
which
should
be
developed
in
future
work.
There
are
exciting
implications
in
the
observation
that
in
suitable
environments,
intelligence
can
be
found
in
relatively
undifferentiated
matter
and
form,
namely
in
the
plastic
cores
of
the
cubes.
Some
comment
must
be
made
in
regard
to
the
results
presented
here.
Although
the
experiment
is
unconventional,
the
data
are
sound.
The
cubes
behave
under
these
conditions
in
the
manner
presented
here.
They
show
social
aggregation,
negentropy
increase,
diurnal
rhythm,
etc.
These
behaviours
are
made
no
less
remarkable
if
it
is
noted
that
it
would
not
be
so
to
a
different
environment.
This
is
true
of
all
behaviours.
When
we
investigate
some
aspect
of
the
universe,
the
way
we
sub-‐divide
the
system
is
arbitraryiv
and
a
matter
of
convention
and
convenience.
Things
are
identified
by
their
looseness
of
coupling
with
other
things
or
by
degrees
of
decompositionv.
Much
of
this
depends
on
mechanistic
assumptions
of
causation.
It
is
necessary
in
this
discussion
to
digress
for
just
a
moment
and
consider
an
interesting
phenomenon
of
mathematics.
This
is
necessary
because
in
science,
once
we
establish
our
categories
and
our
variables,
the
rest
is
mathematics.
Let
us
consider
the
mathematical
properties
of
the
surface
of
a
sphere.
From
measurements
made
on
the
surface
a
consistent
set
of
relationships
can
be
worked
out,
all
describing
the
surface;
these
measurements
even
indicate
a
property
called
curvature
while
telling
nothing
of
what
is
inside
and
outside
or
of
a
third
dimension.
The
measurements
or
pointer
readings
provide
a
discipline
and
knowledge
about
intrinsic
properties
of
the
sphere’s
surface,
properties
present
in
the
information
gathered
at
the
surf
ace.
In
science
we
deal
with
a
three
dimensional
world.
Measurements
of
this
physical
space
also
indicate
curvature
as
one
of
its
intrinsic
propertiesvi.
We
measure
and
draw
our
proofs
from
this
intrinsic
information
because
acme
tells
us
that
by
definition
space
is
everything
and
everywhere.
The
universe
has
no
extrinsic
properties;
we
can
know
of
none,
we
can
conceive
no
fourth
dimension.
Yet
obviously,
contrary
to
the
above
doctrine
we
all
know
of
something
extrinsic
to
the
mathematical
systems
of
physical
science.
We
know
we
are
conscious
(or
something!)
-‐
our
thoughts,
our
intelligence,
our
being
we
know.
They
are
extrinsic
to
our
present
scientific
paradigms.
The
words
to
express
conscience
and
its
qualities
are
inadequate
because
words
suggest
things
-‐
space-‐occupying
things
with
dimension
and
duration;
and
“they”
are
not
of
this
substance.
“They
are
extrinsic
to
physical
reality
and
in
that
sense
do
not
exist.
But
this
suggests
there
may
be
a
discrepancy
in
how
we
are
handling
our
thinking
about
reality.
How
is
a
dyadic
or
higher
order
feedback
relationship
to
be
studied
or
divided
in
regard
to
behaviour?
Many
of
our
sciences
may
be
blind
to
this
problem.
Do
the
men
cause
the
ghettos
or
do
the
ghettos
produce
the
men?
Does
a
family
constellation
cause
the
psychotic
or
does
the
psychotic
promote
the
family
constellation?
Did
society
evolve
the
brain
or
does
the
brain
create
society?
Who
is
the
controller
and
by
when
controlled?
Where
is
the
stimulus?
If
it
can
be
traced
back
to
the
creature
which
is
stimulated?
What
point
of
view,
what
hypothesis,
what
demon
or
ghost
has
the
greatest
validity
in
regard
to
a
systems
approach
to
behaviour?
We
may
be
leaving
out
something
in
our
worldview
and
in
our
scientific
dogmavii.
We
did
not
consider
the
mice
in
our
cubology;
they
were
extrinsic
to
the
cubes
part
of
the
environment.
In
studying
the
behaviour
of
men
and
their
affairs
and
artefacts
we
find
a
lot
that
resembles
the
cubes.
Are
we
leaving
something
out?
Is
something
important
extrinsic
to
our
data?
CONCLUSION
The
experiments
reported
here
represent
a
departure
from
more
classical
points
of
view.
It
is
ingrained
in
the
dogma
o
the
behavioural
sciences
that
in
a
feedback
relationship
(where
event
A
affects
B,
and
event
B
is
affecting
A)
the
important
behaviour
especially
if
it
is
intelligent,
self-‐organizing,
or
goal-‐directed,
is
a
property
of
the
organic
part.
The
control
or
mind
or
brain
is
presupposed
to
lie
in
the
organic
part.
There
appears
no
valid
basis
for
this
assumptionviii.
The
mouse
cube
experiment
shows
that
intelligence
of
a
sort
(mind,
and
the
like)
can
be
found
as
well
in
solid
blocks
of
plastic
in
the
proper
environment.
The
idea
at
fault
seems
to
be
that
mind
or
behaviour
or
control
are
attributed
to
parts
of
a
system.
The
conclusion
tentatively
reached
by
this
author
is
that
the
concepts
of
most
at
our
behavioural
sciences
are
rooted
in
a
culturally
determined
point
of
view
and
advancement
or
intellectual
change
with
some
reward
is
possible
only
when
these
hardened
dogmas
of
the
life
sciences
are
broken
by
other
frames
of
reference,
other
consciously-‐perceived,
accidentally
discovered
realities,
transcultural
and
metalinguistic.
It
is
perhaps
impossible
for
the
straight-‐jacketed
minds
of
pure
scientists
to
consider
the
revolutionary
import
of
this
attitude;
but
those
who,
along
with
their
being
scientists
are
also
philosophers,
or,
more
importantly,
sorcerers,
understand
the
depths
and
dangers
it
portends
to
us
and
our
societyix.
FIGURES
Activity
Index
Day
Figure
1:
Mean
daily
psychomotor
activity
of
a
control
cube
population.
The
ordinate
represents
the
percent
mean
activity
index
obtained
by
averaging
the
five
minute
activities
of
ten
populations
for
each
day
of
a
typical
control
study
and
expressing
this
as
a
percent
of
the
highest
daily
(24
hour)
activity
shown
by
any
of
the
populations
throughout
the
study.
The
abscissa
is
time
in
days.
Activity
Index
Time
of
Day
06:00
to
06:00
Figure
2:
An
average
24-‐hour
activity
record
showing
the
diurnal
effect.
The
ordinate
in
this
case
is
the
mean
percent
activity
computed
on
an
hourly
basis
for
ten
studies.
The
records
for
the
first
five
days
of
these
studies
were
not
averaged
because
of
the
orientation
reflex
(Pig.
1).
The
abscissa
represents
time
in
hours.
Chart
1
THE
EFFECT
OF
SIZE
ON
PSYCHOMOTOR
ACTIVITY
Orienting
Reflex
Small
37.0
±
0.8
Control
17.3
±
0.2
Large
4.2
±
0.7
Daily
Activity
Small
30.3
±
0.3
Control
12.7
±
0.1
Large
2.7
±
1.2
This
chart
indicates
the
mean
counts/hour
value
(±
SEM)
of
the
psychomotor
activity
during
the
first
five
days
of
the
study
(orientation
reflex)
and
the
mean
daily
activity
(±
SEM)
for
the
remainder
of
the
study.
It
can
be
seen
that
the
smaller
cubes
are
generally
more
active
and
reactive
compared
with
the
control
and
larger
cubes.
The
differences
bet
en
the
behaviours
of
the
treated
cubes
and
the
control
cube
behaviours
here
always
significant
P
<
0.05
and
in
some
cases
were
highly
significant.
Chart
2
Orienting
Reflex
Small
23.9
±
0.3
Control
16.4
±
0.6
Large
14.2
±
0.3
Daily
Activity
Small
20.3
±
0.2
Control
12.3
±
0.2
Large
9.9
±
0.8
This
chart
indicates
the
mean,
counts
per
hour
value
(±
SEM)
of
the
psychomotor
activity
during
the
first
five
days
of
the
study
(Orienting
reflex)
and
the
mean
daily
activity
(±
SEM
for
the
remainder
of
the
study.
It
can
be
seen
that
the
lighter
cubes
are
generally
more
active
and
reactive
compared
with
the
control
and
heavier
cubes,
The
difference
from
control
value
all
achieved
P<0.05.
FOOTNOTE
*This
has
been
modified
from
an
original
article
published
in
The
Worm
Runner’s
Digest
Vol.
15,
No.
1,
Dec.
1973,
122-‐126
Which
was
in
turn
also
published
in
Systems
and
Management
Annual
1975,
C.
West
Churchman
Ed.,
Petrocelli/Charter,
N.Y.
511-‐518.
Additional
Information
by
David
Walker
This
paper
was
given
to
me
by
my
mother
when
she
was
on
a
psychology
course
in
the
early
eighties,
and
has
sat
around
in
my
files
ever
since.
In
September
1998
I
had
some
time
and
so
decided
to
scan
it
in
and
check
it
out.
I
sent
the
following
e-‐mail
to
Loyola
University
Medical
Centre:
I
was
handed
a
copy
of
a
paper
entitled
'A
study
of
the
activity,
ethology
and
psychology
of
fluorescent
plastic
cubes'
by
C
L
Scudder
(1976)
at
'Institute
for
the
study
of
mind,
drugs
and
behaviour,
Loyola
University
Medical
Centre,
2160
S
First
Avenue,
Maywood,
Ill
60153.
I
was
trying
to
find
out
if
this
is
the
real
accreditation
for
this
paper,
or
if
this
is
as
much
spoof
as
the
article
itself.
to
which
I
got
the
following
reply:
I'm
unable
to
locate
a
CL
Scudder
here
at
the
medical
centre
currently,
and
we
don't
have
an
institute
by
that
name.
It
would
be
difficult
for
us
to
determine
the
authenticity
of
something
from
1976
without
more
information.
Sorry
we
couldn't
be
of
more
help.
Jacqueline
LaSota
Director
Public
Relations
and
WWW
Marketing
Department
Loyola
University
Health
System
In
2009
I
decided
to
create
a
PDF
version
of
the
document
and
also
looked
into
its
history
a
little
further.
I
found
more
references
to
the
Worm
Runner’s
Digest
including
one
at
Wikipedia
that
says
the
journal
published
both
satirical
articles
and
scientific
papers.
As
someone
involved
in
Business
Intelligence
I
have
periodically
used
this
article
as
an
example
of
how
analysis
without
assessing
all
the
information
can
lead
to
false
conclusions
In
the
scanning
process
I
have
allowed
the
spell
checker
to
change
the
words
from
US
English
to
UK
English;
I
have
also
redrawn
the
three
graphics;
otherwise
it
is
a
faithful
reproduction
of
the
document
I
was
handed.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
i
Scudder,
C.L.
and
Richardson,
D.
Study
of
avoidance
conditioning
in
five
genera
and
strains
of
mice.
Agressologia
10;
135-‐144,
1969.
iii
Scudder,
CL.
The
Mind:
An
Evolving
System
of
Models.
In
Fields
Within
Fields
Within
Fields,
Julius
Stedman,
Ed.
14:
49-‐53,
Winter,
1975.
iv
Ashby,
W.R.