Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.~
REPOR-:f
~
'Va
. ~
.
~(. I I'.}. 26
AP;'UEC fv1ECHAIliCSDEPARTMENT
/"IV ~IVNAl. ~ Oi..Lf{;~ \,It ENf:INEER,I'4!';' ..f Chl'jOL
ur
ftlC T ~9~ ~n.,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
: ta,ke thlS "'pport mi ty to express m;' sincere tha,nks a,nd deep sense of
grati tude to my guide Hiss Vaishal1 Patel Department of Applied tlechanics, Sardar
"alla,bhbhai Regional College of EngHreering &: Technology, Surat "nthout whose
guidance and encourageroent this seminar mould not have been fulfilled.
Ja,ln Niktlll R.
BE. IV CI"IL"
CONTENT
1.0 UITRODUCTION
2, u t-[E71-iODS
FORNIT OF CONCRETE
L.,. SUPFACEHAFiDNESSHETHOD
2.1.1 INDENTATIONMETHOD
:.1.2 REBOI~1D
METHOD
2.: IBR1..TION
OR D't1lliIIC METHOD
:.2.1 RESONANT
FREQUENCY
METHOD
2.2,2 PULSEvELOSIT:METHOt
iA SONICPULSEVELOCIT, METHOD
B \ ULTRASONICPU:"SEVELOC:""',HETHOD
2. it.: :~IELECTRJ."
liEA.SURE11Et;;'S
2.4.3 ELECTRICAL
RESISTI'IT: TES:
2.5 n'THERETHOD;;:;
2.5 1 PENETRa.TION
METHOD
2.5.2 PULLOUtMETrlOD
2.5.3 ACOUSTI~
EMISSlv~TES:
2.6 COHBINEDMETHODS
2,'" CONCLUSION
REFERENCES.
I
_S.EMINAR '99
;
1.0 INTRODUCTION
NDT methods of testing concrete can not be expected to yield absolute values
-- of strength. Therefore these methods attempt to measure some other property of
concrete from which an estimate of its strength. Its durability and its elastic
parameters is obtained.
This paper discuss various NDT methods which are most commonly used in
the testing of concrete. These methods include Surface methods, Vibration or
Dynamic methods, Radio-active or Nuclear methods, Electro-Magnetic methods and
some other methods.
The various techniques that can be used for NDT of concrete are listed below :
1. SURFACE METHODS: (I ) Hardness: (a) Indentation
(b) Rebound
(ii) Water absorption
2. VIBRATION OR DYNAMIC METHODS: (i) Resonancefrequency method
(ii) Pulsevelocity method
(a) Sonic
(b) Ultrasonic
3. RADIOACTIVE METHODS: (i) x-ray or gamma -ray transmission
(ii) gamma-ray back scatter
(HI, Neutron moderation & scattering
(iV) ActiVation analysis
I
Concrete
Impact sprong
--- ------- -- -
-
surface
.
Plunger
.
RE30UNDHAMMER
~..~
~.~
4. ELECTROMAGNETIC
METHODS: (j) Magnetic methods
(ii) For Dielectric properties
(iii) Conductivity! Resistivity
5. OTHER METHODS: (!i Penetration Test
(Ii) Pull out
(iii) Cutoff
(iv) Acoustic emission
6. COMBINEDMETHODS.
The dlstnbutlon of stress and strain around the actuai indentation-the contact
zone-have been analysed in detail indicating that a definite thickness below the
surface is affected, about 2 times the size of the indentation.
A calibration curve can be established for a material like concrete relating the
siZe of indentation and the strength of concrete.
T'" . . .
lie Inden.er use.d are (Ii
t " \1\1"1"." t
~
This test is most suitable for concrete in the 20-60 N/mm2 strength range. as
1881 part 202 recommends 12 readings taken over an area not exceeding 300 mm2,
with the impact points not less than 20mm from each other or from an edge.
A calibration curve can be established relating the
Rebound No. & compressive strength.
Rebound No. & flexural strength.
Rebound No. & modulus of elasticity.
Rebound No. & wall thickness.
I
.
TRIGGEr.
I
DISPLAYU~lI
I
,
PL1..SEGENERATOR LI DELAY
I
I I
TIME MEASL'RING I
, CIRCUIT I
AA'ItLIfIER
TRANSMITTER
i
,/-
.
l" "oF
i '
j"
i , RECEIVER
',;,1 i ./1,/,, I
I~' ./0' /' .'~
,/./ I .'.' I
./ / ...i/ / iI
1//...///1 ,
F="IG.NO.1.
..0" .. ..
0
.. 0-
..
. ...
.. . .. 0 .. . 0
0 III· .. a.
. .
.. 0 ..
.. .. ..
· 0..
.
FIG. NO.2
I
iii ~
Recommendation for the use of this method are given in as 1881:part 203.
The wave velocity depends upon the elastic properties and mass of the medium and
~eatlce IT t"'e f'Y'ass 8"'d "elo,-,ty of wave propagationare known it is possible to
assess the elastIc properties. I=orthis method generally "Portable Ultrasinic Non -
Dest:-uctlVeDiqitallndicatlng Tester" (PUNDIT) instrument used.
10
4.3 4.4 <1.5 4.6 4.7 48 4.9
60
"
"- 50
z
-'"
VI
:J
-g 40
.
VI
"
Q .-
30
co
>-
0
20
36 38 4.0 42 4.4 4G 4.8 50
APPLICATION ! SIGN~FICANCE).
I
POWER. SOURCE
Fit;. NO.3
I
~S.E_M.. .I.N_.A..R._' 9_9~
SIGNIFICANCE
LIMITATIONS
The patchometer ana co\/er methods are magnetic devices and are based on
the principle that the presence of stee! affects the field of a highly permeable V-
shaped magt'et'c core or. Nhlcr wo cnils are mounted. An alternating current IS
passed through one of these coils and the current induced in the other coil is
l'Y'easureo.The inducted current ISaffected by the presence and proximity of the steel
bars, so this can be used for determiningthe size of the bars and cover of concrete.
fAS PER FIG. ...~O.3}
III heavllv I einforced sectiof1~, the effect of secondary reinforcement can not
be eleminareo eriU the.satisfac.tufy determination O'~the cover to steel is practically
impossible
I
...--.....
~~)
I - 0)
I l~~.C.SUPPL'r AA:,'!ETER
I
I
I ":)L ~r,IE";"ER
{S
--s'
I
, I t:i'''~-.""'~-"'T"'\~~ I
t I
~"",~I._J.,","~~j,.,ftJ
.~ I
~, I
"' t
Jl!/
T"\.J
b.L! .
-. ~.,
... ...,.,
~.
--- --- - ~-
--.
FIG.NOA.
J
~s- -E-M---IN_ A_R__ .'-9-g9
plates, opposite charges will accumulate, and if the separating medium is ideal these
will remain constant and no current will flow. In practice, electron drift will occur and a
'conduction' current flows, and the ratio of this current to the initial charging current is
the dissipation factor. When these measurement is carried out at frequency range of
10-100MHz, the effect 01 dissolved salts and faulty contact with electrodes are
minimised.
Electrical resstivity tests have been used for soil testing for many years and
now, has been developed for applicationto in-situ concrete. In this test four electrods
are placed In a straight line on, or just below, the concrete surface at equal spacing~
as shown in fig 4. a low frequency alternating electrical current is passed between the
two outer electrodes whilst the voltage drop between the inner electrodes is
measured.The apparent resistivity is calculated as :
R=JrISV/I
S=Electrode spacing.
V=Voltage drop.
'=Current.
The electrical resistivity method can also be used for estimating the position of
steel reinforcement.
The resistivity Of concrete is highly dependent on its moisture and salt content
and its temperature, which is the limitation of this method.
2.5. OTHERMETHODS
The technique ot firing steel nails or bolts into a concrete surface to provide
fixings is well established, and It is known that the depth of penetration is influenced
by the strength of the concrete. A strength determination method based on this
approach, uSing a specially designed bolts and standerdized explosive cartridge is
knbNnas the windsor prob test.
This method cause some localized damage but damage is sufficiently small to
cause no loss in structural performance. The results are affected by the type of
aggregate and so proper calibration with particular type of aggregate is required.
A pull out test measures the force required to pull out from the concrete a
specially shaped rod whose enlarged end has been cast into that concrete. The
stronger the concrete. the more ISthe force required to pull out. The ideal way to use
pullout test in the field would be to incorporate assemblies in the structure. These
standard specimens could then be pulled out at any point of time. The force required
denotes the strength of concrete. Another way to use pullout test in the field would be
to cast one or t vo large blocksof concrete incorporating pullout assemblies. Pullout
test could then be per''Jrmed to assess the strength of concrete. The damage to the
concrete surface must be required. The pullout tests do not measure strength in the
interior of mass concrete.
I
I. I
i 01
\.. at
I ..'
'.J '
-, , ~, r
10 ~
.
. ~
I
.......
" ,
.
"\...
PREAMPLIFIER
l
7ILTEF:
:---1
P"' OI' E\""f J~P
... ~ o.)>j.. HI ORCOI'I1PUTER
. RECORDERj PRI~!TER :
I
: _I TRANSDUCER
",
.01
. I
flC "10 5.
I
The detected acoustic emissions are then amplified, selectively filtered
processed and then channeled to either a magnetic tape recorder or tc a specially
developed digital computer for recording and analvsls. \.Nhichshows in Fig. NO.5.
These techniques have been used to study the rate of cracking and the
presence and gro\l~1hof fatigue cracks ;n metals.
apply more than one non destructi\le test method at the same time.
Some of the combined methods used in the laboratory or field are described
bp-Ioy,. .
ii \ D~rra"'lc modulus of elasticity and damping constant(determined by resonallce
tests )
(II l Ultrasonic pulse velocity and damping constant.
(Hi) IItrasulliC'pulse 'eloci~) ad pulse at~er"Jation
\
(IV \ Ultrasonicpulsevelosit)'-andreboundnumber.
Log S;;AV+BR-C.
S;; Cube compo strength t<N/cm2
V;;pulse velosity m/Sec.
R;;Rebound number.
A, BIC=Constant
I
.....
I.S-E-M--I-N--A-R-'-9-9:l\
'" ~
2.7. CONCLUSIOill
rHe conventional testing of control cubes can at best ~ ,ndicate the potential
J
quality of concrete assummg that the composition IS same as that going Into the
structure Two mOle steps"compaction and curing- can be different for cubes and the
structure. so tile USe u; NOT can give a better understanding of the quality of
;ol1cre£eHI lS finalv~sitlor
Anotner Qreat advantage IS the possibility of repeating the NDT 111case ot any
doub~. ThiS IS not possible in case of destructive testing. So there IS no scope for
rt'\ar"i'u~~ ~~:.
These met'"tod$ are basicaliy applicable to both metals as well as non me[als.
HO'vvever 1/ gere. t:.. ~"e emphasis in the case of metals is on locating the local
~e~ects \r 1isl"'ol1tir".:i;ies. :... case ::/ "'')t'\crete, on the hand, the emphasis ..:; :).1
eS(~ing tf'\e grcss prQf)ert:es c,. ;:ua'ity Of concrete This is because the concrete is
always full of featUres that: can be cailed as defects.
F"O 1"1 t;1e bas'c structure Ofthe materia! it can be expected that any change in
ore p:-opert: :":)JiC affect a" {..~e: properties as \/eillhis ,s the main reason wny
IndireCt tests are useful. In Otner -NOms, It is deslrabie to determine the quality of tt,e
entire ilolume o~ concrete III tel liS Jf the property i eqUired for end use strength I:I
gerera.. ;hlS is jJst net possible USing conventional destructIve tests With NOT it IS
possible to CO'/ert"'e er t!re lol~r"'e, with appropriate tests
\Nhen estimating say strengtn trom anyone ot tne NDT methods the question I
I
(.,iSEMINAR
'" '99~~
REFERENCES..
...
~',";~I'I:'J':.""':~ ,- ~:"""= ~ p~ :PEPTIE~"F ,..".,If'P E~E P ~JD
CO'l'=FE"~~ ~lA- ",''3 'I;: ""E"'ALS (ASTFII~
1984.
I
I"'flacl fllungor
Housing comfll.
3 nidor wilh \1uido rod
6 12
Pushbullon compl.
7 Hammor guide ber
8 ~isk 23-
9 Cap 8--
10 Two-pert ring
11 Reor cover
12 Comprossion spring . '
',,- 6
13 Powl
14 Hammer moss
15 Roiolnlng spring
16 Impect spring 7--
17 Guide Sl00'/8
18 Folt wosher
.!j
19 Plexlgloss window -3
scole prlntod on window
20 Trip scrow
21 Lock nul
22 Pin
23 Powl spring
" .
j
I