Reading MF in the postcolonial present Sandro meezadra, Jualian Reid, and ranabir samaddar. Biopolitical claims to 'improve the living condition of the poor' function paradoxically to legitimize demolition of slum settlements.
Original Description:
Original Title
R. Mezzadra, Reid, Samaddar. the Biopolitics of Development
Reading MF in the postcolonial present Sandro meezadra, Jualian Reid, and ranabir samaddar. Biopolitical claims to 'improve the living condition of the poor' function paradoxically to legitimize demolition of slum settlements.
Reading MF in the postcolonial present Sandro meezadra, Jualian Reid, and ranabir samaddar. Biopolitical claims to 'improve the living condition of the poor' function paradoxically to legitimize demolition of slum settlements.
The Biopolitics of development. Reading MF in the postcolonial present
Sandro Meezadra, Jualian Reid, and Ranabir Samaddar
C 1. Intro: Reading F in the Postcolonial present
1. But while Fs thought has been inspirational for the interrogation of colonial biopolitics, a well as governmental rationalities concerned with development in postcolonial era, his works have too often failed to inspire studies of the forms of political subjectivity that such regimes of power incite.
2 how this degraded view of political subjectivity came about, particularly within the framework of the discourses and practices of development
2. Why and how it is that human life in postcolonial settings has been depoliticized to such dramatic effect?
2. Biopolitical claims to improve the living condition of the poor function paradoxically to legitimate the demolition of slum settlements, the very spaces of habitat that many of the Indian poor people call home, displacing them for infrastructural development projects or other urban renewal programmes that serve the neoliberal economy. An
Isin, Engin F., and Kim Rygiel. 2007. "Abject Spaces: Frontiers, Zones, Camps." in Logics of Biopower and The War Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave