You are on page 1of 26

Hewlett-Packard :

DeskJet Printer Supply Chain

郭紋伶
郭有維
朱維禮
Kaushal Kishore (KK)
www.themegallery.com

Team Members

1 2 3 4

郭紋伶 KK
www.themegallery.com

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Zero inventory

3 DeskJet supply chain

4 Distribution process

5 The inventory and service crisis

6
4 Conclusion
Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

Introduction

In 1990’s, Hewlett-Packard faced several


problems with inventory levels for the DeskJet
Printer product line. This printer was produced
in Vancouver’s facility and from there was
shipped to a distribution center. HP has three
distribution centers (DC), in North America,
Asia Pacific and Europe that at the moment
were filled of DeskJet stock.

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

Introduction
HP need to reach an optimal solution that
balance the customers’ needs and keep a
low inventory level, getting an agreement
among the DC’s.

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

ZERO inventory
The Vancouver division and its quest for
zero inventory.

Just-in-time (JIT)
Reduced inventory from 3.5 months to 0.9
months.
www.themegallery.com

The DeskJet Supply Chain

Supplier

Manufacturing sites
The DeskJet
Distribution centers
Supply Chain
Dealers

Customers

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

The DeskJet Supply Chain


There were two key stages in manufacturing process:

Printed circuit board assembly and test


(PCAT)
 ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits)
 ROM (read-only memory )

Final assembly and test (FAT)

Company Logo
The Deskjet Supply Chain

No significant buffer inventories

Two key manufacturing


process

9
The Deskjet Supply Chain

Localization

10
The Deskjet Supply Chain
 These products were then sorted into three
groups destined for the three distribution centers:
North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific

PCAT FAT Vancouver
1 week
1 day
U.S. DC
4~5 weeks

Europe Asia

11
www.themegallery.com

The DeskJet Supply Chain


 The management change
 DCs: make-to-stock mode
inventory level=forecasted sales + safety stock
level
 Manufacturing: pull mode
 3 major sources of uncertainty that could affect the
supply chain:
 Delivery of incoming materials
 Internal process
 Demand
www.themegallery.com

Distribution process
Line item fill rate (LIFR)
Calculated as the total number of customer
order line items filled on time divided by the
total number of customer line items
attempted.

Order fill rate (OFR)


Based on orders completed, where an order
contains multiple line items.
www.themegallery.com

Distribution process
Inventory level
 Safety stock (12% ~ 60%)
 Service level (98%)

Distribution cost
 Outbound freight
 salary

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

Distribution process

Step 4
Ship the order
by appropriate
Step 3 carrier.
Shrink-wrap the
Step 2
complete order
Pick the various and label it.
Step 1 products
needed to fill a
Receive customer order.
(complete)
products from
various
suppliers and
stock them.

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

The inventory and service crisis


Europe Problem
 Contained issues
• Safety stock
–Forecasting system
–Make-to-stock system
–Multiple products

• Long lead time


www.themegallery.com

The inventory and service crisis


Safety Stock
Great variations in market demand,
keeping the firm’s target service level
(98% in this case), i.e., meeting
consumers’ requests with a higher
probability.

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

The inventory and service crisis


forecasting system
 Localization

 Inaccurate forecasts

 Uncoordinated and divided in terms of


inventory policy

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

The inventory and service crisis


 Make-to-stock system
Due to all the lacks in forecasts and to
long lead times, creates high levels of
inventory in the DC’s resulting in carrying
costs.
By using push system, HP has to
calculate at great length its inventory
levels avoiding stock-out and overstock.

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

The inventory and service crisis


Multiple products
This variety in products contributes to high
levels of inventory because there’s more
products to keep in safety stock and to
forecast expected demand.

Company Logo
www.themegallery.com

Issues to be discussed
Long lead time
 Reduction in lead time, the standard deviation
of demand during lead and review time is
reduced.
 This is due to the fact that smaller lead-times
imply an absolute variation in demand,
smaller than with larger lead-times.
Issues to be discussed
Air Shipment
Asian and European distribution centers
receive orders more frequently, they won’t
need to keep higher safety stocks when
compared to sea transportation.
Issues to be discussed
New Plant
Another alternative would be to install a
new plant somewhere between Europe
and Asia. This would allow for smaller
transportation costs and lead times.

Company Logo
Issues to be discussed
ERP System
Another proposal has to do with the
implementation of an Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) system
Conclusion
Improve forecasting system

Reduce the lead time and safety stock


 Air shipment
 New Plant

ERP system

You might also like