Vietnam War: The New Legion Vol. 1

The

New Legion

VIETNAM-WAR

Volume 1

AUTHOR: Vinh-Van-Truong

Combined Area Studies, Project Delta Pilot

THE NEW LEGION

*************

Order this book online at www.trafford.com

or email orders@trafford.com

Most Trafford titles are also available at major online book retailers.

© Copyright 2010 Vinh Truong.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written prior permission of the author.

Our mission is to efficiently provide the world’s finest, most comprehensive book publishing service, enabling every author to experience success. To find out how to publish your book, your way, and have it available worldwide, visit us online at www.trafford.com

Trafford rev. 2/9/10

7-Copyright-Trafford_Logo.ai www.trafford.com

North America & international

toll-free: 1 888 232 4444 (USA & Canada)

phone: 250 383 6864 24523.png fax: 812 355 4082

Contents

ACKOWLEDGMENTS

PREFACE

PROLOGUE

Chapter-1

Studying, analyzing photos and declassified documents

You cannot pretend there’s no Evil in the world

Chapter-2

William Colby & the Secret War

The Ban Karai Pass where 1 Supersabre

F-100 had gone down

Chapter-3

Ho Chi Minh Trail or Harriman’s

Super-Highway?

Chapter-4

John Paul Vann & Battle of Ap Bac

Chapter-5

Prime minister Ngo Dinh Diem

and First Republic

ACKOWLEDGMENTS

First and foremost, I would like to thank my daughter Phuong-Truong, for persuading and giving me motivation to write this book. She has relentlessly encouraged me by saying Dad… people were curious, why President Bill Clinton slept on a sofa? His book My life should be fading away after a short period. And even the famous book The Pavillion" where a fugitive escaped from his cell-prison isn’t compared with your story…Dad you should write something! Your book would exist forever due to your unique and background that few can compare with, especially your career as spy-pilot.

She was right. I recalled when we arrived in the United States 1989; I lectured in my parish church and elementary schools where my grandsons attended. At J.G Wright Elementary in Spotsylvania, Virginia, I remember one little girl so moved by my ‘boat-people’ and my unique background story came to see me during break time and said: "I would like…in the early morning, when I wake-up…I expect you are my real grandfather!" Along with that little girl, many people have asked me retell my story. More importantly, when my future generation is old enough to read this, they will read this book of my personal accounts in the Vietnam War and know why they are here in the United States.

There are many reasons why I decided to write this book The New Legion. I felt compelled to write this book for the longest time; After spending thirteen years in the Communists’ so- called reeducation camp. I escaped from a canal in the Mekong Delta. We drifted in a rickety old boat similar to a child’s play-toy from South Vietnam for fourteen days until we reached the nearest Pacific island, Palawan, Philippine. I knew the pain that all the people who were involved suffered yet I thought that perhaps it might be best to let it become a not-so-distant memory. I have finally decided to write it at last.

This story is about loyalty, duty, honor, love: loyalty to our comrades, our American SOG recon-men of fighting in arms, our tactical wing, our country; dedication to duty; honor in the face of extreme adversity: and love for my children whose life together with their father had only just begun. It is a story about doing what I know is right in my heart, despite what others might think or say. It is about never giving up, ever, under any circumstances.

This story is, of course, based on my perspective. Therefore, some readers may remember these events slightly differently or disagree with me on some aspects. Hopefully, the discrepancies will be only minor, and if not, rest assured that no intentional deviation from the truth is intended within these pages of this book. After a long period of studying, and researching in a main library in Fredericksburg, Virginia, I have finally decided to write my story.

On a certain morning of November 2005, I swore allegiance to the truth, no matter the consequences. It is one of the most important promises made to God that I have kept.

I would like to thank to my three grandsons who voluntarily chose to become freedom fighters in the U.S Army Forces, these three individuals display patriotism, courage and sacrifice; these values are the hallmarks of our country. I want to say ‘hello your making me proud’ to them who continue to serve our nation so valiantly. The Vietnamese-American community is a young one in the United States but has made respectable contributions to the betterment of this nation. Currently over 200 servicemen and women of Vietnamese origin are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are promoting and defending America’s campaign for Freedom and Democracy.

To the enlisted Men and Women of America’s Armed Forces, They are our children. They are our nation’s greatest treasure. They are our True Heroes. They granted me the greatest honor of my life- the privilege of leading them.

Naturally working on this book has been a long, hard process. Thanks to my daughter, grandsons, the friendship, encouragement, patience, prodding, creativity, and skillful contribution and strong support for this project which was made possible.

PREFACE

With the sole purpose of clarifying my three decades of obsession on the questions, "Why did Saigon fall? Why I was imprisoned for13 years in the communist’s so called ‘reeducation-camp’. Why I became a boat people to escape from fresh waters of Mekong Delta to the salt waters of the Pacific Ocean and finally drifting to the island of Palawan, Philippine during fourteen terrible days and nights?

As a ‘boat-people’ resettled in United States for two decades, I have spent all my leisure time with assiduous studying in the main library of Fredericksburg, Virginia, I examined, discussed, analyzed and thought it over and over…meditating upon the suffering of my Project-Delta-Force MIA’ crewmembers… until I finally was able to step free on my obsession. After all, I don’t like a state of mind where things are not clearly known or understood: ‘live in a twilight world of truth and half-truth.’

In fact, the aftermath of the war in Vietnam was as grim as had been feared, more than a million Southern Vietnamese fled the country after the war end; some 400.000 were interned in camps for reeducation- many were held only briefly, but some were detained for 17 years, or more, As many as 250.000 more perished in the brutal reeducation camps. Another 1,500.000 were forcibly resettled in the New-Economic-Zones which were located in barren areas of southern Vietnam that were ravaged by hunger and extreme poverty. Of the millions who became Boat-people an unknown number, feared to be many, lost their lives at sea (account for 1975-1979 alone, according to James Bayesian, the International Red Cross estimated that 300.000 boat peoples perished in their attempts to reach safety). More than two million, driven from their homeland, formed a new Vietnamese Diaspora.

More than three decades has since passed and so many documents and audio tapes of Oval-Office conversation during Vietnam War has been declassified and released (thank to 174 declassified, released, and pictured documents on April/29/2.005, National Security Archive, included 2,100 memoranda as 28,000 pages in term " The Kissinger Transcripts: A Verbatim Record of US Diplomacy, 1969-1977) Throughout this time, many studies and research projects have been performed by military and civilian historians and scholars, and many revelations have proven contradictory to previous prejudicial and hasty conclusions regarding the fall of Saigon. With benefit of hindsight, it has become clearer that the [Skull and Bones] US goals were more ambitious than a superficial, bogus military victory. Has the US really wanted a military triumph? It could have easily achieved it…but…

Based on The Secret History of CIA published 2.005 by Joseph J Trento, and the book "The Wise Men": Six Friends and the World They made, published in 1986, by Walter Isaacson and Evan Thomas, in the same year 1986 that W.A Harriman, the King of Cold War, the Eurasia Great Game architect as well, and the author of the Second Indochina-Wars (1954-75) was died in July 26/ 1986 - the last Wise-Man and the ‘World They made’ was passed away as well as a Skull and Bones’ Founder. He was the most notorious figure in US history, by him and with him … many presidents of America get so much trouble; For instant Vietnam by the his stratagem Counter Insurgency Project that affected a president, he‘s a disaster: President Diem, JF Kennedy assassinations. President Johnson announced he would not seek reelection right after Robert Kennedy sudden fell to an assassination’s bullets in 1968 like his brother, Nixon Watergate scandal. In stalemate, President Ford said: "It was a very difficult thing to be President of the United States and watch South Vietnam fall…" The tragic death of President Ngo Dinh Diem on 2, November 1963 marked the turning point of the nature of Vietnam-War.

For long period of studying, I concluded that the chapter John Paul Vann and the battle of Ap-Bac was the most important. I do consider this keyed-up time topic that indicated so adversary in complex causing oppositions of three contradistinctive conflict-confrontations [President Diem, Kennedy, and wise-man W A Harriman] clashing of views in none-reciprocal concept among the secular tendency of political disturbance viewing that were not been so easy to compromise or mutual concession. These conflicts have been occurring since the beginning of National Security Council meeting on September/21/1960 [Eisenhower administration] until the battle of Ap Bac in January 1963. Crucially, they had to anyhow to determinate the final solution, because the critical decisive-right-key-time has to come to conclusion. This small battle became a great significant-keyed-up-time, turning point of US unofficial, illegitimate involved in Vietnamese affairs as violation of Vietnam-War.

(…be back to Pentagon, discharged Lt Colonel, John Paul Vann drew for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the map on a colored slide so that he could cast the tree lines of two hamlets Tan Thoi and of Ap-Bac on the screen in the Pentagon conference room of the American military leaders)

But in the masterminded plan of Harriman and his staffs: Vann lost the ‘tactical’ but won the ‘strategic’ objectives for the cause of Wise-Men’s world-stratagem.

For years at the beginning new life in United-States, I gave a few lectures on the U.S/ Vietnam War in the Parish-church and elementary school where my grandsons attended, but I always dreaded doing so; because talking in public about the war usually produced a sensation of nausea in me. It was 30 years before I began to understand that this nausea came from the dissonance between the interpretive grid I had acquired for the war and what I felt in my heart. My book is about how I began to write about the war and how my ideas about the war changed to become my own view-points [perceptions].

I will discuss the three-Axioms (Harriman and his strategist-staffs stance points; themselves, established "an advising-doctrine as principle proposition assumed without proof for the sake of studying its consequences) in the dominant interpretation of the U.S-Vietnam War, that were established by the ‘invisible permanent government [Company-Dynasty] right after National Security Council meeting in September, 21, 1960 and subsequently taken up by teachers at most schools and universities as the basis for explaining the war. Thereafter motivating the stroked-activists antiwar movement (of course funding by The Company Dynasty in the program ‘Academic-Freedom-Foundation’)

Below it was three ‘Axioms’ that the founder Wise Men had the initiative to introduce for studies-discussion in universities:

There was never a legitimate non-communist government in Saigon (dissolution GVN)

The US had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs (Tonkin-Gulf-Incident)

The US could not have won the war under any circumstances (US troops honorable withdraw

Eventually, it took me 16 years studying in a main library to step free of these axioms above and to see them as ‘abhorred-ideological debris’ of the antiwar movement rather than as sustainable views supported by evidence and logic. What enabled me to do this was that I finally came to terms with my own witness-views of a spy-pilot CAS (Combined-Area-Studies) and experience in the war time. It was both an intellectual change of perspective and an emotionally satisfying experience to jettison the false guilt about the war that I had been carrying around for three decades of a century.

The younger generation should know about that war! And a more selfish that I though as a fresh-Vietnamese American, I am also not among the self-loathing Americans who notice people in other countries looking to us for leadership and see nothing but neocolonialism and imperialism; I accept the premise that the United States has a legitimate, even inescapable, role to play in the world today. Even more badly, I needed to do it for my own peace of mind. Forced myself to write about the war was a liberating experience as I began to find my own writer amidst all the books that have accumulated on the war. Many of the books follow a standard narrative exemplifying the axioms that I introduced above, venality of some journalists which I find unsatisfying. Many important topics are ignored, particularly our Vietnamese aspirations, plans, and actions of our peoples who fought for the hope of democracy in our farther land.

First axiom: To accept the axiom that the governments in Saigon from 1954 to 1975 were illegitimate or not viable is the same as to say that since 1945 the only legitimate or viable Vietnamese government was the one proclaimed by Ho Chi Minh, which is simply a foundation tenet of the Communist version of national history. It is remarkable how easily this ideological exuberance of Vietnamese communists war and continues to be uncritically swallowed by academic specialists in the United States.

It is often forgotten that in 1957 the Soviet Union proposed that both of the Vietnamese government then in existence be admitted to the United Nations, not to mention that China much preferred the existence of two Vietnams. It is clear that, aside from the Vietnamese parties themselves, the participants at the Geneva conference of 1954 all preferred a two-state solution as a way to calm down the potential for global confrontation. The affirmation of a theoretically unified Vietnam in the final declaration of the conference, which was signed by none of the conferees, significantly left the question of the legitimate government of such a unified Vietnam to the vague vicissitudes of an election to be held after two years, which was a diplomatic way of painting over national enthusiasm with cold war realism. Why US [Skull and Bones] didn’t sign on Geneva conference the existence of two Vietnams? The substance of this book might it explain eventually.

Second axiom: After President Diem’ assassination, I was angry about sacrificial my youth to the incompetence of national leaders of Second Republic of South Vietnam which dominated by American authority in forming a puppet government. I prefer the cliché about the importance of defending and nurturing baby democracies in a world awash with tyranny. The liberties that American enjoyed in this country United-States did not just happen without human effort, and there is no guarantee of their continued existence. The excellent features of our political system that they tend to take for granted are the result of sacrifices made generation by generation, sacrifices often unappreciated by those who benefit from them. And this is why I cannot accept the axiom that the United States had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs. I believe that global power in the hands of the United States should be taken as a responsibility, not something about which we need to be apologetic. If the United States fails to use this power for the general good of the people in this world, then it will lose not only its power but also the good that it has accumulated; the liberties that have thrived in the shade of American power will then be endangered. I am not a self-hating American who, shrinking from responsibility, would rather indulge in guilt for mistakes made in daring to work against the global entropy of suffering and chaos. I now have no doubt but that the United States was fully justified in exerting its power to prevent the destruction of hopes for a democratic future for at least some of the Vietnamese people.

Unfortunately, American policymakers [Yale, WIB, and Skull and Bones: W.A Harriman, Prescott Bush, and his son George H W Bush] in the 1960s made some bad-betrayed-political and military decisions focus on their narrow-interest which later on, led to American people turning against the commitment made in Vietnam. In my opinion, the tragedy of Vietnam is not that the United States intervened when it should not have, but rather that the intervention was bungled with decisive-purpose initiated from selfish Company-Dynasty, means ‘American-First’ and that the Vietnamese who believed in United States were ultimately betrayed.

Third axiom is that American effort in Vietnam were inevitably doomed to fail because of a deficiency in will and unity of purpose among American and among the inhabitants of South Vietnam in comparison with North Vietnam and its allies in China and the Soviet-Union. It is true that the government opposed to a non-communist Vietnam were able to mobilize their populations without regard to dissent, while one of the fundamental long-term aims of the United States was to develop the right to dissent, a right that inevitably diminishes unity of will and purpose for national policy. Furthermore, North Vietnam benefited from the advantage of the Communist Party Organization in South Vietnam subject to its instructions; Southerners had no comparable advantage against the North. So why this triumvirate would be on the ‘Strong-Man Side’ strategy in the hint sight of on Soviet-Union side and his Hanoi’s subordinate.

Finally, from the American perspective, Vietnam was a relatively distant and unknown country, without any sense of connection aside from the logic of the global confronted Cold-war. All of these aspects were challenges to any effort to nurture a non-communist government in Saigon. However, these considerations do not amount to an argument that American policy in Vietnam was inevitably doomed. American policy in Vietnam enjoyed public support until 1968, and the military and economic resources available to the United States, by any reckoning, were certainly equal to the task of defending the South Vietnamese government, and full of confidence in America’s might and right to prevail. Even if we acknowledge that the communists were more securely under a command structure able to produce a public unity of will and action than were the Americans and their Vietnamese allies, it is hard to imagine how that would have trumped the military capabilities of the United States if intelligently deployed. One need only consider the French conquest of Vietnam in the late 17 century to see the fallacy of the argument about inevitability. What led to the defeat for the United States and South Vietnam was not a deficiency of will and determination but rather a series of bad decisions under the United States administrations (Kennedy and Johnson) but Wise-Man W.A Harriman, a complicated man, with a dark secret that haunted his ambition, made decision for U.S foreign-policies (see chapter Ho Chi Minh Trail or Harriman’s Super-highway) that prolonged [for certain protracted period of laboratory fixed by Wise-man Harriman and his strategist-staffs] the war into a stalemate that exhausted the patience of the American people. This critical event, Skull and Bones again activated the Congress to cut the war budget. This action was been repeated in Iraq-War too.

Reader, did you think in that war, United-States had a noble cause??? In my experience, most American academics do not respect me because they believe that I chose to be on the wrong side of the war. Yet my only crime was to hope for a democracy in my country and to trust in the United States. We believed in you!

For justifying my speculation of three axioms above and justifying my Vietnam War analysis, personally I must assumed focusing on axiom-2 ( the U.S had no ‘legitimate’ reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs) that Harriman and his staffs would accomplished their objective [CIP] by eliminated two obstructive-presidents. After two presidents’ assassinations [Kennedy and Diem] Harriman authorized a clearance to Skull and Bones 40, George Bundy, to a subordinate-apparatus McNamara, secretary of defense to try fabricated the so called Tonkin Gulf Incident, not for ‘war-declaration’ but for ‘retaliation’. There’s the reason U.S troop to be involved. And addition established by McNamara’s a significant of ‘Electronic Fence’, not for stopping North Vietnamese Communist infiltration, but let them go freely to south by Ho Chi Minh Trail, and hundred thousand radar-sensor devices dropped along the corridor of Ho Chi Minh Trail were just controlled follow-up the level and number of infiltrated groups. Those means and facilities helped-out in performing the Axiom-1

Meanwhile, a small battle of Ap-Bac, three Americans got killed, another eight were wounded, and five U.S helicopters H.21, and one Huey were shot-down. In reality U.S had involved in the Vietnam War on January 2, 1963. The major networks and newspapers reported the casualties. But, it was as if did not happen? So why did they fabricate the so called North Vietnamese PT Swatow-boats (Norwegian PT Nasty-boat plus crews) had attacked the U.S destroyer Maddox; U.S administration also warned Hanoi that another high-seas attack would have dire consequences, and ordered the destroyer Turner-Joy to reinforce the Maddox in 1964. And by this reason, One year later, unsurprisingly in 1965 officially US involved Vietnam War by two Marine battalions landing at Danang seashore. But surely, South Vietnamese government didn’t invite them at all! Brutality, the U.S invaded South Vietnam and deprived it of her sovereignty, independent. Under these circumstances, I fearlessly spoke out against the brutality and ineffectiveness of the US strategy. And once again I’m a man who began by declaring that one had to rely on a rifle and kill discriminately in a guerrilla war and calling in the B.52 bombers of the Strategic Air Command.

As for, patriot-President Diem’s stubborn determination: He chose to dramatize his complaint by delaying agreement on the commitment for joint CIP" Counter Insurgency Project". Because use Vietnam as a laboratory to develop techniques of counterinsurgency. In otherwise, President Diem absolutely didn’t want US troops come in to South VN at any reason. General Maxwell Taylor reported’ on October/ 18/1961.President Diem said: He wanted no U S combat-troops for any mission.

As for, President Kennedy: Even the situation in Laos was becoming a serious problem for him. Rostow and Taylor recommended a joint Lao, Thai, and SVN military operation against a key part of the Ho Chi Minh’ Trail to disrupt infiltration, US Special Forces Green-Beret would serve as advisers. Taylor and Rostow also called for a range of other actions against Hanoi, including bombing. In short, Kennedy stated: I want to have a negotiated settlement. I do not want to become militarily involved. Consequently, Kennedy and some colleagues in Democratic Party do not want send combat-troops to South Vietnam.

* -Presumably, Observers have faulted the intervention in Indochina as evidence of American arrogance of power-attempts by the United States to be the World’s Policeman. But there is another dimension to American arrogance, the international version of our domestic Great Society programs where we presumed that we knew what was best for the world in terms of social, political, and economic development and saw it as our duty to force the world into the American mold to act not so much the World’s Policeman as the World’s Baby-Sister. It is difficult today to recall the depth of our arrogance.

As for, Company-Dynasty [War-Industries-Board] was represented by then Triumvirate [beginning from Korea War 1950] of like-minded leaders in their conceived prosecution in Indochina War: William A Harriman, Prescott Bush, and Robert A Lovett, three among Six Friends in the book "The Wise Men" and the World They made (1986).

* -Company Dynasty’s platform: An immense Military Establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence- economic, political, even spiritual- is felt in every state-house. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implication…We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Finally, Company Dynasty [Skull and Bones] made a decision as the nine years rule of Diem came to a bloody end. Because, W.A Harriman reaffirmed with his reiteration: our objectives (CIP) in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Diem in control. and of course included J.F. Kennedy.

Diem’s elimination was disregarded so easy but how about Kennedy? Because President Kennedy assured to the reporters in Washington that quoted by two lady-historians Marilyn B.Young and Ellen Hammer "We would withdraw the troop, any number of troops, any time the Government of South Vietnam would suggest it". Consequently, the storm blew over: Counter-Insurgency Project in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Kennedy in position president in the thoughtful of Skull and Bones dominant:

He didn’t want send troops far away from US.

He don’t want to become military involved. He praised the agreement for allowing the United States to avoid military intervention.

He would withdraw the troops, any number of troops, anytime that the government of South-Vietnam would suggest it. Meanwhile Diem and Nhu would like withdraw all U.S troops as soon as possible

And the most important is in October/1963, Kennedy administrative cut off aid to Diem in a direct rebuff…

He didn’t want overthrown Diem.

What’s reaction of Company Dynasty or WIB Bones? How about stratagem Eurasian Great Game? How about American-First? I recalled that the War in Iraq, a candidate of presidential election, (2.004) once J.F Kerry said: We bring money for help Iraq people not for Halliburton Company! It wondered why didn’t J.F Kennedy say: We bring money to help the people South Vietnam in defending their country, not for Bell-Lycoming Company (UH-1 Iroquois) Because there are always more stories in ‘Counter Insurgency Project’ including a Big Military-Training never had before in the US history and the helicopters Huey will be as the essential symbol ‘training-aid’, when one said about Vietnam War means about huge of helicopter’s production which like fork-spoon plastic dispensable in the picnic war-game campaign. If there was no war, how can Company Dynasty produce about 10,000 helicopters UH-1? (The Vietnam War alone required more than 7,000 UH-1 for combat-assault training In addition, with the new up-date military strategy, U.S. was essentially transformed into a transition from TASK force to ‘Rapid-Deployment-Force,’ therefore ‘troop-mobility’ was crucial transaction just as in the past when The mobility of horses passed over in triumph of the Army Gengis Khan, Teimujin

There were also needed the ‘Dumping-Area’ for blow-out all out-of-date weaponry (cast off WWII war materials) and an essential testing place for the newest various kind of high-tech weapons for next preparedness in Middle East, on incoming project-course for the ‘New Eurasian Great Game’[the Third chunk after Eur-Asian and the last chunk was Middle-East or Center Asia]

Additionally, Kennedy was not ready for military intervention into Laos and bombing North Vietnam was out of the question. Moreover [Permanent Government] CIA’s adverse-activity expedition landed close the mainland, in a debacle forever to be known by the name of its locale, the Bay of Pigs. Yes, it must be a coincidence it has to be a coincidence. The then some accounts have tied George H.W Bush to support work in the CIA’s 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, due to Zapata Offshore Drilling Company. The orders went out to begin the Bay of Pigs operation was a man named Richard Drain, Skull and Bones 43, and the White House planner of the Bay of Pigs operation was president National security advisor, Mc George Bundy, Skull and Bones 40, and the State Department liaison for the Bay of Pigs operation was his brother William P. Bundy, Skull of Bones 39, and the man who filed the reincorporation papers that erased the Russell Trust Association from existence on the day of the Bay of Pigs was Howard Weaver, Skull and Bones 45w (George Bush’s class) who retired from the CIA’s in 1959. All of which might lead one to suspect that the Skull and Bones corporate shell had been used as a clandestine conduit for the Bay of Pigs, and then erased from existence to cover up the connection as the invasion got under way. In the years to come, [Emperor-II, George H W Bush] his record of clandestine arms deals and shipments as CIA director and then vice president would involve countries from Cuba and Nicaragua to Iran, Iraq, Israel, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. If any vice president in U.S history could fairly be known as the secret arms deal vice president He, George H W Bush would be the Best-One.

The catastrophic failure of the Cuban-exile landing so embarrassed President Kennedy that he appointed General Maxwell Taylor to learn what had gone wrong- The Taylor Commission concluded the Cuba Project had escalated beyond a size manageable by the CIA. It recommended a worldwide review of other CIA enterprises to learn if any had grown beyond intelligent- operations, and if so, to switch them to Military-Control. The story begins Kennedy’s decision in 1961 the task CIA by the summer of 1962 frustrated with the agency sin-ability to execute that mission, Kennedy ordered the military to take over. Right in summer of 1962 the CIA agreed to transfer these Southeast Asian programs to the Military in 18 months, dubbing it Operation Switchback. But on the very day scheduled for Switchback: November 1, 1963 South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem was assassinated. Then three weeks later, President John F Kennedy was assassinated, further delaying the transfer. Consequently the Military had yet to create a unit to absorb the CIA program.

Readers should do to understand The CIA was a spearhead-apparatus controlled by Skull and Bones Unsurprisingly, the Key figure at Geneva was W.A Harriman. Those negotiations were under way in Geneva and on July 23, 1962, resulted in the Neutralization of Laos. How it came about is a complex story, and in hindsight, the results were lamentable; but with Harriman’s anticipation. Harriman was born into one of America’s most well-known and wealthiest families, He amassed a fortune of his own during World War1 through the Merchant Ship-building Company. By the mid-1920, at the age of twenty nine, he owned the largest merchant fleet in the United States. During the 1930s, he branched out into his father’s railroad empire and became chairman of the board of the Illinois Central in 1931 and of the Union Pacific in 1932.

World War II brought Harriman into the US government, and he launched a four-decade career as a powerful and freewheeling diplomat. During the war, he represented the Lend Lease program to the British and the Russians, serving as President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s special envoy to Winton Churchill and Joseph Stalin. In 1943, Harriman was appointed ambassador to Moscow. This was the beginning of a long-standing interest in US-Soviet relations, and his conviction that he knew how to deal with Moscow. Following World War II, Harriman helped shape American foreign policy in the early days of the Cold-War. In 1948, Truman appointed him as the official US representative in Europe for the Marshall Plan, and in 1951, US representative to NATO

Clues, evidences, proofs, and statements testified that though, his number "Three" position of State Department in Kennedy administration but was an U.S policymaker – (do you believe it?) Unsurprisingly, Harriman was number One "A leader among Six Friend the World they made" as well. His policy-standpoint favored sending non-US patrols into Laos to try to find out the size of the Hanoi military buildup. He stood firmly to orchestrate against US advisers taking part in these patrols. It was a clever diversion. Leonard Unger, then US ambassador to Laos, weighed in. He informed the National Security Council that he wanted to keep MACV out of Laos. The State Department was closing ranks playing an orchestra baton

The Joint Chiefs harangued McNamara to lift the ban. The border restrictions were limiting the effectiveness of military operations in Vietnam In March 1964, at the urging of the Joint Chiefs, McNamara requested authorization for "hot pursuit by only South Vietnamese forces over the Laotian line for border control. This was contentious for Harriman, but it was increasingly doubtful that he could prevent a change in US policy (Harriman don’t want to destroy Hanoi military buildup because this crucial Trail came through to invade South Vietnam by North Vietnam for carrying out his ‘Axiom-1) The Joint Chiefs were building a case for crossing the fence that McNamara and Mc George Bundy, the special assistant to the president for national security affairs, found convincing according to SOP [Standard Operation Procedure]

Still, Harriman had to deal with his disciple as Michael-Forrestal NSC told Bundy in April. L. B Johnson had been coaxed into supporting hot pursuit, and Bundy was about to send a telegram to Saigon authorizing it. His subaltern M-Forrestal of the NSC staff cautioned Bundy that: to send the telegram without Harriman’s approval is just asking for trouble! The telegram had already received presidential approval, but that was not enough. It still required an endorsement from W A. Harriman. What a ridiculous policy! M. Forrestal had learned from W Sullivan that Harriman would not object to the substance of the telegram, but to go forward without his concurrence would amount to blindsiding him!.’ You just did not want to do that, Forrestal told Bundy, and he knew the consequences of doing so from experience. Harriman was placated and reluctantly agreed to hot-pursuit"? All verbatim above testified who was US policy-maker?

Though intelligence reports in May 1964 contained more evidence of extensive enemy military activities in Laos As a result, the Joint Chiefs received permission to authorize COMUSMACV…to initiate joint planning with the South Vietnamese government for cross-border operations and legal proceedings with limited covert intelligence patrols in Laos. The chiefs finally got their way. However, the restrictions placed by Washington on these intelligence collection operations made it clear that the State Department was still in the baton-game? Cross-border operations were limited to those areas in Laos between Route 9 and the 17th parallel ( Provisional Military Demarcation Line) adjacent to the border, and the area east of Tchepone [after Laos neutralization agreement 1962, starting from East Tchepone Hanoi’s Troops commenced building Harriman’s Super Highway that I dare say so, instead Ho Chi Mina trail 1959, heading to the South with POL pipe lines parallel on it, along this corridors established with numerous ‘Binh-Tram’ [sanctuaries with overwhelmed by ammunition that Harriman would like don’t touch them, but wait for till 1971 Operation Lam Son 719 starting]

Those areas were considered the critical entry point, due to ‘axiom-1’ [there was never a legitimate non-communist government in Saigon] so No US advisers could lead the Teams. The Vietnamese that crossed the border were not to wear GVN or other uniforms, with non weapons U.S made. Our unmarked helicopters H.34 were permanently loaded in cabin having a plastic explosive ready destroyed hello while forced-landing, and we could engage the enemy only in self defense (according to the ‘Rules Of Engagement’ that Harriman was already dealt with Soviet Union in the war-game CIP-NLF) Our recon-team success was due to sheer verification-check of NVA troop presenting there. It’s that simple.

In conclusion, for maintaining the realpolitik of the Wise-Men with any rate, I personally presumed that, once again came to bloody end. Because Kennedy who didn’t care about ‘American-First’ [WIB Bones] Addition, according to ‘Standard Leadership Procedures’, US troops must undergo for real combat-training due to too long don’t have war since 1953, so why Harriman introduced the Advisory indoctrinated method as taking into the battle Ap Bac with decisive purpose. Yet, ridiculously, even though the rank Lt Colonel was never took commanded a Regiment, Brigadier, Division, and operated coordination with various units like Air-force, Artillery, Armored carriers… another word Vann can drove a tank, but certainly He couldn’t carrying a tank on his shoulder. The Wise Man Harriman was surely known as well about that, but now strategically he thirsty need the Big-Training for U.S combat troop for CIP

This was apparent to Lt Colonel John Paul Vann, American military adviser to 7th Division of ARVN. The Viet Cong showed no fear of American adviser who operated the battle, meanwhile ARVN like the chess-men on chess-board. This was exemplified by the battle of Ap-Bac, which started on 2/January/1963. In the Mekong Delta, forty miles southwest of Saigon, three VC Companies dug in along a one-mile stretch between the villages of Ap-Bac and Ap Tan Thoi. ARVN’ 7th Division, equipped with automatic weapons and armored personnel carriers M113, and supported by bombers and helicopters, attacked the VC defense positions but was effectively repulsed by what amounted to 300 guerrillas. The battle ended with the VC slipping away in good order. Ap Bac was humiliating due to US advising. It revealed the extent to which ARVN like chess-men was rife with poor leadership (US advisor command) and do not know nothing, zero experience in odd-battle submerged with water of the Plain of Reeds. The method US advisor played the war-game battle like that; It is therefore Ap Bac cast doubt on the claim that the US advisor and chess-men ARVN were winning the war below a finger of Lt Colonel John Paul Vann? Once again, Vann can drove a tank, but couldn’t able carry it on his shoulder with his rank just Lt Colonel in military career? (In the Triumvirate’s master mind: ‘Vann lost tactical… but won strategic point’, so later on though he was discharged in the military career but became Civilian General wield with three stars).

General Zinni never forgot when he was First Lt, assigned as an adviser to the elite South Vietnamese Marines, that nation’s most effective fighting force. Zinni stated: The advisers’ job was not to give the Vietnamese Marines tactical advice because they had more fighting experience than most Americans, and it was their country. Rather, the obligation of the advisers was to apply American air and artillery fire power when that became necessary, and provide American logistics, coordination with American units, and American intelligence.

However, the most crucial foreknown schemer is that The Company Dynasty’s master-mind-staffs had initiated what if advisor-Indoctrination-failure in battlefield for the reason forcing pressure on Kennedy administration must be reorganized for beginning military combat-training in the real war right in South Vietnam battlefield.

Tactically, around the world, where’s the hot spot, let Delta Force made bridge spearhead, but cold spot like in South Vietnam, let used the term advisor in pretext for invasion. Eventually, the objective will indeed in moving combat-troops to South Vietnam, but first of all, it’s managed fabricating the so called The Tonkin-Gulf Incident for prevailing predominantly in case US must react-forced in retaliation, because the reason of the axiom-2 (U.S had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs except…) So why U.S must seeking from enemy provocative reason as such the so called the Maddox event.

Consequently, the plan was that on January 11, the CIA’s Office of Current Intelligence declared in a Status on the War in South Vietnam report that The tide has not yet turned. South Vietnam has made some military progress with the VC due largely to extensive US support. The VC, however, continued to expand the size and effectiveness of their forces, and is increasingly bold in their attacks. The estimate presented a picture of an escalating VC challenge that the Government of Vietnam was having a difficult time fending off.

Company-Dynasty [Harriman and Bushes] dispatched Micheal Forrestal, member National Security Council painted a much gloomier to the president Kennedy. Forrestal, the son of secretary of the Navy, James Forrestal (1944) and secretary of defense (1947) a very closest friend of Harriman in World War II. Therefore, He had been a reliable young diplomat aide to Harriman, working on the Marshall Plan. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Forrestal had come to the NSC staff from Wall Street to work on Vietnam. Kennedy sent him to South Vietnam in late December 1962 for a fresh look at the situation. On February 11, 1963, Forrestal told Kennedy to expect A cost and long war. This is in the preparedness to the Second period, chunk-two of Eurasia Great Game’s Stratagem for the new generation of weapons industries to next Middle-East-Wars.

By way of conclusion, I will just stated my conviction that the war in my country was a just fought by the very South Vietnamese and their allies for admirable purposes, that those fought it did so with their mightiest hearts, and in the process they came very close to succeeding in their purpose of enabling South Vietnam to sustain itself as a free and independent nation. Another word, if on the earth don’t have two Bones: W.A Harriman, and George H.W. Bush but just literal United States government alone had kept their promises, southern Vietnamese might now be enjoying prosperity and democracy similar to what has developed in South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand.

For more than three decades, I resisted thinking of myself as a veteran of the Vietnam War, the thirteen years as north Communist’s prisoner, a Boat people escaped from Mekong Delta to Philippines with a boat like a toy drifting fourteen days in open sea… I wanted to get on with my life and not be defined by that sad story, was overwhelmed by feelings of despair; I did also not like the Memorial in Washington DC with the names of all the dead carved on a wall. It was a memorial to the dead, but I was a survivor and that wall had nothing to do with me.

Then, one evening at dusk, in a simple ceremony far from Washington DC, I was huddled in a tent against the cold wind as several young people simultaneously read lists of names of the dead by candlelight. Standing among the people crowded in this tent, watching the candlelight nickering on faces and canvas, listening to the voices mixing name after name in a constant flow of sound, without a tear in my eye, but something moved in me and I felt a release…beyond the Potomac River where Arlington Cemetery, a gleam of my Queen-Bee flight crewmembers: Lt Long, Lt Tung, and Sergeant Lanh buried there with military honors, their final resting place in a clearing surrounded by maple and pine. Abruptly, I burst in crying… mourned my lost comrades in my Project-Delta Flight Group, I nodded and thanked them silently.

At last, I knew I was where I belonged and I was giving honor where it was due. In my mind clinging something in which seemed to me they were the real hero ‘freedom fighters for the Free World’. They were sacrificed not in vain but who know? Sacrifice often unappreciated by those who benefit from them. I murmured… really they sacrificed in the recent specific ‘World War III Alpha’ signifying who won in the Cold War instead of a must be Nuclear War. But that ‘Key-War’ caused the collapse of World Communist doctrine later on; No one had predicted it. It happened so fast that even the most foreign policy and intelligence professionals failed to get a handle on the specific events; Why can’t you be a bit more-savvy? The Soviet rapid free-fall collapse caused a series of quick reactions from the Western powers. Since the collapse was unforeseen, the reaction was unplanned, and inadequate. It was astonishing that the collapse came as such a surprise. Eventually, I must keep my silent appreciation to ‘The Six-Wise-Men’s stratagem’.

When the Soviet Empire slouched off the world’s stage, there was a certain amount of euphoria (many wrongly imagined, for example, that its departure would remove the nuclear threat) and even more relief. Thank God! The Cold War is over, Americans sighed. The Big World will take care of itself. We no longer need the vast, powerful military presence that kept the Evil Empire checked. Peace will bring incredible material dividends. Now we can go about our smaller, private business and get on with our personal lives. Everybody’s going to be secure…and happy. There should be an emergence of a New-World-Order…without defining it.

It was both an intellectual change of perspective and emotionally satisfying experience to jettison the false guilt about the war that I had been carrying around for three decades of a century. Doing so has enabled me to relearn the value I was taught in my classes at Air University, to appreciate the sacrifices made by those freedom-fighters who have become my comrades in arms forever.

Sadly, Company Dynasty plan will dissolved South Vietnam regime [according axiom-1] so why its offered the only weapons out-of-date like Garant, Carbine M1, and Thomson, including the heavy and unwieldy (for a small Vietnamese) cast-off World war II American weapons. Meanwhile Hanoi was supported by Soviet Union AK47 and China AK50, both were automatic weapons. during the enemy Tet-Offensive of 1968, the crisp rattling sounds of AK-47 echoing in Saigon and some other cities seemed to make a mockery of the weaker, single shots of Carbine and Garant M1 fired by stupefied friendly troop like roosters having sex by air shoot petzz … petzz. Even so, South Vietnamese armed forces performed admirably in repelling the Tet-Offensive in 1968to the surprise of The Skull and Bones’ Triumvirate [Harriman, son and father Prescott Bush] and the consternation of the Communists. Report Time magazine ARVN bore the brunt of the early fighting with bravery and élan, performing better than almost anyone would have expected. It was especially noteworthy that the ARVN had achieved such results without modern weapons that could match those of the enemy troop know and feel it when they are poorly equipped, but un-adversely affected both their morale and effectiveness.

The later worst Robert McNamara [WIB-Bone] who as Defense Secretary, presided over the American war effort in those early years, wrote disparagingly of the Vietnamese, earning a searing rebuke from William Colby "He should not be contemptuously slandering Vietnamese who gave their lives and efforts to prevent Communist rule" wrote Colby, "but who saw their great-power protector wash its hands of them because of the costs of McNamara’s failed policies?[The Wise Men’s in Stratagem ‘Eurasia Great Game’ policies not McNamara] The cause, affirmed Colby, was indeed ‘noble’. America fought it the wrong way under McNamara, and lost it in good part because of him (Colby did not know the Triumvirate’s conspirators but surely not McNamara)

Apparently, the war in Vietnam was being won as early as 1962. But underneath the optimistic rhetoric of the top command, a few respected civilian and military-official were already beginning to raise serious questions about progress of the war? Two of the most determined voices of dissent belonged to Mike Mansfield, the new Senate Majority Leader; and Roger Hilsman of State Department. An early years, they supported of the Diem regime, but originated by secret direction from Harriman’ mastermind [axiom-1], abrupt skeptical and independent minded, Mansfield was determined to find out for himself what was going on in the American-financed war. He, the laconic senator from Montana whose nonpartisan independence of thought and personal integrity won him the respect of Democrats and Republicans alike, had proven before to be a man of insight into Asian affairs. In 1944 as a young congressman and former professor of Far Eastern history, he had been dispatched by President Roosevelt on a fact-finding mission to China. His report that Communist strength was impressive, and not limited to revolutionary ideologues, raised eyebrows in Washington but proved prophetic.

In 1962, Mansfield again packed his bags for the Far East at President Kennedy’s request. This time his destination was Vietnam. Mansfield declined several official briefings and met instead with American reporters to hear their misgivings about the military and political situation. Upon leaving the country he discarded the farewell statement prepared by the U.S Embassy and delivered one of his own, markedly more reserved on the progress of the war. He knew the war very well than anyone in America due to Harriman’s Counter Insurgency Plan’s scam [Harriman, Prescott Bush’s early activities in Russia concerning other investments in prewar Korea and Vietnam, the internal function and structure of Company-dynasty comes from Aid to Russia 1941-1946]

Whereas Roger Hilsman, for the military coup d’état against Ngo Dinh Diem, the United States must accept its full share of responsibility, because with the passage of time, our objectives in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Diem in control; Thus, as the nine-year rule of Diem came to a bloody end, our complicity in his overthrow heightened our responsibilities and our commitment in an essentially leaderless Vietnam Thereby South Vietnam didn’t have the freedom for fighting for.

The struggle for Vietnamese independence was fast becoming an ‘American-War’ raising serious questions about the nature of U.S involvement in Southeast-Asia. American knew very little about Vietnam War, even though it ended more than 30 years ago. That is in part because it has been seen by those who opposed the war, or at least opposed their own participation in it, as in their interests to portray every aspect of the long struggle in the worst possible light, and indeed in some cases to falsify what they have had to say about it, as the most venality of the prejudicial journalists having secret direction from invisible Permanent Government.

After World War II, the inherent ideological conflict between the two super powers in the world, The United States and The Soviet Union, was revised. Naturally, the ideological competition was basically between Capitalism and Communism. To avoid another World War, should be a Nuclear-War? The Wise Men with the World They Made, stemming from ‘Eurasian Great Game’, transformed the conflict between the two super powers became what was known as the Cold-War. They implied stratagem-surrogate expanded beyond Europe to influence in Asia started in 1950 by Korea war. The rivalry between the two ideologies rapidly became the war game so called National Liberation Front (NLF: Soviet Union) against Counter Insurgency Plan [CIP: United States] In the brain of their masterminded, this war was long enough to attract the world focus on South East Asia, in deviated target, but at last, US combat-troop should pull out from Vietnam later on, according ‘Axiom-3’: The US couldn’t have won the war under any circumstances. Meanwhile US put permanent troop in South Korea, though within a short time [less than Vietnam and Iraq War] of war (50.000) for joining an invisible bridling segment to Europe as Berlin, (300.000) for preventing crazy-un-taming horses (Soviet Union and Red China) The next period of time will be a transition to up date the ‘New Eurasia Great Game’ for the next phase in Middle-East, or Central Asia, but this time was next generation-turned to wise men’s siblings, such as George H W Bush, (his father Prescott Bush died 1972)

They also create a new Geo-Strategy, Triangular diplomacy which would pave the way for rapprochement with PRC and relations with the PRC would help achieve détente with the Soviet Union as well. Triangular diplomacy would undoubtedly encourage the Soviet Union to cooperate in the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) negotiations, and would help the US withdraw from Vietnam safety. There was the long-standing interest in US-Soviet relations as the result of Harriman knew how to deal with Moscow. He wrote two books, "Peace with Russia" (1959) and America and Russia in a changing World (1971). Moreover, importantly Sino-US relations would open the ‘bamboo-curtain’ for the US to reenter the PRC’ huge, lucrative market after two decades hostilities. His realpolitik Friend become foe and foe become friend occasionally…or contrarily and now and then by Ostrich policy

At last, The New Geo-Strategy once again shifted US policy toward the GVN, South Vietnam. With triangular diplomacy the communist threat in Southeast Asia no longer exists and as a result, the political survival of the GVN became irrelevant to US interests in the region according to axiom-One. Unsurprisingly, it was no more the lesson of struggle regarding the forced defeat of a pioneering World-freedom outpost.

After all, Carl Von Clausewitz (1780-1831) once said: "Policy is the guiding intelligence and war only the instrument, and not vice versa" Sadly, this theory explains US policy toward the GVN. There was the beginning of the Third-period of ‘Eurasia Great Game’ and next should be a ‘New Eurasia Great Game’ surrogated to Middle-East or Center of Asia.

This is the concept of Realpolitik of Wise Men: Six Friends and the World They Made. That’s the objective [Saigon-Fall, according to Axiom-1] of All Bones in WIB which inflict a crushing defeat in heart of millions: the wounded, the dead, the homeless, the families broken apart; people who suffered the many years of this war; and nations who had divided themselves, ruined their innocence, and lost their children. Tired, bleeding memories and regret also rode on that last helicopter. Its consequences were – Reeducation Camps, Boat people, and killing field, vote on foot…

What did we die for? We asked. For what did we suffer and pay such a price? After all, we shook our fists as we watched the formation of helicopters race toward the sea. We never lost a battle, so why did we lose the war? Eventually, in that day Author determined that The Skull and Bones were working a scam: men who had given their courage, dedication, and blood. They also had pulled shut too many shrouds wrapped around too many friends who had given their lives trying to win this war. For them, the flight of that last American helicopter confirmed Skull and Bones’ victory in that cruel April/1975? On the streets, in the villages, inside shanties and chateaus, people hid, terrified. Their eyes too followed the helicopter, and they cried: Why did you forsake us…We believed in you!? Yes! America has turned its back … Deserted us in the breach! How do we stand in defense against such forces when they can now so easily overwhelm us? In Washington, President Ford still remains very difficult for him to sit there as President of the United States and watch South Vietnam collapse!

So why in the past 1960s, the best-triumvirate [J F Kennedy, LB Johnson, and Robert Kennedy] had determined to eradicate this Axis of Evil between Communist Russia and his counterpart Skull and Bones repeated once by the alien property custodian, Union Banking Corp was eventually seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act of December 1941.

Since W A. Harriman and Prescott Bush’s early activities in Russia are detailed in Joseph Finder, Red Carpet (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1983) Were they caught in a J.F. Kennedy trap? As provisioned for the information concerning other investment activities in prewar far-east, that similarities in style of prewar Germany and in prewar Russia.

Alas! They never seem to learn from their mistakes: Do they know how to shoot a pistol on time and accuracy? They’re failed!

Actually, the second Skull and Bones generation, George H W Bush was commenced in September 1977, Chinese National-Day, the meeting went well with him. Deng Xiaoping made a point of telling George that he was welcome in China anytime. Pennzoil wanted a crack at drilling for oil offshore in the East China and South China Sea. Bushes relationship with Beijing also reaped enormous rewards for the Bush families. Greedy for power, the Bushes were green with envy when they learned that Kennedys had won a world eternal famous diplomacy, thereby over the decades the Bushes had self prided on being the un-Kennedys. They considered the Kennedys as competitors. As Jeb Bush had told one reporter in 1986 (the year W. Harriman passed away …why waiting for that year?) He said: I think we could probably beat the Kennedys in touch football, we could beat them in basketball, baseball, any goddamn sport they want to play

PROLOGUE

(Interview on Fox News)

The O’Reilly Factor aired on September 27/2004 with President George W Bush

O’Reilly questioned: "The South Vietnam didn’t fight for their freedom, which is why they don’t have it today?"

President Bush answered: Yes!

The venality of O’Reilly had lied to cover up their treacherous-schemes in Vietnam-War, and as Walter Cronkite as well. I dared have used the terms lie, liars, lying, and O’Lie-lly rather, you might say, liberally. Telling the truth is something I take seriously, and I try to hold myself to an impossibly high standard. Permanent Government treachery due to the Cold-War’s scam, and the War on Terrorism, Bushes lies about important things: like our reasons for going to war, the economy, education, social security…But I think they lies only when they feels they has to. They know that particular most of the time, Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, and Rush Limbaugh are only too glad to do it for them. All the lies, small and large, add up, they create a world view in which the mainstream media is a liberal propaganda machine. Yes, we’ve heard it over and over and over again. For six decades [1950 Korea-War till now] the media elite is an invisible tool of the Permanent Government. You know who they are. Fox News, The editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal, Talk radio, they are biased, and they have an agenda. They employ a tried-and-true methodology. Firstly, they concoct an inflammatory that serves their political goals. Are their lies pathological, or are they merely malicious? They try to push it into the mainstream media. All too often, they succeed. And we have to be more than vigilant. We have to fight back. We have exposed those who bear false witness for the false witness bearers that they are. And we have to do it in a straight-forward, plainspoken way. For instant, The Impact of Media explores in detail the media distortion due to television’s misrepresentations during the Vietnam War. It rebuts the view promoted by PBS’s 13-part documentary series, Vietnam: A Television History. The rebuttal also applies to The Ten Thousand Day War series. The Impact of Media is a must see for historians and politicians alike. All presidents involved Vietnam War should lauded this rebuttal video when they knew it and said that it’s something all Americans should not see. So! Let’s call them what they are: liars, lying, lying liars. However, beside that the Vietnam War has been participated not only by a great numbers of warriors, but also countless Angels of mercy. It produced some the quiet Americans and the ugly Americans who finally sent the poor people of Vietnam to hell on April 30th, 1975; but on the other hands it also introduced a lot of good, true American who relentlessly tried to Deliver us from Evil. Unfortunately, the good Americans’ efforts have been buried under tons of biased reports and bungled news stories written by unscrupulous journalists throughout the Vietnam War. And with passing time, those inspired stories have been fallen quietly into oblivion.

As