Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Vadertje Langbeen
Vadertje Langbeen
Vadertje Langbeen
Ebook228 pages2 hours

Vadertje Langbeen

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview
LanguageNederlands
Release dateOct 1, 1966
Vadertje Langbeen
Author

Jean Webster

Jean Webster (1876-1916) was a pseudonym for Alice Jane Chandler Webster, an American author of books that contained humorous and likeable young female protagonists. Her works include Daddy-Long-Legs, Dear Enemy, and When Patty Went to College. Politically and socially active, she often included issues of socio-political interest in her novels.

Related to Vadertje Langbeen

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for Vadertje Langbeen

Rating: 4.096865885470086 out of 5 stars
4/5

702 ratings48 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One of my Dreamwidth friends recently mentioned "Daddy Long Legs" in her journal. My brain went "You can get it free on Project Gutenberg!" and about half an hour later, I had it on my ebook reader. It's an absolutely delightful book. I originally read this when I as young and never forgot it. I was pleased to discover that I enjoyed it even more as an adult.It's a series of letters from an orphan to the mysterious benefactor who is paying for her college education. She doesn't know what his name is, but the deal is that he supports her education as long as she writes him a regular letter about what she's doing. As she's only even seen his elongated shadow, she nicknames him "Daddy Long Legs".She tells him about what she's learning, what she thinks of it, cheerfully berates him for never writing back, tells him of what she gets upto with her friends, comments on all kinds of things with a cheerful irreverence. (She knows that one of the reasons he chose to help her is that she wrote a humorous school essay mocking the trustees' annual visit to the orphanage)It's partly a wonderful window into the world of 1912, from the social attitudes to orphans, to the clothes worn by young women, but it's also very funny. I laughed out loud several times while reading it.There's a romance that develops between Judy and a relative of one of her college friends, but she is concerned about her background and the fact that he comes from an upper-class family. (Orphans really were low status back then)It reminds me a little of "84 Charring Cross Rd". There's the same love of literature, and the same cheerful, humorous, slightly disrespectful but fond attitude towards the correspondent.You can get it for free! Read it. Far more fun than most classics.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The story, told in a series of letters, follows an orphan from her youth in the orphanage to college, which is provided by an anonymous benefactor who only asks that she keep him updated as to her progress. I loved this book as a child and read it many times.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    The audiobook reader, Julia Whelan, sounded the right age (17-21), but read too fast, not pausing enough between the letters. Predictable ending. Couldn't view the downloadable material which supposedly includes some very childish stick-figure drawings (some referred to in the text) by Webster. Sounds like it is no great loss.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I loved it, very entertaining. A reread for sure.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I never read this as a kid, but I remember a friend carrying it around with her a lot. @foggidawn reviewed it a little while ago, bringing it back to my attention, and it sounded like fun. I loved it and got very caught up in all the little details of women's college life in the 1910s. The identity of the "mysterious" Daddy-Long-Legs seemed very obvious to me, though I rather suspect I might not have thought so if I had read this when I was ~nine. While some of the story is a bit dated, very little terribly much bothered my modern sensibilities, especially as I think Jersuha would have been a fairly forward-thinking and "modern" woman in her time.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Seventeen-year-old Jerusha Abbott has spent her entire life at the John Grier Home, an orphanage. When one of the trustees takes an interest in her (due to a humorous but unflattering essay on visiting day at the orphanage) and decides to send her to college. He elects to remain anonymous; all Jerusha knows is that he is tall (she caught a glimpse of him silhouetted in the doorway on his way out), rich, and has only ever sponsored the education of boys before. One of the conditions of her education is that she is to write him monthly letters on her progress, with the understanding that he will not respond in any way. This book comprises that one-way correspondence, and readers will soon find themselves charmed by Jerusha's youthful exuberance and zest for life. But will she ever discover the identity of her mysterious benefactor?Some aspects of this book are indicative of its time, but all in all, I think it holds up pretty well. I know of readers who are bothered by certain aspects of the book, particularly the ending, but I find I don't mind them, even on a second reading. All in all, I found it a pleasant, quick reread, and will probably read it again at some time in the future.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I picked this up at the Books on Tap book club at Forager. It was recommended by one of Rochester's librarians as one of her favorites as a kid. It surprised me that it was written in 1912. The story follows Jerusha, an orphan, who is picked by a secret trustee of the orphanage to go to college. The story is predictable, but fun to read. I know if I had read it at age 12 it would have been a favorite like Anne of Green Gables, David Copperfield and Oliver Twist. Books about orphans seem to be a successful formula for pre-teens!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I first read this in my teens and I really loved it - I found it funny, and charming, and romantic. I loved the cheerful but unsentimental tone of the story, and I loved how fresh and vivid and likeable Judy was.

    BUT
    I re-read this recently, and while I still enjoyed its humour and its happy ending, I am a bit more ambivalent about the Judy/Daddy-Long-Legs relationship. Now that I am older and more aware of things like the connection between relationships and power, I can see instances where Daddy Long Legs' behaviour is controlling and possessive (e.g. when he ordered Judy to head to the farm for the summer, rather than spend it with her friend Sallie (and her brother Jimmy).

    I think part of my unease is because I can't see how the romance has developed, based on the one-sided communication - perhaps he just wants her because she is totally under his control!? Dear Daddy Long Legs, I want to know how you fell in love with Judy. I want to see your actions justified in the name of jealousy borne out of infatuation. Please tell your side of the story!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I first read this book when I was about eight or nine years old, and I loved it from the start. The whole "writing letters" method of storytelling has always appealed to me since, and I really blame (or give credit) this book for that, because Judy comes so alive in her letters. We don't see her "in action" after the first chapter in the book, but that doesn't matter, because her letters are so funny and heartfelt. And the other characters, whom we never "see" outside of her letters, come alive as well: Sallie, Julia, Jervie, and even Daddy-Long-Legs, from whom we hear so little.Rarely a year goes by when I don't skim through this book. I usually read the first chapter (when Judy is still in the orphanage and gets her scholarship from a benevolent trustee) and read some of the more meaningful (to me) letters, and then I turn to the back and read the last six or so letters. Without fail, even though I have done this almost annually for almost thirty years, I still get the "awwww" fuzzies at the end. Just reading those last few letters can snap me out of a bad funk.I've seen people online say that they wish that they could read Harry Potter for the first time again, without knowing what is going to happen. Harry Potter's an okay series (although I never got obsessed with it like so many have), but forget it - I'd rather be able to read this book again for the first time! I remember when I read it for the first time, I was SO SURPRISED that Jervie was Daddy-Long-Legs. I may have squealed a bit on the bus. Don't judge me. Although it's great to go through the book and watch Judy mention Jervie multiple times (giving Jervie the hint that she returns his feelings, which I'm not sure he would have had had if she hadn't spilled out her heart in her letters to her Daddy-Long-Legs), it'd be amazing to go into this book not knowing and see if I'd figure it out as an adult.Child-me would have given this book five stars without question. Adult-me gives it four and a half. This book was written in a different world, really, one that was only a hundred years ago! It's hard to believe how much has changed since then. Judy is talking about women needing the right to vote and how, if she marries, it's rather expected that she gives up aspirations for a career, although she sees that it might be possible to have both a husband and a career. Jervie is a socialist (which is all kinds of YAY, because blatant socialists almost never appear in books, at least as "good" characters) and a social reformer. He is quite hot-headed and demanding, which is one of the reasons why I lower the book half a star. He has a tendency to be rash and even insulting (at one point he calls Judy a "child" because she is trying to do the RESPONSIBLE thing and work for the summer instead of going to Europe). And Judy freely admits that she molds her personal opinions to fit his, which...rubs me wrong. I try to tell myself that it was a different time. Yes. And it may be a little creepy to have Jervie reading all of these letters to him, letters in which Judy is frank about her emotions in a way that he would never have known had he not been the recipient. It's weird reading her describe him to him, all without her knowing. It almost feels like an invasion of her privacy, like he should have let her know that he didn't want to hear about her love life (he's a bit brusque with her a few other times, so I think this would have fit his "Daddy-Long-Legs" character). I still love me some Jervie/Judy, though. That ending letter. Yum.Besides the stuff under the spoiler cut, I guess my only other real complaint is that this book is too short! I'd love for it to be at least four times longer than it is, perhaps supplemented with letters from Judy to other characters (she mentions that she's writing to both Freddie and Jervie, and I would KILL to read some of her letters with Jervie back and forth) or third-person chapters (like the first one) showing what they're doing. I'd love for more Jervie/Judy scenes; I will not lie. But, alas, it's not meant to be, and I really don't care all that much for the "sequel," Dear Enemy, so...yeah. I'll just fill out the story in my mind. ;)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I think it can be really hard to pull off a book that is solely in letter form-especially when the letters are only from one character-but Webster does a great job of making Judy's world come alive. Judy is a vibrant, entertaining, highly likable character (an orphan sent to college by a mysterious anonymous benefactor, to whom she writes), and this is a quick, delightful read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    How did I miss this book for so long? It was a thoroughly delightful book that made me smile and laugh out loud. There are really two main characters in the book. Jerusha Abbott writes letters to her benefactor whom she calls Daddy Long Legs, well, most of the time. The other is the unseen Daddy Long Legs.I fell in love with Jerusha. She's remarkable independent, especially considering the time period the book was written in. She has a keen eye for people and the ability to make the reader see them, too. Her letters are clever, amusing, and yet filled with insight. I loved watching her grow up.If you enjoy well-written books, this should interest you. Be aware there are illustrations that matter to the book, so be sure the version you get has those illustrations.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Daddy Long Legs by Jean Webster

    5 stars and a heart

    Written and set in pre-WWI Northeastern USA.

    Jerusha (Judy) Abbott grew up an an orphanage, but is offered a full college education with allowance by an anonymous trustee who appreciates a witty high school essay she wrote about life in the orphanage. Her one form of repayment is to write him a letter each month and to address it to Mr. John Smith. Having seen his shadow and knowing he had long legs, she starts writing to Daddy Long Legs after the second letter, and her colourful, illustrated letters take us through her four years of school including the summer breaks.

    If you've never read it, it's really something that, while totally different, is right up there with Anne of Green Gables (from a similar time; I'm not sure why it hasn't stayed as popular other than she is older than Anne when Anne starts out. There's no sentimentality, but it is definitely a fun read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A most delightful book. A charming, fluffy, sweet little literary morsel. The only downer is. . . the heroine decides to become a Fabian Socialist. NOOOO!!!

    But other than that, a truly delightful read, as I believe I mentioned. Highly recommended for fans of L.M. Montgomery, Grace Livingston Hill, and other similar authors.

    Now, to read the sequel: "Dear Enemy". And I must also watch the Fred Astaire musical and the Mary Pickford silent film, though I doubt either will be half as magical as the book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A charming novel, which is apparently a classic but which I had never heard of as a child - presumably because the winter-spring romance that develops would now be considered scandalous. But I found it enjoyable and not too implausible as far as romances go, and enjoyed the letter format - reminiscent of Pride & Prejudice.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a favourite kids book that I alway enjoy reading.

    The book is written in the style of letters, which I actually find quite annong. The sequel to the book (Dear Enemy) is written the same way.

    However I find the plot sweet, and the books quick to read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is a fantastic and witty little book. Another reviewer here wrote that only women should read it. Well, I'm a man and I enjoyed it tremendously. Maybe it was written for young adults in the first place, but I believe that anybody, man or woman, of any age, will - and should - enjoy this 100 years old pearl of literature. Five stars, there can be no doubt about it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is my first kindle novel, it was free and the only book that interested me, mainly because I'd seen the Fred Astair film, I didn't know it was a book. I loved it, and wish I'd come across it years ago. An easy enjoyable read, I'd recommend it to anyone.
    Judy was a likeable heroine, a bit like Anne in Anne of Green Gables.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Another American classic, this one not half so preachy and therefore enjoyable. A few years ago, I read Dear Mr Knightley by Katherine Reay, which is an update of Jean Webster's 1912 novel, and was not impressed. The epistolary form is a difficult style of narrative to pull off, and the premise of an anonymous benefactor dictating the life of a disadvantaged young woman certainly doesn't translate well into a modern setting. The original, however, is short and sweet.When Jerusha Abbott turns seventeen, she is told that an anonymous trustee of the orphanage has offered to send her to college, on the condition that she writes him a letter every month. For the next four years, Jerusha - who wisely changes her name to Judy - fulfils her side of the arrangement, penning witty, forthright and free-spirited accounts of her life at college. Her benefactor never replies directly, but occasionally sends a message through his secretary - usually when trying to control Judy's life, telling here where she is allowed to spend her summers and whether or not to accept a scholarship. That side of the story remains a little worrying - not to mention how she calls her guardian 'Daddy Long Legs' and sometimes just 'Daddy' - but luckily Judy is a strong-minded young woman who knows how to pick her battles!I loved some of Judy's thoughts, on religion - 'Their god (whom they have inherited intact from their remote Puritan ancestors) is a narrow, irrational, unjust, mean, revengeful, bigoted person. Thank heaven I don't inherit any god from anybody!' - and imagination - 'It makes people able to put themselves in other people's places. It makes them kind and sympathetic and understanding. It ought to be cultivated in children' - and enjoyed her character. She's from a poor background without family, yes, but doesn't bang on about how having no money is some sort of spiritual experience like A Tree Grows In Brooklyn or how women exist only to serve others (Louisa May Alcott, looking at you).Great fun - I bought an actual printed copy, shock horror, and will definitely keep to read again.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A coming of age story about a young orphan girl who meets her benefactor and soul mate.
    I did not believe that Jerusha was dependent on her benefactor, Daddy Long Legs. Jerusha was an independent woman. Her love of Daddy Long Legs, comes from her desire to belong to a family. He became her entire family; her grandmother, her uncle, her father, all rolled into one. Her love for him was based not only this, but also for his generosity to her. He had given her a way out of the drudgery her life was, in the asylum. Who wouldn’t be grateful and loving to such a person? ‘I love college and I love you for sending me.’

    Jerusha proved, that by accepting a Trustee’s gift of a college education, anything more than that, would make her dependent, and she was not comfortable with this.
    Jerusha received a $50.00 check from Daddy Long Legs, after she had written to him about the lovely hats Julia bought. This check was unacceptable to Jerusha. She knew she was a charity case, and although she was able to accept the allowance and college funding from him, this was above and beyond. Especially since Jerusha had intended to pay him back, everything he had given her. ‘Id love pretty hats and things, but I mustn't mortgage the future to pay for them.’ The check was returned to him.

    Jerusha shows her independence by following her judgement, in accepting the scholarship she was awarded. The scholarship would cover board and tuition for two years. Jerusha won it for marked proficiency in English. Her benefactor conveyed to her, not to accept it. “I don’t understand your objection in the least. But anyway, it won’t do the slightest good for you to object, for I’ve already accepted it and I am not going to change!” She further communicates her independence as she writes, ‘don’t be annoyed because your chick is wanting to scratch for herself. She’s growing up into an awfully energetic little hen - with a very determined cluck and lot of beautiful feathers (all due to you).’ She is telling him that she is developing her own mind and can make important decisions on her own, thanks to her maturity, and her education.

    Jerusha’s mind was also made up when she wrote Daddy Long Legs, about her spending the summer at the seaside with Mrs. Paterson, to tutor her daughter. She would be earning fifty dollars a month. She did not give him the chance to object, because her mind was set. In this instance, she was going to earn money, just as she had when she won the scholarship. She was realizing her potential, and that she could pay back some of the charity, given to her. She was also demonstrating that she had free will. ‘How does my program strike you, Daddy? I am getting quite independent, you see. You have put me on my feet and I think I can almost walk alone by now.’
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Audio book narrated by Julia Whelan.

    Jerusha (Judy) Abbott is an orphan who has been raised at the John Grier Home. Being the oldest orphan, she is in charge of the younger children. Children are usually released from the Home at age sixteen. Jerusha, having excelled at school was allowed to go to the village for high school, and kept on at the Home two years past the usual time frame. But this exception, too, must come to an end. An unusual offer has come to her, however. In the past, one of the Home’s trustee’s has sometimes helped a particularly bright boy by paying his college tuition. This year, one of Jerusha’s essays has captured this benefactor’s attention, and he has agreed to pay her college tuition for four years. He will remain anonymous, but does require that she write to him monthly – not to thank him, but to tell him of her experiences, much as she would write to her parents.

    So begins this delightful book of letters from Judy to the man she knows as “Mr John Smith,” but whom she affectionately calls Daddy Longs Legs (or just Dear Daddy). The reader witnesses her growth from an immature but exuberant young girl to an accomplished and delightful young woman as her horizons are broadened by all she learns. My only complaint is with the unrealistic (and somewhat abrupt) ending. I don’t want to give anything away, so I won’t say more about that. I’m guessing this is a difference in styles and expectations from the time when it was first published – 100 years ago in 1912.

    Julia Whelan does a wonderful job of performing the book. Her enthusiasm as Jerusha is introduced to experiences she hadn’t even dreamed about is infectious. Also, she perfectly voices Judy’s genuine need to explain herself and her continual questioning of her benefactor for some guidance and answers. What the audio cannot convey, however, are the illustrations that the text contains. These are drawings the author, herself, included in the original, and I think they add to the charm of the book. So, if you are going to listen … get a copy of the text so you can at least see the drawings that are referred to.

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    When I was so young, around 6, my brother and I would wake up early to watch an anime series called "يا صاحب الظل الطويل" aka "The Man with the Long Shadow" aka "Daddy Long Legs".

    Little did I know by then, that the story would stay with me till this very day; I guess what we get attached to while young does stick in our minds and hearts, and as always a well written story is always a classic.

    It helps also that I'm always attracted to protagonist who are writers, like Judy Abbott, Anne Shirley and Jo March.

    Years ago, I bought the book and a few days ago I reread it and fell in love with the spirit of the author more than ever. I think the best adaption of the story was the Japanese cartoon version, it's so close to the actual book and so deep, the cartoonist and director really brought the story to life, I wish the people who brought Downton Abbey to TV would just make the cartoon a reality because it's simply amazing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I was expecting to find Daddy-Long-Legs by Jean Webster a light-hearted, sentimental read that would barely hold my interest. Well, yes, it is both light-hearted and sentimental but I also found an element of creepiness in the relationship that Daddy and Judy had. Starting out as a benefactor to an orphan by paying for her to go to college, his lurking in the background, pulling the strings and almost shaping this young girl into his future wife was rather disturbing. However, now that I have voiced my concern, I do have to admit that I thoroughly enjoyed this book. Daddy-Long-Legs is presented in a letter format as Judy is instructed to write to her benefactor and keep him up to date on her life. She calls him Daddy-Long-Legs as she only ever saw a quick glance at him from behind and remembered him mostly for the length of the shadow he cast. She dutifully writes him, and here lies the charm of this book. Her letters are fun, breezy informative chat-fests. She is an open book and tells all, establishing a relationship with this shadow figure who continues to hide his identity.Over the course of the book we discover that Judy isn’t the meek and mild orphan that she appears to be, she has backbone and an inner strength and when she wants to she knows how to stand up for herself. By the book’s end, it is clear that Judy will have a wonderful life with her Daddy-Long-Legs, and in a romantic tale such as this, this is the happy ending that was hoped for.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Daddy-Long-Legs by Jean Webster is a hundred year old epistolary novel about a young woman getting a chance to follow her dreams because of the sponsorship of an unnamed benefactor. The story follows Jershua "Judy" Abbott through her college education and the early days of her career as a writer.I come to the book, though, through the 1955 film adaptation staring Fred Astaire as the titular character and Leslie Caron as Judy (renamed Julie for the movie). While the gist of the film is the same as the book: older man provides money for a younger woman's college education — the set up is completely different and more troubling. At the time the film was made, Fred Astaire was more than twice Leslie Caron's age. Although he plays a young-at-heart character (one enamored with rock and roll drumming), he is still clearly old enough to be her father.So it was with an uneasy curiosity that I read Jean Webster's book.The differences between the film and original source material are immediately apparent. First and foremost — the setting is domestic. Judy, though still an orphan, has been raised in the United States. She is not an exotic — post WWII French teacher of French orphans. She is, instead, an American contemporary with LM Montgomery's Anne Shirley. Judy's experience at the orphanage and her sponsorship into an American university, is therefore, recognizable and credible — something the film version can't pull off.In the film, there is a heavy dose of voyeurism of the dirty old man variety as Julie's benefactor befriends her under false pretenses and otherwise keeps an eye on her. Of course voyeurism is part and parcel of film story telling but it's clearly at odds here with the source material. In the book, Judy and Jervys (changed to Jervis in the film), do meet and become friends, as he keeps up the secret identity as her benefactor. But their meeting is circumstantial and as he's significantly closer in age to her (late twenties/early thirties to her late teens/early twenties), it is far more plausible that she and he would become more than just friends.Judy's letters are written in a believable, charming voice that rings true a century later — and I suspect well into the next century. Along with her quirky turns of phrase are drawings, little sketches that Judy sometimes sends along in her missives. They too add to the overall appeal of the novel.Keeping all those thoughts in mind, I adore the novel. It is delightful. Anyone who loves LM Montgomery's books or anyone who is a fan of Louise Rennison's books, will enjoy Daddy-Long-Legs.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I loved it, very entertaining. A reread for sure.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Loved this story! While it is definitely outdated in many ways it is still a charming escape.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I loved this book apart from the socialist propaganda, but that kind of ruined it. One of Judy's diary entries is basically, "Dear Diary, Should I become a Communist or a socialist?"!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Of course I have seen the movie a dozen times so I started looking for the book a few years ago. In many ways, of course, the book is better -- the movie replaced the social commentary and sparks of independent woman with musical numbers and 1950s sauciness and a lot of Fred Astaire (which is fine in a musical but...). in fact, i was a bit suprised how closely the movie did adhere to the spine of the novel...although only to the sweet parts of the spine.

    The book was published in 1912 but the thoughts and feelings of the young protagonist felt so very contemporary and fresh. As an epistolary novel it is unusual because we see only one person, really, writing, so it is more of a diary in letter form, but that works quite well to reveal the characters sussinctly.

    I have the next book waiting (Dear Enemy) waiting for me.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I remember reading this as a kid and really liking it, and it is rather remarkable how well I remembered the story and how much I still enjoyed the book. The story is relatively simplistic: an orphaned girl is sponsored by a nameless benefactor to attend college, with the stipulation that she write to the nameless benefactor, whom she dubs "Daddy-Long-Legs" regularly. Following the initial set-up, the story is told entirely in the letters Judy writes to DLL. As an adult, I am slightly put off by DLL's manipulation of Judy's life, but only slightly. I still found the book utterly charming. And now I discover there is a sequel! Or frappulous joy!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Perchè non ho mai letto questo romanzo prima? (tutta colpa dell'irritante Judy nell'omonimo anime)
    E' un bellissimo romanzo epistolare e Judy è un personaggio fantastico, una ragazza positiva e dalle sue lettere traspare il senso dell'umorismo, l'amore per lo studio e l'ostinazione nel voler crescere con le sue forze.
    La struttura epistolare è decisamente coinvolgente e molto scorrevole; l'ebook gratuito di "girlebooks" ha anche il vantaggio di avere le illustrazioni originali, simpatiche e in linea con il carattere di Judy.
    Assolutamente consigliato.

    ---
    Why I did not read this novel before? (all the blame to the noisy Judy from the homonymous Japanese anime).
    This is a wonderful epistolary novel and Judy is a great female character, always positive; her letters are humoristic and they show her love in studying and her stubbornness in wanting to grow up with her own strength.
    The epistolary structure is very involving and fluent; the free ebook by "girlebooks" contains also the original illustration that are nice and Judy-like.
    Absolutely recommended.

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The book is interesting and fun to read. The only thing that prevented it from getting five stars from me was the fact that the tone of the protagonist sounded like that of a 10 year old, not a college student and certainly not the 21 year old girl she is at the end of the book.

Book preview

Vadertje Langbeen - Jean Webster

http://www.pgdp.net

Opmerkingen van de bewerker

De tekst in dit bestand wordt weergegeven in de originele, verouderde spelling. Er is geen poging gedaan de tekst te moderniseren.

Afgebroken woorden aan het einde van de regel zijn stilzwijgend hersteld.

Overduidelijke druk- en spelfouten in het origineel zijn gecorrigeerd; deze zijn voorzien van een dunne rode stippellijn

, waarbij de Brontekst via een zwevende pop-up beschikbaar is.

Variaties in spelling (met/zonder koppelteken, met/zonder extra spatie) zijn behouden.

Van de meeste illustraties is een vergroting beschikbaar door op de betreffende illustratie te klikken.

Een overzicht van de aangebrachte correcties is te vinden aan het eind van dit bestand.

Het origineel van dit e-boek is een vertaling van het engelse boek „Daddy-Long-Legs". Dit boek is ook als e-boek beschikbaar via Project Gutenberg: e-boek no. 157 en e-boek no. 40426 (geïllustreerd).

Het engelse origineel is via Project Gutenberg ook beschikbaar in een audio-versie: e-boek no. 19782.

Dit Project Gutenberg e-boek bevat externe referenties. Het kan zijn dat deze links voor u niet werken.

VADERTJE LANGBEEN

VADERTJE

LANGBEEN

DOOR

JEAN WEBSTER

6de GOEDKOOPE DRUK

AMSTERDAM

SCHELTEMA & HOLKEMA'S BOEKHANDEL

K. GROESBEEK & PAUL NIJHOFF

LAMME WOENSDAG.

De eerste Woensdag van elke maand was een echt in-vervelende dag, een dag, die vol angst tegemoet gezien werd, dapper doorstaan moest worden en dan weer zoo gauw mogelijk vergeten werd. Geen vlekje mocht er dan op de vloeren te bespeuren zijn, geen stofje op de stoelen en geen rimpel in de beddelakens. Zevenennegentig onrustige, kleine vondelingetjes moesten geboend, gekamd en geborsteld en in versch gesteven pakjes gestoken worden, en aan alle 97 werd nog extra op het hart gedrukt, dat zij zich netjes moesten gedragen en vooral met twee woorden moesten antwoorden, wanneer een van de regenten of van de bezoekers zich verwaardigde hen aan te spreken.

Het was werkelijk een allerafschuwelijkste dag en de arme Jerusha Abbott, de oudste vondeling, had er nog den meesten last van. Maar ook deze afschuwelijke „Lamme Woensdag" kwam, net zooals zijn voorgangers, gelukkig tot een eind. Jerusha vluchtte van de provisiekamer, waar zij sandwiches voor de gasten had klaargemaakt, naar boven, om haar gewone dagelijksche werk af te maken. Aan haar was de speciale zorg voor Kamer F. opgedragen, waar elf kleine kleuters van vier tot zeven jaar sliepen in elf kleine bedjes, die op een rij langs den muur stonden. Jerusha verzamelde haar pleegkinderen om zich heen, trok hun verkreukelde pakjes glad, snoot hun vuile neuzen en stuurde ze op een rijtje naar de eetkamer, waar ze zich gedurende een gezegend half uur aan brood met melk en pruimepudding te goed konden doen.

Daarna liet ze zich op de vensterbank neerzakken en drukte haar bonzend, gloeiend voorhoofd tegen de koele ruit. Van 's morgens vijf uur af was ze op de been geweest en had ze iedereen naar de oogen moeten zien en dan nog op den koop toe uitgescholden en opgejaagd door een zenuwachtige directrice. Want achter de schermen bezat Juffrouw Lippett lang niet altijd de kalme waardigheid, waarmede ze op den Lammen Woensdag de regenten en bezoeksters ontving.

Jerusha staarde recht voor zich uit, over de uitgestrekte bevroren weilanden, over het hooge ijzeren hek, dat het gesticht omringde, over het heuvelland, waarop zich hier en daar een landhuis verhief, naar de torenspitsen van de stad, die te midden van de kale boomstammen verrezen

.

De dag was afgeloopen, voor zoover zij wist, goed afgeloopen zelfs. De regenten en bezoeksters hadden de ronde door het gesticht gedaan, de verslagen gelezen, hun thee gedronken en waren nu weer vlug weggegaan naar hun eigen gezellige huizen om daar hun vervelende kleine liefdadigheidsplichten weer tot het begin van de volgende maand te vergeten. Nieuwsgierig leunde Jerusha tegen het raam en volgde belangstellend met de oogen den stroom van equipages en automobielen, die door het hek van het gesticht wegrolden. In haar verbeelding vergezelde zij eerst de ééne, dan weer de andere equipage tot de groote landhuizen, welke zich langs de heuvels verhieven. Zij zag zichzelf, gehuld in een dikken bontmantel en met een grooten fluweelen hoed met veeren op, gemakkelijk in de kussens gevlijd, terwijl ze nonchalant den chauffeur gelastte „Naar huis" te rijden. Aan den drempel van haar huis werd haar droombeeld echter verward.

Jerusha had zooveel verbeeldingskracht, dat Juffrouw Lippett wel eens beweerde, dat ze nog gek zou worden, indien zij er zich niet met kracht tegen verzette. Maar hoe groot haar fantazie ook was, die kon haar toch niet brengen in het portaal van de huizen, waar zij wilde binnentreden. De arme, avontuurlijke kleine Jerusha had in haar heele zeventienjarig bestaan nog nooit den drempel van een gewoon huis overschreden. Zij kon zich het dagelijksche leven van menschen, die niet met den zorg voor de arme vondelingen belast waren, met geen mogelijkheid voorstellen.

„Jerusha Abbott

Je moet komen

In de kamer

Van Juf Lippett!"

Tommy Dillon, die in het koor had meegezongen, kwam zingende de trap op en de kamer binnen, al luider keel opzettend naarmate hij naderde. Jerusha schrok uit haar droom aan het venster op en keerde tot de dagelijksche lasten van haar leven terug.

„Wie heeft er naar me gevraagd?" onderbrak ze Tommy's gezang op angstigen toon.

„Juf Lippett is in de kamer.

Ze is geloof ik gek.

A-a-men!"

eindigde vrome Tommy zijn mededeeling. Toch was zijn toon niet plagerig, want zelfs het onverschilligste pleegkind voelde medelijden voor zijn armen broeder of beklagenswaardige zuster, die in de kamer van de gejaagde, zenuwachtige directrice werd ontboden. En Tommy hield van Jerusha, al rammelde ze hem ook wel eens door elkaar en al werd zijn neus ook vaak heel hardhandig door haar gesnoten.

Jerusha ging naar de kamer. Twee diepe rimpels vertoonden zich tusschen haar wenkbrauwen. Wat had ze nu weer niet goed gedaan? Waren de sandwiches niet dun genoeg gesneden, waren er schillen in de amandelkoekjes geweest of had een bezoekster het gat in Suze Hawthorns kous ontdekt? Hemelsche goedheid, had een van die allerleukste kleine kleuters uit haar eigen kamer een regent misschien een brutaal antwoord gegeven?

De lange lage gang was niet verlicht en toen zij bij de kamer kwam, stond daar nog een regent, op het punt van vertrekken, in de open gangdeur, die naar de hal leidde. Jerusha kreeg slechts een vluchtigen indruk van den man. Zij zag alleen maar, dat hij groot was en heel lange beenen had. Met zijn armen zwaaide hij naar de auto, die voor de deur stond te wachten. Toen deze zich in beweging zette en naderbij kwam, wierpen de lantaarns een duidelijke schaduw van den man tegen den muur van de vestibule. Die schaduw toonde enorm lange armen en beenen, die langs den wand naar den uitgang zwaaiden. Het geheel maakte den indruk van iets enorm groots en fladderends.

Jerusha's angstig gezichtje nam een vroolijke uitdrukking aan. Ze had een blijmoedig karakter en het geringste kon haar lachlust opwekken. Ze kwam dan ook door die kleine gebeurtenis geheel opgevroolijkt in de directricekamer en begroette Juffrouw Lippett met een glimlach. Tot haar groote verbazing was de Moeder, zooal niet glimlachend, toch oogenschijnlijk in een rooskleurige bui. De kleine Jerusha werd tenminste haast net zoo welwillend ontvangen als de bezoekers van dien middag.

„Ga zitten, Jerusha. Ik moet iets met je bespreken."

Jerusha liet zich in den eersten stoel den besten neervallen en wachtte ongeduldig af, wat komen zou. Een auto snorde langs het raam. Juffrouw Lippett keek haar na.

„Zag je dien heer, die zooeven wegging?"

„Ja, zijn rug".

„Het is een van de regenten, die het meest te zeggen heeft.

Hij heeft ook al groote sommen gegeven om onze inrichting te steunen. Ik mag je zijn naam niet noemen, hij heeft mij uitdrukkelijk gezegd, dat hij onbekend wil blijven."

Jerusha keek haar met groote oogen aan. Zij was er niet aan gewend, dat de directrice de particuliere zaken van de regenten met haar besprak.

„Deze heer stelt in verschillende van onze jongens belang. Herinner je je Charles Benton en Henry Freize? Die werden alle twee door hem naar de universiteit gezonden en beiden hebben ze door hard werken en groot succes het geld eer aangedaan, dat zoo edelmoedig voor hen werd uitgegeven. Een andere betaling wenscht deze heer niet. Tot nu toe heeft hij alleen maar jongens op weg geholpen en het is me nooit gelukt, ook maar in het minst belangstelling in een van de meisjes van het gesticht bij hem op te wekken, hoe zeer enkelen het misschien ook verdiend hebben. Ik kan je wel vertellen, dat hij absoluut niets om meisjes geeft".

„Zoo, juffrouw", bromde Jerusha, die dacht, dat zij hierop iets moest antwoorden.

„Vandaag is op de vergadering jouw toekomst besproken".

Juffrouw Lippett hield even een veelzeggende pauze. Daarna vervolgde zij weer op haar kalme spreekwijze tot de nu plots gespannen toehoordster:

„Zooals je weet, worden de kinderen gewoonlijk hier niet langer dan tot hun zestiende jaar gehouden,

maar hebben we bij jou een uitzondering gemaakt. Tot je veertiende jaar ben je op de lagere school geweest en omdat je altijd goed geleerd hebt, werd er besloten, dat je daarna de middelbare school mocht bezoeken, ook al was je gedrag lang niet altijd even goed. Nu heb je ook die geheel bezocht en kan het gesticht niet langer voor je zorgen. Je hebt al twee jaar meer dan je toekwam".

Juffrouw Lippett negeerde het feit, dat Jerusha gedurende die twee jaar hard voor haar kost had moeten werken, zoodat het werk voor het gesticht in de eerste plaats en dat voor haar opvoeding pas daarna aan de beurt was gekomen. Ook sprak ze er niet over, dat het kind op dagen als heden b.v. thuis werd gehouden, om het huis schoon te maken.

„Zooals ik zooeven al zei, werd vanmiddag je toekomst besproken, grondig besproken."

Beschuldigend keek Juffrouw Lippett de kleine, voor haar zittende

gevangene aan en bescheiden sloeg deze de oogen neer, niet omdat zij zich van iets kwaads bewust was, maar omdat zij begreep, dat dit van haar verwacht werd.

„Natuurlijk behoorde iemand in jouw positie ergens heen gestuurd te worden, waar je hard moet werken, maar je hebt nu eenmaal op school goed je best gedaan, vooral in sommige vakken. Het schijnt, dat je Engelsche opstel zelfs schitterend geweest is. Juffrouw Pritchard, die in ons bestuur zit en ook in het schoolcomité, heeft er met je leeraar over gesproken en heeft hier een opstel van je voorgelezen, dat je „Lamme Woensdag hebt betiteld.

Deze keer was Jerusha's schuldige uitdrukking niet geveinsd.

„Het komt me voor, dat je je niet bepaald dankbaar toont, wanneer je het instituut, waar je zooveel hebt genoten, belachelijk maakt. Als het niet bepaald humoristisch geschreven was, geloof ik dan ook niet, dat de regenten het je ooit hadden vergeven. Maar gelukkig voor jou heeft Mijnheer.... ik meen Mijnheer de regent, die zoo juist vertrokken is, heel veel gevoel voor humor en naar aanleiding van dit brutale opstel heeft hij aangeboden, je voor zijn kosten naar de universiteit te sturen".

„Naar de Universiteit?" Met open mond gaapte Jerusha de directrice aan.

Die knikte. „Ja, hij bleef net hier om nog verschillende condities met me te bespreken. Heel buitengewone condities waren het. Die Mijnheer de regent is een fantast, mag ik wel zeggen. Hij gelooft, dat je veel oorspronkelijke gedachten hebt en wil nu een schrijfster van je maken".

„Een schrijfster!" Jerusha kon haar ooren niet gelooven. Half onbewust herhaalde ze Juffrouw Lippett's woorden.

„Ja, dat wil hij nu eenmaal. Of zijn wensch ook in vervulling zal gaan, moet de toekomst ons leeren. Hij wil je een heele groote toelage geven, eigenlijk te groot voor een meisje zooals jij, dat nog nooit eenig begrip van geldzaken gehad heeft. Maar hij heeft nu alles tot in de kleinste bijzonderheden met me besproken en ik kwam er niet toe, eenige tegenwerpingen te maken. 's Zomers kun je hier altijd komen en Juffrouw Pritchard is zoo vriendelijk geweest om voor je uitzet te willen zorgen. Je pension en het collegegeld zal direct aan de universiteit betaald worden en de vier jaar, dat je daar bent, krijg je nog een toelage van $ 35.— per maand. Daardoor zal je op gelijken voet met de andere meisjes-studenten kunnen leven. Eén keer per maand ontvang je het geld door den secretaris van dien regent en dan moet je hem zelf in antwoord daarop elke maand een brief schrijven, waarin je hem er voor bedankt. Of nee, bedanken moet je hem ook weer niet voor het geld, daar geeft hij niets om.... Maar je moet hem schrijven over de vorderingen, die je maakt en hem allerlei kleine bijzonderheden van je dagelijksch leven vertellen. Schrijf hem net zoo'n brief als je aan je ouders zoudt sturen als je die hadt.

Die brieven moet je aan Mijnheer John Smith richten, en aan zijn secretaris zenden. Hij heet natuurlijk niet John Smith, maar wil nu eenmaal onbekend blijven en voor jou zal hij dan ook wel nooit iemand anders zijn dan John Smith. Hij verlangt dat je hem geregeld elke maand schrijft, omdat hij meent, dat niets een betere oefening voor je stijl en het gemakkelijk in woorden brengen van je gedachten is, dan juist brieven schrijven. Omdat jij nu geen familie hebt aan wie je kunt schrijven, wil hij die brieven ontvangen. Ook wil hij precies op de hoogte gehouden worden van je vorderingen. Hij zal je nooit antwoorden of de geringste notitie van je brieven nemen. Hij verfoeit dat gecorrespondeer! En, hij wil natuurlijk geen last van je hebben. Mocht het voorkomen, dat je een direct antwoord noodig hebt—b. v. als je weggestuurd zou worden, wat naar we hopen niet gebeuren zal—dan kun je aan den secretaris, Mijnheer Griggs, schrijven. Je bent verplicht elke maand een brief te sturen, dat is de eenige betaling, die Mijnheer Smith van je verlangt, dus moet je ze altijd stipt op tijd sturen, want het is je rekening, die je daarmee betaalt. Ik hoop, dat je altijd met het

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1