4 3 2 1 Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. Content Part 1: Cause Provides in-depth causes of this particular war/battle with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Includes essential knowledge about this particular war/battle. Subject knowledge appears to be good, but presents more of a summary than an analysis of cause.
Includes essential information about the particular war/battle, but there are 1-2 factual errors. Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. Content Part 2: Impact Provides in-depth analysis of the impact of this particular war/battle with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Includes essential knowledge about the impact of this particular war/battle. Subject knowledge appears to be good, but presents more of a summary than an analysis of impact
Includes essential information about the impact of the war/battle, but there are 1-2 factual errors. Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. Organization Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. Content is logically organized for the most part. There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. Sources Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. Very little or no source information was collected. Graphics/Media The best method/software to present the information was used. All graphics, transitions, audio, and video ADD to the audiences understanding and enjoyment. Presentation method/software is appropriate, but there are too many unnecessary transitions, graphics, etc. The abundance of graphics do not add to the audiences enjoyment or understanding. Presentation medium is acceptable and graphics, transitions, etc. are minimally used, but the visual elements feel thrown together. The graphics used distract from the audiences enjoyment or understanding. An inappropriate presentation medium was chosen and no attention was given to transitions, graphics, audio, or video components of the presentation.
! Is the battle I selected DECISIVE? ! Did I access reliable, accurate, and timely resources? ! Did I use a number of sources and cross-check facts? ! Did I attempt to determine the cause of the battle? ! Did I adequately explain the DECISIVE nature (the impact) of the battle? ! Did I choose a presentation medium (Prezi, Keynote, iMovie, etc. )that will effectively convey my research? ! Have I organized my research and presented it in a way that makes sense? ! Have I included audio-visual elements? ! Have I proofread my presentation? ! Have I cited my sources in a final slide or transition? ! Have I practiced the delivery of my presentation (including correct pronunciation of names and places)?
On a scale of 1-5 (5 being the highest), rate your performance and work in each category. ______ RESEARCH/SOURCES ________ORAL PRESENTATION ______ORGANIZATION ________CONTENT of PRESENTATION ______AUDIO-VISUAL ELEMENTS