Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Forjando Patria: Pro-Nacionalismo
Forjando Patria: Pro-Nacionalismo
Forjando Patria: Pro-Nacionalismo
Ebook323 pages2 hours

Forjando Patria: Pro-Nacionalismo

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Often considered the father of anthropological studies in Mexico, Manuel Gamio originally published Forjando Patria in 1916. This groundbreaking manifesto for a national anthropology of Mexico summarizes the key issues in the development of anthropology as an academic discipline and the establishment of an active field of cultural politics in Mexico. Written during the upheaval of the Mexican Revolution, the book has now been translated into English for the first time.

Armstrong-Fumero's translation allows readers to develop a more nuanced understanding of this foundational work, which is often misrepresented in contemporary critical analyses. As much about national identity as anthropology, this text gives Anglophone readers access to a particular set of topics that have been mentioned extensively in secondary literature but are rarely discussed with a sense of their original context. Forjando Patria also reveals the many textual ambiguities that can lend themselves to different interpretations.

The book highlights the history and development of Mexican anthropology and archaeology at a time when scholars in the United States are increasingly recognizing the importance of cross-cultural collaboration with their Mexican colleagues. It will be of interest to anthropologists and archaeologists studying the region, as well as those involved in the history of the discipline.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 15, 2010
ISBN9781607320418
Forjando Patria: Pro-Nacionalismo

Related to Forjando Patria

Related ebooks

Social Science For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Forjando Patria

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Forjando Patria - Manuel Gamio

    PATRIA

    Translator’s Introduction

    .......................................................................

    Manuel Gamio and Forjando Patria:

    Anthropology in Times of Revolution

    In 1909 and 1926, Manuel Gamio made two crucial trips from Mexico to the United States. In the first, he arrived as a student at Franz Boas’s Department of Anthropology at Columbia, making him the first Mexican to obtain an advanced professional degree in anthropology from a foreign university. In 1926, he returned to the United States as an exile, fearing for his life in a tense climate of internal struggles that marked the years after the 1910 Mexican Revolution that ended the long dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz. The period between these two trips across the Rio Bravo was crucial for Gamio and for the history of modern Mexico. In that stretch of time, Gamio completed first a master’s degree and later a doctorate at Columbia University and collaborated with foreign scholars in conducting research in his home country. He also aligned himself with the military faction that was currently consolidating its power through a series of new political institutions and a vibrant nationalist ideology, creating a strong new state that would be governed by over seventy years of single-party rule. With this combination of academic credentials earned abroad and commitments to revolutionary projects at home, Gamio helped to found the precursors of anthropological and archaeological institutions that would play a crucial role in Mexican cultural and development policies throughout the twentieth century. His relationship to North American academics, revolutionary state formation, and the study of ancient and contemporary societies makes his life and work a useful point of entry for understanding the particular valence that anthropology would take in twentieth-century Mexico.

    Published in 1916, Forjando Patria marks the midpoint of the crucial period in Gamio’s career that was bounded by his studies at Columbia and his eventual exile. In this text, he outlined a professionalized anthropology that would serve as a science of good governance for the emergent revolutionary state. It is a broad-reaching manifesto in which the author seeks to reconcile the anthropology that he had learned at Columbia University with nineteenth-century narratives about modernization and even older anxieties about the nature of postcolonial national identity. Many of the recurrent themes of this text had appeared in the works of Mexican scholars since the nineteenth century (see Molina Enriquez 1909; Sierra Mendez 1969 [1902]; Hale 1989; Shadle 1994; Saez Pueyo 2001). But what makes Forjando Patria exceptional is the fact that it was written and read amidst the emergence of revolutionary institutions that would define political life for three quarters of a century, and that can still be perceived amidst more recent reconfigurations of Mexican democracy and nationalism.

    A. GAMIO, BOAS, AND ANTHROPOLOGY BETWEEN THE PORFIRIATO AND REVOLUTION

    Gamio’s own youth and early intellectual formation bridge the distinct realities of Porfirian and revolutionary Mexico, something that is quite evident in the major themes explored in Forjando Patria. Born in 1883, he grew to adulthood in the period of peace and relative economic progress often referred to as the pax porfiriana. This was a time when the strong, centralized dictatorship consolidated by Díaz brought a three-decade respite from the instability that had governed during the first two thirds of the nineteenth century. Born into a reasonably prosperous family, Gamio completed his preparatory studies at the Escuela Nacional Preparatoria (National Preparatory School), an intellectual bastion of the positivism that was the official philosophy of Porfirian Mexico. A cocktail of Comte and Spencer, Mexican positivism was a moderate, or even conservative, inflection on a tradition of liberal thought with roots in the early nineteenth century. Stressing a positive knowledge of national realities over the blind application of European democratic principles on an insufficiently civilized populace, the positivist doctrine of evolution over revolution was perfectly suited for a period marked by a strengthening of technocratic rule and strict limitations on traditional democratic institutions (see Zea 1953; Hale 1989; Saez Pueyo 2001).

    Gamio’s biographers have seen other incidents in his early life as signs of an emergent revolutionary consciousness. After completing his preparatory studies, he briefly studied engineering before leaving school to take over the management of a failing family farm. There, observing the conditions of the local workers, he developed the admiration for Mexico’s indigenous peoples and the desire to improve their living conditions that were to influence his later career (see Gonzalez Gamio 1987). This particular anecdote resonates with the genre of narratives that was at the core of post-revolutionary nationalism in Mexico. In popular histories and grade-school texts, the biography of the revolutionary tends to hinge on a pivotal encounter with the suffering of the poor and downtrodden and the subsequent development of a social consciousness attuned to cross-class sympathies. Such solidarity between members of the mestizo middle class and the indigenous population is also a recurring theme in Forjando Patria.

    It was in the last year of the Porfirian dictatorship that Gamio had his first encounters with anthropology, through courses taught at Mexico’s National Museum of Anthropology. During this time, it is evident that he had relatively little influence in the Mexican intellectual scene. His earliest attempts to conduct independent archaeological investigations were frustrated by Leopoldo Batres, the irascible National Inspector of Monuments. Batres was a favorite court intellectual of President Díaz and notoriously jealous of other researchers.

    As doors closed to him at home, Gamio turned to members of an expatriate community with important academic connections in the United States. On the recommendation of the Anglo-American antiquarian Zelia Nuttal, who had had her own nasty conflicts with Batres,¹ he was admitted into Franz Boas’s anthropology department at Columbia University. Gamio was completing his master’s degree in New York when the first shots of the revolution were fired, and he returned home in 1911 to what would be more than a decade of almost continuous warfare (Gonzalez Gamio 1987; de la Peña 1996: 44–46).

    Research by foreign scholars continued in Mexico despite the reigning climate of instability, and Gamio was integrated into the Escuela Internacional de Arqueología y Etnología Americana (International School of American Archaeology and Ethnology). The International School was maintained through support from the national governments of the United States, France, Mexico, and Prussia and from the private universities of Pennsylvania, Columbia, and Harvard. It opened its doors in 1911 and closed just four years later under political pressure from warring revolutionary factions (see de la Peña 1996: 58–62). During the brief period of its operation, the International School hosted European and Anglo-American archaeologists and ethnologists, including Boas, Alfred Tozzer, George Engerrand, and Eduard Seler. In a time when Mexican philosophers and artists were seeking alternatives to the hegemonic positivism of the Porfiriato, the instructors at this institution offered novel theoretical currents that would influence some of the most important post-revolutionary scholars (Gonzalez Gamio 1987; de la Peña 1996; Matos Moctezuma 1998: 79–80).

    Gamio’s primary research as a fellow of the International School was in archaeology. Much of this consisted of ceramic surface collections and test pits that would later be recognized as the first systematic applications of stratigraphic excavation methods anywhere in the world (see de la Peña 1996; Bernal 1980). This work also led to Gamio’s designation as Mexico’s Inspector General of Monuments, a post that had been dutifully abandoned by his old nemesis, Leopoldo Batres, when Díaz was ousted from the presidency (Matos Moctezuma 1998: 62). This represented a general changing of the guard in the Mexican academy, as Porfirian intellectuals found themselves marginalized after the loss of their old political patrons. In the chapter of Forjando Patria titled Our Intellectual Culture, Gamio makes a triumphant reference to the fall of these sackcloth pontiffs (see Chapter

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1