1. If they win says yes in real life do they win? Imagining hegemony failing good a.

(If no) why do we read the says no cards? Why not just explain the aff and our specific act of imagination 2. Does the aff link to Antonio? yes 3. Does the system collapse in the hypothetical world of the plan? yes 4. What is the system? heg 5. What role does seduction play in this aff? We affirm objecthood- only way possible for seduction 6. What is seduction? Read seduction 7. Only the subject desires; only the object seduces. What is the distinction between the types of desire that are good and the type of desires the object can have? Objects dont have desirethey let themselves be traversed by becoming- seduction is an affective relation that entices you a. (if your answer is the subject cares about stuff beyond its control)- how does this not link to the aff? Beyond the self is something not experienced by the self 8. What is exactly the strategy of the subject? a. Is it really just a paranoid tip-toeing through life? If so, why wouldnt we read the security/sarcaphogus vtl impact card? 9. Do you claim advantages beyond the hypothetical inactment of the plan? 10. IS hegemony in every instance bad? Not in abstract is bad- in context of res when res asks us to cannibalize other countries values 11. Your evidence says that domination involves oppression and violence. Yet it also says that hegemony is the end of domination? That seems to be factually false.