Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science
Written by Peter Godfrey-Smith
Narrated by Matthew Lloyd Davies
4.5/5
()
About this audiobook
Intended for undergraduates and general audiences with no prior background in philosophy, Theory and Reality covers logical positivism; the problems of induction and confirmation; Karl Popper's theory of science; Thomas Kuhn and "scientific revolutions"; the views of Imre Lakatos, Larry Laudan, and Paul Feyerabend; and challenges to the field from sociology of science, feminism, and science studies. The book then looks in more detail at some specific problems and theories, including scientific realism, the theory-ladeness of observation, scientific explanation, and Bayesianism. Finally, Godfrey-Smith defends a form of philosophical naturalism as the best way to solve the main problems in the field.
Peter Godfrey-Smith
Peter Godfrey-Smith is a professor in the School of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Sydney. He is the author of the bestselling Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness, which has been published in more than twenty languages. His other books include Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science and Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, which won the 2010 Lakatos Award.
More audiobooks from Peter Godfrey Smith
Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Metazoa: Animal Life and the Birth of the Mind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Theory and Reality
Related audiobooks
What is Life?: With Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Understanding Beliefs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The World According to Physics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Idea of the World: A Multi-Disciplinary Argument for the Mental Nature of Reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Will Make You Smarter: New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Paradox Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Minds Make Societies: How Cognition Explains the World Humans Create Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Philosophy of Physics: A Very Short Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mind-Body Problem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ancient Philosophy: The Fundamentals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5In Search of a Theory of Everything: The Philosophy Behind Physics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophical Method: A Very Short Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow History Gets Things Wrong: The Neuroscience of Our Addiction to Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Non-Existence of the Real World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Trust Science? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Irrationality: A History of the Dark Side of Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Instinct: How We Evolved to Have Reason, Consciousness, and Free Will Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Enigma of Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Science & Mathematics For You
Radiolab: Mixtape: How The Cassette Changed The World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thinking in Systems: A Primer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Midnight in Chernobyl: The Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Radiolab: Journey Through The Human Body Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anatomy of a Breakthrough: How to Get Unstuck When It Matters Most Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Radiolab: The Feels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Starry Messenger: Cosmic Perspectives on Civilization Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cosmos: A Personal Voyage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Marshmallow Test: Mastering Self-Control Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Packing for Mars: The Curious Science of Life in the Void Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brain Rules (Updated and Expanded): 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Neuroscientist Who Lost Her Mind: My Tale of Madness and Recovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quackery: A Brief History of the Worst Ways to Cure Everything Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Comfort of Crows: A Backyard Year Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fuzz: When Nature Breaks the Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gene: An Intimate History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Salt: A World History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quantum Physics: What Everyone Needs to Know Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Theory and Reality
77 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Clear and lively. A good balance between information and comprehensibility. The use of a personal voice and taking a standpoint was helpful because it made the exposition more engaging and, at the same time, allowed me to glean where I might read on to encounter further perspectives.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'm reviewing this book as an instructor using it for an introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Godfrey-Smith is going for a general overview of the last one hundred or so years of debate in the philosophy of science, and it works well as a secondary source for that kind of course.One thing that Godfrey-Smith is able to do quite well in this volume is write in a conversational style that appeals to students. In a number of ways, it comes off as the written form of a good lecture. It contains moments of quick analysis, an informal tone and even a few jokes.It is also a strength of the book that Godfrey-Smith is clear about his own views and the ways in which they shape his analysis of the various views considered here. Students should recognize that these positions are not sacred or beyond the reach of their own criticism. Works like this which demonstrate a philosopher working with the ideas in addition to presenting them is a good model for the students to have.I think there are two main weaknesses with the book, both of which call for supplementation in course readings (indeed, I'd imagine both weaknesses are the results of design decisions by the author). First, the book is short and moves fast. Complex ideas are often left underdeveloped, and some ideas are presented a bit too quickly for the students (for example, the discussion of Quine's "Two Dogmas" is understandably quick given its place in the book, but does not provide enough space to explain what his arguments are). Pairing it with a set of primary source readings alleviates this rather nicely, since students will be expected to work out the details in their own reading, but can use Godfrey-Smith as some help and guidance for the big picture issues.The second of the weaknesses is that it does not provide sufficient historical context to debates about the scientific method in philosophy. At least an extra chapter discussing deductivism and inductivism and how they lead into Hypothetico-Deductivism (which does make an appearance) would be very helpful. This material lays the groundwork for some of the more complex ideas discussed later, and in some ways serves as an easier example to introduce the notion of a syntactic theory.I recommend this book as a supplementary reading for an introduction to philosophy of science course. It is probably too thin to use as a main text, but its clear presentation makes it ideal for giving students a leg up on more complex primary readings.