Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Efficiencies of Unit Operations

    Uploaded by

    Diana Nathalie Garzon Abella
    30 views1 page
    The document provides removal efficiencies in percentage terms for various pollutants like BOD, COD, SS, and FOG using different preliminary, primary, and biological wastewater treatment processes and units. These include manual screens, self-cleaning screens, grit chambers, fat traps, static fine screens, rotary fine screens, primary settlers, chemical clarification, DAF, activated sludge, trickling filters, UASB, PFAR, and constructed wetlands. Removal efficiencies ranging from 0 to 98 percent are listed for each treatment process and pollutant.

    Original Description:

    EFICIENCIAS OPERACIONES UNITARIAS

    Original Title

    Efficiencies of Unit Operations (1)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides removal efficiencies in percentage terms for various pollutants like BOD, COD, SS, and FOG using different preliminary, primary, and biological wastewater treatment processes and units. These include manual screens, self-cleaning screens, grit chambers, fat traps, static fine screens, rotary fine screens, primary settlers, chemical clarification, DAF, activated sludge, trickling filters, UASB, PFAR, and constructed wetlands. Removal efficiencies ranging from 0 to 98 percent are listed for each treatment process and pollutant.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    30 views1 page

    Efficiencies of Unit Operations

    Uploaded by

    Diana Nathalie Garzon Abella
    The document provides removal efficiencies in percentage terms for various pollutants like BOD, COD, SS, and FOG using different preliminary, primary, and biological wastewater treatment processes and units. These include manual screens, self-cleaning screens, grit chambers, fat traps, static fine screens, rotary fine screens, primary settlers, chemical clarification, DAF, activated sludge, trickling filters, UASB, PFAR, and constructed wetlands. Removal efficiencies ranging from 0 to 98 percent are listed for each treatment process and pollutant.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    OPERATION

    preliminary
    MANUAL SCREENS

    REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES BOD COD SS


    0 5 0 0 5 10 30 30 30 35 90-98 85-90 80-85 50-80 70-85 70-80 70-80 0 5 0 0 5 10 30 30 30 35 90-98 80-85 80-85 50-80 70-85 70-80 70-80 0 10 0 5 30 50 50 70 60 60 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

    FOG
    0 5 0 30 5 10 30 30 80 90 40 20 40 30 30 20-30 20-30

    SELF-CLEANING SCREENS GRIT CHAMBER FAT TRAPS STATIC FINE SCREENS ROTARY FINE SCREENS PRIMARY SETTLER CHEMICAL CLARIFICATION DAF DISPERSED DAF DISSOLVED ACT. SLUDGE EXTENDED ACTIVATED SLUDGE CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE COMPLETE MIX TRICKLING FILTER UASB PFAR CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

    biological

    primary

    You might also like