Audiobook11 hours
Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible
Written by Jerry A. Coyne
Narrated by Joe Barrett
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
About this audiobook
In his provocative new book, evolutionary biologist Jerry A. Coyne lays out in clear, dispassionate detail why the toolkit of science, based on reason and empirical study, is reliable, while that of religion-including faith, dogma, and revelation-leads to incorrect, untestable, or conflicting conclusions.
Coyne is responding to a national climate in which over half of Americans don't believe in evolution (and congressmen deny global warming), and warns that religious prejudices and strictures in politics, education, medicine, and social policy are on the rise. Extending the bestselling works of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens, he demolishes the claims of religion to provide verifiable "truth" by subjecting those claims to the same tests we use to establish truth in science.
Coyne irrefutably demonstrates the grave harm-to individuals and to our planet-in mistaking faith for fact in making the most important decisions about the world we live in.
Coyne is responding to a national climate in which over half of Americans don't believe in evolution (and congressmen deny global warming), and warns that religious prejudices and strictures in politics, education, medicine, and social policy are on the rise. Extending the bestselling works of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens, he demolishes the claims of religion to provide verifiable "truth" by subjecting those claims to the same tests we use to establish truth in science.
Coyne irrefutably demonstrates the grave harm-to individuals and to our planet-in mistaking faith for fact in making the most important decisions about the world we live in.
Related to Faith Versus Fact
Related audiobooks
The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/550 Great Myths About Atheism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letter to a Christian Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of Faith Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Religion and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Science Does Not Disprove God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Meaning to Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Science Delusion: Asking the Big Questions in a Culture of Easy Answers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seven Types of Atheism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Instinct: How We Evolved to Have Reason, Consciousness, and Free Will Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Galileo's Middle Finger: Heretics, Activists, and the Search for Justice in Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conspiracy: Why the Rational Believe the Irrational Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Darwin Devolves: The New Science About DNA That Challenges Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5There Is No God and Mary Is His Mother: Rediscovering Religionless Christianity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/550 Great Myths of Human Evolution: Understanding Misconceptions about Our Origins Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Evolution of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ethics in the Real World: 82 Brief Essays on Things That Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ape that Understood the Universe: How the Mind and Culture Evolve Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries That Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Morality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Biology For You
Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Genius Life: Heal Your Mind, Strengthen Your Body, and Become Extraordinary Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gathering Moss: A Natural and Cultural History of Mosses Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Confident Mind: A Battle-Tested Guide to Unshakable Performance Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Genius Foods: Become Smarter, Happier, and More Productive While Protecting Your Brain for Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Grieving Brain: The Surprising Science of How We Learn from Love and Loss Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Cosmic Serpent: DNA and the Origins of Knowledge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hot Zone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries That Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jaws: The Story of a Hidden Epidemic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How the Mind Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Buddha's Brain: The Practical Neuroscience of Happiness, Love & Wisdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All That Remains: A Renowned Forensic Scientist on Death, Mortality, and Solving Crimes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Longevity Paradox: How to Die Young at a Ripe Old Age Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Neuroscientist Who Lost Her Mind: My Tale of Madness and Recovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Radiolab: Journey Through The Human Body Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Autistic Brain: Thinking Across the Spectrum Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Second Nature: A Gardener's Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Faith Versus Fact
Rating: 4.380952412698413 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
63 ratings7 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This book explores the differences between science and religion, and no matter if you’re an atheist or a believer, you should read it!
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Easy to understand, well thought through reasoning why science and religions are incompatible and why the religions in whole are harmful for the humanity.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Outstanding book. Clear, provocative, direct. In civilizations such as our, that embrace technological developments that would sound like magical to ancient people – the simple existence of a plane, for god’s sake! How would people from ancient Egypt or the time of Christ, or Buda or all the other people that gave us the written word of god – how would they think about a simple plane? I was saying, in civilizations such as our, is strange to find people that ascertain things like the origins of universe, the mysteries of life, human evolution and so on, from text written 25 centuries ago by people that would consider us like GODS!
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jerry A. Coyne is an emeritus professor of biology at the University of Chicago. He is also a fairly militant atheist. His latest book, Faith vs. Fact, argues that religion and science are completely incompatible. In so doing, he attempts to refute Stephen Jay Gould’s theory that religion and science were “non-overlapping magisteria.”
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the beginning of his book, I wasn't sure if Coyne would make his case, but he did, and in spades. I doubt he'll change many minds (he examines the incredulous ability for people to cling to faith when presented with incontrovertible evidence disproving one thing or another), but he collects in this book a nice set of tools for the next discussion. Overall, excellent point and counter point, addressing most of the common, and many of the more creative, accommodationist objections to incompatibility.
One particular part resonated...Coyne's deconstruction of Stephen Jay Gould's non-overlapping magisteria. I used to think Gould was on to something, but I came to the conclusion that he really missed the point. While religion's domain of teaching authority certainly should never presume to intrude on science, science can, and will, be able to determine all things eventually - for a nontestable claim is nothing more than imagination.
I like James Morrow's quote in his novel Only Begotten Daughter: “Science does have all the answers...The problem is that we don’t have all the science.”
Someday, we'll have more science. Not all, but more. And we'll be able to explain more of religion than religion can ever hope to explain about science.
Recommended, and worth a second read. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jerry A. Coyne is an emeritus professor of biology at the University of Chicago. He is also a fairly militant atheist. His latest book, Faith vs. Fact, argues that religion and science are completely incompatible. In so doing, he attempts to refute Stephen Jay Gould’s theory that religion and science were “non-overlapping magisteria.” Gould was trying to be nice to religion by giving it a domain of knowledge that was other than and inaccessible to scientific inquiry—it was a different way of knowing. Coyne takes issue with that concept, observing that religion historically has asserted many propositions that were intrinsically empirical and thus subject to verification or refutation. He also remarks that many of those propositions have not fared very well when subjected to scientific scrutiny. Coyne argues that religious “knowledge” is not knowledge at all—it is merely unsubstantiated belief. Coyne takes on all “accommodationist” scientists, i.e. those who would carve out some types of analysis for revealed religion. The basic conflict between the two kinds of belief comes down to a disagreement over methods of inquiry. Coyne contends that the scientific method, broadly defined and understood, is the only route to genuine knowledge. He points out that if religion were permitted even a limited sphere of primacy, there still would be absolutely no way to distinguish the relative merits of different, conflicting religions, all of which purport to possess “the Truth.”Coyne’s book is carefully and tightly reasoned. He will make “men of faith” (a term that he thinks should be an insult, not a compliment) uncomfortable, although one wouldn’t necessarily expect them to read this book. (JAB)
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Excellent!