Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Rats: Observations on the History & Habitat of the City's Most Unwanted Inhabitants
Rats: Observations on the History & Habitat of the City's Most Unwanted Inhabitants
Rats: Observations on the History & Habitat of the City's Most Unwanted Inhabitants
Ebook338 pages6 hours

Rats: Observations on the History & Habitat of the City's Most Unwanted Inhabitants

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

New York Public Library Book for the Teenager
New York Public Library Book to Remember
PSLA Young Adult Top 40 Nonfiction Titles of the Year

"Engaging...a lively, informative compendium of facts, theories, and musings."-Michiko Kakutani, New York Times

Behold the rat, dirty and disgusting! Robert Sullivan turns the lowly rat into the star of this most perversely intriguing, remarkable, and unexpectedly elegant New York Times bestseller.


Love them or loathe them, rats are here to stay-they are city dwellers as much as (or more than) we are, surviving on the effluvia of our society. In Rats, the critically acclaimed bestseller, Robert Sullivan spends a year investigating a rat-infested alley just a few blocks away from Wall Street. Sullivan gets to know not just the beast but its friends and foes: the exterminators, the sanitation workers, the agitators and activists who have played their part in the centuries-old war between human city dweller and wild city rat.

Sullivan looks deep into the largely unrecorded history of the city and its masses-its herds-of-rats-like mob. Funny, wise, sometimes disgusting but always compulsively readable, Rats earns its unlikely place alongside the great classics of nature writing.

With an all-new Afterword by the author
LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 11, 2008
ISBN9781596919174
Rats: Observations on the History & Habitat of the City's Most Unwanted Inhabitants
Author

Robert Sullivan

Robert Sullivan is the author of Rats, The Meadowlands, A Whale Hunt, and most recently, The Thoreau You Don't Know. His writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The New York Times, New York, A Public Space and Vogue, where he is a contributing editor. He was born in Manhattan and now lives in Brooklyn, New York.

Read more from Robert Sullivan

Related to Rats

Related ebooks

United States History For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Rats

Rating: 3.7257462388059697 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

268 ratings19 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Recently, I went to New York City with my son. It was the first time I had ever been to New York City, although I had been all around it several times. Two of the things I wished to see were the Tenament Museum and a New York City Rat. (At least one rat makes an appearance in almsot every book I've read about New York City.) We were only in the city for two days before going to Croton on Hudson, but we knew we'd hit the museum and we kept looking for rats. When we went to the museum we needed to use a couple of their lockers for our backpacks, and of course being who I am, we were early so we looked around the Tenament Museum shop. I looked for a book about the Triangle Shirt Factory fire and couldn't find one I hadn't already read (that's often the fate of someone who is interested in labour history/ethics) but there was this book entitled "Rats" by Robert Sullivan. I immediately picked it up and started to read the cover. A staff member of the store approached me and said, "I know this sounds strange, but the staff recommends this book very highly." One of his colleagues joined us and said "I loved that book."In the hotel that night I began to read the book and I was immediately engrossed. For four evenings (about 20 minutes each evening) I began to devour the book of "Rats". I don't normally read nature books, (and the title doesn't lead a reader to believe it's a nature book) but this is about rats in their natural habitat.Rats are absolutely fascinating and Mr. Sullivan shares his experiences with them using charm, wit, affection and objectivity in a way to delight the reader. I learned interesting facts about rattus norvegicus. They are thigmophilic and can't vomit?I also learned that they are not indigenous to North America, and they are not the friendly pet rats that we usually consider. However, the most interesting point is the closeness the rat has with humanity and the similarities in our two species.This books is more than a natural history. It is a history of the struggles of humanity and humanity's interaction with itself and other species, including rats. It is full of little stories as well as myths and legends. Although focused on New York City itself, it also includes the impact of the life of the rat world wide.What I did not anticipate was how easily the book could be put down because of unexpected circumstances, and then picked up and enjoyed without losing a beat. I've also learned that if I ever get to New York City again, there's a better way to look for rats than we were doing.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Rats are not my favourite topic, but Mr. Sullivan made then fascinating, albeit still a bit repulsive. Rats have affected humans a lot more than most other things in history, and for that reason if no other they should be read about. This is a great read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Rats by Robert Sullivan is a fascinating study of rats and their cohabitation with humans. One particularly interesting section was on rats and plague, which, as you may know, is spread to humans by the rat flea. Apparently the Japanese were the first to experiment with the use of plague as a biological weapon during WWII under the direction of General Shiro Ishii. He discovered that the best was to infect a city with plague was to fill clay bombs with infected fleas. An attack was successfully conducted against the Chinese city ofChangde. A clue that the outbreak was caused by humans rather than rats was that the rats began dying of plague weeks after the humans, a reverse of the normal situation.

    General Ishii also practiced vivisection on live humans. He was never tried for war crimes, apparently having made a deal with the Americans who got copies of his notes and papers which formed the basis for the early American attempts at creating biological weapons. He retired a respected medical man.

    The United States began experimenting with biological weapons in the early fifties and tested their weapon distribution methods on unsuspecting Americans. In one case, Navy planes sprayed the eastern Virginia coat with microbes similar to Anthrax but "thought to be harmless," and as late as 1966, soldiers dressed in civilian clothes dropped light bulbs filled with the microbes on the tracks in New York subways in order to measure how the microbes dispersed -- all without the knowledge of the public or Congress.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Finished this one over the weekend. It was enjoyable and touched on many aspects of rats, including their natural history, history of rats in New York City, profiles of exterminators and their methods, and rats' role in carrying disease. There is certainly a lot to learn. It's amazing that a creature that most people don't think about, unless in disgust, is so firmly rooted in life alongside humans. The author does not love rats, and maybe that was why the book didn't excite me more than it did. I have to admit I've never lived in a city in close proximity to rats and I don't seem to have that instinctive repulsion or fear that most people have, although the author's descriptions of rat bites and rat attacks are sobering (and reminded me of the evil rat in Lady & The Tramp, which I have always thought unfairly demonized the poor rodent - guess I was wrong). Still, I believe a creature that is so adaptable and obviously intelligent deserves our respect and even a bit of admiration. It seems we tend to hate those animals who do the best job of living with us -- rats, pigeons, mice, etc. -- when their adaptability, evolution, and tendency to reproduce and drive out other species makes them more like us than other, rarer creatures. There was very little in this book about environmental concerns, either. The matter-of-fact discussion of the exterminators and the chemicals they use, which are described as very hazardous, did not venture into discussion of how those poisons are affecting groundwater, air quality, etc., although there was some discussion of accidental and intentional human poisoning using rat poison. Guess that was too much for the scope of this book, but it was a constant thought in the back of my mind as I read. I also wish the book had some photos, although they might have been unappealing to most readers. I admire the author's tenacity and willingness to submerge himself in the world of rats for a year, but it doesn't seem that he gained any great wisdom or new understanding.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I used to think I had obsessions. Not compared to this guy. Fascinating book, but lots of ewwwwing! and oooohging over it whenever members of my family would see it. I wanted to pass it to my exterminator when I was done. Couldn't find it anywhere. Maybe a family member lost it accidentally on purpose.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Everything you wanted to know about New York's rats (rattus norvegicus) but were afraid to ask can be found in this entertaining booklet. Some people have truly strange hobbies. The author obviously enjoyed hanging out in New York's seedier and abandoned alleys to observe rats feeding on the wastes of consumer society. The most important finding of the book is that the rat population is controlled by its access to a food supply. Rat traps don't work (due to the risk-averse and conservative nature of rats). Poison only temporarily checks the rat population. Cleaning up, closing architectural sins and locking away food and waste is the only way to solve pest problems.While Sullivan points out that rats may pop up anywhere, pest problems are good indicators of both poverty and failed public healthcare problems. New York's infrastructure is clearly and visibly worse than many a comparable big city, due to massive underinvestment and focus on developers instead of the people. Taking better care of the people in need, making back alleys nicer, safer and cleaner would, however, necessitate a shift in political priorities. At least, New Yorkers are today spared the cruel entertainment of rat-baiting, whose eradication by a political struggle is ably told by Sullivan. Recommended for a good introduction to both the animal and a darker side of the Big Apple.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    If you've ever wondered what secret life all those creatures you see scurrying along subway tracks or around the garbage bags of any city in the world, then this book is for you. Even if you're not, actually. Because sure, rats are gross, disgusting animals. But as they are part of the daily life of many city dwellers worldwide, their history is quite close to that of the human being, and their behavior can tell a great deal about ours.Sullivan's book is full of informative facts, funny anecdotes and many forgotten bits of history; a very entertaining read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An interesting look into a world that's all around us, but that we rarely know how to see. Thorough, at times even bordering on the obsessive, but it works for the topic. Suffers a bit when he tries to get all high-flown and Thoreauvian. You can imitate Thoreau without "imitating Thoreau" if you know what I mean. But those parts are ignorable, and the substance of the book and the entertainingness of the stories it tells carry it through.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Engrossing and horrible book about the lives of the rats who live(d) in a specific downtown New York City alley. I learned far more than I wanted to know about our fellow city-dwellers, and a lot of it really icky. Nonetheless, I couldn't put it down until I finished it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book sorely lacked any type of visual aid such as a map of New York or photographs of newspapers or even the rats themselves. Besides that, it was an interesting idea which showed how much history can be tied into one little alley.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I had expected a lot more from this book. I have had plenty of contact with rats over the years and it was good to know more about them. I had underestimated their reliance on man for so much of their food. It has led me to be more careful to not provide for them.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What's most interesting about this book is how much of it is not actually about rats. I enjoyed some of the historical detail, but the connections with the world of rats was tenuous. I read the book on the strength of a single mention of Jack Black, Queen Victoria's rat catcher -- I wanted more details. I got no more details.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    nonfiction; more history than biology.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I was recommended this book as a good book about rats. We are suffering rat incursions and I wanted to learn more about them. Sadly this isn't really a book about rats, its a book about humans and New York City loosly themed around rats. Its alright if you want a psychogeographical journey around NYC rat history but not if you want a book about rat behaviour. Fantastic notes section at the end tho'!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I was about a paragraph and a half into Rats[/url] when it occurred to me “this reads like a New Yorker article.” Inspecting the author bio on the jacket, it turns out Robert Sullivan is a “frequent contributor to New Yorker”. So that’s why there are trenchant observations on the history of the alley in New York where Sullivan sets up to observe rats; compelling accounts of Sullivan’s conversations with exterminators, public health workers, and casual passers-by; a politically correct history of the New York sanitation workers strike in the 1960s; and stream-of-consciousness musings that include John James Audubon, Henry David Thoreau, Walt Whitman, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Daniel Defoe. There’s not very much about rats, though. We do learn that Rattus norvegicus was a relatively late (early 18th century) arrival in the New World; that there are no rats in Alberta; that a rat requires about two ounces of water a day; and that rats really can crawl and swim up through the S-trap in your toilet bowl, and that one old rat (missing a paw, at that) in an unnamed government building in Washington, D.C. was so cunning about traps and poison bait that it finally had to be taken out by a stake-out sniper with a rifle and night-vision equipment. This isn’t a bad book at all; it was a quite enjoyable read and Sullivan is a good writer. But I need to go find some dull texts on rodent biology now.
    No illustrations; no maps (a handicap, since Sullivan spends a lot of time discussing New York current and historical geography). No index. No footnotes or formal bibliography, although there’s an end matter “Notes” section that lists Sullivan’s sources (but also where he bought his binoculars and night vision goggles).
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Not for the squeamish, this one. Sullivan stakes out a New York City alley and observes its rats, interspersing his own anecdotal take on the critters with perspectives from rat scientists, exterminators, street people, &c. Reminded me of a Mary Roach book without the humor, or Andrew Blechman's book on pigeons from a few years ago.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A beautifully written, highly engaging book on err.. rats. Well it's not just about rats, it's a wonderful mix of social politics, history and science too. Sullivan chose to concentrate on rats ‘ relationship with humanity and this keeps this book from being dry, instead it's fun and full of life. He knows when to digress with a fascinating aside, concentrate on personal accounts or recount history. It's packed full of interesting things but even though there's a wide remit it fits together remarkably well. I thought it a well researched book and luckily the author doesn't need to show off, his judicious use of facts and his ability to clarity makes this lots of fun.Of course there's a caveat people expecting to have a book based solely on rats will disappointed, others who already have a good knowledge of New York or USA history may have seen some of it before and be bored. Although Sullivan writes in such an engaging fast paced manner that that this may not matter. The was one minor fault for me (although it did not detract from the book). Sullivan's attempts to tie the book together thematically, to reach a conclusion to his obsessive year seemed false, interesting yet strained.Still I would highly recommended this book to ..well just about anyone.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One of my favorite things to do as a reader on vacation is read a book with local flair. You may have noticed my lead to books: The Big Bam by Montville and Pigeons by Blechman. This trip I brought along, Rats: Observations on the History & Habitat of the City’s Most Unwanted Inhabitants by Robert Sullivan, as our 2007 guidebook. Robert Sullivan, author of The Meadowlands and A Whale Hunt, is currently a contributing editor to Vogue and constant contributor to the New Yorker. In 2004, the year Rats was published, I heard Sullivan on NPR and as a guest of David Letterman. I remember thinking he sounds sane and looks normal, but what is wrong with this man. No one, in his right mind, willingly gives up a year of their life to observe rats in their natural habitat. I am happy to say, after reading Rats, author Sullivan is like most Americans. He still gets a little freaked-out working around and in proximity to rats, even after a year of “observing.” Let us start with the whys. Sullivan thought the rats of New York City, although a quarter to half a million strong, were mostly ignored by nature writers. If they appeared in print it was to shock newspaper buyers into full subscriptions. Yet, for all the potential diseases they carry, they have had little consequence on humans in the last eighty years. Throughout history, where humans created community, so too did rats. As our fictitious Hansel and Gretel skipped into the woods, it wasn’t song birds but rather hungry rats that ate their bread crumbs. For America, it was the rattus norvegicus or Norway Rat, who arrived, “in the first year of the Revolution.” From which they ambled after the settlers into the country, as Sullivan quips, “a manifest infestation.” In the summer of 2001, Sullivan set up camp outside the entrance to Eden’s Alley. In an L-shaped corridor connecting Gold Street and Fulton, the oldest section of Manhattan, he began his shift at five in the evening where he observed through a night-vision monocular until morning broke. The yearlong experiment included the tragic September 11th loss that fall, when volunteers worked to contain the rats and the pestilence they harbor from Americans. This is a fascinating read about a disgusting animal many humans would rather ignore. Would it surprise you, John James Audubon spent his later years walking the streets of lower Manhattan, similar to our neo-naturalist Sullivan, looking for rats.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The setting is New York City, then and now. Sullivan decides to do a nature study of the New York City rat. He stakes out an alley – Edens Alley—two blocks away from the World Trade Center, buys some night vision paraphernalia, and observes rats for at least a year. The reader learns the particulars of the rat: Incisor length (2 inches, grows 5 inches per year); reproductive habits (screws 20 times or more per day; 21 day gestation period with females immediately fertile upon delivery); food preferences (dislikes vegetables, loves chicken pot pie); vital statistics (about a foot long); recreational habits (gnawing); diseases it carries (almost all of them). The reader learns about the history of New York as it pertains to rats—the streets and alleys, the famous rat outbreaks, the activists who used rats in their causes. We also learn about exterminators and poisons. We see the World Trade Center disaster through the eyes of the exterminators and New York City Dept. of Health. We get a recap of the Black Death, as well as of the plague in America (San Francisco, Joseph Kinyoun, Rupert Blue). We get quotes from Thoreau. We get both blatant and subtle parallels between the rat world and our world. We vicariously get to trap live rats. It’s exciting, it’s exhilarating, it’s a good read!

Book preview

Rats - Robert Sullivan

Acclaim for Rats

This is a wonderful book about the despised creatures with whom New Yorkers share their city. Rats have been hunted down here for centuries, but remain unvanquished. As Mr. Sullivan reminds us—in detailed, graceful prose—they are as much part of the city's history as any part of its human alloy. One thing is certain: after reading this book you will understand much more about that history, and never look at a rat in the same way again.Pete Hamill, author of Forever and A Drinking Life

"Eloquent.''—Entertainment Weekly

"Rats is a sort of bizarro-Walden, an exercise in really knowing one small, unremarkable and, in this case, revolting plot of ground. In Sullivan's mirror Walden it's the rats, not the people, who live lives of quiet desperation, 'hiding beneath the table of man, under stress, skittering in fear.' "—Newsday

Sullivan leavens his systemic study with anecdotal digressions, approaching his fleet-footed, fast-food-loving quarry with a naturalist's curiosity and a storyteller's fluency.New York magazine

"Rats is a must-read. Don't let this book scurry out of your sight."— San Antonio Express

Hugely entertaining.Village Voice

Sullivan takes us deeper into the world of rats than most of us, left to ourselves, would be willing to go.Dallas Morning News

"Rats will both entertain and edify you about a part of the world you never thought much about."—Chicago Sun-Times

Who knew a book about one of nature's most reviled creatures could make such great bedside reading? I thoroughly enjoyed this historical chronicle of rodents in New York City. It's not only a history of rats, but it is also a social history of the city.Book Sense

Sullivan beguiles us with remarkable tales about an inexhaustible topic.Playboy

[A] sublime book.Wired

"Rats might generate sympathy for a truce in the longstanding war between rats and the human civilization they mimic."—Colorado Reporter-Herald

Skittering, scurrying, terrific natural history.Kirkus Reviews, starred review

This book is a must pickup for every city dweller, even if you'll feel like you need to wash your hands when you put it down.Publishers Weekly, starred review

RATS

RATS

Observations on the History and Habitat

of the City's Most Unwanted Inhabitants

ROBERT SULLIVAN

For Suzanne

Contents

1 Nature

2 The City Rat

3 Where I Went to See Rats and Who Sent Me There

4 Edens Alley

5 Brute Neighbors

6 Summer

7 Unrepresented Man

8 Food

9 Fights

10 Garbage

11 Exterminators

12 Excellent

13 Trapping

14 Plague

15 Winter

16 Plague in America

17 Catching

18 Rat King

19 A Golden Hill

20 Spring

Afterword

Notes

Acknowledgments

A Note on the Author

By the Same Author

You always have to think beyond the structure. Think about what is going on underneath and all around, because that is where the rats are located. The more you look into it, the more you will most likely find.

John Murphy, an exterminator, in

Pest Control Technology magazine

I think his fancy for referring everything to the meridian of Concord did not grow out of any ignorance or depreciation of other longitudes or latitudes, but was rather a playful expression of his conviction of the indifferency of all places, and that the best place for each is where he stands. He expressed it once in this wise: I think nothing is to be hoped from you, if this bit of mould under your feet is not sweeter to you to eat than any other in this world, or in any world.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, in a

remembrance of Henry David Thoreau *'

It avails not, time nor place—distance avails not,

I am with you, you men and women of a

Generation, or ever so many generations hence,

Just as you feel when you look on the river and sky, so I felt, Just as any of you is one of a living crowd, I was one of a crowd . . .

Walt Whitman, Crossing Brooklyn Ferry

Chapter 1

NATURE

When I wrote the following account of my experiences with rats, I lived in an apartment building on a block filled with other apartment buildings, amidst the approximately eight million people in New York City, and I paid rent to a landlord that I never actually met—though I did meet the superintendent, who was a very nice guy. At this moment, I am living out of the city, away from the masses, in a bucolic little village with about the same number of inhabitants as my former city block. I wouldn't normally delve into my own personal matters, except that when I mention my rat experiences to people, they sometimes think I took extraordinary measures to investigate them, and I didn't. All I did was stand in an alley—a filth-slicked little alley that is about as old as the city and secret the way alleys are secret and yet just a block or two from Wall Street, from Broadway, and from what used to be the World Trade Center. All I did was take a spot next to the trash and wait and watch, rain or no rain, night after night, and always at night, the time when, generally speaking, humans go to sleep and rats come alive.

Why rats? Why rats in an alley? Why anything at all in a place that is, let's face it, so disgusting? One answer is proximity. Rats live in the world precisely where man lives, which is, needless to say, where I live. Rats have conquered every continent that humans have conquered, mostly with the humans' aid, and the not-so-epic-seeming story of rats is close to one version of the epic story of man: when they arrive as immigrants to a newfound land, rats push out the creatures that have preceded them, multiply to such an extent as to stretch resources to the limit, consume their way toward famine—a point at which they decline, until, once again, they are forced to fight, wander, or die. Rats live in man's parallel universe, surviving on the effluvia of human society; they eat our garbage. I think of rats as our mirror species, reversed but similar, thriving or suffering in the very cities where we do the same. If the presence of a grizzly bear is the indicator of the wildness of an area, the range of unsettled habitat, then a rat is an indicator of the presence of man. And yet, despite their situation, rats are ignored or destroyed but rarely studied, disparaged but never described.

I see that I am like one person out alone in the woods when it comes to searching out the sublime as it applies to the rat in the city. Among my guidebooks to nature, there is no mention of the wild rat, and if there is, the humans that write the books call them invaders, despised, abhorred, disgusting—a creature that does not merit its own coffee-table book. Here is the author of a beautiful collection of photographs and prose joyously celebrating the mammals of North America as he writes about rats: There comes a time when even the most energetic of animal lovers must part ways with the animal kingdom. He goes on: "No matter how much you like animals there is nothing good to say about these creatures . . ." It is the very ostracism of the rat, its exclusion from the pantheon of natural wonders, that makes it appealing to me, because it begs the question: who are we to decide what is natural and what is not?

What makes me most interested in rats is what I think of as our common habitat—or the propensity that I share with rats toward areas where no cruise ships go, areas that have been deemed unenjoyable, aesthetically bankrupt, gross or vile. I am speaking of swamps and dumps and dumps that were and still are swamps and dark city basements that are close to the great hidden waters of the earth, waters that often smell or stink. I am speaking, of course, of alleys—or even any place or neighborhood that might have what is commonly referred to as a rat problem, a problem that often has less to do with the rat and more to do with man. Rats will always be the problem. Rats command a perverse celebrity status—nature's mobsters, flora and fauna's serial killers—because of their situation, because of their species-destroying habits, and because of their disease-carrying ability—especially their ability to carry the plague, which, during the Black Death of the Middle Ages, killed a third of the human population of Europe, something people remember, even though at the time people didn't know that rats had anything to do with all the panic, fear, and death.

In fact, in New York City, the bulk of rats live in quiet desperation, hiding beneath the table of man, under stress, skittering in fear, under siege by larger rats. Which brings me to my experiment: I went to the rat-filled alley to see the life of a rat in the city, to describe its habits and its habitat, to know a little about the place where it makes its home and its relationship to the very nearby people. To know the rat is to know its habitat, and to know the habitat of the rat is to know the city. I passed four seasons in the alley, though it was not a typical year by any definition. As it happened, shortly after I went downtown, the World Trade Center was destroyed. That fall, New York itself became an organism, an entity attacked and off-balance, a system of millions of people, many of whom were scared and panicked—a city that itself was trying to adapt, to stay alive. Eventually, New York regained its balance, and I went about my attempt to see the city from the point of view of its least revered inhabitants. And in the end—after seeing the refuse streams, the rat-infested dwellings, after learning about the old rat fights and learning all that I could learn from rat exterminators and after briefly traveling off from my alley to hear about rats all over America—I believe this is what I saw.

FOR MOST OF MY LIFE, however, my interest in rats had remained relatively idle, until the day I stumbled on a painting of rats by one of the patron saints of American naturalists, John James Audubon. Audubon famously documented the birds of North America in their natural habitat—drawn from nature was his trademark—and he next did the same for mammals, even the rat, or in this case several rats in a barn, stealing a chicken's egg. As I investigated the painting, I learned that Audubon had researched rats for months, and that in 1839 in New York City, where he lived during the last years of his life, he hunted rats along the waterfront. (He wrote the mayor and received permission to shoot Rats at the Battery early in the morning, so as not to expose the inhabitants in the vicinity to danger . . .) In other words, Audubon was not just a Representative Man out of the American past whose legacy inspired American conservationists and environmentalists, not just some Emersonian model, but also a guy who spent time in New York City walking around downtown looking for rats.

I read more about Audubon. I read that he was born in what is now the Dominican Republic. I read that he turned to painting late in life after failing as a businessman, and that after traveling all over the continent to finish The Birds of North America he moved to New York, living first downtown, then up on what is today 157th Street, in a neighborhood that is coincidentally now settled by people from the Dominican Republic—coincidence is the stuff of ratting! I read that he fished in the Hudson Paver. I read that his eyesight eventually went, that shortly thereafter he began singing a French children's song over and over and eventually died. His home was left to rot away and was finally paved over. The more I read of Audubon, the more I felt a desire to study the rat in its urban habitat, to draw the rat in nature.

One day, I got on the subway and took a trip uptown. I went to Trinity Cemetery on 155th Street and saw the tall, animal-covered Celtic cross on Audubon's grave, and then, with old maps, I tried to figure out where his house would have been. Finally, I found the lot, unmarked; it had apparently once been on a gentle hill sloping toward the river, but now it was a hole, a three-story-deep pit, surrounded by two tall apartment buildings, and an elevated highway. When I looked away from the hole, the view was breathtakingly panoramic and Hudson River-filled. And when I got my binoculars out and looked down into the site, I could see the dozens of tennis-ball-size burrows that are more commonly referred to as rat holes.

Chapter 2

THE CITY RAT

But enough about you, I think I hear the reader protesting. What about rats? And so, as I arise from my selfishness to describe the wild rat of New York City, the object of this nature experiment, I begin by noting that when it comes to rats, men and women labor under a lot of misinformation—errors inspired, it seems to me, by their own fears, by their own mental rat profiles rather than any earth-based facts. So, with this in mind, I offer a brief introductory sketch of the particular species of rat that runs wild in New York—Rattus norvegicus, aka the Norway or brown rat. I offer a portrait that is hysteria-free, that merely describes the rat as a rat.

A rat is a rodent, the most common mammal in the world. Rattus norvegicus is one of the approximately four hundred different kinds of rodents, and it is known by many names, each of which describes a trait or a perceived trait or sometimes a habitat: the earth rat, the roving rat, the barn rat, the field rat, the migratory rat, the house rat, the sewer rat, the water rat, the wharf rat, the alley rat, the gray rat, the brown rat, and the common rat. The average brown rat is large and stocky; it grows to be approximately sixteen inches long from its nose to its tail—the size of a large adult human male's foot—and weighs about a pound, though brown rats have been measured by scientists and exterminators at twenty inches and up to two pounds. The brown rat is sometimes confused with the black rat, or Rattus rattus, which is smaller and once inhabited New York City and all of the cities of America but, since Rattus norvegicus pushed it out, is now relegated to a minor role. (The two species still survive alongside each other in some Southern coastal cities and on the West Coast, in places like Los Angeles, for example, where the black rat lives in attics and palm trees.) The black rat is always a very dark gray, almost black, and the brown rat is gray or brown, with a belly that can be light gray, yellow, or even a pure-seeming white. One spring, beneath the Brooklyn Bridge, I saw a red-haired brown rat that had been run over by a car. Both pet rats and laboratory rats are Rattus norvegicus, but they are not wild and therefore, I would emphasize, not the subject of this book. Sometimes pet rats are called fancy rats. But if anyone has picked up this book to learn about fancy rats, then they should put this book down right away; none of the rats mentioned herein are at all fancy.*

Rats are nocturnal, and out in the night the brown rat's eyes are small and black and shiny; when a flashlight shines into them in the dark, the eyes of a rat light up like the eyes of a deer. Though it forages in darkness, the brown rat has poor eyesight. It makes up for this with, first of all, an excellent sense of smell. Rats often bite young children and infants on the face because of the smell of food residues on the children. (Many of the approximately 50,000 people bitten by rats every year are children.) They have an excellent sense of taste, detecting the most minute amounts of poison, down to one part per million. A brown rat has strong feet, the two front paws each equipped with four clawlike nails, the rear paws even longer and stronger. It can run and climb with squirrel-like agility. It is an excellent swimmer, surviving in rivers and bays, in sewer streams and toilet bowls.

The brown rat's teeth are yellow, the front two incisors being especially long and sharp, like buckteeth. When the brown rat bites, its front two teeth spread apart. When it gnaws, a flap of skin plugs the space behind its incisors. Hence, when the rat gnaws on indigestible materials—concrete or steel, for example—the shavings don't go down the rat's throat and kill it. Its incisors grow at a rate of five inches per year. Rats always gnaw, and no one is certain why—there are few modern rat studies. It is sometimes erroneously stated that the rat gnaws solely to limit the length of its incisors, which would otherwise grow out of its head, but this is not the case: the incisors wear down naturally. In terms of hardness, the brown rat's teeth are stronger than aluminum, copper, lead, and iron. They are comparable to steel. With the alligator-like structure of their jaws, rats can exert a biting pressure of up to seven thousand pounds per square inch. Rats, like mice, seem to be attracted to wires—to utility wires, computer wires, wires in vehicles, in addition to gas and water pipes. One rat expert theorizes that wires may be attractive to rats because of their resemblance to vines and the stalks of plants; cables are the vines of the city. By one estimate, 26 percent of all electric-cable breaks and 18 percent of all phone-cable disruptions are caused by rats. According to one study, as many as 25 percent of all fires of unknown origin are rat-caused. Rats chew electrical cables. Sitting in a nest of tattered rags and newspapers, in the floorboards of an old tenement, a rat gnaws the head of a match—the lightning in the city forest.

When it is not gnawing or feeding on trash, the brown rat digs. Anywhere there is dirt in a city, brown rats are likely to be digging—in parks, in flowerbeds, in little dirt-poor backyards. They dig holes to enter buildings and to make nests. Rat nests can be in the floorboards of apartments, in the waste-stuffed corners of subway stations, in sewers, or beneath old furniture in basements. Cluttered and unkempt alleyways in cities provide ideal rat habitat, especially those alleyways associated with food-serving establishments, writes Robert Corrigan in Rodent Control, a pest control manual. Alley rats can forage safely within the shadows created by the alleyway, as well as quickly retreat to the safety of cover in these narrow channels. Often, rats burrow under concrete sidewalk slabs. Entrance to a typical under-the-sidewalk rat's nest is gained through a two-inch-wide hole—their skeletons collapse and they can squeeze into a hole as small as three quarters of an inch wide, the average width of their skull. This tunnel then travels about a foot down to where it widens into a nest or den. The den is lined with soft debris, often shredded plastic garbage or shopping bags, but sometimes even grasses or plants; some rat nests have been found stuffed with the gnawed shavings of the wood-based, spring-loaded snap traps that are used in attempts to kill them. The back of the den then narrows into a long tunnel that opens up on another hole back on the street. This second hole is called a bolt hole; it is an emergency exit. A bolt hole is typically covered lightly with dirt or trash—camouflage. Sometimes there are networks of burrows, which can stretch beneath a few concrete squares on a sidewalk, or a number of backyards, or even an entire city block—when Rattus norvegicus first came to Selkirk, England, in 1776, there were so many burrows that people feared the town might sink. Rats can also nest in basements, sewers, manholes, abandoned pipes of any kind, floorboards, or any hole or depression. Often, Robert Corrigan writes, 'city rats' will live unbeknownst to people right beneath their feet.

Rats also inhabit subways, as most people in New York City and any city with a subway system are well aware. Every once in a while, there are reports of rats boarding trains, but for the most part rats stay on the tracks—subway workers I have talked to refer to rats as track rabbits. People tend to think that the subways are filled with rats, but in fact rats are not everywhere in the system; they live in the subways according to the supply of discarded human food and sewer leaks. Sometimes, rats use the subway purely for nesting purposes; they find ways through the walls of the subway stations leading from the tracks to the restaurants and stores on the street—the vibrations of subway trains tend to create rat-size cracks and holes. Many subway rats tend to live near stations that are themselves near fast-food restaurants. At the various subway stations near Herald Square, for example, people come down from the streets and throw the food that they have not eaten onto the tracks, along with newspapers and soda bottles and, I have noticed, thousands of no longer-charged AA batteries, waiting to leak acid. The rats eat freely from the waste and sit at the side of the little streams of creamy brown sewery water that flows between the rails. They sip the water the way rats do, either with their front paws or by scooping it up with their incisors.

DEATH COMES IN MANY FORMS for a brown rat living in the wilds of the city. A rat can be run over by a car or a bus or a cab. It can be beaten with a plunger as it climbs up through a sewer pipe and surfaces into an apartment's toilet bowl. Cats, while mice eaters, are not likely to attack adult rats; a rat will easily repel an attack by a cat, though cats will kill young rats. In the city's less populated areas, or in the little patches of parkland and green, rats sometimes die quasi-wilderness deaths. In Brooklyn's Prospect Park, I once watched a large red-tailed hawk swoop down on a brown rat, an adult male that had been living in a burrow in a wooded area adjacent to an overstuffed garbage can. The hawk then flew into the upper branches of a maple tree, dangling the large, still-wriggling rat from its talons. People have confided rat shootings to me on numerous occasions; in fact, more people than I had ever imagined shoot rats in the city—using pellet guns or air rifles or even more potent rifles in alleys and in infested basements. And of course, rats also die when they are caught in snap traps, which is the trap sometimes referred to as a break-back trap, a rat-size version of the classic mousetrap. It is especially difficult to trap a rat with a snap trap. Generally speaking, rodents are wary of new things in their habitat, preferring routine to change; biologists refer to this trait as neophobia. Rats can be even more neophobic than mice. Thus, exterminators are likely to leave unset snap traps out for a few days before setting them, often baited, allowing the rats to become comfortable with traps. Some exterminators regularly treat snap traps with bacon grease.

Most frequently rats die from ingesting poison. I don't know of a precise statistic, but I know that at any given moment there is poison all over the streets and homes of New York, not to mention the rest of America. Sometimes, poison is injected directly into the rat burrow; the rat dies of heart failure or, with the most severe poisons, of damage to its central nervous system—they are found dead on their bellies, arms and legs extended. More often, poison is added to grains and the grain is put into shoe-box-size containers called bait stations. Bait stations are the things that people in cities see constantly in back alleys and in parks and do not recognize or, chances are, even think about. Bait stations are designed to keep bait away from pets and children, but they are also designed as little rat-friendly zones. With their small holes and zigzaggy interiors, bait stations are to a rat what a smoothly run fast-food restaurant is to a human. When rats eat the poisoned grain in the bait station, they return to their nests to die—in walls, in floors, underneath streets and restaurant stoves, in sewers. The most widely used poisons are anticoagulants, which cause the rat to bleed to death internally. It takes several meals for the rat to die. As it returns, it sometimes seems more and more woozy. Exterminators refer to this phenomenon as dead rodent walking.

Ingesting poison, fighting for food, being attacked by a larger rat or beaten with a toilet plunger: these are everyday rat dangers that make the life expectancy of the rat in the city approximately one year. And yet rats persist; they thrive in New York City and in cities throughout the world. Rats do not inhabit cities exclusively, of course; like man, rats can live anywhere. Brown rats in wilderness areas are sometimes called feral rats; they survive on plants and insects and even swim to catch fish.* However, brown rats are generally larger and more numerous in cities. As a result, it is in cities that they are especially successful at spreading the diseases that are like poisons to humans. They carry diseases that we know of and they may carry diseases that we do not know of—in just the past century, rats have been responsible for the death of more than ten million people. Rats carry bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and fungi; they carry mites, fleas, lice, and ticks; rats spread trichinosis, tularemia, leptospirosis. They carry microbes up from the underground streams of sewage; public health specialists sometimes refer to rats as germ elevators. Though targeted over and over by man, rats generally wreak havoc on food supplies, destroying or contaminating crops and stored foods everywhere. Some estimates suggest that as much as one third of the world's food supply is destroyed by rats.

Rats succeed while under constant siege because they have an astounding rate of reproduction. If they are not eating, then rats are usually having sex. Most likely, if you are in New York while you are reading this sentence or even in any other major city in America, then you are in proximity to two or more rats having sex. Male and female rats may have sex twenty times a day, and a male rat will have sex with as many female rats as possible—according to one report, a dominant male rat may mate with up to twenty female rats in just six hours. (Male rats exiled from their nest by more aggressive male rats will also live in all-male rat colonies and have sex with the other male rats.) The gestation period for a pregnant female rat is twenty-one days, the average litter between eight to ten pups. And a female rat can become pregnant immediately after giving birth. If there is a healthy amount of garbage for the rats to eat, then a female rat will produce up to twelve litters of twenty rats each a year. One rat's nest can turn into a rat colony of fifty rats in six months. One pair of rats has the potential of 15,000 descendants in a year. This is a lot of rats, and while the regenerative capabilities of the rat might seem incomparable to those of any other species, in Rats, Lice, and History, the classic work on the effect of disease on human history, Hans Zinsser suggests that the fertility rate of the human can rival the fertility rate of the rat.

ONE OF THE THINGS I find most fascinating about rats is that they have a sense of where they are and of where they have been. This is explained by the fact that rats love to be touching things. Biologists refer to rats as thigmophilic, which means touch loving. Consequently, rats prefer to touch things as they travel. Their runways are often parallel to walls, tracks, and curbs; in infested basements, grease slicks parallel ceiling beams and the run of sewer pipes. Rats

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1