Hello Waller,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, as I just had your email forwarded to me.
I agree that the scientific investigations of physical mediumship (as well as the same
endeavors in mental mediumship don!t seem to be getting us anywhere. I am more
interested in the mechanisms that enable the phenomena to occur than the verification
that they e"ist. #ven $raude is conflicted, as he is still very much open to %ai!s &%
phenomena being real (as opposed to the ectoplasm
However, I will say that most of the 'uestions regarding physical mediumship could be
addressed with the integration of infrared and(or thermal imaging technologies that emit
less light than the dim red light already being used. I don!t understand the reluctance
among those physical mediums such as %ai, who are interested in subjecting themselves
to disciplined scrutiny, to allowing such integration.
&hran ) I sat in a s*ance last year with %ai (the first and only time we have e"perienced
physical mediumship and we were both frustrated by the total darkness. +here was much
physical phenomena taking place during the session, but we walked away unable to form
and intelligent opinion , either it was an incredible display of physical mediumship with
spirit involvement, &% phenomena from the living, or an elaborate hoa", with no way to
discern the truth. If thermal imaging technology were allowed, we could have walked
away with a firm and definitive assessment.
+here is no doubt in my mind, based upon the well,credentialed investigators of the
$S&- years ago, that physical mediums were genuine (with some producing the
phenomena in daylight. It is my great hope to develop the same confidence and
verification with the physical mediums today.
+hanks again for your correspondence.
-egards,
$ob
-obert .insberg
/ice,&resident ) 0ounder
0orever 0amily 0oundation
111 2tlantic 2ve
3ceanside, 4.5. 66781
9:6,;17,88<8
www.foreverfamilyfoundation.org