The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that the AFL-CIO did discriminate against female employees on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII. The AFL-CIO appealed, and, unfortunately, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the female employees failed to prove liability under disparate impact or disparate treatment theories.
Legal Momentum's amicus curiae brief focused on the history of the gender wage gap, and the ways in which the wage gap continues to plague female employees.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that the AFL-CIO did discriminate against female employees on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII. The AFL-CIO appealed, and, unfortunately, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the female employees failed to prove liability under disparate impact or disparate treatment theories.
Legal Momentum's amicus curiae brief focused on the history of the gender wage gap, and the ways in which the wage gap continues to plague female employees.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that the AFL-CIO did discriminate against female employees on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII. The AFL-CIO appealed, and, unfortunately, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the female employees failed to prove liability under disparate impact or disparate treatment theories.
Legal Momentum's amicus curiae brief focused on the history of the gender wage gap, and the ways in which the wage gap continues to plague female employees.