Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Timescape
    Timescape
    Timescape
    Audiobook15 hours

    Timescape

    Written by Gregory Benford

    Narrated by Simon Prebble and Pete Bradbury

    3.5/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    Winner of both the Nebula Award and the John W. Campbell Award for best science fiction novel, Timescape is an enduring classic that examines the ways that science interacts with everyday life to create the many strange worlds in which we live. In a future wracked by environmental catastrophe and social instability, physicist John Renfrew devises a longshot plan to use tachyons--strange, time-traveling particles--to send a warning to the past. In 1962, Gordon Bernstein, a California researcher, gets Renfrew's message as a strange pattern of interference in an experiment he's conducting. As the two men struggle to overcome both the limitations of scientific knowledge and the politics of scientific research, a larger question looms: can a new future arise from the paradox of a forewarned past? With multiple plot lines and diverse characters, Timescape offers something for all lovers of fascinating science and great fiction. Simon Prebble and Peter Bradbury combine for a narration that skillfully uncovers the mysteries beneath our understanding of the universe.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherRecorded Books, Inc.
    Release dateApr 18, 2008
    ISBN9781436121118
    Timescape
    Author

    Gregory Benford

    Gregory Benford is a physicist, educator, and author. He received a BS from the University of Oklahoma and a PhD from the University of California, San Diego. Benford is a professor of physics at the University of California, Irvine, where he has been a faculty member since 1971. He is a Woodrow Wilson Fellow and a Visiting Fellow at Cambridge University. He has served as an advisor to the Department of Energy, NASA, and the White House Council on Space Policy. He is the author of over twenty novels, including In the Ocean of the Night, The Heart of the Comet (with David Brin), Foundation’s Fear, Bowl of Heaven (with Larry Niven), Timescape, and The Berlin Project. A two-time winner of the Nebula Award, Benford has also won the John W. Campbell Award, the British Science Fiction Award (BSFA), the Australian Ditmar Award, and the 1990 United Nations Medal in Literature. In 1995 he received the Lord Foundation Award for contributions to science and the public comprehension of it. He has served as scientific consultant to the NHK Network and for Star Trek: The Next Generation.

    Related to Timescape

    Related audiobooks

    Science Fiction For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Children Of Ruin

      May 22, 2019

      Children Of Ruin
      1 min read

    • Article

      Inhibitor Phase

      Aug 11, 2021

      Inhibitor Phase
      2 min read

    • Article

      “Really?”

      Jun 2, 2022

      “Really?”
      6 min read

    • Article

      Roger’s Profanisaurus

      Oct 15, 2020

      Amber warning n. A log dropped in a partner’s bed; a subtle sign that a romantic relationship may just possibly be heading for trouble. Named in honour of Johnny Depp’s estranged squeeze, viz. Amber Heard = Douglas Hurd. and in local news… phr. Annou

      6 min read

    • Article

      Tathra Hotel

      May 16, 2018

      Tathra Hotel
      6 min read

    • Article

      The Lights... Are On

      Nov 19, 2018

      There were times when you needed a break from the nationals, trying instead a rally with a somewhat different approach. There were some great inland ones with many situated almost in the middle of nowhere. Usually, with a couple of hundred in attenda

      3 min read

    • Article

      What Just Happened?

      Apr 9, 2021

      What Just Happened?
      4 min read

    • Article

      Roger’s profanisaurus

      Oct 13, 2022

      Roger’s profanisaurus
      9 min read

    • Article

      Profanisaurus

      Jun 23, 2022

      bite off more than you can poo v. To overeat. bite the brown bullet v. To walk with tightly clenched buttocks, perhaps after biting off more than you can poo. ‘Prince Charles there, graciously and regally biting the brown bullet as he graciously and

      8 min read

    • Article

      Roger’s PROFANISAURUS

      May 18, 2023

      Roger’s PROFANISAURUS
      7 min read

    • Article

      LetTer BoCKS

      Feb 1, 2024

      LetTer BoCKS
      12 min read

    • Article

      Roger’s PROFANISAURUS

      Oct 12, 2023

      Roger’s PROFANISAURUS
      7 min read

    • Article

      A Puzzle Of Nostalgia

      Aug 26, 2022

      A Puzzle Of Nostalgia
      5 min read

    • Article

      Splash

      Feb 9, 2018

      Splash
      6 min read

    • Article

      A holiday INDOORS

      Apr 7, 2021

      “You’ll have probably noticed that there’s been very little mention on this page during the past year of lockdowns and respiratory disease and bubbles and masks and toilet roll shortages and quarantine, and illicit Darby and Joan club meetings being

      3 min read

    • Article

      HOMEBUSH Hotel

      May 14, 2020

      HOMEBUSH Hotel
      6 min read

    • Article

      Three Poems

      Jul 1, 2023

      Jester-necked pile of ideasfattening by the cutting board.I have known the summer wall,it says slowly. The hillside facessouth into the valley.Dew on the tomato plants.Anything that grows, swarms,bunches itself against a stayand cannot stay. The vine

      4 min read

    • Article

      A Room in August Town

      Sep 12, 2023

      A Room in August Town
      25 min read

    • Article

      It’s Art, But Not As We Know It

      Apr 12, 2023

      THOSE of you who were there will remember, I’m sure, that it was pretty spectacular. I was about 35in tall at the time and Tony Blair (72.04in, for what it’s worth) was about to lead New Labour to a landslide victory. I can’t actually remember what t

      2 min read

    • Article

      Quantum Radio

      Feb 22, 2023

      Quantum Radio
      5 min read

    • Article

      Doug’s DIARY

      Jun 17, 2022

      what a busy month it's been. Our feet have barely touched the ground, and our heads have all too brief ly felt the comfort of our soft pillows. It's midgie season, and we've just finished yet another late-night shift, slathered in insect repellent. I

      6 min read

    • Article

      Roger’s PROFANISAURUS

      Jan 5, 2023

      Roger’s PROFANISAURUS
      8 min read

    • Article

      Prevarication Jones

      May 1, 2019

      Prevarication Jones
      16 min read

    • Article

      Bucksaw

      Jun 3, 2019

      From the back seat of the car, Benjamin read the gold-lettered sign at the edge of the rolling green lawn and said, “Why do they call it a correctional facility?” He’d meant only to think the question, rather than speak it, but lately, more and more,

      23 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Timescape

    3.5/5

    414 ratings14 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      There are two timelines in this story: one in sort-of mid-apocalyptic 1998, when algae blooms and mass extinctions have triggered the beginning of the end it seems, and one in 1962, when scientists at UCLA are conducting some sort of physics experiment involving tachyons...? Anyway, the future scientists (aka those in 1998 - the book was published in 1980) figure out that they can send a message via tachyons to the 1962 scientists, warning them of the impending doom. But they don't want to make it too clear or else the Grandfather Paradox would kick in and...it...wouldn't...work? But somehow it sort of doesn't work anyway (but also sort of does), because, I'm guessing, butterfly wings and then Kennedy gets shot but not killed? Because physics! Gah. I give up. There's way too much science talk and not nearly enough make-it-make-sense-to-the-reader talk. I got confused. And then I got bored. Which I think would have happened without the confusion - it takes just this side of forever for any actual plot to be bothered to happen. So nope, this one didn't really work for me.
    • 2/5
      Dull, with a soupçon of “women are not important” (and I’m a man myself), characters who lack character and are hard to tell apart, and so far (I’m a third in) nothing has happened. Long passages of people explaining things to one another that they ought to know already. No charm, no surprises, and a very uninspired imagining of the near future (at the time). It gets 2 stars for being competently written (I try to save 1 star for "how did this get published???" books), but I am clearly the other end of the target market for this kind of fiction, and I'm stunned that it would win any award, let alone something so major.

      Time to abandon and find something more fulfilling.
    • 5/5
      I could not stop thinking about this book. The premise is fascinating, the two worlds described are fascinating. The scientists of the past and "future" are character studies and their pursuits are interesting. The climax just kept going. I highly recommend this book!
    • 5/5
      Timescape is one of my favorite sci-fi novels. I first read it around 1990 and recently finished my third reading. The characters are varied and complex, yet I don't find myself relating to any of them very well. Instead, I enjoy the detailed discussions of the science, how science is performed as well as descriptions of the academic environment. The realism can be attributed to Benford's practice as an astrophysicist at UC, Irvine. More importantly, the story is an interesting, unfolding mystery posing questions involving possible communications between time and multiverses.One timeline within the story occurs in 1963. The other timeline is in 1998, which, at the time of it's writing, was a good 18 years in the future. Consequently, when reading it today, one finds that the 1998 "future" misses the mark on several occasions. I found myself able to ignore those issues and think of the future timeline as simply an alternate universe not incompatible with a near future of my own timeline.Each time I've read through the book, I've understood a little more given it's many cultural references. For example, one character in the 1963 timeline mentions a new Phil Dick book titled: "The Man in the High Castle". While I haven't read this book, I did recognize it as a recent TV series produced by Amazon.
    • 4/5
      This is a novel of scientific discovery that does not neglect the story of the people who make the science. It is a better novel as much due to both its fusion of detailed character development and interpersonal drama and the science fiction narrative that includes time travel, an alternate reality, and ecological issues.The story is written from two viewpoints, equidistant from the novel's publication in 1980. One narrative is set in a 1998 ravaged by ecological disasters and is on the brink of large scale extinctions. It follows a group of scientists in the United Kingdom connected with the University of Cambridge and their attempts to warn the past of the impending disaster by sending tachyon-induced messages to the astronomical position the Earth occupied in 1962–1963. Given the faster-than-light nature of the tachyon, these messages will effectively reach the past. These efforts are led by John Renfrew, an Englishman, and Gregory Markham, an American most likely modeled on Benford himself.Another narrative is set in La Jolla, California at the University of California-San Diego in 1962, where a young scientist, Gordon Bernstein, discovers anomalous noise in a physics experiment relating to spontaneous resonance and indium antimonide. He and his student assistant, Albert Cooper (also likely based on the author and his experiences at UCSD), discover that the noise is coming in bursts timed to form Morse code.The resulting message is made of staccato sentence fragments and jumbled letters, due to the 1998 team's efforts to avoid a grandfather paradox. Their aim is to give the past researchers enough information to start efforts on solving the pending ecological crisis, but not enough that the crisis will be entirely solved (thus making a signal to the past unnecessary and creating a paradox). Due to the biological nature of the message, Professor Bernstein shares the message with a professor of biology, Michael Ramsey. Since the message also gives astronomical coordinates, he also shares it with Saul Shriffer, a fictional scientist who is said to have worked with Frank Drake on Project Ozma. Initially, these characters fail to understand the true meaning of the message. Ramsey believes it to be an intercepted military dispatch hinting at Soviet bioterrorism, while Shriffer thinks the message is of extraterrestrial origin. Shriffer goes public with this theory, mentioning Bernstein in his findings. However, Bernstein's overseer, Isaac Lakin, is skeptical of the messages and wants Bernstein to keep working on his original project and ignore the signal. As a result of this interruption in their experimentation, Bernstein is denied a promotion and Cooper fails a candidacy examination. The signal also exacerbates difficulties in Bernstein's relationship with his girlfriend, Penny.In 1998, Peterson recovers a safe deposit box in La Jolla containing a piece of paper indicating that the messages were received. Meanwhile, it is clear that the viral nature of the algal bloom is spreading it faster and through more mediums than originally expected. Strange yellow clouds that have been appearing are said to be a result of the viral material being absorbed through the water cycle, and it soon affects the planet's agriculture as well, resulting in widespread cases of food poisoning. Flying to the United States, Markham is killed in a plane crash when the pilots fly too close to one of the clouds and experience seizures.In the past narrative, now advanced into 1963, Bernstein refuses to give up on the signals. He is rewarded when the signal noise is also observed in a laboratory at Columbia University (a nod "Tachyons were the sort of audacious idea that comes to young minds used to roving over the horizon of conventional thought. Because of Feinberg I later set part of my tachyon novel at Columbia towards the inventor of the tachyon concept, Gerald Feinberg of Columbia). Using hints in the message, Ramsey replicates the conditions of the bloom in a controlled experiment and realizes the danger it represents. Bernstein finds out that the astronomical coordinates given in the message represent where the Earth will be in 1998 due to the solar apex. He also receives a more coherent, despairing message from the future. Having built a solid case, Bernstein goes public and publishes his results.The remainder of the story involves the possibility of an alternate reality and some surprising consequences. The combination of science, the impact of the scientists' work on their interpersonal relations, and the impact of the science itself on the future made this an excellent work of science fiction. It is no surprise that it won several awards including the Nebula Award in 1980.
    • 3/5
      Physicists as rock stars. Meh. While I did find Benford's style of writing to be very readable, the overall problem I had with this book; it's kind of boring. Benford has an almost mystical reverence for 'The Equations' and spends an inordinate amount of time inside his character's heads as they think about and work upon 'The Equations'. Sorry, but that does not make a compellingly nail-biting storyline. At least not for me.My other complaint is - with a couple of exceptions - the lack of character development. Also, the rather provincial depiction of the female personalities. For a book published in 1980, Timescape feels like a book at least 10-20 years older. The tone makes Benford appear to be an author out of touch with his times.On the plus side, the central concept of the story is actually very interesting and I really enjoyed the way Benford dealt with how the 'time-travel' aspect affected his characters and their worlds. Too bad it all gets bogged down by paragraph upon paragraph of exposition about the coolness of physics. Not really my cuppa...
    • 3/5
      This book has two plotlines; one in the late 1990s, as the world is crumbling due to global warming. Scientists have discovered a way to send messages back in time, so they send warnings to 1962 in the hopes that global warming will be averted. The other storyline is in the early 1960s, where a scientist's experimental data is corrupted by weird noise, which he eventually realizes is a message from the future.This is a pretty intriguing plotline, but there just isn't enough story there to fill such a long novel. I felt like most of the novel was filler - there is a lot of focus on the wives, girlfriends, and personal lives of the main characters that really has nothing to do with the story. There is also a lot of discussion of physics and science, which is quite interesting, but seemed to drag on longer than necessary to tell the story.[spoiler alert]The most disappointing part of the book is that the characters in the 1960s realize they are getting a message from the future, but they never seem to understand that the message is a warning. History changes, but it's not clear if global warming is actually averted. At times, I thought that the message from the future was actually going to bring about global warming, because as soon as they read what causes the disaster, they start recreating the disastrous technology 20 years too early - that would have been an interesting plot twist. [/spoiler]Perhaps one of the most interesting aspects of the book was the examination of the culture of academia, especially the comparison of how easy it is to get scientific funding in the 1960s and how hard it is to get funding in the 1990s.
    • 4/5
      In this story, Earth is undergoing an ecological holocaust and scientists attempt to send a message backwards in time to try and avoid the human actions that precipitated it. Overall it is a compelling story although it does get slow in places. Gregory Benford makes the error of using actual dates in the story so that the parts that take place in the "future" are occurring in 1996. (The movie 2001 is still great even though we have not yet visited Saturn or have a moon base however). The discussions on the physics of time travel and in depth as one would expect from a "hard" SF story and may not be for everyone. Gregory Benford was a professor in the physics department at UCSD and the descriptions of the experiences of the protagonist as an assistant professor are spot on.
    • 3/5
      Timescape by Gregory Benford was first published in 1980. It won the Nebula Award and the John W. Campbell Memorial Award for Best Science Fiction Novel that year. It is a work of “hard” science fiction, i.e., it is based upon science instead of social science. The story emphasizes physics (mostly theoretical physics), and I found it to be difficult to cope with all the scientific explanations. Surprisingly, that beginning physics course that I completed in college 43 years ago did not help me understand the seemingly endless physics lesson that I plodded though in this book! It is true that Benford also included much character development, considerable relationship experiences for the many characters, and much flavor of the times (1963, 1998, and 1974) and settings (mostly La Jolla California in the US and Cambridge in England). Unfortunately, I did not particularly like the characters in this book and I found most glimpses of their lives provided by Benford to be boring. The basic story of the book is interesting, but not unique for a science fiction book. The characters in 1998 were experiencing an ecological disaster that was escalating to apocalyptic proportions. Their scientists attempted to contact scientists in 1963 to warn them about certain scientific/industrial processes that were leading to the ecological disaster. They hoped to change the future by changing the scientific/industrial processes of the past. They attempted to send a beam of tachyon particles (which travel through time) carrying a message to the 1963 scientists. That story line was interesting and the results brought some interesting paradoxes. However Benford’s propensity to dwell on detailed theoretical physics and scientific processes required much more knowledge then this reader could bring to the book. That scientific content is what makes this book unique. If you are interested in details about scientific experimental processes, and you know a little about physics, you would probably get more out of this book and enjoy it. Unfortunately, I am not a physicist and I have never even played one on TV! I should have skipped this book.
    • 4/5
      Substance: Scientists living on the fatally polluted earth of 1998 seek desperately to stave off disaster by sending a message to scientists in the past, using tachyons pulsed in Morse code. Excellent scientific info and worthwhile story. Interesting characters, very individual.Style: The shifts between past and present are handled well, as are the shifts from English to American settings and characters.NOTES:p. 87: important; p. 89: chlorinated flurocarbons in fertilizer are the culprit (one of the US scientists in 1963 discovers why);p. 90-103: time and tachyons;p. 112: AGW side effects & ethanol;p. 119: mercury is a poison, what is it doing loose in the sewers and gathered by unshielded children?p. 131-132: clues, but not enough info;p. 136: rapping on the elderly and Social Security;p. 144: independent somethings;p. 159: 1950s nostalgia;p. 199: ah yes!p. 203: signal overlays - slow on the uptake here!p. 207-212: paradoxes;p. 283: PC science;p. 349: forecasting and why it doesn't work;p. 356: test of new development;p. 363: paradox as a probability wave;p. 473ff: splitting universes;p. 480: ho ho ho.
    • 1/5
      This science-fiction classic is lauded for marrying hard physics-based sci fi with strong character stories, but the characters were precisely the reason I didn’t like the book. The plot is intriguing: in a future (actually 1998) plagued by environmental catastrophes, a couple of physicists hatch a plan to send a message back in time, hoping that the scientists of the past can avert the catastrophe. But I couldn’t get into the story because all of the characters were unlikeable, stereotyped or just plain flat.For example, in an early chapter, the wife of one of the physicists is approached by a squatter asking for some milk for her child. She refuses, saying she only has enough for her family. Okay, I can understand that reaction; food supplies are obviously running short. But then, a few days later, she hosts a lavish dinner party for her friends, where she serves three desserts! This brought to mind what I most dislike about humans and what is really at the root of a lot of our problems, including climate change: that we can rationalize that avoiding our own minor discomforts and deprivations is more important than helping to meet the basic needs of a fellow human being. I really couldn’t like any of the characters after that scene, no matter how hard they tried to save the world.Abandoned before finishing.
    • 5/5
      Captures the feel of an experimental physics lab very well. Not that every day is this exciting of course :-)
    • 4/5
      John Renfrew, dans un 1998 anticipé (à l'époque de la parution du livre en 1980) qui court à la catastrophe écologique, essaie d'envoyer un message en 1963 par le biais de tachyons, particules plus rapides que la lumière et qui peuvent remonter le temps. En 1963, Gordon Bernstein reçoit le message et arrive à le décoder. C'est le point de départ de cette œuvre de hard-science. En général d'ailleurs on ne s'attend pas vraiment à de la hard-science dans le domaine du voyage temporel, fut-il simplement de message, mais il faut reconnaître que Benford s'en sort remarquablement bien. Le noyau du problème est le sempiternel problème des paradoxes temporels, qui est ici posé à plat par les protagonistes qui cherchent à y trouver une solution ... en équations. En effet, si 1998 envoie des alertes à 1963, 1963 prend alors des mesures et 1998 n'a plus alors de raison d'envoyer des messages d'alerte : c'est la classique paradoxe du barjavelien du "grand-père". Mais là le traitement est original puisque donc, il se veut scientifique. Et je me suis laissé prendre à l'histoire, je suis plutôt bon public pour la hard-science même si ici on a des fois la tête qui tourne, mais au delà de la science, on a comme dans tout bon ouvrage du genre, la société qui gravite autour et qui influe sur les intellects, surtout du côté 1963 dans une Amérique bouillonnante. Un paysage du temps, c'est une tentative de vue rationnelle de la physique du temps, doublée d'une vue du temps dans le monde. J'ai bien aimé, on flirte avec les domaines de l'uchronie et du voyage temporel mais avec une autre saveur, c'est agréable, mais sûrement à recommander à un public averti.
    • 5/5
      I usually hate time travel stories because they make my head hurt, but this one makes a pleasant change from the norm. It's not people travelling back through time, and requiring some FTL technobabble device, but messages streamed through time by means of already FTL tachyon particles.The story is told through the eyes of two sets of scientists. One team is based in Cambridge in the late nineties, in a world which is falling apart. The earth's climate has changed, algal blooms caused by pesticides are wreaking havoc on the oceans, and civilization is slowly starting to crumble under the pressure of sustained ecological chaos. The second team, consisting mostly of physicist Gordon Bernstein, is based in La Jolla, California in the early sixties. It's interesting to compare and contrast between the two worlds: Gordon is an assistant professor at La Jolla, hungry for promotion and his chance to procure tenure. As with many of the greatest discoveries, his scientific breakthrough comes quite by accident: Bernstein and Cooper, his assistant, are running a series of experiments whose results are plagued by seemingly random noise. It is only when Bernstein analyzes the noise more completely that he realizes what he has found, and then he faces an uphill struggle to persuade his peers that he has found something worthy of further study. Renfrew and Markham, by contrast, come across as much older and more worn. They're not at the start of their scientific careers, searching for glory and acclaim or to gain a quick promotion. Rather, their experiments offer hope, a last chance measure to stop the environmental disaster unfolding in their time before it has a chance to overshoot. One of the things that I like most about this novel is the detailing of everyday academic life. The idea that a brilliant scientific discovery might be put on hold or pooh-poohed by the academic community at large because of departmental politics, or that one should refrain from publishing anything the slightest bit controversial because it might impact your standing amongst your fellow peers felt horribly familiar.