In his April 7, 2016 piece in The Guardian, "The Sugar
Conspiracy" Ian Leslie argues that the politics of nutrition has
blinded us to the fact that sugar is more deserving than saturated
fat of the status of dietary arch-villain and that the politics
continue but the status of sugar and saturated fat are starting to
switch. But we need to move beyond nutritional boogeymen, not
switch one for another. Our sense of history and physiology -- key
concepts about the historical role of Ancel Keys, the rate at which
sugar is converted to fat in a process called de novo lipogenesis,
and whether insulin's stimulation of fat storage can offer a
plausible explanation of obesity -- get distorted when we try to
make a public enemy out of sugar, just as they do when we make a
public enemy out of saturated fat. It's time for a more nuanced
view.