Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts
A1. lnLake 8asellne uaLa A2. lnLake 8evlew 81. lall Mld-1erm LvenL uaLa uevelopmenL 82. lall Mld-1erm LvenL uaLa 8evlew C1. lall Lnd-1erm uaLa uevelopmenL C2. lall Lnd-1erm uaLa 8evlew u1. Sprlng Mld- 1erm LvenL uaLa uevelopmenL u2. Sprlng Mld- 1erm LvenL uaLa 8evlew L1. Sprlng Lnd- 1erm uaLa uevelopmenL L2. Sprlng Lnd- 1erm uaLa 8evlew l. Annual AssessmenL 8evlew & 8eporL on llndlngs & Acuons 1aken 8ased Cn SLudenL Learnlng CuLcomes Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts SOA Degree Program (please enter degree program name): Bachelor of Music in Performance
A1. Intake Data (Audition, Portfolio Review, Other): Date(s): various audition dates in January, February, March and April Activity: listening to and evaluating music auditions Method of Documentation Used: audition rating sheets Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinators A2. Intake Review (Degree Program Faculty): Date Of Review: varying dates in late Spring Term Data Used: audition rating sheets Key Observations: musical ability Actions Taken: rate audition and determine qualification for desired major Participants: music scholarship committee Responsible Party: Director of the PSOM B1. Fall Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other): Date(s): within a week after the end of mid-term exams Activity: area faculty meetings Method of Documentation Used: verbal discussion Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinators B2. Fall Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other) Date of Review: within a week after the end of mid-term exams Data Used: notes taken during lessons; observation of student performances in general recitals Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student Actions Taken: recommendations for improvement Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinators C1. Fall End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Fall End Term Report, Surveys, External Reviews, Course Evaluations, Other) Date(s): exam week Activity: area juries Method of Documentation Used: record juries Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinator
Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts C2. Fall End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office, Other) Date of Review: exam week Data Used: student performances in juries, juried recitals, general student recitals, and large and small ensembles Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student Actions Taken: pass/fail Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinator D1. Spring Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other): Date(s): within a week after mid-term exams Activity: area faculty meetings Method of Documentation Used: verbal discussion Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinator D2. Spring Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other) Date of Review: within a week after the end of mid-term exams Data Used: notes taken during lessons; observation of student performances in general recitals Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student Actions Taken: recommendations for improvement Participants: area faculty Responsible Party: area coordinator E1. Spring End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Event #1 Report, Surveys, External Review Report, Course Evaluations, Other) Date(s): exam week Activity: area/full faculty juries Method of Documentation Used: record juries Participants: area/full faculty Responsible Party: area coordinator/ performance department chair E2. Spring End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office, Other) Date of Review: exam week Data Used: student performances in juries, juried recitals, general student recitals, and large and small ensembles Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student Actions Taken: pass/fail Participants: area/full faculty Responsible Party: area coordinator/performance department chair Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts
F. Annual Assessment Review & Report on Findings & Actions Taken (Degree Program Faculty, Dept/School Faculty, Guest Faculty, Institutional Research Office, Other) Date of Review: end of Spring Term exam week Data Used: results of juries, juried recitals, general student recitals, performances in large and small ensembles, etc. Key Observations: musical and technical progress of students Actions Taken: Curriculum: TBA Staffing: TBA Facilities: TBA Operations: TBA Procedures/Processes: TBA Participants: performance department faculty and non-departmental performance faculty Responsible Party: performance department chair