Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Green State Dynamics
Green State Dynamics
Green State Dynamics
Ebook138 pages1 hour

Green State Dynamics

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This book is a theory of everything and it is based on a very simple concept. Everything from atoms to gravitation, psychology, economics and sociology to name a few are all easily explained in terms of equilibrium and disequilibrium. This book is about how re-examining the use of the word "force" and "disorder" can solve the biggest problems in the sciences and social sciences today.This book unites not only gravity with the other four "forces" but unites everything together around the concept that all "forces" are merely different forms of equilibrium and disequilibrium.
In this book you will learn what string theory, gravitation, politics, economics and psychology all have in common. Everything has a green state and a green state is a state of equilibrium that is dependent not only upon the subject in question but upon its surroundings. Written in simple everyday language Green State Dynamics will help you to understand the validity of any theory you apply it to. If you are involved in any type of sciences, social sciences or in any type of research the question is not if you will read this book, but rather when.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 4, 2013
ISBN9781301395361
Green State Dynamics
Author

Alan Perez

I am a graduate from Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. I currently live In South Shields, England after having lived in the U.S. for over 40 years. I love to learn and haven't stopped in my 51 years of life. I have several more books near completion that build upon my Green State Dynamics theory

Related to Green State Dynamics

Related ebooks

Science & Mathematics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Green State Dynamics

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Green State Dynamics - Alan Perez

    Green state dynamics

    By Alan W. Perez

    COPYRIGHT NOTICE

    © 2013 by Alan Perez, Smashwords Edition. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author. This e-book is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This e-book may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

    DEDICATION

    This book is dedicated to my mother Sheila who always stood by me in spite of all of the headaches I caused her, to my stepfather Charlie who taught me to always question everything and to my wife Susan whose love and inspiration has driven me to finish this project after so many years.

    Table of Contents

    Introduction

    Chapter 1: Redefining Entropy

    Chapter 2: Something and Nothing

    Chapter 3: Introducing GSD

    Chapter 4: Kinetic and Static Energy

    Chapter 5: Unified Field Theories

    Chapter 6: Propagation of Light

    Chapter 7: Visualizing Green States

    Chapter 8: Is Space Truly Distorted

    Chapter 9: Oscillational Essence

    Chapter 10: Strings and Things

    Chapter 11: Psychology and GSD

    Chapter 12: Sociology and GSD

    Chapter 13: Politics and GSD

    Chapter 14..Economics and GSD

    Conclusion

    Bibliography

    About the Author

    Introduction

    Ever since I was a small boy I was mesmerized by science but I was always critical of the way that most scientific theories were explained. I found it hard to visualize Einstein’s explanations of what things would look like if you were traveling at the speed of light. I found the idea of atoms behaving like little planetary systems incredible and I wondered if perhaps our universe was simply an atom in yet another much larger person or thing. Some days I still wonder. I don’t think that I impressed too many of my teachers over the years with all of my questions and demands for clearer explanations.

    This book is the result of over thirty years of reading books on just about every topic imaginable and trying to make sense of the often confusing terminology that scientists use. Terms like the word force which is correctly used when applied to engineering problems but grossly inappropriate for describing the pull in atoms and gravitational theories.

    It has been the holy grail of science to discover a theory that would connect everything known to man in one theory. This book does that by examining the terminology that is used incorrectly not only in the physical sciences but in the social sciences as well. All of the information we need for a grand unified theory has already been discovered. It has only been our inability to properly express our collective findings and discoveries in correct terminology that has prevented a GUT from being announced decades ago. To put it in a nutshell everything we see or do is a result of equilibrium or disequilibrium. Every force is the result of either a state of equilibrium, disequilibrium or a transitory state between the two.

    I have written this book as simplified as possible to appeal not only to the string theorist but to the psychologist and the sociologist who analyze human and animal behavior. Everything is connected and the way everything is connected applying green state dynamics is more elegant than any string theory will ever be. Be prepared to look at the world in a new refreshing way.

    Alan W. Perez

    December 21, 2012

    South Shields, England

    Chapter One

    Redefining Entropy

    Entropy. It is a word to describe the amount of disorder in a system. The greater the amount of disorder: the greater the amount of entropy. If you have maximum entropy then you have maximum disorder. Total entropy is the long term fate of the universe according to German physicist Rudolph Julius Clausises (1822-88). He introduced the concept of entropy.

    Another name for entropy would be the heat death of the universe. It is the point in time in which all matter will reach the same temperature. While it is easy to see how all of the stars will eventually burn out, it is harder than it appears to define disorder. If we stopped and thought about it, wouldn’t it be disorder if everything got hotter or never reached the same temperature as the Second Law of Thermodynamics demands?

    Disorder. It is a word like art…or pornography. It is a word that we all know well but everyone would have a slightly different definition of it. No two people define art or pornography the same. Likewise disorder is in many ways indefinable. Disorder cannot exist except in our opinions.

    Greene, in his book The Elegant Universe, tries to describe entropy by telling you to imagine a room in which everything is in order. Imagine a room in which all of the books on a bookshelf are in alphabetical order. Everything is clean and where it should be. According to Greene entropy or disorder can only increase. According to him things in this room can only become more and more disordered. It sounds reasonable but does it apply to the physics and science of everything that occurs in the room? No. It doesn’t.

    To begin with all of the belongings and property in the room are in there because someone put them in there. The order of the books on the shelves may make sense to one person but not to another. No matter what you do to that room there will never be disorder except in your opinion of the room.

    In Gary Zukav’s book, The dancing WuLi Masters, Zukav states suppose for example that we drop a drop of black ink into a glass of clear water. Initially its presence is quite ordered according to Zukav. That is, according to him all of the molecules of ink are in one small area and are segregated from the molecules of water.

    As time passes, however, natural molecular motion will cause the black ink molecules to steadily disperse into the molecules of clear water until they are distributed evenly throughout the glass resulting in a murky homogenous liquid with no structure or order whatever, only a bland uniformity. (Maximal entropy).

    But wait. Isn’t maximal entropy supposed to be maximal disorder? If we read the end of Zukav’s statement we see that he is calling a homogenous liquid that has only bland uniformity structure less and without order. It is a statement that contradicts itself.

    If we analyze the whole illustration we find that it is a terrible example of increasing disorder. Imagine again the glass of water. It sits there as pure and unadulterated as we can possibly make it. It is by itself an example of order if there ever was one. Then we drop into it a drop of ink. This act contrary to what Zukav states is anything but order. The ink falls into the water. Regardless of whether the ink falls to the bottom, floats to the top or disperses…it will follow all of the rules of physics and chemistry. If it is a chemical compound that is soluble in water then it will without a doubt dissolve.

    If it disperses it will do so in an orderly fashion until it reaches what Zukav calls bland uniformity which is of course just another way of saying that it reached a state of equilibrium.

    It would be tempting to forgive Zukav’s choice of an example and even Greene for his but their examples are the examples that all scientists seem prone to give….and they’re all wrong.

    It is not the concept of entropy that is wrong. It is the concept that increased entropy is the same thing as increased disorder that is wrong. Why? Because in any system where there are rules then there can be no disorder. Only in a system where there are no rules can disorder exist: and even then the concept of disorder fails. In a system where there are no rules then everything will behave according to a system of no rules.

    Disorder only exists in our minds and in our opinions. It is a concept that no two people will agree on.

    Roger Primrose makes the same mistake in his book Road to Reality. He says to think about entropy in terms of an ordinary gas, where having the gas concentrated in small regions represents low entropy and the in the high entropy state the gas is spread uniformly. In both Penrose’s explanation and Zukav’s see that entropy is uniformity and uniformity is anything but disorder.

    Penrose goes on to say but with gravity, things tend to be the other way around. A uniformly spread system of gravitating bodies would represent low entropy (low disorder) where as high entropy (high disorder is achieved when the gravitating bodies clump together.)

    The diagrams that Penrose use are as follows;

    I f we look very closely at both examples we get a better idea of what is going on and we find in both examples there is really no increase in disorder. So let us divorce the concept of disorder from entropy and try to define what entropy really is.

    In any example of entropy we find that

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1