Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Sweet Caress
Sweet Caress
Sweet Caress
Ebook549 pages8 hours

Sweet Caress

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Born into Edwardian England, Amory's first memory is of her father standing on his head. She has memories of him returning on leave during the First World War. But his absences, both actual and emotional, are what she chiefly remembers. It is her photographer uncle Greville who supplies the emotional bond she needs, who, when he gives her a camera and some rudimentary lessons in photography, unleashes a passion that will irrevocably shape her future.A spell at boarding school ends abruptly and Amory begins an apprenticeship with Greville in London, photographing socialites for the magazine Beau Monde. But Amory is hungry for more and her search for life, love, and artistic expression will take her to the demi monde of Berlin of the late '20s, to New York of the '30s, to the blackshirt riots in London, and to France in the Second World War where she becomes one of the first women war photographers. Her desire for experience will lead Amory to further wars, to lovers, husbands, and children as she continues to pursue her dreams and battle her demons.
In this enthralling story of a life fully lived, illustrated with “found” period photographs, William Boyd has created a sweeping panorama of some of the most defining moments of modern history, told through the camera lens of one unforgettable woman, Amory Clay. It is his greatest achievement to date.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateSep 15, 2015
ISBN9781632863348
Author

William Boyd

William Boyd is also the author of A Good Man in Africa, winner of the Whitbread Award and the Somerset Maugham Award; An Ice-Cream War, winner of the John Llewellyn Rhys War Prize and short-listed for the Booker Prize; Brazzaville Beach, winner of the James Tait Black Memorial Prize; Restless, winner of the Costa Novel of the Year; Ordinary Thunderstorms; and Waiting for Sunrise, among other books. He lives in London.

Read more from William Boyd

Related to Sweet Caress

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Sweet Caress

Rating: 3.9130434335403734 out of 5 stars
4/5

161 ratings23 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Beeindruckende fiktive Lebensgeschichte der Fotografin Amory Clay, verwobenen mit tatsächlichen geschichtlichen Ereignissen. Spannt einen breiten Bogen vom England des Jahres 1908 über die wilden 30er in Berlin, die Zwischenkriegs- und Kriegszeit in New York und Frankreich, den Vietnamkrieg bis ins Schottland des Jahres 1978.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The story of a woman who repeatedly defies social morays and finds herself photographing her way through history .
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Sweet Caress - Life, full and unadulteratedSweet Caress is a fictional autobiography of a woman who lived an interesting life during tumultuous times. Amory Clay was born in 1908 in England and died in 1983 and so experienced or was at least affected by two world wars, the great depression, the War in Vietnam and the social and sexual revolution of the sixties.As a professional photographer Amory chronicles the changing times giving author William Boyd the opportunity to place her in the middle of the action which enhances the interesting and complicated personal life of his protagonist.And interesting it is. Her career includes photographing members of high society in London to taking candid shots of the underside of pre-World War II Berlin. She's in New York shooting fashion then back to London working for a news magazine. She's on the front lines in Europe in 1944 and in Vietnam in 1967.During that time she has an affair with her married boss, a relationship with a French writer, marries a Scottish Lord and has twin daughters.Sweet Caress is about life - full and unadulterated. Love, heartbreak, birth, death, motherhood, family - it's a rich mix and Boyd keeps the narrative moving hitting the highs and lows, the successes and failures all the while giving us the insights of his remarkable heroine. His writing is seamless and precise, the characters complicated and appealing, the settings vivid.Boyd is able to capture the uncertainty of life, how events and other people shape our destiny as much or more than we consciously do ourselves. How seemingly chance meetings and random acts chart our lives. How man plans and God laughs.Boyd has interspersed photographs and captions throughout this book perhaps to give the reader the experience of reading a journal. However I found these pictures unnecessary. Rather than enhancing the novel they proved disconcerting for two reasons. I create my own image of the characters I'm reading about. Suddenly seeing them in black and white and having them look nothing like I imagined was off-putting. The second reason is the photographs are very amateur and of poor quality in concept and execution - hardy the work of a professional which, for me, eroded Amory's credibility. It was a good idea that didn't work.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Once I got over the idea that the author had used 'found' photos of random people to illustrate this story about a war photographer, I enjoyed this book. I should recommend this for bookclub; much to discuss about Amory's life, loves and historical moments she captures on film.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Excellent story telling focusing on the life of Amory Clay, a female photographer. Engrossing from beginning to end.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    There are many things that I admire and respect about William Boyd's fiction. He knows how to develop characters, keep action going, build suspense, and he builds images with words, sometimes so poetically it takes your breath away. His metaphors can be interesting because they are so unusual ('like a boxer who just received bad news') and his characters can have some genuinely endearing characteristics (summarise a person in four adjectives). He's clearly enamoured with fictional autobiographies and he is able (in many of them) to take on a whole persona and give them a life story. The pictures. While I understand what critics say about the photos being amateurish and distracting, not professional enough for a professional photographer, it is at least an attempt to add something to the narrative about the process of seeing. It also introduces that mystic quality of chance, of finding the pictures and then weaving the story around them. He's not the first to do this, nor the last. Orhan Pamuk does it and adds objects owned by his characters. They do add something to the narrative in Pamuk's case, I think in part, because he has an eye for it, was a photographer before he became a writer. But Boyd's attempt falls short of what it might have been. For one, there is too much of it. Less would have been more and selecting more enigmatic photos would have been better in showing the developing artistic vision of Amory. Avoid trying to show us the end product of an award winning professional photographer if you are trying to avoid liability but you can show us developing ideas in found photography if you have an eye for it. Boyd fails to give us any sense of her ideas, any real identity and that is the problem. As it is there was the struggling young photographer with a few stabs at some ideas (absences, for example) but it was hardly developed in a meaningful way. Boyd is a master of written language but not so masterful with photographic language. It bogs down his rolling narrative that already so competently puts interesting pictures in our minds.other things that bothered me:1. I found the excessive and constant description of drinks and drinking and smoking cigarettes a rather tired cliche that got me screaming by the end. ENough already. There are better ways to introduce a scene.This was a crutch I'd have liked to see a competent writer avoid. It irritated after about the fiftieth time.2. Like others, I too found the Vietnam section not believable and muddled. Granted a professional woman's return to her career after a long stint away could well have been interesting, but wild success in a year in a place with so much chaos didn't seem realistic. Logistics were overlooked and unconvincing. Again the pictures were not worth a thousand well chosen words. 3. What I find hard to like about this story and others I've read by Boyd is the sort of dewey eyed admiration of characters that are made to seem admirable for their broken childhoods, heavy smoking and drinking, casual sexcapades and disconnectedness. It not only doesn't seem unique, it seems immature and it's hard to find something plucky or admirable about it. I kept waiting for something I could admire about Amory. I kept wishing this character would quit moaning about doing what her Uncle told her to do, about taking one job after another from former lovers and then being swept off her feet by a rakish (but rich) Scottish Laird destined to drink himself to death (another very tired cliche). I didn't find Amory a very independent thinker and in her entire career she didn't seem to have any ideas in her picture taking, nor did she show much interest in any other photographers. I found her more interesting as a male author's idea of what a woman's life might have been like in this life time of war if she could be made into a male stereotype that flits around and samples history, but not much in the way of the inner life of an interesting woman.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    William Boyd is another author that is often recommended to me but that I can't warm to. Not that I dislike his books. On the contrary, I'm often intrigued by his themes and by his writing. I just don't seem to be able to derive any satisfaction out of reading them.

    Sweet Caress is a prime example of this dilemma:
    The story follows the life of Amory Clay, a woman who in her youth defies the advice of her parents and sets out to become a photographer. Soon thrown into the throng of the roaring twenties and early thirties, she lives a life that is similar to some of the real life individuals that I love to read about.

    And that is just it - I love reading biographies and stories involving the real personalities, and I just can't get my head around why I would want to read a fictional account that involves characters that are somehow based on but are not - not even fictional versions of - the actual individuals of the time.

    Why include fictional characters that resemble Anita Berber and Marianne Breslauer, when they could actually be included as characters? I mean, I get that disguising real people as fictional characters is useful, even necessary, to offend contemporaries of the author, but this is hardly the case here.
    After that I lost interest and skim read to the end.

    This is just another case where I'd prefer a non-fiction book about the era to a literary attempt at historical fiction.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Sweeping novel about a female professional photographer. Perhaps a bit too sweeping. I liked it a lot, right up to the part about Viet Nam. Library book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    While a high school student I viewed history as the story of war, with interludes in between when nations recovered from the last war and prepared for the next. In his new novel, "Sweet Caress," William Boyd seems to view his main character and narrator Amory Clay from the same perspective. She is a 20th century woman, born in 1908 and dying in 1983, and her life is shaped by the century's wars virtually from beginning to end.Her father is a writer before the Great War. He survives combat, but afterward he is a shell of the man he once was. At his lowest point, he picks up Amory from her school and deliberately drives the car into a lake, determined to die and take his favorite daughter with him. Both survive, but Amory is forever changed.She becomes a photographer, gets beaten up by fascists while trying to get shots of a parade and, after the next war breaks out, has some harrowing experiences following the Allied army into Europe. Her brother dies in World War II, and the war veteran she marries is, like her father, ruined psychologically by his experiences.In her 60s, Amory leaves her twin daughters behind in Scotland and becomes a war correspondent in Vietnam. She is wounded by the Vietcong, yet her greatest danger comes from the British. Returning home, she learns that Blythe, one of her daughters, has run away to the United States and, even at that distance, has had her own life shaped by the war.This photographer's story comes complete with photographs throughout, raising a chicken-or-egg kind of question. Did Boyd find photos to illustrate his story or shape his story around the photos he found? I suspect it was a little of each. In any case the photographs greatly enhance the novel.In case anyone needs reminding, "Sweet Caress" suggests the stupidity and futility of war, yet in the end the novel manages to be life-affirming. It is not just war that shapes our lives and our history. It is also those sweet caresses of peace in between.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Sweet Caress is impressive in its way, in its scope, its feeling of authenticity, and its interwoven threads, but I'm sorry to say that it just didn't move me very much. The main character, Amory Clay, never seemed real to me, and so I didn't greatly care what happened to her. I put the book aside for a couple of days and didn't miss it, but I came back and finished it anyway just because I hoped for more before the end. Instead, the whole last portion just seemed out of joint to me, as if the narrative had wandered from its roadmap and couldn't find its way back in time.I greatly enjoyed Boyd's Ordinary Thunderstorms and Waiting for Sunrise, but this one didn't touch me as those did.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Author creative in that with old photos and diary notes reflecting on passing of time, this novel reads like a memoir. Amory Clay, British, was born before the Great War. This is her story of her life from 1908-1983. As Frank Sinatra put it, she did it her way. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book was so realistic (chock-full of historic people and places) that I had to keep reminding myself that I was reading a novel rather than a memoir. Mr. Boyd writes the believable story of an English woman born in 1908 who is a bit precocious and goes through some unusual experiences both with her dysfunctional family and her early life. She becomes a photographer and experiences both WWII and The Vietnam War through her assignments.The book covers her life and is written as if she is relating it to you. Actual photographs that the author collected are interspersed throughout and were the inspiration for the novel. The effect is to make her story come alive not only on the pages, but also in the mind of the reader. I found it a most enjoyable and all encapsulating read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    If written by any other writer this would simply count as a well written, engaging novel. But for William Boyd it feels a little like he's produced a cover version of the New Confessions but failed to include the magic ingredients. Like the New Confessions (and Any Human Heart) the novel looks back over the lead character's life (a woman this time) through the 20th Century. There are the familiar Boyd themes of a disjointed childhood, and strong attractions but ultimately unsuccessful relationships. There are regular Boyd locations, 1920s Berlin and 1930s America. But somehow this doesn't draw you in like the earlier novels.It's good, but not great.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    First of all, this is the second Boyd book I have read the first being Any Human Heart. Which I loved. This book was very good but maybe not in the same league as AHH. It is hard not to compare with The Race to Paris since the subject matter is relatively similar. Unlike Race, this book is a sprawling epic that gives us an unforgettable character in Amory Boyd, a fictional Margaret Bourke-White type. I loved her and all her many lives. Wm. Boyd does what I consider a formidble task for any male writer to be able to capture a woman's essence. So many writers tend to shade women as they would like us to be. Who better to know how a woman should act than a man.So she is a fabulously talented photographer taught by her uncle. As she ages into her late 50's she heads off to Viet Nam to cover the war around 1967 to 1968. "What am I doing here?" She asks herself. I know....I understand what it feels like to need excitement in one's life if only to remind yourself that you are still alive.Would recommend to anyone. Fascinating study of a life well lived.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Amory Clay is a fictional woman professional photographer in the tumultuous 20th century. Born in 1908, coming of age in the 1920s, living through the depression, WWII, and Vietnam, photographing the times. From her retirement she looks back over her life, interweaving personal events with her documentation of world events.

    Boyd enjoys blurring the lines of the real and fiction. The pages are sprinkled with real photos from the collection of the author, but which illustrate the story, giving faces to characters and character to events. Even the epigraph is attributed to a fictional character:

    "However long your stay on this small planet lasts, and whatever happens during it, the most important thing is that - from time to time - you feel life's sweet caress."

    I enjoyed reading this book. Amory was, in many ways, an average person - not particularly famous in her profession, but quite competent. She experienced life's ups and downs, but felt some sweet caresses, too.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Amory relates the story of her life, straddling as it does the twentieth century, from the First World War to the eighties.Her father is mentally damaged from the First World War. Broad-minded Amory becomes a photographer, which allows her to travel the world from ‘30s Berlin, to war-torn Europe, to Vietnam. And the text is interspersed with found photos, adding a nice touch.But I found Amory had such a modern voice that I couldn’t really believe I was reading a ‘true’ history. The past was a different place but I felt as though the modern character was parachuted into these vivid moments of the last century rather than being a changing product of them.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This book annoyed me because at first I thought it was a novel based on a real woman. It read as if the author had done some research and fictionalized a life. When I found out that it was a work of pure fiction I was surprised because Boyd wrote about things happening to this woman that , to me, were so silly that unless they were true I cannot imagine why any writer would include them. There were photographs included, which apparently the author just found and seemingly wrote his story "around". The whole thing felt like a writing assignment (take 20 photos and write a story connecting them) or an improve skit. The story just did not hold together and seemed incredible - if all of the things that happened to Armory really happened to one woman - well that would be a great work of non-fiction, but in this case the events in Armory's life just felt random. In the end I did not really feel she was a fully actualized character, nor did I like or admire her.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Compelling, engrossing, captivating, beguiling
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Amory Clay was born in 1908, a decade before the Great War. Her father is damaged in this war and he nearly takes his daughter with him, on his downward spiral. Her uncle teaches, Amory, the art of photography, as a young woman and we get to follow her through the years, as she documents her life in photos and in later years, as journal entries.As a working photographer, she finds herself, immersed, in many historical moments: she is beaten by fascist blackshirts, she witness’s atrocities in France, during WWII, she visits the steamy jungles of Vietnam and finds herself searching for her wayward daughter in a hippie commune in Northern California.This is Any Human Heart, from a female perspective. The writing is not as strong as that fine novel but the prose is easy and swift and there are many points of interest, along the way. There are also “fake” photographs, highlighting the narrative, which I found, hit or miss. A good read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Auch wenn William Boyd viel daran setzt, es anders aussehen zu lassen: Trotz der zahlreicehn Bilder und der detaillierten bografischen Daten bleibt Amory Clay eine Romanfigur. Die vom Autor geschaffene Pseudo-Authentizität hat aber jedenfalls ihhren Reiz. Und es stimmt: Hier werden wirklich viele Leben der Protagonistin erzählt, die sich - nachdem es ihr Vater nicht geschafft hat, sie in einem See zu ertränken - durch zwei Kriege des 20. Jahrhunderts fotografiert. Was nicht von ungefähr kommt, immerhin hatte ihr Vater mehr als eine Psychose aus dem Ersten Weltkrieg davongetragen. Amory wechselt die Kriegsschauplätze wie ihr Liebhaber: Immer impulsiv, immer mit vollem Einsatz, immer mit völliger Hingabe. Danach fällt ihr noch zu, einen familiären Kampf auszutragen, von dem nicht sicher ist, ob sie ihn gewinnen konnte. Das Ende rührt. Und lässt den Leser mit seinen eigenen Gedanken zurück. Ein ambivalentes Buch, von dem nicht klar ist, ob es klug ist, eine Leseempfehlung abzugeben.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a pseudo-autobiography about a woman who photographs her way through life. Tucking into a Boyd novel is like tucking oneself into a comfy, well-known bed with one's favorite Teddy bear. But at the same time he shows us that a book needn’t be boring in order to make us think about important issues. Tight and controlled narrator matches our heroine. A brisk read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Wow. I don’t know any other author who could have pulled off this book so beautifully. Boyd does the fake autobiography so well that you can fool yourself into thinking his characters are real. Amory Clay felt authentic to me (except she was an awfully sloppy photographer) and her voice was honest and pulled no punches. She didn’t glamorize her past nor did she try to martyr herself on her poor decisions. In the end she admits that her life was interesting because of the many mistakes she made. Indeed, if she’d done the easy thing or just had better luck her life would have been pretty dull.Because I read and loved Any Human Heart which is a similar novel in the sense that it’s a journal of one person’s life, I couldn’t help compare the two. Amory doesn’t have so many brushes with greatness as Logan had, but she had very personal experiences with monumental events; mostly wars, WWII and Vietnam. She’s relating her story in the present with journal entries that morph seamlessly into vignettes from her entire life, starting with early childhood and her difficult relationship with her mother and ending with her mostly solitary life on a Scottish island. Each slice of her life is delivered with polish and complete recall. As in all lives there are highs and lows, and at one point I had to stop the audiobook because I was too tense about her predicament and needed a break. A lot of reviews talk about Boyd’s portrayal of Amory as a woman and are critical just as many were with Brazzaville Beach. I didn’t have an issue with BB, but I did with Restless where I felt the feminine qualities of both lead characters were superficial; that except for the occasional mention of lipstick, the story could have been of father and son rather than mother and daughter. Amory’s character feels more naturally female to me. She’s a human who happens to be female rather than just a caricature or a wish-fulfillment vehicle. She embraces her independence, but doesn’t make a cause out of it. She mourns her apparent infertility, but doesn’t let it consume her. She has an active sex life, but isn’t promiscuous. She is driven and ambitious, but accepts her defeats with grace. I liked her a lot and was especially appreciative of her circumspect attitude at the end. I would have been sad at her demise, but since it comes to all of us, it wasn’t a tragedy.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    William Boyd is one of my favorite writers. For me, any new book by Boyd is a cause for celebration, a good reason to drop everything and schedule a few long days with nothing else to do but enjoy it. So, that’s exactly what I set out to do, but “Sweet Caress” took far longer for me to read than most of his books. This book wasn’t a complex character-driven literary mystery, nor was it a nail-biting suspense-filled thriller; this was a fictionalized literary memoir covering the greater part of a century. The main character, Amory Clay, an independent, attractive, professional photographer, led a complex and complicated life that brought her face-to-face with many of the key moments of 20th century history.Amory’s life journey (from 1908 to 1983)—whether motivated by affairs of the heart or necessitated by a fascinating set of career challenges—takes her from London to Berlin, back to London, across the Atlantic to New York, back to London, on to Paris, then to the German WWII front lines, back to Paris, to the French countryside near Bordeaux, back to London, to the west coast of Scotland, many trips back and forth to London and Edinburgh, to Vietnam (during the war), back to Scotland, to Southern California and back to Scotland a few times, and finally back to Scotland to the small island of Barrendale (in reality a peninsula), off the far northeastern coast. I could tell you a bit about what motivates Amory to make these abrupt changes in location, but I don’t think it would help illuminate the literary merit of the book and it might lessen your enjoyment of the novel should you choose to read it. Perhaps it is enough to say that her life is complex and complicated…and like many women, much is motivated by her desire to live close to the men she loved.With Amory, Boyd creates a fully authentic human being. I find it nearly impossible to believe any reviewer who says that she or he found this character unbelievable. Especially women reviewers who says they find Amory not appropriately female enough. Rubbish! There is much about Amory that reminds me of many women I know (including me), all of us highly intelligent and independent. I’ll share one moment perhaps midway through the novel when Amory is visiting with her younger sister Dido, a concert pianist who travels the world and interacts with many famous musicians and conductors. Dido is also a devoted wife and mother of two children. The two sisters are in midlife when they have this conversation. They’re a little inebriated and the younger one brags to the older one that (so far) she’s made love to 53 different men. She asks Amory (who has a history of often risky behavior and an arrest record for obscene photography) how many men she’s slept with. Amory doesn’t tell her; she’s a bit ashamed at how few men fit this category in her life. But later that night she thinks about it and is amazed that her conservative younger sister has had more than 10 times the lovers she has had…and all the while, she’d thought she’d led the more risqué life! Toward the end of the novel, Amory sums up her own life with these jumbled words: it was “rich and intensely sad, fascinating, droll, absurd and terrifying—sometimes—and difficult and painful and happy.” But at the same time, she remarks that most lives are equally as complicated as hers had been. “Any life of any reasonable length throws up all manner of complications, just as intricate.” If there is a theme to this novel, it must be this: we all lead amazingly complex and emotionally rich lives. But it takes a sublime writer like William Boyd to illuminate an everyday complicated life like Amory’s and make it into an emotionally satisfying and intriguing literary journey. “Sweet Caress” is plainly and simply a sublime book! The title, no doubt, refers to the whole of a life, in this case, a sweet caress (despite it having been punctuated frequently by immense pain and suffering). When I finished the story of Amory Clay, I felt a profound sense of loss: there would be no more to the story of this intriguing woman. The book came wrapped in a marketing sleeve proclaiming: “The story of a woman / The story of a century / The novel of the year.” The first two are obviously correct; the last is pure hyperbole. This is certainly a masterful novel, but it will hardly be the “novel of the year.” I don’t even think it is one of Boyd’s best, but I am delighted that he wrote it and that I read it. I can imagine myself rereading this story sometime again in the distant future. I do that to all the outstanding books I savor. I envy you the experience you have before you to read it fresh for the first time.

Book preview

Sweet Caress - William Boyd

Sweet Caress

For Susan

BY THE SAME AUTHOR

Novels

A Good Man in Africa

An Ice-Cream War

Stars and Bars

The New Confessions

Brazzaville Beach

The Blue Afternoon

Armadillo

Nat Tate: An American Artist 1928–1960

Any Human Heart

Restless

Ordinary Thunderstorms

Waiting for Sunrise

Solo

Short Story Collections

On the Yankee Station

The Destiny of Nathalie X

Fascination

The Dream Lover

Plays

School Ties

Six Parties

Longing

The Argument

Non-Fiction

Bamboo

Sweet Caress

The Many Lives of Amory Clay

William Boyd

CONTENTS

By the Same Author

Prologue

Book One: 1908–1927

1. Girl with a Camera

2. Family Matters

3. High Society

4. Cloudsley Hall

Book Two : 1927–1932

1. Life is Sweet

2. Berlin

3. Ein wenig Orgie

4. A Very Private Place, Very Secret

5. Scandal!

6. The Wages of Sin

Book Three: 1932–1934

1. Americana

2. The Hotel Lafayette

3. The Watershed

4. South of the Border

Book Four: 1934–1943

1. Blackshirts

2. The Maroon Street Rioto

3. Persimmon Hall

4. Le Capitaine

5. Operation Torch

Book Five: 1943–1947

1. Typhoon

2. High Holborn

3. D-Day

4. Paris

5. The Super-Tank

6. Transformations

Book Six: 1947–1966

1. The House of Farr

2. The Cellar

3. Consequences

4. Scotia!

Book Seven: 1966–1968

1. The Vietnam Scrapbook

Book Eight: 1968–1977

1. Room 42, San Carlos Motel

2. Willow Ranch

3. Mrs Tayborn Gaines

CODA IN BARRANDALE : 1978

Acknowledgements

A Note on the Author

Also available by William Boyd

Quelle que soit la durée de votre séjour sur cette petite planète, et quoi qu’il vous advienne, le plus important c’est que vous puissiez – de temps en temps – sentir la caresse exquise de la vie.

(However long your stay on this small planet lasts, and whatever happens during it, the most important thing is that – from time to time – you feel life’s sweet caress.)

Jean-Baptiste Charbonneau, Avis de passage (1957)

Amory Clay in 1928.

PROLOGUE

What drew me down there, I wonder, to the edge of the garden? I remember the summer light – the trees, the bushes, the grass luminously green, basted by the bland, benevolent late-afternoon sun. Was it the light? But there was the laughter, also, coming from where a group of people had gathered by the pond. Someone must have been horsing around making everyone laugh. The light and the laughter, then.

I was in the house, in my bedroom, bored, with the window open wide so I could hear the chatter of conversation from the guests and then the sudden arpeggio of delighted laughter came that made me slip off my bed and go to the window to see the gentlemen and ladies and the marquee and the trestle tables laid out with canapés and punchbowls. I was curious – why were they all making their way towards the pond? What was the source of this merriment? So I hurried downstairs to join them.

And then, halfway across the lawn, I turned and ran back to the house to fetch my camera. Why did I do that? I think I have an idea, now, all these years later. I wanted to capture that moment, that benign congregation in the garden on a warm summer evening in England; to capture it and imprison it forever. Somehow I sensed I could stop time’s relentless motion and hold that scene, that split second – with the ladies and the gentlemen in their finery, as they laughed, careless and untroubled. I would catch them fast, eternally, thanks to the properties of my wonderful machine. In my hands I had the power to stop time, or so I fancied.

BOOK ONE: 1908–1927

1. GIRL WITH A CAMERA

There was a mistake made on the day I was born, when I come to think of it. It doesn’t seem important, now, but on 7 March 1908 – such a long time ago, it seems, threescore years and ten almost – it made my mother very cross. However, be that as it may, I was born and my father, sternly instructed by my mother, placed an announcement in The Times. I was their first child, so the world – the readers of the London Times – was duly informed. ‘7 March 1908, to Beverley and Wilfreda Clay, a son, Amory.’

Why did he say ‘son’? To spite his wife, my mother? Or was it some perverse wish that I wasn’t in fact a girl, that he didn’t want to have a daughter? Was that why he tried to kill me later, I wonder . . . ? By the time I came across the parched yellow cutting hidden in a scrapbook, my father had been dead for decades. Too late to ask him. Another mistake.

Beverley Vernon Clay, my father – but no doubt best known to you and his few readers (most long disappeared) as B. V. Clay. A short-story writer of the early twentieth century – stories mainly of the supernatural sort – failed novelist and all-round man of letters. Born in 1878, died in 1944. This is what the Oxford Companion to English Literature (third edition) has to say about him:

Clay, Beverley Vernon

B. V. Clay (1878–1944). Writer of short stories. Collected in The Thankless Task (1901), Malevolent Lullaby (1905), Guilty Pleasures (1907), The Friday Club (1910) and others. He wrote several tales of the supernatural of which ‘The Belladonna Benefaction’ is best known. This was dramatised by Eric Maude (q.v.) in 1906 and ran for over three years and 1,000 performances in the West End of London (see Edwardian Theatre).

It’s not much, is it? Not many words to summarise such a complicated, difficult life, but then it’s more than most of us will receive in the various annals of posterity that record our brief passage of time on this small planet. Funnily enough, I was always confident nothing would ever be written about me, B. V. Clay’s daughter, but it turned out I was wrong . . .

Anyway, I have memories of my father in my very early childhood but I feel I only began to know him when he came back from the war – the Great War, the 1914–18 war – when I was ten and, in a way, when I was already well down the road to becoming the person and the personality that I am today. So it was different having that gap of time that the war imposed, and everyone has since told me he was also a different man himself, when he came back, irrevocably changed by his experiences. I wish I had known him better before that trauma – and who wouldn’t want to travel back in time and encounter their parents before they become their parents? Before ‘mother’ and ‘father’ turned them into figures of domestic myth, forever trapped and fixed in the amber of those appellations and their consequences?

The Clay family.

My father: B. V. Clay.

My mother: Wilfreda Clay (née Reade-Hill) (b.1879).

Me: Amory, firstborn. A girl (b.1908).

Sister: Peggy (b.1914).

Brother: Alexander, always known as Xan (b.1916).

The Clay family.

*

THE BARRANDALE JOURNAL 1977

I was driving back to Barrandale from Oban in the evening – in the haunted gloaming of a Scottish summer – when I saw a wild cat pick its way across the road, not 200 yards from the bridge to the island. I stopped the car at once and switched off the engine, watching and waiting. The cat halted its deliberate progress and turned its head to me, almost haughtily, as if I’d interrupted it. I reached, without thinking, for my camera – my old Leica – and held it up to my eye. Then put it down. There are no photographs more boring than photographs of animals – discuss. I watched the brindled cat – the size of a cocker spaniel – finish its pedantic traverse of the road and slip into the new conifer plantation, promptly becoming invisible. I started the engine and drove on home to the cottage, strangely exhilarated.

I call it ‘the cottage’, however its true postal designation is 6 Druim Rigg Road, Barrandale Island. As to where numbers 1–5 are, I have no idea, because the cottage sits alone on its small bay and Druim Rigg Road ends with it. It’s a solid, two-storey, thick-walled, mid-nineteenth-century, small-roomed house with two chimney stacks and one-storey outbuildings attached on either side. I assumed somebody farmed here a hundred years ago, but all that’s gone, now. It has mossy tiled roofs and walls of concrete cladding that had aged to an unpleasant, bilious grey-green and that I had painted white when I moved in.

It fronted the small, unnamed bay and if you turned left, west, you could see the southern tip of Mull and the wind-worked grey expanse of the vast Atlantic beyond.

I came in the front door and Flam, my dog, my black Labrador, gave his one glottal bass bark of welcome. I put away my shopping and then went through to the parlour, my sitting room, to check on the fire. I had a big stove with glass doors set in the chimney recess in which I burned peat bricks. The fire was low so I threw some bricks on it. I liked the concept of burning peat, rather than coal – as if I were burning ancient landscapes, whole eons, whole geographies were turning into ash as they heated my house, heated my water.

The cottage on Barrandale Island, before renovations and repainting, c.1960.

It was still light so I summoned Flam and we walked down to the bay. I stood on the small crescent beach, as Flam roved around the tide rack and the rock pools, and I watched the day slip into night, noting the wondrous tonal transformations of the sunset on its dimmer switch, how blood-orange can shade imperceptibly into ice-blue on the knife-edge of the horizon, listening to the sea’s interminable call for silence – shh, shh, shh.

*

When I was born – in Edwardian England – ‘Beverley’ was a perfectly acceptable boy’s name (like Evelyn, like Hilary, like Vivian) and I wonder if that was perhaps why my father chose an androgynous name for me: Amory. Names are important, I believe, they shouldn’t be idly opted for – your name becomes your label, your classification – your name is how you refer to yourself. What could be more crucial? I’ve only met one other Amory in my life and he was a man – a boring man, incidentally, but unenlivened by his interesting name.

When my sister was born, my father was already away at the war and my mother consulted with her brother, my uncle Greville, on what to call this new child. They decided between them on something ‘homely and solid’, so family lore has it, and thus the Clays’ second daughter was called ‘Peggy’ – not Margaret, but a straightforward diminutive from the outset. Perhaps it was my mother’s counter to ‘Amory’, the androgynous name she didn’t choose. So Peggy came into the world – Peggy, the homely and solid one. Never has a child been so misnamed. In the event, when my father returned home on leave to greet his six-month-old daughter the name was firmly established and she was known to all of us as ‘Peg’ or ‘Peggoty’ or ‘Peggsy’, and there was nothing he could do. He never really liked the name Peggy, and was never wholly loving to Peggy as a result, I believe, as if she were some sort of foundling we’d taken in. You see what I mean about the importance of names. Did Peggy feel she had the wrong name because her father didn’t like it, or her, particularly? Was it another mistake? Was that why she changed it later?

As for Alexander, ‘Xan’, that was mutually consented to. My mother’s father, a circuit judge, who died before I was born, was called Alexander. It was my father who shortened it instantly to Xan and that stuck. So, Amory, Peggy and Xan, there we were – the Clay children.

My first memory of my father is of him doing a handstand in the garden at Beckburrow, our house near Claverleigh, in East Sussex. It was something he could do effortlessly – a party trick he had learned as a youngster. Give him a patch of lawn and he would stand easily on his hands and take a few steps. However, after he was wounded in the war he did it less and less, no matter how much we implored him. He said it made his head ache and his eyes lose focus. When we were very young, though, he needed no urging. He liked doing handstands, he would say, because it readjusted his senses and his perspectives. He would do a handstand and say, ‘I look at you girls hanging from your feet like bats and I feel sorry for you, oh, yes, in your topsy-turvy world with the earth above and the sky below. Poor things.’ No, no, we would shriek back, no – you’re the one upside down, Papa, not us!

I remember him coming back on leave in uniform after Xan was born. Xan was three or four months old so it must have been towards the end of 1916. Xan was born on 1 July 1916, the opening day of the battle of the Somme. It’s the only time I recall my father in his uniform – Captain B. V. Clay DSO – the only occasion I can bring him to mind as a soldier. I suppose I must have seen him uniformed at other times but I remember that leave in particular, probably because baby Xan had been born, and my father was holding his son in his arms with a strange, fixed expression on his face.

Apparently he had left precise instructions about the naming of his third child: Alexander if he was a boy; Marjorie if a girl. How do I know this? Because sometimes when I was cross with Xan and wanted to tease him I called him ‘Marjorie’, so it must have been common knowledge. All family histories, personal histories, are as sketchy and unreliable as histories of the Phoenicians, it seems to me. We should note everything down, fill in the wide gaps if we can. Which is why I am writing this, my darlings.

During the war, the man we saw most of, and who lived with us at Beckburrow from time to time, was my mother’s younger brother, Greville – my uncle Greville. Greville Reade-Hill had been a photo-reconnaissance observer in the Royal Flying Corps, and was something of a legend owing to the fact that he had stepped unscathed from four crashes until his fifth crash duly broke his right leg in five places and he was invalided out of the service. I remember him in his uniform limping around Beckburrow. And then he transformed himself into Greville Reade-Hill, the society photographer. He hated being called a ‘society photographer’ even though that was exactly and evidently what he did. ‘I’m a photographer,’ he would say, plaintively, ‘impure and not so simple.’ Greville – I never called him uncle, he forbade it – set my life on its course, unknowingly, when he gave me a Kodak Brownie No. 2 as a present for my seventh birthday in 1915. This is the first photograph I ever took.

In the garden at Beckburrow, spring 1915.

Greville Reade-Hill. Let me call him to mind then, just after the war, as his career was beginning to take off, unsteadily but definitely upwards, like a semi-filled hydrogen balloon. He was tall, broad-shouldered and good-looking, real handsomeness marred only by a slightly too large nose. The Reade-Hill nose, not the Clay nose (I have the Reade-Hill nose, as well). A slightly large nose can make you look more interesting, both Greville and I have always agreed – who wants to look ‘conventionally’ handsome or beautiful? Not me, no, thank you very much.

I can’t remember a great deal about that first photograph – that momentous first click of the shutter that was the starting pistol that set me off on the race for the rest of my life. It was a birthday party – I think my mother’s – held at Beckburrow in the spring of 1915. I seem to recall a marquee in the garden, also. Greville showed me how to load the film into the camera and how to operate it – simplicity itself: look down into the small limpid square of the viewfinder, select your target and press down the little lever at the side. Click. Wind on the film and take another.

I heard the laughter in the garden and ran to find my camera. And then scampered across the lawn and turned the lens on the ladies in their hats and long dresses strolling down towards the beeches at the garden’s end that screened the pond.

Click. I took my photograph.

But my remaining memories of that day are more to do with Greville. As he crouched by me showing me how the camera worked what has stayed in my mind more than anything else was the smell of the pomade or Macassar that he put on his hair – a scent of custard and jasmine. I think it may have been ‘Rowland’s Macassar’ that he wore. He was very fastidious about his clothes and grooming, as if he were always on show in some way or, now I come to think of it, as if he were about to be photographed. Maybe that was it – as someone who photographed people in their finery he became particularly aware of how he was looking, himself, at any hour of the day. I don’t think I ever saw him tousled or dishevelled, except once . . . But we’ll come to that in good time.

Beckburrow, East Sussex, our home. In fact I was born in London, in Hampstead village, where we lived in a rented two-floor maisonette in Well Walk just a hundred yards from the Heath. We left Hampstead when I was two because my father became temporarily rich as a result of the royalties he received from Eric Maude’s dramatisation of his short story, ‘The Belladonna Benefaction’. He used the financial windfall to buy an old house in a four-acre garden half a mile from the village of Claverleigh in East Sussex (between Herstmonceux and Battle). He had a new kitchen wing added with bedrooms above and installed electric light and central heating – all very newfangled in 1910. Here is what The Buildings of England: Sussex had to say about Beckburrow in 1965:

CLAVERLEIGH, a small village with no plan but considerable charm below the South Downs. One winding street ending at a small church, ST JAMES THE LESS at the S end (1744, rebuilt in 1865 in a limp, mongrel version of the classical style) . . . BECKBURROW ½ m. E on the lane to Battle, a good capacious C18 tile-roofed cottage with attractive materials – brick, flint, clunch – and remains of timber framing at one gable end. The small mullioned windows of the old facade give an air of immense solidity. Sober neo-Georgian additions (1910) with a heavy-hipped roof. Inoffensive, a home to be lived in rather than an exposition of taste. A good weatherboard BARN.

That was what I always felt about Beckburrow – ‘a home to be lived in’. We were happy there, the Clay family, or so it seemed to me as I was growing up. Even when Papa came home after the war – thin, irritable, unable to write – nothing really seemed to have changed in the place’s benign enfolding atmosphere. We had a nanny, two housemaids, a cook (Mrs Royston who lived in Claverleigh) and a gardener/factotum called Ned Gunn. I went to a dame school in Battle, driven there and back by Ned Gunn in a dog cart, until we acquired our own motor car in 1914 and Ned added ‘chauffeur’ to his list of accomplishments.

When my father came home, in those early years after the war, the only real pleasure he seemed to take in life was long walks to the sea, over the Downs, to the beaches at Pevensey and Cooden. He strode out, leading his children and whatever friends and relatives we had with us, like some slightly demented Pied Piper, urging us on. ‘Step we gaily, on we go!’ he would shout back at us as we dawdled and explored.

My mother joined us later with the motor and we would be driven home at the end of the day to Beckburrow. However, once we arrived at the beach, it was immediately obvious how my father’s mood changed. The high spirits of the walk gave way to taciturn moodiness as he sat there smoking his pipe staring at the sea. We never gave it much thought. Your father was born moody, my mother would say, always brooding about something. He’s a writer who can’t write and it’s making him fractious. And so we put up with his interminable silences punctuated by the odd demonic rant when his patience finally snapped and he would stalk the house shouting at everyone, bellowing for ‘Just a bit of peace and quiet, for the love of Jesus! Is it too much to ask?’ We simply made ourselves scarce and Mother would calm him down, leading him back to his study, whispering in his ear. I’ve no idea what she said to him, but it seemed to work.

Your parents, however strange they may be in actual fact, always seem ‘normal’ to their offspring. Indeed, the slow realisation of your parents’ defining oddness is a harbinger of your developing maturity – a sign that you are growing up, becoming your own person. In those early years at Beckburrow, from our move there until the mid-1920s, nothing seemed much wrong with our little world. Servants came and went, the garden flourished; Peggy appeared to be some kind of infant prodigy on the piano; baby Xan turned into a somewhat self-contained, thoughtful and almost simple boy who could amuse himself for hours creating elaborate patterns with a handful of sticks and leaves or damming the stream at the bottom of the south lawn, conjuring into being a little empire of rivers and lakes and irrigation channels, setting small balsa-wood rafts off on minuscule voyages of discovery. It would keep him occupied an entire day until he was called in for supper.

What about our Amory? What about me? So far, so run of the mill. After the dame school in Battle came the secondary school in Hastings. Then in 1921 it was announced that I was going away – to be a boarder at Amberfield School for Girls near Worthing. When I left for Amberfield (Mother accompanying me, Ned driving) and we pulled away down the lanes from Beckburrow it was the first time in my life that I registered the full level of hurt, injustice and disappointment that amounted to a betrayal. My mother would hear nothing of it: ‘You’re a lucky girl, it’s a wonderful school, don’t make a fuss. I hate fuss and fusspots.’

I came home in the holidays, of course, but, as the one absentee, felt I was something of an outsider. The barn had been converted into a music room for Peggy, wainscotted, painted, a carpet on the floor and furnished with a baby grand piano, where she was taught by a Madame Duplessis from Brighton. Xan mooned about the garden and the lanes around the house, a solemn boy with a rare, transforming smile. My father appeared to be spending most of the week in London, looking for literary work of some sort. He was given a part-time job as an editor and contributor to the Strand magazine and was a reader for various publishing houses. The pot of money from ‘The Belladonna Benefaction’ was running out. A 1919 production in New York closed after a month but cheques continued to arrive in the post, the mysterious enduring legacy of a once successful play. My mother was quite content, it seemed to me, running her big house, or sitting on the bench of the magistrate’s court in Lewes, or initiating and organising charitable works in the East Sussex villages around Claverleigh – fetes, tombolas, bring-and-buy sales.

And Greville would come down occasionally from London. Only Greville was my friend, I felt, and he taught me how to take better photographs, changing my Box Brownie for a 2A Kodak Jnr, with an extending lens on a concertina mount and, one mysterious afternoon, he blacked out the pantry, unpacked his trays and pungent bottles, and showed me the astonishing alchemy involved in taking images trapped on film and, through the application of chemicals – developer, stopper, fixer and washes – turning them miraculously into negatives which could then be printed into black and white photographs.

I still felt this nagging sore of resentment at my banishment, however. One day I generated enough courage to confront my mother and asked her why I had to go away to school when Peggy and Xan could stay at home. My mother sat me down and took my hands. ‘Peggy is a genius,’ she said, breezily, ‘and Xan has problems.’ And that was that, an end to the matter until my father finally went totally insane.

*

THE BARRANDALE JOURNAL 1977

I feed Flam, my loyal and loving Labrador, and, as the summer night slowly comes on, light the oil lamps. I use my diesel generator to power the small refrigerator, the washing machine and my radio and hi-fi. I don’t want electric light or a television set – and, anyway, I won’t be around much longer, so what’s the point of more home improvements? I live in a comfortable technological limbo, a halfway house: on the one hand laundry, music, the world’s news and ice cubes for my gin and tonic; and, on the other, a peat fire and the particular glow that the oil lamp gives off – the subtle waver of the incandescent wick, the lambent marshmallow, generating that subtle shadow-shift that makes the room more alive, somehow – breathing, pulsing.

Barrandale doesn’t really deserve to be called an island. It’s separated from the mainland of the west of Scotland by a narrow ‘sound’, maybe fifty or sixty feet across at its widest. And the sound is bridged, the ‘Bridge over the Atlantic’ as we locals grandiosely like to term it. There’s another island with another more famous, grander, older, stone bridge (ours is made of girders and railway sleepers but is ten feet longer, which makes us feel ever so slightly more superior: we cross a larger portion of the Atlantic). Still, Barrandale is irrefutably an island, and driving over the bridge – over the sound – establishes, almost unknowingly, an island mentality.

My separate schooling, it turned out – so I learned later – was the result of a will. The death of a great-aunt (Audrey, on my mother’s side) conferred on the Clay family a sum of money for the education of Amory, great-niece and firstborn. My father’s steadily diminishing and erratic income couldn’t have coped with the termly fees demanded by Amberfield, but, if I hadn’t been sent there, or somewhere similar, the benefaction wouldn’t have been forthcoming. Completely strange, unknown currents can shape our lives. Why didn’t my parents tell me? Why did they pretend it was their decision? I was taken away from the familiar comforts and securities of Beckburrow and I was meant to be grateful, the privileged one.

My mother was a tall, bespectacled, somewhat cumbersome woman. She managed to conceal whatever affection she might have felt for her children with great success. She had two expressions she used all the time: ‘I don’t like a fuss’ and ‘Put that in your pipe and smoke it’. She was always patient with us but in a way that seemed to suggest her mind was elsewhere, that she had more interesting things she could be doing. We always called her ‘Mother’, as if it was a category, a definition, and didn’t reflect our relationship, as if we were saying ‘ironmonger’ or ‘historian’. Here’s the sort of exchange that would ensue:

ME: Mother, could I have another helping of blancmange, please?

MOTHER: No.

ME: Why not? There’s plenty left.

MOTHER: Because I say so.

ME: But that’s not fair!

MOTHER: Well you’ll just have to put that in your pipe and smoke it, won’t you?

My mother on Cooden beach in the 1920s.

Taken with my 2A Kodak Jnr. Xan is laughing behind her.

I never saw any real expression of affection between my mother and my father – and at the same time I have to admit I never saw any signs of resentment or hostility.

My father’s father, Edwin Clay, was a miner from Staffordshire who went to night classes at a Mechanics’ Institute, educated himself, qualified himself, and ended his career as a director of Edgeware & Rackham, the publishers, where he eventually became the managing editor of five trade magazines that served the building industry. He grew wealthy enough to send his two sons to private schools. My father, a clever boy, won an exhibition to Lincoln College, Oxford, and became a professional writer (his younger brother, Walter, died at the Battle of Jutland, 1915). The one-generation jump was remarkable, I suppose, and yet I always sensed in my father that familiar mixture of pride at his achievements combined with – not shame, but a diffidence, an insecurity: an English social insecurity. Would anyone take him seriously, a miner’s son, as a writer? I believe that part of the reason for buying Beckburrow and enlarging it and living the county life must have been to prove to himself that those insecurities were now worthless and wholly cancelled out. He had become thoroughly middle class; a successful writer of several well-received books married to a judge’s daughter, with three children, living in a large and covetable big house in the East Sussex countryside. Yet he was not entirely a happy man. And then the war came and everything went wrong.

I think tonight I might begin to sort out all those old boxes of photographs. Or maybe not.

*

It is 1925. The Amberfield School for Girls, Worthing. My best friend Millicent Lowther stuck on the false moustache and smoothed it down with her fingertips.

‘It was all I could find,’ she said. ‘They seemed only to have beards.’

‘It’s perfect,’ I said. ‘I only want to get an idea of the sensation.’

We were sitting on the floor, our backs to the wall. I leant forward and kissed her gently, lips to lips, no great pressure.

‘Don’t pout,’ I said, not pulling away. ‘Men don’t pout.’ The contact with the false moustache wasn’t unpleasant, although, given the choice, I’d always prefer a clean-shaven top lip. I moved slightly, changed the angle, feeling the prickle of the bristles on my cheek. No, it was tolerable.

We older girls regularly practised kissing at Amberfield but I have to say the experience wasn’t much different from kissing your fingers or the inside of your upper arm. Having never kissed a man, and I was now seventeen years old, I wasn’t sure what all the fuss was about, as my mother would have said.

We broke apart.

‘Any moustache pash?’ Millicent asked.

‘Not really. It’s just that Greville’s grown one and I wanted to see what it might feel like.’

‘Gorgeous Greville. Why don’t you invite him to visit?’

‘Because I don’t want you specimens ogling him. Did you get the fags?’

We bought cigarettes from one of the young Amberfield gardeners, a gormless lad with a harelip called Roy.

‘Oh, yes,’ Millicent said and fished in her pockets, producing a small wrap of paper and a box of matches. I liked Millicent a great deal – she was smart and sardonic, almost as sardonic as me – but I would have preferred her to have fuller lips, the better to practise kissing – her upper lip was almost non-existent.

I screwed one of the small Woodbines into the ebony cigarette holder that I had stolen from my mother.

‘Just Woodbines,’ Millicent said. ‘Very infra dig, I’m afraid.’

‘You can’t expect a poor proletarian like Roy to smoke Craven A.’

‘Roy, the hoi polloi. I suppose not, but they do burn my throat, rather.’

‘While your head spins.’

I lit Millicent’s cigarette and then my own and we puffed smoke up at the ceiling. We were in my ‘darkroom’, a broom cupboard outside the chemistry laboratory.

‘Thank the Lord your chemicals pong so,’ Millicent said. ‘What is that smell?’

‘Fixer. It’s called hypo.’

‘I’m not surprised no one’s ever descried cigarette smoke in your little cubbyhole.’

‘Not once. Is descried the mot juste?’

‘It’s a word that should be used more often,’ Millicent said, a little smugly, I thought, as if she had invented the verb herself, spontaneously.

‘But correctly,’ I admonished.

‘Pedant. Annoying pedant.’

‘Apart from us, only the Child Killer comes in here, and she loves me.’

‘Is she a femme, do you think, the Child Killer?’

‘No. I think she’s sexless . . .’ I drew on my Woodbine, feeling the head-reel. ‘I don’t think she really knows what she’s feeling.’ The Child Killer was in fact called Miss Milburn, the science teacher, and I owed her a great deal. She had given me this broom cupboard and encouraged me to set up my dark room in it. She had dense unplucked eyebrows that almost met over her nose, hence her nickname.

‘But aren’t we femmes?’ Millicent asked. ‘Kissing each other like this?’

‘No,’ I said. ‘We only do it to educate ourselves, to see what it’d be like with a man. We’re not bitter, my dear.’ ‘Bitter’ was Amberfield slang for ‘perverted’.

‘Then why do you want to kiss your uncle? Eugh!’

‘Simple – I’m in love with him.’

‘And you say you’re not bitter!’

‘He’s the handsomest, funniest, kindest, most sardonic man I’ve ever met. If you were ever in his presence – not that you’ll ever be – you’d understand.’

‘It just seems a bit odd to me.’

‘Everything in life is a bit odd, when you come to think of it.’ I was quoting my father – it was something he’d say from time to time.

Millicent stood up, cigarette between her lips, and squeezed her small breasts.

‘I just can’t imagine a man doing this to me . . . Rubbing my bosoms. How would I feel, react? I might want to punch him.’

‘That’s why it’s just as well we try everything here, first. One day we’ll get out of this jungle, we’ll be free. We need to have some idea of what’s going to be what.’

‘It’s all right for you,’ Millicent said, grudgingly. ‘The world you move in – writers, society photographers . . . My father’s a timber merchant.’

‘Your secret’s safe with me.’

‘Minx! Queen of the minxes!’

‘I’m not a snob, Millicent. My grandfather was a Staffordshire miner.’

‘I’d rather my father was a writer than a timber merchant, that’s all I’m saying.’ Millicent carefully removed her false moustache and stubbed out her Woodbine.

‘Any more kissing?’ she asked. ‘We haven’t tried it with tongues.’

‘Bitter woman! You should be ashamed of yourself.’ I clambered to my feet and went to look at my photographs drying on their line of string. A bell rang in a distant corridor.

‘I think I’m meant to be supervising some of the younger specimens,’ she said. ‘See you later, darling.’

She left and I carefully unpegged the photos. I didn’t print every negative I developed as I didn’t want to waste paper on contact sheets. I would scrutinise the negative with a magnifying glass and was often very confident of the choice I eventually made. The decision to print was somehow key to what I felt about the photograph and each one that I selected would be given a title. I don’t know why I did this – some vague painterly connection, I suppose – but in bestowing a title the photograph lived on in my mind more easily and permanently. I could recall almost every photograph that I’d printed – a memory archive – an album in my head. I think also that the whole process of photography still seemed astonishing at that stage of my life. The abidingly magical process of trapping an image on film through the brief exposure of light and then, through the precisely monitored agency of chemicals and paper, producing a monochrome picture of that instant of time still possessed its alluring sorcery.

Now, Millicent having gone, summoned by her bell, I took down my three new photographs – stiff, dry – and laid them out on the small table at the end of the box room. I had called the three photographs ‘Xan, Flying’, ‘Boy with Bat and Hat’ and ‘At the Lido’. I was pleased with them all, particularly ‘Xan, Flying’.

One hot day the previous August we’d gone down to the Westbourne Swimming Club Lido in Hove where they had a one-acre, unheated salt-water pool with a twenty-five-foot diving board at one end. It took Xan three jumps before I was happy that I’d truly captured him in mid-air.

I wrote the titles on the back of the prints in a soft pencil, added the date, and slipped them into my loose album. All three photographs were similar in that they were candid shots of people in movement. I liked taking photographs of people in action – walking, coming down steps, running, jumping and, most importantly, not looking into the lens. I loved the way the camera could capture that unreflecting suspended animation, an image of somebody halted utterly in time – their next step, their next gesture, next movement, forever incomplete. Stopped just like that – by me – with the click of a shutter. Even then I think

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1