Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Greening The Lyre: Environmental Poetics And Ethics
Greening The Lyre: Environmental Poetics And Ethics
Greening The Lyre: Environmental Poetics And Ethics
Ebook211 pages2 hours

Greening The Lyre: Environmental Poetics And Ethics

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This work covers important and neglected ground—environmental language theory. Gilcrest poses two overarching questions: To what extent does contemporary nature poetry represent a recapitulation of familiar poetics? And, to what extent does contemporary nature poetry engage a poetics that stakes out new territory? He addresses these questions with important thinkers, especially Kenneth Burke, and considers such poets as Frost, Kunitz, Heaney, Ammons, Cardenal, and Rich.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMay 1, 2002
ISBN9780874175547
Greening The Lyre: Environmental Poetics And Ethics

Related to Greening The Lyre

Related ebooks

Literary Criticism For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Greening The Lyre

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Greening The Lyre - David W. Gilcrest

    author.

    INTRODUCTION

    SOCRATES: Even the wolf, you know,

    Phaedrus, has a right to an advocate,

    as they say.

    PHAEDRUS: Do you be his advocate?

    It is difficult to conceive of a region

    uninhabited by man.

    —THOREAU, Ktaadn

    The subject of this study is contemporary nature poetry. It should be noted, from the start, that all three of these terms are potential troublemakers. For example, the contemporary nature poem might simply refer to nature poetry published relatively recently. However, this kind of definition ignores the more athletic sense of contemporaneity, the idea that the poetry of a given era (here, the most recent) reflects a generalized attitude or mood that is more or less distinctive. The idea of contemporaneity is further complicated by correspondences between the present poetic dispensation and previous ones. Such correspondences belie claims to novelty (and especially progress).

    The term nature and the idea of the nature poem are equally thorny. The nature poem is traditionally and usefully distinguished from other types of poetry by virtue of its subject: the nonhuman aspects of the world around us. The problem with this kind of definition is that it risks dividing the human from the nonhuman along the familiar fault line of culture/nature. Such a dichotomy tends to mask human nature, the aspect of our existence that includes our lives lived as sheerly physical and physiological entities.

    The possibility of nature as a subject for poetry is entwined in the currents and crosscurrents of English literary history. From the perspective of the early twenty-first century, the evolution of Romanticism typically marks the transformation of nature from its merely scenic or ornamental role in neoclassical poetry (when it appears at all) toward something like the subject or focus of much poetic endeavor.¹ Thus we now recognize that in the years between, say, 1712 (when Pope published The Rape of the Lock) and 1726 (when Thomson’s The Seasons made its way into the world), the attitude of poetry toward nature changed dramatically.

    What is less clear is whether the development of a Romantic sensibility and its posture toward the nonhuman actually represent as radical a shift as this thumbnail history suggests. It can be argued, for example, that nature emerges in Romantic poetry less as an autonomous subject and more as simply the arena for the Romantic poet’s exploration of his or her imaginative consciousness.

    Nature did not appear as a poetic subject in its own right until the human role with respect to nonhuman nature began to be attenuated. Many factors contributed to this change: the rise of physical and biological sciences and the bodies of knowledge they contributed, the development of a geological and evolutionary sense of time that served to de-emphasize the importance of human experience and human history, and the gross degradation of the natural world, accelerated by the effects of industrialization and human population growth, that demonstrated the limits of our conceptions of nature and encouraged an understanding of nonhuman nature on its own terms.

    The idea of nature as subject thus corresponds with the development of what may loosely be called an environmental perspective: the view that all beings, including humans, exist in complex relationship to their surroundings and are implicated in comprehensive physical and physiological processes. An environmental poetry is consequently distinguished from other types of nature poetry (especially Romantic nature poetry) to the extent that it reinforces and extends this perspective. In The Environmental Imagination, Lawrence Buell captures this distinction by articulating four criteria for the environmental text. They are:

    1. The nonhuman environment is present not merely as a framing device but as a presence that begins to suggest that human history is implicated in natural history.

    2. The human interest is not understood to be the only legitimate interest.

    3. Human accountability to the environment is part of the text’s ethical orientation.

    4. Some sense of the environment as a process rather than as a constant or a given is at least implicit in the text. (7–8)

    Inasmuch as contemporary nature poetry engages these positions, it assumes an environmental orientation. That is not to say, however, that all contemporary nature poems are environmental texts; rather, contemporary nature poetry consists of environmental poems as well as other types of nature poetry, including Romantic nature poetry written recently.

    Perhaps it is the case that all poetry is environmental, not necessarily in the specific sense of Buell’s definition, but because every poem implies a place. Certainly narrative and dramatic poetry is situated (situare: to place) somewhere, whether or not the features of place (for example, an accounting of resident and accidental flora and fauna and of the relationships that obtain among them, an indication of local and regional topography, an appraisal of seasonal and meteorological conditions, and so on) are explicitly acknowledged. The same is true for lyric poetry, at least in its aspect as the song of personal experience. Even poetry that concerns itself exclusively with human culture (including language) must assume physical and physiological conditions that allow for cultural activities. In this sense, contemporary nature poetry admits all poetic genres.

    I began by saying that the subject of this study is contemporary nature poetry. I should add, however, that I have approached my subject with two fundamental questions in mind:

    1. To what extent does contemporary nature poetry represent a recapitulation of familiar poetics?

    2. To what extent does contemporary nature poetry engage a poetics that stakes out new territory?

    My reading of contemporary nature poetry suggests that if such poetry is innovative, its novelty lies in the direction of environmentalism. As a result, in attempting to answer these two questions I ultimately find myself endeavoring to answer an additional query:

    3. What are the prospects for an environmental poetry?

    This, then, is the true subject of my study, although it will only achieve a measure of definition at the conclusion rather than at the beginning of this work.

    Buell’s criteria for the environmental text raise several intrinsically related issues with which I will be concerned as I address the prospects for environmental poetry. The first issue is epistemological: what can we know of the nonhuman, and how is our knowledge constructed? The second issue is properly aesthetic: how can we integrate the nonhuman into human poetic discourse? Strictly speaking, these two issues taken together circumscribe environmental poetics. A third issue is entailed by the rhetorical stance of environmentalism itself. As Buell’s criteria indicate, the environmental text is grounded in the premise that prevailing attitudes toward nature, as a function of what we think we know and how we represent that knowledge, are demonstrably deleterious to the nonhuman and have resulted in unprecedented, and catastrophic, alterations in the natural world. If environmentalism describes the project of discovering better ways of conceptualizing the nonhuman sphere and our relationship to it, and of putting those concepts into practice, it is finally an ethical undertaking. The environmental poem can thus be found, in theory anyway, at the confluence of the three principal tributaries of Western intellectual inquiry: epistemology, poetics, and ethics.

    Recent scholarship has initiated the search for the environmental poem. Notable efforts include John Elder’s Imagining the Earth: The Poetry and the Vision of Nature (University of Illinois Press, 1985), Terry Gifford’s Green Voices: Understanding Contemporary Nature Poetry (Manchester University Press, 1995), and Gyorgyi Voros’s recuperation of Stevens as a linguistically savvy poet of nature in Notations of the Wild: Ecology in the Poetry of Wallace Stevens (University of Iowa Press, 1997). Both Voros and Leonard Scigaj, in his Sustainable Poetry: Four American Ecopoets (University Press of Ken-tucky, 1999), take on the ostensibly postmodern antireferentialist bias in contemporary literary criticism and linguistic philosophy in their efforts to reconnect word and world.

    My own pursuit of the environmental poem begins in chapter 1 with an examination of the influence of ecology on contemporary nature poetry. Although normative ecology provides a productive critique of homocentric values, I argue, following Wolfgang Iser, that a sheerly ecologized poetic, while fulfilling our desire for certitude under pressure of environmental crisis, fails on epistemological and ultimately aesthetic

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1