AQ: Australian Quarterly

Science is messy, so why is SciComm clean? Time to get elbow deep.

Nowhere is science’s struggle with public trust more evident than when we look at the disparity between what the science and empirical evidence shows, and what some of the general public thinks the science shows: think climate change, evolution and vaccines.

Arguably, despite years of trying, traditional science news sources are not reaching out to certain sections of the general public. The general public includes everyone. People like you, as well as people without such good taste in magazines.

Buy why isn’t everyone listening?

When it comes to translating the stuffy, formal scientific language into digestible and engaging content for a broader audience, we tend look to the cheerleader of

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from AQ: Australian Quarterly

AQ: Australian Quarterly3 min read
A Word
Every year in May, the Federal Treasurer hands down the government’s budget to great fanfare and nit-picking. Health spending is always one of the big ticket items that receive much scrutiny – and every year the Australian Institute of Policy and Sci
AQ: Australian Quarterly1 min read
AQ: Australian Quarterly
EDITOR: Grant Mills ASSISTANT EDITOR: Stephen Burke DESIGN AND PRODUCTION: Art Graphic Design, Canberra PRINTING: Newstyle Printing, Adelaide SUBSCRIPTIONS: www.aips.net.au/aq-magazine/subscribe ENQUIRIES TO: Stephen Burke, General Manager AIPS BOARD
AQ: Australian Quarterly4 min read
References
1. https://www.regionalaustralia.org.au/libraryviewer?ResourceID=10 2. https://www.regionalaustralia.org.au/libraryviewer?ResourceID=100 1. Nichols, D. E. (2016). ‘Psychedelics’, Pharmacological Reviews, 68:264–355, p.268, http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/p

Related Books & Audiobooks