Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life
    Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life
    Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life
    Audiobook11 hours

    Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life

    Written by Allen Frances, MD

    Narrated by Paul Boehmer

    4/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    In Saving Normal, Allen Frances, one of the world's most influential psychiatrists, warns that mislabeling everyday problems as mental illness has shocking implications for individuals and society: stigmatizing a healthy person as mentally ill leads to unnecessary, harmful medications, the narrowing of horizons, misallocation of medical resources, and draining of the budgets of families and the nation. We also shift responsibility for our mental well-being away from our own naturally resilient and self-healing brains, which have kept us sane for hundreds of thousands of years, and into the hands of "Big Pharma," who are reaping multi-billion-dollar profits.

    Masterfully charting the history of psychiatric fads throughout history, Frances argues that whenever we arbitrarily label another aspect of the human condition a "disease," we further chip away at our human adaptability and diversity, dulling the full palette of what is normal and losing something fundamental of ourselves in the process. Saving Normal is a call to all of us to reclaim the full measure of our humanity.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateJun 14, 2017
    ISBN9781541476905
    Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life

    Related to Saving Normal

    Related audiobooks

    Medical For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      In 'Healing' A Doctor Calls For An Overhaul Of The Mental Health Care System

      Mar 1, 2022

      People in mental health crisis need more than emergency response, argues a leader in the field. They need a continuum of long-term care to put them on the path to recovery.

      6 min read

    • Article

      My Disease is Not a Metaphor

      Oct 2, 2018

      My Disease is Not a Metaphor
      11 min read

    • Article

      Trying To Understand 'What Made Maddy Run'

      Aug 2, 2017

      Journalist Kate Fagan's new book digs into the life of a young woman whose suicide shocked the University of Pennsylvania, where she ran track. Madison Holleran's life seemed perfect, until it wasn't.

      2 min read

    • Article

      The Life of an Addict

      Nov 20, 2017

      The Life of an Addict
      17 min read

    • Article

      Speaker's CORNER

      Oct 21, 2019

      Speaker's CORNER
      2 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Cultural Confusion: The Shifting Line Between Sane And ‘Unsane’

      May 8, 2018

      Where does sanity end and mental illness begin? It's a shifting boundary, one based as much on culture as it is on our understanding of the brain and mental health.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Kind Of Blue

      Jul 4, 2021

      Kind Of Blue
      10 min read

    • Article

      Therapy Is Making Kids Ill

      Mar 28, 2024

      IF YOU DON’T HAVE WORDS TO EXPRESS a thought, can you even think it? The idea that language shapes cognition is known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, after American linguist Edward Sapir and his student Benjamin Whorf, and almost a century after it wa

      5 min read

    • Article

      The End Of Psychiatry?

      Jul 24, 2022

      The End Of Psychiatry?
      6 min read

    • Article

      I Am a Heroin User. I Do Not Have a Drug Problem

      Feb 17, 2021

      Carl Hart is a neuroscientist and Ziff Professor of Psychology at Columbia University—he was the first tenured African-American professor of sciences at Columbia. His research focuses on the “behavioral and neuropharmacological effects of psychoactiv

      9 min read

    • Article

      Far Out, Man

      Dec 5, 2021

      Far Out, Man
      13 min read

    • Article

      Commentary: Mental Illness Was My Family's Secret — And America's Great Shame

      Oct 1, 2019

      In 2011, I began a professional and personal journey to understand my profession's abandonment of our sickest patients. I had been trained as a psychiatrist at an Ivy League medical center on the East Coast. Like most of my colleagues in my generatio

      5 min read

    • Article

      Insult or LSD?

      Nov 22, 2020

      Heart not in the COVID-avoidance fun? How about a few insults to get you in the mood for the pending vaccine, or the forcible injection of a psychoactive drug such as LSD to make you more of a socially responsible mask wearer? The virus is nasty, for

      3 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Saving Normal

    4/5

    52 ratings9 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      This is an interesting and much-needed commentary on the excessive prescription of medications and misuse of psychiatric diagnoses. The guilt throughout this book is palpable; the author, sharing responsibility for the production of DSM-IV, didn't prevent the misuse of medications and diagnoses. While this book does say that everyone is different and that's fine, the message gets lost, as there is an inconsistency of audience. A slightly better organization of the book (perhaps one section aimed with a message for individuals, medical professionals, Big Pharma and legislation) might help solidify the message.In this century, we live in an instant gratification culture. You can have just about anything shipped to you in two-days or less after ordering from the internet. So, why, then, should it not be possible to instantaneously "fix" your mood or behaviors. It becomes easier for an individual to blame an inherent condition that needs medication to control than it is to develop new coping mechanisms or deal with life's miseries. And society tells the individual this is acceptable.
    • 4/5
      Six-word review: Well-documented indictment of medical profiteering.Extended review:When you put a profit motive behind finding as much as possible wrong with as many people as possible, suddenly and frighteningly a lot of people have something wrong. And nothing lends itself better to free-wheeling commercialization than people's emotional states. Because not everybody has a sore foot or hearing loss, but everybody has troubles sometimes and everybody feels bad sometimes. And when people feel bad, they want to feel better.And the pharmaceutical industry is right there with its hand out.Two hands, in fact: one to dispense from a bottomless barrel of meds for every describable ailment, and one to rake in obscenely huge profits from true believers and cynics alike.Diagnostic inflation and overmedication are the two dominant themes of Allen Frances' book. Dr. Frances, the psychiatrist who headed the DSM-IV (1994) team, doesn't limit his discussion to psychotropic medications, but they are a primary target. The DSM is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, now in its fifth edition (DSM-5, 2013). A revenue-generating publication of the American Psychiatric Association, it was until its third edition in 1980 a relatively obscure document intended as an aid to professional diagnosis, initially in a military context. It was never meant to be a "bible" or to govern the relationships between therapists and clients, never mind furnishing criteria for insurance claims. With the upsurge in psychiatric research and practice in the 1970s and the explosion of psychotropic medications in the 1980s, the detailed classification of mental conditions became dramatically relevant.And suddenly so did the DSM.As Dr. Frances documents in disturbing detail, it was the vastly profitable pharmaceutical industry that stood to gain the most from those developments.The selling of health to moneyed interests compromises everything from the integrity of practitioners to the well-being of the patients, many too young, too old, or too impaired to make their own choices.A primary casualty of this seismic shift in the medical and pharmaceutical landscape is the concept of normality. By loosening diagnostic criteria, the therapeutic community's chief reference work ends up classifying anything outside of a narrow range as a disorder. The result is the medicalizing of life's ordinary ups and especially downs. Too much energy or too little, a spell of sadness, a display of eccentricity: diagnosis by checklist will give it a name, and then off you go to your pharmacy, hoping for a small copayment and instant relief.Frances' courageous book calls his peers and colleagues to account, faulting them not for their lack of integrity but for their lack of judgment (page 288). He shows no mercy to Big Pharma, however, for capitalizing on people's natural desire to cope with their problems and grasp at easy remedies--and, what's worse, for manufacturing crises in mental and physical healthcare for its own gain.Even more harmful than turning the vicissitudes of life into illnesses and relatively healthy people into patients is creating false epidemics of disorders such as ADHD, autism, and PTSD. Once attached, those labels adhere like leeches and can compromise for a lifetime a person's self-confidence, employability, access to healthcare and coverage, and quality of life. Dr. Frances relates several harrowing accounts of patients whose iatrogenic conditions might well have sunk them. Anyone who feels anything strongly or does anything passionately becomes a candidate for therapeutic intervention. And once plugged into the system, many become captives of it. "We have to address the fact," says Frances, "that the misuse of legal drugs has now become a bigger public health problem than street drugs. It is unacceptable that 7 percent of our population is addicted to prescription drugs and that fatal overdoses with them now exceed those caused by illegal drugs" (page 211).Frances reserves special attention for the well-known placebo effect: "Modern drug companies have made big bucks capitalizing on the power and ubiquity of the placebo response. The best way to get great results with a pill is to treat people who don't really need it--the highest placebo response rates occur in those who would get better naturally and on their own" (page 99).Does Dr. Frances have solutions to propose? He does, although without expressing much optimism. It must begin, he says, with the political will to do what must be done, and that means that public servants must wean themselves from the creamy persuasion of Big Pharma's virtually unlimited financial resources. A section called "Dismantling the Marketing Machine" lists fourteen policy changes that would act to curb the powers wielded in the interests of corporate greed. The media have an enormous role to play as well: once seduced by the magic of promised cures, they are now wising up and showing some well-placed skepticism. Doctors and patients themselves also figure in the picture, and Frances outlines action steps for them.A key part in the process of trend reversal belongs to the DSM, and the author calls for its drastic revision as well as a reduction in reliance on it throughout the medical, educational, and legal systems.As a layperson, I'm not qualified to evaluate this book with respect to the healthcare industry. However, it seems like an important book to me, and the author's passion for his subject is unmistakable. Saving Normal has significantly heightened my awareness of some issues that I'd already been paying attention to and opened my eyes to others. Assuming that the author's credentials are as represented and his documentation reliable, I think it has to be taken seriously. I don't know if most people would want to learn something from this book, but most people could.The extent to which I engaged with it shows in my pencil work. In general, I regard a nonfiction book as a dialogue, and my side of the exchange takes the form of underscores, ticks in the margin, and annotations, sometimes extensive. I read this one hard; scarcely a page is unmarked. I found plenty here to think about and plenty to come back to.Nonetheless, I do have a few quibbles with it. The book needed at least one more thorough, sentence-shaking, word-wrangling line edit. (Every time an author makes a change, remember, what you have is unedited text. The number of errors introduced in the course of incorporating changes is potentially limitless.) At several points, I wrote in the margin, "Naptime for editors." There is unexplained insider jargon. There is inconsistent use of abbreviations and failure to expand at first occurrence. There are shifts in audience focus: sometimes the author seems to be addressing the public, sometimes fellow medical professionals, and sometimes people he knows personally. There are egregious sentences such as this: "The value of early intervention to prevent psychosis rests on three fundamental and necessary pillars--diagnosing only the right people, having a treatment that is effective, and also safe" (page 198). There is a lot of trouble with parallel structure, especially with correlatives. There are instances of illogical order of presentation and downright ambiguity. There's a Bible misquote on page 170--and no excuse for it, either, since it's so readily checked.Yes, I know it isn't easy to get all this stuff right. That's why people hire professional editors. And when one is too familiar, too close to the material, or just worn out, maybe you need another one.A notable drawback to utility is the fact that the ample chapter notes are headed by chapter numbers, without page references; but the running heads in the chapters give title only and not chapter number, so that when you want to look up a note, you first have to page back in the chapter to find out the number of the chapter you're in. This is something that a fresh editorial eye ought to have spotted in page proofs right away. A book that aspires to making a difference--indeed, becoming an agent for major change--deserves every measure of care that can be lavished on it. An extra two months' attention before press time might have been just the prescription it needed.
    • 4/5
      Dr. Allen Frances has written a provocative book, Saving Normal, about the way we treat mental illness in the United States. He centers the book on the DSM-IV and DSM-V, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the bible of psychiatry, in its fourth and fifth iteration. He believes that the broadening of the definitions of many mental disorders has led and will further lead to the labeling of millions of normal people as “mental patients”. He concludes that too many people are being given drugs who don’t need them, primary care doctors are administering drugs they don’t understand, drug companies are preying on consumers and doctors in order to make big profits and that the limited psychiatric resources are not going to those who really do need help.Dr. Frances is a psychiatrist and professor emeritus and former chair of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science at Duke University School of Medicine. He chaired the Task Force that wrote the DSM-IV and worked with the group that wrote DSM-III and DSM-IIIR so he really does know what he is writing about. He doesn’t shy away from taking some of the blame for redefinitions that came about in DSM-IV that have caused an increase in diagnoses of autism, ADHD and bipolar disorder. He uses that experience to highlight how important it is to anticipate the unintended consequences of the revisions of this manual. If you are interested in the issue of mental illness, this is a must read.
    • 4/5
      This is an interesting book. Dr. Allen was a member of the groups that developed - and later revised - DSM III (Diagnostics and Statistical Manual for Behavioral Science, 3rd Edition), and chaired the committee that developed DSM IV. Saving Normal is a reflection on developments in psychiatry after DSM III, the way DSM IV was an effort to preempt efforts by pharmaceutical companies to increase diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses, and how the recently completed DSM 5 has the potential of making it easier for psychiatrists to find some mental illness in just about anyone.The result of the process is a loss of grasp on the concept of "normalcy," and millions of people ending up on useless drugs to treat "illnesses" that really exist only in the mind of the psychiatrist and the pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Allen tries to make the case that this process is a result of poorly structured DSMs that make it possible for psychiatrists to find illness in just about anything that deviates from a poorly defined concept of normalcy.It is educational to find out the role drug companies have played in the proliferation of mental-illness diagnoses, and how they have managed to make billions of dollars per year developing (what Dr. Allen contends are) virtually useless drugs that serve little purpose other than to make people dependent on them. At root, I believe this book is an attempt on Dr. Allen's part to absolve himself of blame for a process that - arguably - he was part of, and even led. He admits complicity in the process, but I get the impression he doesn't own up to the extent to which he contributed to the problem.
    • 4/5
      As a chair of the DSM-IV task force, Dr. Frances has a unique and expert viewpoint of the psychiatric diagnosis process. In this book he examines how psychiatry has gotten away from the psychiatrist and now lays at the hands of big pharmaceutical companies and general practitioners. The results being that many "worried-well" are being overly treated with anti-anxiety and anti-depressants that they do not need while the truly sick fall through the cracks. I think this is an important book that addresses issues seen not just in psychiatry but also in the general field of medicine. This became a bit dry at times and even repetitive which made for slow reading, but the author definitely realizes a huge problem and wrote this book in order to make an important argument that may not reach the widest audience. Overall, this is an informative yet depressing look at how medical decisions are made and medicines are marketed. I received this book through a LibraryThing giveaway.
    • 5/5
      This book should be judged not so much by how well it is written but just by the fact of who wrote it. There is a lot of weight to be given to former chair of DSM-4 (Diagnostic and Statistical manual) when he talks about 'diagnostic inflation' in mental health. He recognizes the unfortunate role DSM-4 played in that terrible process but also identifies the other factors that together contributed in such massive 'medicalization' in psychiatry. He describes the recently issued DSM-5, which, unfortunately, provides foundation for further expansion of diagnostic inflation. He writes about role played by big pharmas, consumer advocates, media, psychiatric association, etc. Although the author does describe the steps necessary to reign in mental diagnosis proliferation they seem to be not very realistic. The author himself is quite pessimistic regarding short term resolution. But somebody has to step up and this book is one small step in this direction.
    • 4/5
      An excellent book. The hardcover version, released in 2013, was named a Top 10 Science and Health Book by Booklist. In Saving Normal, author Dr. Allen Frances researches why we're seeing so many more cases of mental disorders being diagnosed in the U.S. Dr. Frances chaired the DSM-IV Task Force (DSM is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and helped led the DSM-III and DSM-III-R groups, so he's an insider when it comes to this issue. He believes that literally millions of us are being labeled with mental problems when we're really no more than the average "worried well" person who must cope with the stresses of everyday life.He puts most of the responsibility (blame) for this diagnostic trend on the big pharmaceutical companies, who make a profit from developing and selling drugs that may or may not even affect the psychiatric conditions we supposedly suffer.The author does not question at all the very real mental issues some patients face, and their need for medical help and prescribed medication. He's simply saying that we need to look closely at why these diagnoses are rising; who is making these judgment calls; and what we are putting into our bodies, or the bodies of our families, when we take these prescribed drugs.This book raises many important points. I received it through the LIbraryThing giveaway, but this has not influenced my opinion. I highly recommend it.
    • 5/5
      Brilliant! This is an outstanding book about the dangers of the psychiatric community overpathologizing mental illnesses. I have been concerned about this for sometime especially with the alarming rate of children on psychiatric medicines. This book reminded me of previous sentiments echoed by Dr. William Glasser.
    • 5/5
      The premise of this fascinating book is that behaviors and conditions that used to be considered normal variations in human personality have come to be considered mental illnesses. This has happened through a vast expansion of the list of diagnoses in the "DSM," which is considered the bible of psychiatric diagnosis, followed by the commercial exploitation of this expansion by the drug companies. The author is clearly an expert in this area, as a former chairman of the Duke University Medical School Department of Psychiatry and an editor of a previous edition of the DSM. However, this book is written for a general audience, in a lively, engaging style, and is free of technical jargon. It includes a history of mental illnesses and their treatment throughout history, a description of how mental illnesses are recognized and described via grouping of symptoms, and a description of "fad" mental illness diagnoses of the past and present. The author is no extremist; he reiterates that psychiatry and psychiatric drugs have helped and continue to help many people who need them. What he is opposed to is the medicalization of what is essentially normal behavior, and labeling of people who aren't really ill, so that they can be sold drugs to cure their "condition." I would highly recommend this book, both for those who have an interest in this subject, and for the general reader who is interested in how science tries, sometimes well and sometimes not so well, to categorize and describe human behavior.