Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volume 1, Issue 7
In an extraordinary development, an anonymous threat from the Professional Standards Department of West Yorkshire Police to pursue criminal charges or civil action against uPSD has been received by uPSD researcher, Felicity Stewart-Smith. In an unattributed email sent from the PSD Enquiries mailbox, the threat referred to unsubstantiated allegations concerning an officers or staff members private and family life. It is believed that it was sent in an effort to suppress a story concerning a PSD DCI and a PSD D/Sgt who were allegedly having an affair whilst purportedly working on the same criminal investigation.
would assist with any police enquiries and very vigorously defend its position in any contemplated civil proceedings. Ms Stewart-Smith said: We take all reasonable steps to ensure that our published material can be stood up in court and that our views and facts are professionally presented. We utterly deplore both the complete lack of balls of the officer hiding behind this anonymous email and the scarcely concealed bully boy tactics of PSD. D/Supt. Alan Lees It is in our certain Head of PSD knowledge that this bullying and uncultured approach is a regular and routine tactic when PSD do not get their own way. The simple facts are these: If WYP had a Professional Standards Department/ Anti-Corruption Unit worthy of its name - and pursued misconduct and criminal complaints appropriately - then uPSD, by its very definition, would not exist. Instead, our files get thicker by the week and the number of people coming forward with further evidence of serious impropriety continues to grow. uPSD abhor bullies, and the way to deal with these weak, ineffective, promotionchasing officers is to continue to fearlessly, but fairly, report their own misdemeanours and those of the favoured few whom they choose to protect. So our message to PSD is very clear. We will operate within the law and we have absolutely no intention of backing down.
The criminal trial that followed this ill-starred three year investigation, costing a sum well into six figures, collapsed in spectacular fashion at an abuse of process hearing. The trial judge rounded on the PSD D/Sgt concerning her evasive and untruthful evidence. That is what, we believe, PSD consider as constituting a right to private and family life. It should also be mentioned that the spouse of the PSD D/Sgt is a serving WYP officer, which amply demonstrates the care PSD had for that fellow officers family life. Supt Alan Lees was asked for his views on this type of occurrence. No comment has been received and the email sent on 17th August remains unacknowledged Felicity Stewart-Smith by him. This is, of course, in breach of the Police Pledge and Standards of UPSD Professional Behaviour that applies to all police officers. uPSD has viewed key documents in this criminal case, the most crucial being the responsibility of the PSD DCI as Senior Investigating Officer. On any impartial view, the whole investigation was a shambles: A conclusion underlined by the trial judges serious impropriety comments and, more specifically after a very detailed examination, also drawn by an independent CPR33 expert witness. That expert is a former Head of AntiCorruption in another police force, absolutely horrified at the goings-on in West Yorkshire having viewed documents pertaining to other similar cases. A view also shared by at least one other Head of Professional Standards in neighbouring police forces, and a former Chief Constable, to the certain knowledge of uPSD. After the anonymous threat, uPSD Felicity Stewart Smith quickly made its position clear that it uPSD Researcher
PAGE 1 OF 4
The report exposed serious failings in West Yorkshire Polices systems and how they fail the reporting centres connected to hate crime. It was a wellresearched, intelligently constructed and quite damning report. However, the reaction it provoked and the choice of spokesman informed plenty about the polices real attitude towards this type of offence. DCC John Parkinsons DCC Parkinson statement to the Yorkshire Post was not misled the Yorkshire Post only the usual trite we take this seriously and will review nonsense it also contained a factual error that was intended to deliberately mislead the public and attempt harm JWYs credibility. Parkinson claimed that JWY had gone to the press at same time as informing the Force of its findings. Conveniently, omitting to mention that JWY had written to the Chief Constable on this very topic six weeks earlier and absolutely nothing had been done about it. This latest press interaction with DCC Parkinson follows on from his unconvincing performance defending allegations of institutional racism Kash Ahmed within West just West Yorkshire Neil Wilby Yorkshire Police on Investigative journalist a recent BBC File on 4 radio programme. Coincidentally, another contributor to that same programme was former police officer Kash Ahmed who was widely acclaimed for his contribution and is, himself, a victim of racial hate crime.
At the time of writing, no results of the promised police review into hate crime reporting were in evidence.
Police Federation
daily diet served up by the Professional Standards Department/Anti-Corruption Unit: Ignore correspondence, not return call messages, slam a phone down, backdate a letter, lose a file, forge a document, obstruct an investigation of prima facie crime, assist an offender to evade prosecution, maliciously prosecute a problem officer, intimidate a witness, put out a false statement to discredit a witness, threaten to search a victims home without just cause, procure a warrant under false premise. These are just a routine list of what goes on in a rotten-to-the-core PSD operation. How can uPSD be so sure? Well the answer is simple. We now have 26 hand-picked cases from which to abstract patterns of these types of misdemeanours. Once the matrix is formed and the same infractions occur by the largely the same group of officers you know that the die is cast. PSD have asked uPSD to provide evidence to back up their claims which is akin to an invitation to dance with the devil. Our answer to that is plain and simple: In June of this year an investigative journalist, Neil Wilby, made a written offer to provide Her Majestys Inspector of Constabulary, Mr Roger Baker, and the Head of Professional Standards of a neighbouring force with the material they would need to establish widespread incompetence/ corruption within West Yorkshire Police. That offer was rebuffed by Mr Baker with embarrassing haste. without even referring to the other officer, Mr Wilby has met this highly regarded senior detective twice, professionally, and he has very considerable confidence in this officers ability and integrity. The offer to HMIC will remain on the table except that uPSD now have 26 cases under consideration and not just the 13 Mr Wilby referred to at the time. If West Yorkshire have nothing to hide they will welcome an external enquiry to clear their name. HMIC intervened in Cleveland with what is now Operation Sacristy and given uPSDs inside knowledge of that operation we can confidently state that matters are worse in West Yorkshire than they ever were in Cleveland.
Contact us
If you want to get in touch email us at unprofessionalstandards-wyp@yahoo. co.uk You may have a problem or a story about someone you know. watch out for our new Twitter and Facebook pages coming soon.
PAGE 3 OF 4
August 2012
Volume 1, Issue 7
Following the report in Issue 6 of uPSD that Mr Mark Burns-Williamson has failed to either adopt integrity in his PCC election manifesto or denounce the corruption within PSD at West Yorkshire, uPSD has been liaising with investigative journalists and a forensic accountant in other police areas to expand on this: Burns-Williamsons vice-chair on the Yorkshire and Humber Joint Police Authorities Committee, Cllr Jane Kenyon, is under intense public and press scrutiny following revelations concerning fraud offences. These offences include the forgery of a Companies House document, Jane Kenyon failing to declare NYPA Chairman that she was a controlling executive of a bankrupt company and serial misdeclarations on the register of interests. All the material that prove the allegations are open source and accessible to anyone. Kenyon has also managed to lose two Chief Constables and a Deputy CC, all stained with proven impropriety, on her watch at NYPA. This association and his failure to either denounce Kenyon or, more crucially, remove her from the vice-chair pending investigation, will stain Burns-Williamsons candidacy for Police and Crime Commissioner. There is a further local link as Kenyon is the daughter of the infamous Sir Bernard Kenyon, a former Clerk to the West Riding County Council and central figure in the John Poulson/T Dan Smith council corruption scandal some years ago. A further bizarre link is that another investigative journalist Neil Wilby (see above) was, at one time, a next door neighbour of John and Cynthia Poulson in Carleton, Pontefract. It was about Jane Kenyons larger-thanlife father that the famously pithy phrase was coined: I suppose it is just about possible to believe in The Immaculate Conception of County Clerks but I cannot see how effective discipline can be exerted over minor public officials when the Chief is allowed this type of licence. The Poulson scandal also engulfed the