Motor Circuit Analysis Manual

ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
MOTOR CIRCUIT ANALYSIS MANUAL

ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Alpine Components
Telephone: 01424 437000 E-mail: info@alpine-components.co.uk
Web: www.alpine-components.co.uk
166 Main Fax:CT
Street • P.O. Box 1139 • Old Saybrook, 01424 722502
06475, USA
Phone: (860) 395-2988 • Fax: (860) 399-3180 • Email: info@alltestpro.com • Web Site: www.alltestpro.com
ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Alpine Components
Telephone: 01424 437000 ALL-TEST
E-mail: info@alpine-components.co.uk
Pro, LLC
Web: www.alpine-components.co.uk
166 Main St Fax: 01424 722502
Old Saybrook, CT 06475
www.alltestpro.com
Phone 860-395-2988 • Fax 860-399-3180
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................1
MCA ......................................................................................................................1
Use of this Manual................................................................................1
ALL-TEST Pro Instrument Philosophy .................................................2
ALL-TEST Pro Analysis Philosophy.....................................................2
Motor Diagnostic Theory ......................................................................3
Basic Electrical Theory..........................................................................................3
Applying MCA.......................................................................................5
Manual Testing......................................................................................................6
AUTO Testing .......................................................................................................6
Motor Testing Procedure.......................................................................................6
Initial Readings......................................................................................................7
Motor/Winding Analysis........................................................................7
Sample Test Results .............................................................................................8
Condemning Criteria .............................................................................................8
Data Analysis Tips.................................................................................................9
Condemning Priority..............................................................................................9
Condemning Tips ................................................................................................10
Unassembled Motor Analysis..............................................................................10
Data Interpretation Basic Rules and Tolerances ...............................12
Assembled Motor Analysis ..................................................................................12
ANALYZING MEASUREMENTS AND CHANGE ..............................14
Troubleshooting Rules ........................................................................................14
Shorted Windings: ............................................................................................14
Winding Contamination and Rotor Position.........................................................14
Rotor Reposition Test:.........................................................................................14
Insulation Resistance: .........................................................................................15
Insulation Resistance Readings........................................................................15
Loose Connections..............................................................................................15
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE ..........................................................15
Implementing Predictive Maintenance.................................................................16
Predictive Maintenance Hints..............................................................................17
Data Collection and Test Result Issues...............................................................17
Bad Results........................................................................................................17
Waiting ..............................................................................................................18
Incorrect Readings ..............................................................................................18
Data Collection Procedure ..................................................................................19
TROUBLESHOOTING MOTORS................................................................................21
Rotor Compensated Test ....................................................................................21
Rotor Reposition Test..........................................................................................21
ROTOR TESTING....................................................................................................22
DATA COLLECTION...........................................................................................22
ANALYSIS...........................................................................................................23
APPENDIX 1 Winding Alarm Scenarios ...........................................24
Winding Alarm Scenarios ....................................................................................24
Scenario 1: ALL readings are balanced...................................................................24
Scenario 2: Fi or I/F in Red all other measurements balanced .....................................24
Scenario 3: Fi or I/F in Red; L & Z in Alarm...............................................................25
Scenario 4: R > 5% Unbalance..............................................................................26
Scenario 5: Fi or I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm but similar pattern..................................26
Scenario 6: Fi or I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm but non-similar pattern............................27
Scenario 7: Fi & I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm but non-similar pattern plus a frequency shift
of the impedance measurement.............................................................................28
Scenario 8: All measurements are balanced but insulation to ground measurement is low28
Scenario 9: Fi & I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm, readings are Truncated..........................29
Scenario 10: Other readings..................................................................................29
Scenario 11: Zero Values......................................................................................30
APPENDIX 2: Test Methods for Determining the Impact of Motor
Condition on Motor Efficiency and Reliability.....................................31
APPENDIX 3: Multiple Technology Approach ...................................40
APPENDIX 4: Single and Three Phase Transformer Testing; Using
Static Motor Circuit Analysis Techniques...........................................50
APPENDIX 5: Synchronous Machine Testing With All-Test
Instrumentation...................................................................................61
APPENDIX 6: Servo Motor Testing, Evaluating Servo Motors with
MCA....................................................................................................69
APPENDIX 7: Electrical Diagnostics for Generators .........................70
APPENDIX 8: DC Current Motor Electrical Evaluation Using Motor
Circuit Analysis ...................................................................................94
APPENDIX 9: Case Study - Phase Unbalance at Vermont Yankee
Nuclear .............................................................................................102
APPENDIX 10: Case Study: Dynamometers 012002......................104
APPENDIX 11: Utilizing the ALL-TEST PRO 31™ To Detect Pin-Hole
Shorts ...............................................................................................107
DISCLAIMER, COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARKS...............................................110
Copyright: ........................................................................................................111
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Understanding Motor
Diagnostics using Motor
Circuit Analysis (MCA)
INTRODUCTION
MCA is a very simple and safe method to test electrical windings while the winding is de-
energized. The basic premise of MCA:
In equipment with three phase windings all phases should be identical (same #
turns, same wire size, coil diameter & etc.). Consequently, all characteristics of
the windings should also be similar. If a change occurs in any one of these
characteristics, the change is never for the better, (windings do not fix
themselves) as degradation is taking place. By analyzing the amount and
relationships of the change it is possible to identify the cause of the degradation.
Once the cause and the severity of the degradation is known it is now possible to
determine the necessary action.
Use of this Manual

The purpose of this manual is to provide users of MCA technology tips and guidelines to follow
when performing Motor Diagnostics using the ALL-TEST ProTM line of MCA instruments. This
manual is intended primarily for use with the ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000TM (ATIV). However,
some of the information is applicable to the ALL-TEST PRO 31TM (AT31). If the user doesn’t
have both an ALL-TEST PRO 31TM and ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000TM an ohm meter and
inductance bridge may be used in place of either one of the instruments for certain tests.
©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 1

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
ALL-TEST Pro Instrument Philosophy

Knowing that the response of a motor to any type of measuring or test is dependent on not only
the size and voltage of a motor, but in particular the design and construction, our philosophy is to
make instruments that:
• are easy and safe to use
• light weight and portable
• shows fault(s) immediately
• shows any change over time
• makes several different measurements for analysis
ALL-TEST Pro Analysis Philosophy

Testing and analysis of electrical motors, transformers or any winding is not “black magic art”. In
reality it is very straightforward, if sufficient and proper measurements are performed.
It has been the experience at ALL-TEST ProTM that the most accurate and comprehensive method
of determining the true condition of motor windings is by controlling the testing parameters while
the motor is de-energized. This method removes errors and conflicting results from stray or
unknown sources used by other methods.
By injecting a known, low voltage AC sinusoidal, non-destructive signal through the motor
windings, winding faults or weaknesses are not driven to failure. In many cases, potentially
destructive faults can be easily corrected before total winding failure occurs.
Winding faults are indicated by variances in the response to the injected signal through the
windings. These variances cause unbalances in the measured response to the injected signal. Using
MCA faults appear the same regardless the size or type of the winding. Motors as small as
automobile windshield wiper motors as well as 300 Megawatt Generator windings have been
successfully tested.
Through additional investigation and measurement of these variances in the winding, faults can be
quickly and easily identified, and corrected prior to energizing the winding which could lead to
total destruction of the motor.
Examples:
A deteriorating Insulation to Ground situation, will normally require immediate
attention as this fault can be very dangerous and lead to safety and immediate
machine failure.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
On the other hand a developing turn-to-turn or coil-to-coil fault, especially in low
voltage motors, generally degrade over a longer period of time and provide the
opportunity to correct the fault before it becomes a catastrophic failure requiring a
complete rebuild or costly replacement.
MCA injects an AC signal through the windings, and measures the response of this signal to
identify any unbalances in the windings that indicate either a current or potential fault.
Motor Diagnostic Theory

ALL-TEST ProTM MCA instruments are based on proven electrical theory. The motor
system can be represented by developing the basic motor circuit, which is nothing more than
a basic RCL circuit. This circuit represents the various components of the motor system.
Each basic circuit represents one phase of the three phase motor system. Since each phase
of the motor system is identical, each basic circuit should respond the same to an applied
signal.
To allow the user to obtain the most benefits from of the ALL-TEST ProTM instruments and
this manual, a brief review of electrical theory as applied to Motor Diagnostics is presented
below. A quick review of this section will help in understanding the results obtained from
the ALL-TEST ProTM instruments. Additional information is available in any electrical text
book. ALL-TEST ProTM also offers on-site or public training courses to further the user’s
knowledge. For dates and locations of these courses please visit us on our website
www.alltestpro.com.
Basic Electrical Theory

R -Resistance is the Direct Current, resistance measured in Ohms. The resistance should be
the same across all phases or fields. Any difference indicates a problem. Difference can be
due to “over-winding”, corrosion, bad connections, & etc.
Note: If testing large coils or motors with 100 milli-ohm resistance or less, the operator
should use extreme caution to obtain “valid” readings. It may be necessary to clean the
contacts or connectors to obtain good or “valid” measurements. It is recommended to
Remeasure the phases several times to verify these values. *If accurate low resistance
measurements are necessary use a low-resistance ohm meter.
Z- Impedance is the Direct Current and Alternating Current Resistance in a coil or winding.
Impedance includes DC Resistance, inductive reactance and capacitive reactance. Impedance
is measured in Ohms.
Zero impedance of a winding indicates “a shorted” winding. See also I/F below.
Note: A coil or winding can have a severe turn-to-turn or coil to-coil fault, but show “good”
when “meggering”. It can also show a severe Ground Insulation fault but show perfectly
OK turn-to-turn.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
L- Inductance is the property of a changing magnetic flux to create (or induce) a voltage in a
circuit. Inductance is dependent on the number of turns and of the material in a spool or
coil’s core. Inductance opposes any change in the current flow through a conductor. The
value is a measurement of the ability of a coil to store a magnetic field. It is measured in
Henrys or milli-Henrys.
Self-Inductance is the property of a circuit where a change of current in the circuit

creates (induces) a voltage in the same circuit.
Mutual Inductance is the concept that current flow through one conductor or
circuit can induce a voltage into a nearby circuit or conductor.
Note: In a three phase induction motor with the rotor in place, inductance unbalances can
be the result of unbalanced mutual inductance due to the rotor angular orientation (More
commonly referred to as rotor position).
Phase Angle is a relative measurement that indicates the angular difference between two
waveforms of the same frequency. The results are expressed in degrees angular difference (
0 – 900). In the electrical circuit the phase angle expresses the relationship of the AC current
to the applied voltage. This test is included in IEEE Std 1415™-2006 sec 4.3.20 as an
effective method to identify winding shorts.
Basic Electrical theory states that:

In a purely Resistive circuit, current & voltage are in-phase. I.e. they both reach the same
point in the waveform at the same time.
In a purely Inductive circuit voltage leads current by 90 degrees. I.e. Voltage reaches it
maximum & minimum value 90 degrees before current.
In a purely Capacitive circuit current leads voltage by 90 degrees. I.e. Current reaches it
maximum & minimum values 90 degrees before voltage.
If the Voltage leads the current the phase angle is positive, if the voltage lags the current the
phase angle is negative.
In MCA the phase angle expresses the relationship of the measured current to the AC
voltage applied by the ALL-TEST ProTM instruments.
Note: Phase angle should not be confused with the 120 degrees electrical separation
between electrical phases in a three phase system.
C- Capacitance is the capability of a body, system, circuit, or device for storing electric
charge. It is a measure of the amount of electrical charge stored for a given applied potential.
The unit of capacitance is the Farad (F). The capacitance of a circuit opposes any change in
voltage in the circuit.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The capacitance of a circuit is dependent on the geometry of the system and the material of
the dielectric.
Any capacitors in the motor circuit should be tested separately from the motor.
INS- Insulation (to Ground) Test. Measured in Meg-Ohms.

A motor can have a good insulation to ground but fail other phase-to-phase tests and vice
versa.
I/F- Current/Frequency Response is a test designed primarily to test for coil-to-coil or turn-
to-turn faults. This test is included in IEEE Std 1415™-2006 sec 4.3.33 as an effective
method to identify winding shorts.
For the I/F test the low voltage AC signal is applied to the connected winding/windings, at
a specific frequency and the resultant current is measured. Then the frequency of the
applied AC signal is then doubled and the resultant current is again measured.
The I/F reading is the ratio of the current at the doubled frequency to the current at the
original frequency. This result is displayed as a ratio. I.e. An I/F reading of
-50 indicates that the current at the doubled frequency is 50% lower than the current at the
original frequency.
For a single phase winding, the I/F reading should be between -50 and -15 for a good coil.
For an open winding the reading will be 0 (zero).
Note: Small unbalances (≤ 1) of the average in the three phase windings can be caused by
the rotor position, or display limitations of the instrument in Auto Mode. These can be
verified by conducting a rotor compensated test or take manual measurement.
Applying MCA
ALL-TEST ProTM has two instruments designed to perform MCA.
ALL-TEST PRO 31™ (AT31) is a trouble-shooting tool that will test a wide variety of motors
and some transformers. It will test most AC motors under 600V and can also be used to test higher
voltage motors, depending upon their resistance, inductance, and impedance. The AT31 should be
used in conjunction with an ohm meter, as it does not measure resistance (it does perform an
insulation to ground resistance test).
ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000TM (ATIV) is an analytical instrument that will test virtually any
motor, generator, transformer, or coil based device. It is used not only for incoming inspection and
trouble-shooting, but also for PdM or CBM testing purposes (data trending and time to failure
estimation). The ATIV will not only detect most types of motor electrical faults, but it can also help
the user determine how long it will run.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Manual Testing
Testing Motors has become a routine task in plants that recognize the importance maximizing
plant reliability. Testing motors has become mandatory as acceptance criteria for inventory
control. De-energized testing of new and rebuilt motors identifies faults before they are placed in
the storeroom for extended periods.
Manually testing motors is done using either the AT31 or the ATIV. The motors can be tested
either directly from the motor connection box or from the motor line leads located in the motor
controller. Testing the motor remotely from the motor controller has the additional advantage of
testing all of the cabling and connectors in the motor system as well.
Manual Testing requires connecting the ALL-TEST PRO instrument to the winding to be tested,
manually selecting the parameters and measurements to be made. The results are either simply
viewed or viewed & recorded. These measurements can then be analyzed and interpreted based
on the guidelines provided in this manual. The measurements taken with the AT31 can also be
entered into the ALL-TEST PRO Condition Calculator 4.0TM, for analysis, storage and report
generation (3-phase AC motors only).
The AT31 provides additional diagnostic capabilities, since it has the ability to perform tests at
different test frequencies and provides real time display of the value tested.
Testing can also be performed using the ATIV in the manual mode (see ALL-TEST IV PRO
2000TM manual for specific details). The manual mode of the ATIV provides improved analysis
over the AUTO MODE for inductance or impedance measurements below 10, since the
measured values are displayed with decimal places instead of just whole numbers.
AUTO Testing
In the AUTO mode:
1) The ATIV automatically tests the condition of the motor windings.
2) Automatically sets the measurement parameters and allows the measured data to be
stored in the non-volatile memory.
3) Stores the data which can then be uploaded to the companion TREND/EMCAT
PRO 2005TM software for analysis, trending, report & work order generation.
Motor Testing Procedure

It is important to note that a “perfect” 3-phase motor is very difficult to find based upon
manufacturing tolerances & etc. In other instances, motors may have a particular difference
in design in order to meet special applications. In both cases, with the rotor mounted in the
motor, it may be necessary to perform additional steps to isolate rotor or stator faults.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Initial Readings
In a few cases, some motors may exhibit unusual levels of unbalance. This can occur for a
number of reasons, including:
1) Stator winding to rotor bar ratio and position.
2) Stator winding design (lap versus concentric coil).
3) Other tolerance-related issues including rotor casting voids.
If a series of unusual readings are detected with the ATIV, there are several ways of isolating
the cause. One method requires the use of an AT31 or an inductance meter in concert with
the ATIV (See Rotor Compensated Test in the Motor Troubleshooting Section), the other
method involves a short series of additional tests using the ATIV (Rotor Reposition Test in
the Motor Troubleshooting Section).
Performing Motor Diagnostics

using MCA
Motor/Winding Analysis
Performing motor/winding analysis has been greatly simplified with the development of
advanced diagnostic tools such as the AT31 and ATIV, Condition Calculator 4.0TM, &
TREND/EMCAT PRO 2005TM, however, even as good as these tools are, additional information
and testing may be required before the final condition of the machine can be accurately assessed.
To help maximize the data obtained from the ALL-TEST PROTM tools, the next few sections are
going to provide the analyst the procedures, techniques, suggestions and methods necessary to
help the analyst properly and accurately diagnose most winding faults using Motor Circuit
Analysis (MCA).
The basic rule for MCA is: If the data indicates a good winding then the winding is generally
good. However, if MCA indicates a fault then additional testing should be performed before
condemning a winding.
1) The test leads that are supplied with the ATIV instrument are very good leads for
most applications, however, they are not good for every application. Any 4mm shielded,
banana jack type instrument test leads can be used. Note: The repeatability of the
resistance readings can be improved by using a small wire brush to clean surface
oxidation from connection points and by lightly squeezing the test jaws together while
lightly twisting the clips on the connection point to ensure as solid a connection as
possible. If high accuracy of the winding resistance measurements is required it is recommended that a
low resistance ohm meter is used.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Note: Extreme care should be taken during the comp. lead test portion of the AUTO
measurement mode to improve resistance measurement accuracy and repeatability.
2) The ATIV uses a two-wire method for making the DC resistance measurement and is
not be as accurate as a low resistance ohm meter, which uses either 3 or 4 wire method,
when measuring very low resistance. The accuracy of the ATIV is +-1% from 1 to 999
ohms, therefore, when testing below 1 ohm the accuracy of the instrument’s measured
value will degrade. Note: For MCA purposes the DC resistance measurements are used
to detect problems related to connections and are not used to detect winding faults (Fi
and I/F are a much better indication of winding faults).
3) The ATIV in the AUTO mode measures and displays the values of inductance (L) and
impedance (Z) as whole numbers. Ex-2.9 Ω becomes 2 Ω , 2.1 Ω will also be displayed
as 2 Ω. This may cause misinterpretation in the TREND/EMCAT PRO 2005TM software
with impedance (Z) and inductance (L) matching. Winding contamination is generally
suspected if the impedance does not follow inductance from phase to phase. The
analysis software algorithm evaluates the phase difference of both inductance and
impedance. When the software evaluates the measurements of Z & L with values less
then 10, because the ATIV truncates decimals below 10, the software may incorrectly
diagnose contamination or overheated windings. Always verify the L & Z measurements
by taking the measurements manually. The manual measurement of the ATIV measures
and displays the decimals.
Sample Test Results
Reading T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-

T3
Resistance .272 .273 .272
Impedance 47 53 58
Inductance 9 10 11
Phase Angle 73 72 71
I/F -43 -42 -41
Condemning Criteria
The original assumptions of MCA were based on that most industrial motors are 3 phase, AC
Induction Motors with squirrel cage rotors. The rules and limitations presented below are based
on these assumptions. However, that does not prevent MCA from being successfully applied to
other motor/rotor types. In fact, MCA has been successfully applied to DC motors, single phase
motors, both permanent magnet and externally excited synchronous motors, generators,
distribution and transmission transformers. Also, in almost all applications the size of the winding
is not an issue. The following criteria still apply.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
However, for some of the non-induction, 3 phase, non-squirrel rotors motors special procedures
or tests maybe required. Many of these are presented in the Appendix of this guideline.
Data Analysis Tips

When a motor testing program is first implemented it is expected that between 20- 40% of the
motor systems tested may exhibit some alarm condition when evaluated with the
TREND/EMCAT PRO 2005TM software (the software provides color coded alarms for easy
interpretation). When a motor is in an alarm state, this does not necessarily mean that the motor
will fail or should not be operated, but that the measured values have exceeded pre-determined
limits established for most common motors.
The software alarm limits of the TREND/EMCAT PRO 2005TM are established for standard 3-
phase squirrel-cage induction motors. Some motors may have a special design, which cause the
measured values to be normally outside of these standard limits. In fact, many new motors will
have an unbalance in inductance and impedance, due to rotor bar winding ratio. Therefore, it is
virtually impossible to establish limits for all possible design configurations. Of these cases, it is
necessary for the analyst to evaluate these readings on a case by case basis. The software flags any
motor exceeding these limits to inform the analyst that they have exceeded normal limits. The
following analysis tips provide a method of more closely evaluating these special circumstances.
Following the Analysis tips are various Scenarios using actual readings. Reviewing these scenarios
will provide additional insight into determining how to evaluate the test data.
Condemning Priority
The TREND/EMCAT PRO 2005TM software simply generates the alarms when the measured
values exceed pre-determined limits. However, not all faults are the same. The guidelines provided
below will help the analyst place priority upon the alarms generated by the TREND/EMCAT
PRO 2005TM software.
One of the first considerations regarding winding faults should always be motor criticality.
Obviously, the most critical motors should be afforded a higher priority than less critical motors.
The second consideration is the type and location of the fault. Additional considerations include
availability of spares, maintenance schedules and other plant operations. These priorities assume
that the test data is valid and good connections are made. Bad test lead connection can negatively
impact all readings.
1) Winding shorts are generally more severe than contamination or rotor faults, therefore,
motors with unbalances in I/F & Fi alone should be evaluated first, to determine the
condition of the winding.
2) Motors with alarms in Fi & I/F as well as inductance and or impedance should be
evaluated next. It may be necessary to perform a rotor reposition or rotor compensated
test to separate rotor from winding faults.
3) Motors exhibiting small Resistance unbalances alone have the lowest priority.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Condemning Tips
1) Never condemn a motor from the Motor Control Center. Faults in the cabling or
connections between the test point and the motor itself can cause unbalanced readings.
Before condemning a winding always perform a confirming test at the motor with the
motor leads disconnected from the supply cabling.
A) To determine whether the fault is in the motor or the cabling retest the motor
at the next connection point between the motor and the starter.
B) A rotor reposition test may be necessary to separate rotor from winding faults.
(Refer to the Troubleshooting section of this manual for the Rotor Reposition
Test)
2) Generally, never condemn a motor based on an unbalanced inductance or impedance

alone (may require additional testing). The Rotor Bar/Winding Ratio can cause a large
unbalance in mutual inductance as well as small unbalances in the I/F & Fi readings.
3) Always verify the reading before condemning a motor. Stored energy in a motor
system can corrupt the data set. Remember, it is much easier to take readings again than it
is to remove the motor.
4) Winding shorts are first indicated by unbalances in Current/Frequency response (I/F)

and Phase Angle (Fi).
5) Loose connections are indicated by unbalances in winding resistance measurements.
6) Winding contamination or overheated windings are indicated when Impedance Pattern

(Z) does not follow Inductance Pattern (L).
7) Never condemn a motor if the readings are not repeatable. EMI or the shaft turning
will also give inconsistent readings.
Unassembled Motor Analysis

If the rotor is removed from the stator the mutual inductance created by the stator magnetic field
inducing a voltage into the rotor will no longer create an inductance unbalance. Therefore, the
only part of the basic motor circuit that is responding to the injected AC signal from the
instrument is the stator winding and stator iron. Any unbalances caused by rotor bar/winding
ratio error are eliminated. Therefore, the fault criteria are much tighter for motors tested when the
rotor is removed. Below are the tolerances for motors stators only (motors with the rotor
removed).

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Note: Experience has proven that these tolerances hold true regardless of the size of the motor.
Test Result Tolerance
Resistance (R) <5%
Impedance (Z) <3%
Inductance (Z) <5%
Phase Angle (Fi) +/- 0
Current frequency Response (I/F) +/- 0
Insulation Resistance < 600 Volts > 5 Megohms
Insulation Resistance >600 Volts > 100Megohms
This table is only applicable to motors with the rotor removed

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Data Interpretation Basic Rules and Tolerances

There are specific rules that encompass virtually all test applications of three phase motors in
which the motors are assembled and a rotor is installed. The common method for testing is
from an MCC or disconnect with the rotor stationary.
Assembled Motor Analysis

If the rotor is installed in the stator the mutual inductance of the rotor may cause large inductance
unbalances which will result in a large impedance unbalance. The Rotor Bar/Winding ratio may
also cause small unbalances in I/F and Fi.
Test Result Tolerance Detail

Resistance (R) <5% Possible Loose connections
Impedance (Z) Impedance follows Any unbalance is most likely due to rotor position or
and Inductance (L) Inductance motor design
Impedance (Z) Impedance does not Possible winding contamination or overheated
and Inductance (L) follows Inductance windings
Phase Angle (Fi) +/- 1 digit (degree) Indicates a winding short: 74, 75, 76 OK; 74, 74, 76
from average suspect; 73, 73, 76 failed
I/F +/- 2 digits (%) from Indicates a winding short: -44, -45, -46 OK; -44, -46,
average -46 suspect; -42, -45, -45 failed
Insulation >5 Megohms Indicates poor insulation to ground (I.e. ground
Resistance Supply voltage < 600V fault)
Insulation >100 Megohms Indicates poor insulation to ground (I.e. ground fault)
Resistance Supply voltage > 600V
Resistance (R): Unbalances in resistance are an indicator of loose connections, pitted contactors,
cold solder joints, and etc. In some cases the resistance unbalance has been the result of poor
connections at the test leads. Always retake the resistance measurements if a resistance unbalance
exists. Changes in the resistance measurements with repetitive readings indicate test lead or test
lead connection issues. Attempt to clean the connection location and then retake the resistance
readings. If the readings were taken at the motor control center taking reading progressively closer
to the motor will normally locate the high resistance connection(s).
Inductance Unbalance (L): When a squirrel cage rotor is installed in the motor, inductance
unbalances are possible, especially on the smaller less expensive motors. If this does occur these
unbalances is usually the result of the unbalanced mutual inductance created by the unequal rotor
bar/winding ratios resulting by the rotor’s position. To verify that this unbalance is the result of
the rotor position, the rotor reposition test should be performed. (See section on Rotor reposition
test).

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Impedance (Z) follows Inductance (L): Since inductive reactance is usually the largest
contributor to impedance, if the rotor position creates an unbalanced in the winding
measurements then this should create an unbalance in impedance measurements as well, however,
the unbalance in impedance should follow the unbalance in inductance. For example: a motor
inductance unbalance may be 10, 14, 8, or a pattern of Medium, High, Low, the impedance
should follow with a Medium, High, Low pattern, such as 120, 133, 115. In this case impedance
follows inductance. However, if the impedance was 133, 115, 120, now the impedance pattern is
High, Low, Medium and a fault would be indicated. See Impedance (Z) does not follow
Inductance (L) below.
Impedance (Z) does not follow Inductance (L) Changes to impedance such that it does not
follow inductance is normally caused by changes in the insulation system. The insulation system is
a large dielectric. A change to the material condition of the insulation system will be reflected as a
change in the capacitance of the motor circuit. A change in the capacitance of the system will
change the capacitive reactance (Xc), which will normally cause the Impedance (Z) to not follow
the inductance (L). The fact that impedance does not follow inductance (Z) is a good indicator of
the insulation system changes, such as winding contamination, burned windings (overheated),
very large phase unbalances or very poor rotor bar condition.
Phase Angle (Fi): The amount of the lag of the current to the applied voltage in the basic motor
circuit is one of the most sensitive of measurements in the basic motor circuit. Fi is usually one of
the first measurements to change when the insulation system degrades (Winding short).
Unbalances of >1 degree from the average indicate a winding short.
Current Frequency Response (I/F): Degraded winding insulation systems respond differently
at different frequencies. The I/F measurement are also one of the first indications of winding
system degradation. The I/F readings should be between -15 to -50. All I/F reading should be
balanced within 2 digits (per cent). Unbalances of >2 per cent from the average indicate winding
shorts. A spread of >4 digits between maximum and minimum I/F measurements, also indicates
winding faults. These readings are for non-compensated rotor position at the motor. However, if
a winding fault is indicated additional testing may be necessary to verify the winding fault.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
ANALYZING MEASUREMENTS AND CHANGE

Data interpretation of collected ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000TM data can be performed through
TM
the TREND 2005/EMCAT PRO 2005 software.
Troubleshooting Rules
Following are the basic rules for troubleshooting with the ATIV:
Shorted Windings:
Developing windings faults, as well as shorted windings, are evaluated by viewing the Fi and I/F
readings of similar coils or between phases:
Phase Angle (Fi) – The phase angle should be within 1 digit of the average reading. For
example, a reading of 77/75/76 would be good because the average reading is 76. A
reading of 74/77/77 would be bad.
Current Frequency Response (I/F) – The current frequency response should be

within 2 digits of the average reading or <4 digits between maximum and minimum I/F
measurements. For example, a reading of –44/-45/-46 would be good. A reading of -
40/-44/-44 would be bad. However, a reading such as -42/-44/-44 should be considered
suspect.
Winding Contamination and Rotor Position

The position of the rotor within the electric motor may cause a normal phase unbalance.
Winding contamination may also cause phase unbalances. The difference between the two can be
evaluated quickly by looking at the pattern of impedance and inductance.
Rotor Reposition Test: To verify the Impedance (Z) and/or Inductance (L) unbalance is
the result of rotor bar/winding ratio unbalances it is necessary to evaluate the relationship of the
Z & L unbalances. If the unbalances are related to the rotor, they will change relationship by
changing the rotor position. For example, if there are inductances of 17/18/19 and values of
impedances 24/26/29 with the rotor at its existing position. Rotate the shaft approximately 90
degrees (1/4 turn) the values should change relationship, such as inductances of 16/19/17 and
impedance values of 23/30/25. This indicates that the unbalances are due to rotor position.
NOTE: Since the ATIV stores Z & L as whole numbers only when the measured values are <
10, lower measurement values of L & Z may be confusing. For example: This may be the case if
the inductances are 5/5/5 and the impedances are 8/9/8. To confirm the analysis, manually
measure the Impedance and Inductance of all three windings using the Manual Mode of the
Instrument.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Insulation Resistance: The insulation resistance (Meg-Ohm readings) will show a
breakdown of insulation between the winding conductors and ground. The latest edition of the
IEEE Std. 43-2000 states that the insulation resistance of windings should fall in the following
ranges:
Insulation Resistance Readings
Type of Insulation Insulation Resistance Values
All insulation systems prior to 1974 1 Meg-Ohm + 1 Meg-Ohm/kV
Random Wound Motors > 5 Meg-Ohms
Form Wound Motors and DC > 100 Meg-Ohms

Armatures
Loose Connections
Loose connections or glazing on contacts will show as resistance unbalances. The maximum
resistance unbalance should be 5%.
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE
As early as the 1960’s, many companies realized that by routinely monitoring the operating
condition of rotating equipment it is possible to obtain an advanced warning of operational
or other problems that would impact continued efficient operation. This early warning
provides time to remove the machine from operation and affect minor repairs and
adjustments before catastrophic failures occur.
This maintenance philosophy, referred to as Predictive Maintenance (PdM), has escalated

since the early 1980’s, with the introduction of micro-processor based data-collectors. Many of
the machines’s operating characteristics, such as temperature, pressure, oil condition,
vibration and performance can be trended to identify changes. However, one of the glaring
holes in predictive maintenance has been the inability to easily & accurately identify faults
within electrical equipment, such as motors, transformers, solenoids and other like
equipment. One of the main reasons for this was the lack of available easy-to-use predictive
maintenance instruments for testing motors or other electrical equipment.
Predictive maintenance instruments should be :

1) Hand Held
2) Easy to use
3) Provide output in Conventional Units

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Implementing Predictive Maintenance
Implementing a successful predictive maintenance program requires more than purchasing
an instrument and taking data. Predictive maintenance programs when successfully
implemented require a complete understanding of the PdM process.
Successful predictive maintenance consists of three phases- Detection, Analysis and

Correction. Each one of these phases is important in its own aspect. Problems are created
when short cuts are taken and phases are skipped or combined.
Detection: The detection phase involves periodically monitoring the operating

characteristics of the selected equipment. These values are trended, compared to
previously recorded data from that machine or similar machines, then compared
against pre-determined or published standards and/or reviewed for any change.
During the detection phase, the data collection process should be done
quickly and carefully, with the intent of monitoring as many machines as
possible. When a change is detected, additional data may be necessary, to determine
the cause of the machine’s condition change. This is done during the analysis phase.
In most cases, the MCA data taken during the detection phase may be sufficient to
identify developing shorts or other winding issues. But at times, additional data or
testing needs to be performed to more accurately identify the problem.
It is usually a waste of time to perform these test for a more detailed analysis during
the detection process, as it slows down the detection process. Most experienced
predictive maintenance departments have recognized the importance of separating
these two processes.
Analysis: The analysis process involves taking additional and perhaps different types
of tests than the detection process. This additional testing may require disconnecting
the motor from the load, turning the shaft or separating the motor leads and requires
more time to take the data. Since usually only a few machines during the detection
inspection exhibit any significant change, it is usually more time effective to only take
the data necessary to identify a change during the detection process, and then go
back for a more detailed look, once a change is detected.
However, if the plant site is remote or has other access limitations, these may justify
more detailed data be taken during the detection process.
Correction: The correction phase involves correcting and eliminating the problem
that triggered the analysis. This may require cleaning a motor, tightening
connections, or a complete motor rewind. The exact type of correction and repairs
are determined by the analysis. Details for correcting and eliminating these problem
are outside the scope of this manual.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Predictive Maintenance Hints
The following recommendations are from over 20 years experience with MCA using the
ALL-TEST ProTM line of motor testers. It should be remembered that these are
recommendations only and are designed as suggestions to provide for the optimum
program. It may not be possible to implement each and every suggestion on all applications:
1) When performing Predictive Maintenance (PdM) on three phase electric motors,

try to place the rotor in the same position each time (I.e. Place the shaft key at the 12
o’clock position) this will minimize changes from data collection to data collection
due to rotor position. (You may also use the AT31 in conjunction with the ATIV to do a
rotor compensated test). This step is recommended for long term trending,
2) When the initial test is performed, if variations in the inductance measurements of
5 to 15% between phases, perform a rotor reposition test in order to determine if the
variation is due to the rotor bar/winding ratio or if there is a rotor fault. These
variations may be normal or the unbalance may be due to rotor position. Review the
rotor position section of this manual for further clarification.
3) The upper limit of equipment size that can be successfully tested is primarily
dependent on the DC resistance of the windings. For the ATIV, the winding’s DC
resistance needs to be between 0 .001 and 999 ohm in each phase. The windings
capacitance & inductance, plus cable length can also impact the range of equipment
that can be tested.
4) Always mark your motor leads and always collect data from 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3. This
TM
is the order in which the TREND 2005/EMCAT PRO 2005 software records and
displays the data. Establish a pattern when numbering the leads for example left to
right, front to back, or top to bottom. This also provides consistency in readings.
This consistency also helps identify in which phase the fault occurred.
I.e. If an increase in resistance in 1-2 and 1-3 occurs, then you should check the
phase 1 connections.
Data Collection and Test Result Issues

There are issues inherent with faulty motors and with data collection process of motors in an
industrial environment. Following are some of those issues when collecting data with the
ATIV and their resolution:
Bad Results
1) EMI (Electro-Magnetic Induction) can cause problems with resistance readings. This
usually only occurs when testing from the MCC. EMI can come from heavily loaded cables
located directly next to the cables from the motor that is being tested. The values are
normally in the milli-Volt range and not always detectable with a multi-meter or volt meter.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The low voltage frequency interferes with the resistance bridge in the ATIV. Use the EMI
feature of the AT31 to measure the EMI level. If the EMI cannot be removed the motor
must be tested from the motor itself.
2) Motor Rotor Turning If the shaft in the machine being tested is rotating, it will induce a
voltage into the basic motor circuit. This will affect all of the readings.
Note: To determine whether the bad result is caused by EMI or rotating shaft, use the
Rotor feature of the AT31. If the shaft is rotating the bar graph on the screen will move
back and forth across the display screen of the AT31. If the bar graph moves erratically
across the screen check the EMI level using the EMI feature of the AT31.
3) Low Resistance If the winding resistance is less than 0.001 Ω, installing a small resistor
(approximately 0.25 Ω) in series with the test leads may increase the resistance measurement into
the allowable measurement range.
Waiting
1) Test Leads in wrong ports The most common reason for the ATIV screen to display waiting
is the test leads were left in the insulation resistance test ports after measuring the insulation
resistance to ground.
2) Open Circuit If the test leads are in the correct port then the signal from the ATIV does not
have a complete path and an open circuit exists. Test closer to the motor to find the open circuit.
The open circuit may be in the test leads. Check them for continuity.
Incorrect Readings
1) Capacitors or Lightening Arrestors in the motor circuit will filter the test results and create
incorrect readings which could provide false positives or false negative results. Always disconnect
any capacitors or lightening arrestors connected to the motor circuit. Note: The manual mode of the
ATIV provides a convenient method of testing for faulty capacitors.
2) Non-Repeatable Resistance Measurements EMI interference will cause non-repeatable

resistance values (see Bad Results above). Contamination in the motor or cabling can cause non-
repeatable resistance readings. Also, carbon buildup or heavy contamination in cabling.
Disconnect the motor leads at the motor connection box and retest.
Poor connections at the test clips will normally affect the resistance only, but it may affect other
readings also, depending upon severity. If a resistance unbalance exists always retake readings
before condemning motor. If resistance phase measurements are repeatable from one test to
another the resistance unbalance is most likely in the motor or cabling. If resistance measurements
do change from one test to another the fault is most likely the result of poor connections at the
test leads. Clean the connections thoroughly until repeatable readings are obtained.
2) Servo-motors, Machine tool Motors Some machine tool and servo-motors have permanent
magnet rotors which may affect the I/F & Fi measurements. The I/F & Fi readings will be
repeatable but outside standard tolerances. Testing permanent magnet rotors may require special

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
procedures. (See Appendix 6) Trending the differences in the highest and lowest I/F & Fi
readings will provide additional indication of winding degradation. Rotor faults can also cause the
difference between the I/F & Fi readings to increase, it is suggested that a rotor position test be performed to verify a
rotor fault.
3) Synchronous Motor Testing Synchronous motors windings will also test for shorts in the
rotor windings. If the Auto test indicates winding shorts, the short could be either in the stator or
the rotor windings. To determine which winding is shorted rotate the shaft approximately 900 and
retake the readings. If the fault remains in the same phase as the original test the short is most
likely in the stator winding. If the fault shifts to another phase the fault is most likely in the rotor.
The synchronous motor rotor winding are a single winding, evaluating them is done by trending
or comparing current reading to a baseline.
4) Wound Rotor Motor Testing wound rotor induction motors will also identify shorts in the
rotor windings. If the Auto test indicates winding shorts, the shorts could be either in the stator or
the rotor windings. The windings of a wound rotor motor are tested using the slip rings. The
same tolerances apply to the 3 phase rotor windings as to the stator. If the rotor tests good the
fault is in the stator.
Data Collection Procedure

Using the ALL-TEST IVPRO 2000TM
1. Check the charge on the ATIV. Five stars is fully charged, three stars is near the end of
the useful charge, two stars provides a battery alert and then will shut the unit off.
2. Select the Insulation Resistance Test Voltage for the motor under test. (Ref to the ALL-
TEST IV PRO 2000TM manual)
3. De-energize the motor to be tested following the appropriate lock out/tag out (LOTO)
procedures and verify the equipment is de-energized.
a. Remove one leg of each phase of any power factor correction capacitors that
may be present in the circuit.
b. If performing an insulation-to-ground test from a variable frequency drive or if
other electronics are in the circuit, disconnect leads from the device being tested.
Failure to do so could result in serious or catastrophic damage to the VFD or
electronics from the applied test voltage of 500 or 1000 VDC.
4. Check connection points to ensure that they are not coated with any foreign substance
or that the leads are not burned and oxidized. A dirty contact point may result in poor
readings.
5. Turn on the instrument and backlight, as necessary.
6. Select AUTO MODE and follow the instructions:
a. Short leads together to set up the resistance test
b. Connect to windings as per message on the screen. Use T1 - T2; T1 – T3; and,
T2 – T3 as Winding 1, Winding 2 and Winding 3.
7. Between each winding test the options ‘OK’ and ‘REMEASURE’ are shown. (Note: It
is recommended to ‘REMEASURE’ after the first winding readings to discharge any

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
stored charge that may be present from any previous tests.) If the ‘REMEASURE’
readings repeat then: Select ‘OK’ to move on to the next winding, if the readings do not
repeat:
a. If the ‘REMEASURE’ readings vary significantly, check the test lead connections
before completing the REMEASURE.
b. If the ATIV flashes “Waiting …” or “BAD RESULT:”
i. If the instrument flashes “Waiting …” check to ensure that the test leads
are connected to the ATIV test ports and to a good winding at the test
point. If the test leads are in the proper ports, then the winding is open.
To verify an open winding, test a known good winding.
ii. If the instrument states “BAD RESULT” this indicates that either the
test winding has a resistance value below 0.001 Ohm or low level current
(EMI) is present in the cables. If EMI is suspected, test as close to the
motor as possible. If other windings read above 0.001, the winding or
conductors are directly shorted.
iii. It could also be that the shaft is turning, for example a damper on a fan
may allow the fan to rotate so the motor rotor is not completely at rest.
8. Continue until all three windings have been successfully tested. After the
completion of all three winding tests, the user is asked whether or not to perform an
“INS TEST”. To perform the “INS TEST” (Meg-Ohm test) select ‘Yes’; and then move
the test leads to insulation test ports. To skip the “INS TEST” select ‘No’.
9. To verify that both test leads are properly grounded it is recommended to perform one
“INS TEST” between 2 known ground points where there is no paint (i.e.: bolts, on
motor, etc.). This measurement should result in a “zero” ground reading and verifies that
both test leads are properly grounded.
a. Remove the red test lead and connect it to any of the motor leads. (Caution: Do
not remove both test leads)
b. Select ‘REMEASURE’ and test between any of the motor leads and the point of
ground.
10. When testing is completed, some of the test readings will be displayed on the screen. To
view other data scroll up/down using the up/down buttons on the keypad. NOTE:
ALWAYS SAVE YOUR READINGS BEFORE GOING ANY FARTHER! (Refer to
ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000TM Operating Manual for detailed steps to save.)
11. When saving, name the data test set with up to 11 alpha-numeric characters (minimum
3), save phases and horsepower (up to 3-digits). Horse Power is not needed and does not
affect the analysis of the machine.
12. Before re-energizing equipment, quick-check readings (Reference the following section
or User Manual). Normal method: Check Fi and I/F readings for winding shorts,
impedance and inductance pattern matching for winding contamination or overheated
windings, resistance for loose or broken connections and insulation to ground for
grounded windings.
13. If no dangerous condition or motor fault exists, return equipment to service using
LOTO procedures.
14. Upon completion of data collection, upload data to software and print report.

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
TROUBLESHOOTING MOTORS
Rotor Compensated Test
1. Connect the AT31 (an Inductance tester may be used in substitute for the AT 31) to the
first set of windings (T1-T2) and rotate the shaft until the highest impedance reading is
obtained.
2. Measure the first winding using the AUTO MODE of the ATIV reading then stop.
3. Connect the AT31 to the second set of windings (T1-T3) and rotate the shaft until the
highest impedance reading is obtained.
4. Measure the second winding using the AUTO MODE of the ATIV reading (second
winding) then stop.
5. Repeat for your third winding. If the final results still show an unbalance, the stator
should be suspect, if they are balanced; the rotor should be checked using the rotor
testing steps for either the AT31 or ATIV. If both the stator and rotor test good, then
the unbalance is due to the motor design and should be noted.
Rotor Reposition Test
Using the ATIV, a short series of tests may be performed in order to determine whether the
unbalanced readings are due to the rotor, stator or design. The steps are straightforward:
1. Note the position of the rotor after saving the original readings. Rotate the shaft 90
degrees from its original position and remeasure the motor windings in the same
order that they were originally taken.
2. Reference the previous reading and note if the unbalance has shifted with the rotor
movement. If it has, or if the readings are inconclusive, retake the measurements at
180 degrees from the original position.
3. If the readings remain unbalanced in the original position, the stator windings are
most likely faulted, if the readings shift with the rotor position, perform a rotor test
as outlined in the motor troubleshooting guide.
Shifting Readings Example

T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
0
Impedance 0 47 53 58
Inductance 00 9 10 11
0
0
Impedance 1800 58 47 53
Note: The readings will not be exact, this is just an example
21
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Maintained Readings Example

T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
0
0
0
0
Note: The readings will not be exact, this is just an example
ROTOR TESTING
One of the important features of the ATIV is the ability to perform a complex analysis of a
three phase motor rotor.
DATA COLLECTION
Three phase squirrel cage rotors can be tested with the ATIV Motor Circuit Analyzer using
the manual inductance testing method.
Note: Where the MCA method could miss some rotor faults the ATPOL on-line tester is a
very useful supplement detecting all types of rotor problems while the motor is running.
1) Verify the winding integrity by performing an Auto test of the motor.

2) Rotate the shaft so the shaft keyway is in the 12 O’clock position.
3) Manually measure the inductance of the first winding (T1-T2), record the
measurement on a pre-labeled data sheet; continue with the other two windings (T1-
T3) and (T2-T3) by connecting to the other windings selecting “Remeasure” from
the menu bar on the manual inductance measurement screen. Record these values in
the appropriate spaces on the data sheet.
Set up a sheet of paper labeled T1 through T3 across the top and 24, then 1-23 along
the left side. See Appendix one for a sample data sheet
4) Rotate the shaft the specified number of degrees as recommended by the table below.
A minimum of 24 shaft positions should be taken. However, on 4 pole motors or greater
it is recommended that more positioned be taken. The more rotor positions taken, the
more detail is available for analysis.
22
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Number of Minimum # of Degrees Shaft

Poles Readings Rotation
2 24 150
4 36 100
6 48 7.50
8 72 50
>10 72 50
5) Repeat the measurement procedures in step 4 above until the rotor has made one
complete revolution.
NOTE: The more accurate the positioning of the rotor the more accurate the analysis
will be. It is recommended to attach a rotating protractor or use a piece of circular graph
paper attached to the shaft to provide maximum accuracy.
6) When a complete set of data have been taken the results should be graphed using
either the Rotor Test feature of the EMCAT PROTM 2005 software, or directly into a
spreadsheet program such as Microsoft Excel.
ANALYSIS
1) The readings will not be identical but should result in a repeating pattern as the
shaft is rotated. If the pattern varies, there are rotor, casting, or air gap problems.
2) Rotor and casting problems show as a sudden change in one location on the
motor while air gap problems change consistently around the rotor.
3) The resulting waveform should be even and 120 degrees out of phase from each
other. There are a number of cases where these readings will deviate:
A) Large deviations at the peak or valley of at least one waveform will identify
high resistant points in copper rotor bars, possibly where the bar is welded to the
shorting ring.
B) Similar deviations will indicate broken rotor bars or, in small inexpensive
aluminum rotors, the rotor laminations may not be set properly, leaving
variations in the resistance of each rotor bar (low quality motor).
C) A more common problem in many electric motors (some manufacturers have
more challenges than others) is casting voids. This is usually found as a flat point
at the incline or decline on at least two of three sine-waves.
D) Eccentric rotor problems are normally found when the inductance tapers off
or the waveform moves higher or lower (arcs from right to left).
23
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 1 Winding Alarm Scenarios

Winding Alarm Scenarios
Over 20 years experience conducting motor testing using MCA has identified 11 common
scenarios created by the 6 measurements taken during the auto test mode using the ATIV. The
section below provides a sample display and brief write up of each scenario.
Scenario 1: ALL readings are balanced
This is a good winding and additional testing should be performed at the normal test interval.
Scenario 2: Fi or I/F in Red all other measurements balanced
All measurements are within acceptable limits except I/F, which is out by a differential of 6. This
generally indicates a phase to phase fault. If this test was performed at the Motor Control Center
(MCC) retest directly at the motor.
24
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
All measurements are within acceptable limits except Fi which is out by a differential of 3 and >1
from average. This generally indicates a coil to coil fault. If this test was performed at the Motor
Control Center (MCC) retest directly at the motor before condemning the motor.
Scenario 3: Fi or I/F in Red; L & Z in Alarm
Fi is in alarm indicating a probable coil to coil winding fault. Impedance & Inductance are also
both in alarm, but Impedance is following Inductance. This is most likely the result of rotor
bar/winding ratio differences. Perform a rotor reposition test to verify this condition.
25
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Scenario 4: R > 5% Unbalance
All measurements are within acceptable limits except R which is in alarm (> 5%). This indicates
high resistance connections. If these readings were taken at the MCC disconnect at the next
closest connection point and retest motor. If unbalance persists continue towards motor until
resistance unbalance either clears or further isolation is not possible. It often happens that the
resistance unbalance clears during the troubleshooting process, especially if the loose connections
are tightened during the process.
Scenario 5: Fi or I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm but similar pattern
26
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Rotor Position 1
Rotor Repositioned
Fi & I/F measurements are in balance, however, both the L & the Z measurements are in alarm.
This could be the result of rotor bar/winding ratio (Rb/W). In this scenario, impedance follows
inductance in a Low-High–Medium (L,H,M) pattern. This unbalance is most likely the result of
Rb/W differences. This is a common reading especially on smaller motors. To verify if this
unbalance is the result of Rb/W perform rotor reposition test.
Scenario 6: Fi or I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm but non-similar pattern
Since the impedance unbalance does not follow the inductance the capacitance of the system has
changed. This is most likely the result over the insulation becoming brittle due to overheating or
the windings are contaminated.
27
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Scenario 7: Fi & I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm but non-similar pattern

plus a frequency shift of the impedance measurement
The impedance measurement of T2-T3 is almost double the measurements of the other two
windings. When this occurs it is normally caused by a frequency shift of the instrument when
making the impedance measurement for that winding. Experience has shown that this is a very
early indication of winding or rotor issues.
Scenario 8: All measurements are balanced but insulation to ground

measurement is low
All winding measurements are balanced, however, the insulation to ground readings are below
recommended levels. Recommend clearing ground before operation.
28
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Scenario 9: Fi & I/F balanced; L & Z in Alarm, readings are truncated
Fi & I/F are balanced, however, L & Z are in alarm, it is difficult to determine the L & Z pattern
since the ATIV truncates any decimals in the auto mode and displays 0’s in place of the decimal.
To determine if these patterns match manual readings of L & Z should be taken.
Scenario 10: Other readings
Most readings are zero, the L & Z readings may be 0 due to the values being < 1. The ATIV will
truncate readings of Z & L that are <1 to 0.0. Verify whether these values are actually 0 or if they
are < 1 by taking manual measurements. However, since the Fi & I/F of 2 of the windings are
also 0 this indicates a short circuit in the winding.
29
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Scenario 11: Zero Values
Readings in T2-T3 are all zeros, this occurs when the winding is completely shorted.
30
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 2: Test Methods for Determining the Impact

of Motor Condition on Motor Efficiency and Reliability
Dr Howard W. Penrose, Ph.D.
Abstract
This article discusses the financial impact of motor condition on electric motor efficiency and
reliability by reviewing a combination of Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA) and vibration techniques.
Cost impacts on energy, production and maintenance will be outlined. The topic will surround a
utility study and US Department of Energy market transformation success during 2000 and 2001.
The primary areas of concern are phase balance, rotor bars, cleanliness and bearing issues.
Introduction
Electric motors are the prime mover of industry and our general comfort in commercial
buildings. The motor systems consume 20% of all energy used in the United States and 59%
of all electricity generated. Within each sector:
q 78% of electrical energy in industrial systems (>90% in process industries)

q 43% of the electrical energy in commercial buildings
q 37% of the electrical energy in the home
There are well over 1.2 billion electric motors, of all types, used throughout the United
States. However, electric motors are often ‘out-of-sight, out-of-mind,’ until production is
down due to a burn-out or catastrophic bearing failure.
It is important to understand that equipment usually fails over time, reliability decreases and
losses increase (efficiency decreases) over time prior to most catastrophic failures. Although
some equipment faults are instantaneous, the larger majority of catastrophic faults that
impact production are the result of a failure in the implementation of a maintenance
program. This failure is primarily due to management not fully understanding that
maintenance is an investment in the business and not an ‘expense of doing business.’ If you
do not invest in materials, equipment and people, you do not have product to sell: If you do
not invest in predictive maintenance practices (PM, TPM, RCM, or any other program), you
do not have product to sell or less of it at a higher overall production cost.
Proper implementation of a maintenance program has been shown to reduce energy

consumption in plants by as much as 10-14%,1,1 while also reducing unplanned production
downtime. Average downtime costs are shown as follow:
31
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 1: Estimations for Downtime Costs1

Industry Average Downtime Costs, per hour
Forest Products $7,000

Food Processing $30,000
Petroleum and Chemical $87,000
Metal Casting $100,000
Automotive $200,000
In a recent utility energy and reliability project, a group of electric motors from 5 to 200
horsepower were reviewed in several industries, including: Petroleum and Chemical; Forest
Products; Food Processing; Mining (Quarry); and Pulp & Paper. The plants varied from
having no existing planned maintenance program to full implementation, including an
existing energy program. Of these motors, randomly evaluated, 80% were found to have at
least one deficiency with 60% of those (48% of the original) found to be cost effective to
replace. The plants without programs had the greatest number of defective motors, the
plants with existing maintenance and energy programs had the least number of defective
motors. Eight percent of the motors were evaluated to determine the types of faults and the
potential cost avoidance with corrective action (repair or replace) by using vibration analysis
and motor circuit analysis (MCA). Several had a combination of electrical and mechanical
problems:
Table 2: Utility Energy Project Findings

Type of Test Percentage of Faults
Vibration Analysis 45% of motors tested

Motor Circuit Analysis 70% of motors tested
Insulation Resistance (Meg-Ohms) 5% of motors tested
Several motors had combined vibration and electrical faults. A few had winding faults
combined with insulation resistance faults. Several had shorted windings that were
continuing to cause production problems, but were written off as ‘nuisance’ trips (detected
in the study by using MCA). “Findings of the advanced portion of the Motor PAT Tool
demonstration project indicate that measuring for … phase unbalance of resistance,
inductance, impedance, phase angle and I/F (current/frequency response) provided more
useful results.”1 The combined incremental production cost avoidance of 20 of the defective
motors, from 5 to 250 horsepower, was $297,100, rendering implementation costs
insignificant.
The purpose of this paper is to first provide information for determining cost avoidance
through the application of a maintenance program on electric motors. This will be followed
with a discussion of the implementation of motor circuit analysis (MCA) and vibration
analysis.
32
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Cost Avoidance Through Maintenance
There are a number of ways to determine cost avoidance through the implementation of
maintenance programs. In this discussion, the focus will be on the methods introduced
through the US Department of Energy’s Industrial Assessment Centers (IAC’s), which
provide a very basic and conservative method. The PAT Tool Demonstration Project used
a much more complex method1, which is outside the scope of this article. However, some
of the tools, such as MotorMaster Plus1, will be used to provide cost information for motor
repair costs.
“Utility representatives have indicated that in a survey of facilities with no preventive

maintenance programs, motor rewinds represented 85% of the total number of motor
repairs (on average). After preventive maintenance programs were established, the numbers
of rewinds were reduced to about 20% of the total.”1 This statement has been found to hold
true through research projects including: Dreisilker’s Total Motor System Maintenance and
Management Program (DTM2 ™), the PAT Tool Project, and others.
For the purpose of this discussion, we will consider a paperboard plant with 485 motors.
There are two operating production lines that have a potential downtime cost of $6,575
each. An average of 3 motors were repaired per month, of which a majority (70%) required
rewind replacement (normally caused by immersion, contamination or the motors became
coated in material). The facility operated 8,000 hours per year with the catastrophic failures
normally causing one line to fail at a time. Additional costs, not covered by this discussion,
included cleaning of the system prior to re-starting the operation. No maintenance program
in place.
33
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 3: Breakdown of Motor Horsepower and Repair Costs

Motor Size Number of Motors Rewind Cost Recondition
Cost
< 20 horsepower 347 (Replacement, not - -

repaired)
20 15 $660 $220
25 10 $760 $255
30 2 $880 $295
40 3 $1,020 $340
50 27 $1,295 $430
75 18 $1,500 $500
100 21 $1,610 $540
125 32 $1,820 $610
400 6 $3,400 $1,200
750 4 $7,735 $2,600
The first step is to calculate the unplanned production downtime costs:
Equation 1: Unplanned Production Downtime Cost

PCDowntime = (MF/Yr) x (PLost/failure) x (PCost)
= (36 motors/yr) x (4 hrs/failure) x ($6,575/hr)
= $946,800/year
Where PC is the annual cost of unplanned downtime, MF is the number of motor failures,
P represents production
Step 2 is to calculate the average cost of rewinding equipment. In this case, we will
concentrate on just 20 horsepower and larger.
Equation 2: Average Cost of Rewinding Motors
Ravg = ((Nn1 x RWCn1) + … + (Nnn x RWCnn))/NT

= ((1520 x $66020) + (1025 x $76025) + … + (4750 x $7735750)) / 138 motors
= $1,650
Where Ravg is the average rewind cost, Nn is the number of motors for each horsepower, RWCn is the rewind
cost for each horsepower
The average cost for reconditioning the motors is calculated the same way, except the
reconditioning cost is used instead of rewind costs. For this example, the average
reconditioning cost would be $555.
34
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Step 3 is to calculate the average repair cost per motor before and after maintenance
implementation.
Equation 3: Average Repair Cost per Motor
Ravg = (% Recondition x $/Recondition) + (% Rewind x $/Rewind)

= (30% x $555) + (70% x $1,650)
= $1,322 / motor
Assuming that the number of motors rewound versus reconditioned would be inverse
with the application of the program, the number of rewound motors would be 30%, and
the average cost of repair would be $884 per motor. Once the program is implemented,
the number of motors to be repaired, overall, will be reduced.
Step 4 uses the number of motors repaired per year and the difference between the
reconditioned motors vs. rewound in order to come up with a conservative estimate of
savings.
Equation 4: Repair Cost Reduction Estimate (RRCest)
RRCest = (motors repaired/year x initial repair costs) – (motors repaired/year x new repair
costs)
= (36 motors/yr x $1,322/motor) – (36 motors/yr x $884/motor)
= $15,768 per year
Step 5 is to determine potential energy savings. For the purposes of conservative estimation,
a 2% improvement in efficiency will be assumed. Maintenance components include (and the
type of test system, vibration and MCA only, for this paper, used to evaluate):
q Improved lubrication (vibration)

q Proper alignment and balancing (vibration)
q Correction of circuit unbalances (MCA)
q Reduced motor temperatures (MCA, vibration)
q Reduced efficiency losses caused by rewinds (US Department of Energy estimates
one percentage point efficiency reduction per rewind)
q Improved drive system performance
Equation 5: Energy Cost Savings
Energy Savings = (total hp of motors considered) x (load factor) x (operating hours) x (%

savings) x (.746 kW/hp) x (Electrical usage costs)
= 14,930 horsepower x 75% load x 8,000 hrs x 2% savings x 0.746 kW/hp x $0.06/kWh
= $80,192 per year
35
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Step 6 is to determine the in-house labor costs to implement the program. Assume 1 man-
hour per motor per year. Estimated costs for this example will be based upon $25 per hour.
Equation 6: In-House Labor Costs
Labor = (1 hr/month/motor) x (# of motors) x (12 months/yr) x ($/man-hour)

= 1hr/month/motor x 138 motors x 12 months/yr x ($25/man-hour)
= $41,400 per year
Step 7 is the purchase price for the MCA and vibration analysis equipment. For the
purposes of this article, the same equipment selected for the utility PAT Project will be used.
The estimated combined costs for the ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 MCA instrument and the
Pruftechnik vibration analysis equipment is $22,000.
Step 8 are the training costs for implementing the system. Assuming equipment training
costs of $4,500 per person and maintenance training costs of $6,000 per person, the cost
should be approximately $10,500 per person.
The final step is to determine the simple payback for the implementation of the program. In
the case of this example, assume a 50% reduction in unplanned downtime for the first year:
Table 4: Costs and Savings for Maintenance Implementation

Maintenance Savings Maintenance Costs
$473,400 Reduced Downtime $41,400 Labor Costs
$15,768 Reduced Motor Repair Costs $22,000 Equipment Costs
$80,192 Energy Cost Reduction $10,500 Training Costs
$569,360 Total Savings per Year $73,900 Total Costs per Year
Equation 7: Simple Maintenance Payback
Payback = (Total Costs per Year)/(Total Savings per Year)

= $73,900 / $569,360
= 0.13 years or 1.6 months
The smaller size of this particular plant would allow for complete implementation of a
maintenance program. Larger manufacturing plants will often have thousands of electric
motors and may require a breakdown of departments or areas for successful implementation.
Application of Vibration Analysis
Vibration analysis is used by maintenance professionals as a means to detect mechanical and

some limited electrical faults in rotating equipment. By performing regularly scheduled
testing, the operating reliability of an electric motor can be determined through trending.
36
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Based upon bearing failure, greasing, belt tension, misalignment, or other unbalances,
increases in energy losses can occur. These losses show as vibration, noise and heat.
Improper belt tension and greasing will increase the friction and windage losses of the
motor. This can be calculated as:
Equation 8: Bearing Losses
Watts Loss = (load,lbs x JournalDiameter,inches x rpm x f) / 169

.f is dependant upon oil used and temperature, 0.005 is typical
Vibration analysis for troubleshooting will detect bearing (41% of failures) faults, balance
and alignment (12% of failures) faults, primarily. It will also detect rotor faults (10% of
failures) and some electrical faults (37% of failures), to some extent. However, electrical and
rotor faults tend to fall in frequency ranges that can be related to other equipment, and are
directly load related. Vibration analysis requires the electric motor to be operating at a load
that is constant during each test that would be trended.
Application of Motor Circuit Analysis
“There are many tools available to perform quality preventive maintenance of individual
motors. Of these, motor circuit analysis (MCA) systems hold great promise for identifying
motor problems before expensive failure and for improving the general efficiency of motor
systems in general.”1
Motor circuit analysis allows the analyst to detect winding faults and rotor faults in the
electric motor. One power of this type of test method is that it requires the equipment to be
de-energized, which allows for initial incoming testing of the electric motors and
troubleshooting when equipment fails. Primary energy losses that can be detected include
phase unbalance and I2R losses, while faults include shorted windings, loose connections,
ground faults and rotor faults.
A resistive fault gives of heat, as a loss. For instance, a 0.5 Ohm loose connection on a 100
horsepower electric motor operating at 95 amps:
Equation 9: Resistive Losses
Kilo-Watts Loss = (I2R)/1000

= (952 x 0.5)/1000
= 4.5 kW (demand loss)
Equation 10: Energy Usage Loss
$/yr = kW x hrs/yr x $/kWh

= 4.5 kW x 8000 hrs/yr x $0.06/kWh
= $2,160 / year
37
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Electric motor phase unbalances (inductance and impedance) effect the current unbalances,
cause motors to run hotter and reduce the motor’s ability to produce torque. The
percentage unbalance of impedance can be evaluated to determine efficiency reduction and
additional heating of the electric motor. A general rule is that, for every 10oC increase in
operating temperature, the life of the equipment is reduced by half.
Figure 1: Efficiency Reduction Due to Impedance Unbalance

% Efficiency Reduction
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
% Impedance Unbalance
For instance, the paperboard company has a 100 horsepower electric motor, that would
normally be 95% efficient, that has a 3.5% impedance unbalance. The efficiency would be
reduced by 4 points of efficiency, or to 91%.
Equation 10: Energy Cost Due to Phase Unbalance Losses
$/yr savings = hp x 0.746 x %load x $/kWh x hrs of operation ((100/Le) – (100/He))

= 100 hp x 0.756 x .75 load x $0.06/kWh x 8000 hrs ((100/91) – (100/95))
= $1,240 / year
Figure 2: Increase in Temperature Rise Due to Phase Unbalance
50
40
% Increase
30
20
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
% Unbalance
38
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The impedance unbalance will also cause an increase in operating temperature based upon
an increase in I2R losses. In the case of the 100 horsepower electric motor, this means a
temperature rise of about 30oC, or a reduction in motor insulation life to 13% of its original.
Motor Circuit Analysis is also used to evaluate the windings for contamination. “Frequent
cleaning of a motor’s intake (if any) and cooling fins is especially important in dirty
environments… Tests confirm that even severe duty, generously rated, and oversized
motors can quickly fail in such conditions if they become thickly coated or if lightly coated
and with their airflow reduced by half. Their insulation life can then fall to 13 – 25% of
normal.”1 The same phenomenon occurs if the windings become coated in contaminants.
The MCA rotor test requires inductance and impedance readings through 360 degrees of
rotation of the rotor. The readings are graphed and viewed for symmetry. Rotor test results
provide a definitive condition of the rotor and is often performed following identification of
a possible rotor fault by vibration, as part of an acceptance program, during repair or when
the motor is identified as having torque problems.
Conclusion
The implementation of an electric motor maintenance program will have a significant impact
on a company’s bottom line. Whether the company has a few hundred motors or many
thousands, the simple payback from the investment into vibration and MCA is usually
termed in months. Payback is impacted from savings from production availability, reduced
equipment repair costs and improved energy costs, all with a minimum investment in
manpower, training and equipment.
The application of these two technologies compliment each other while also evaluating the
progress of the maintenance program and improving upon equipment availability. Vibration
analysis evaluates the mechanical condition of equipment while MCA evaluates the electrical
condition of equipment. Combined, the analyst has the ability to view the complete
condition of the electric motor.
Bibliography
US Department of Energy, Industrial Productivity Training Manual, 1996 Annual IAC

Directors Meeting, Rutger’s University, 1996.
DrivePower, 1993.
Pacific Gas & Electric, Electric Motors Performance Analysis Testing Tool Demonstration
Project, February, 2001.
39
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 3: Multiple Technology Approach

The Multi-Technology Approach to Motor Diagnostics
Howard W. Penrose, Ph.D.

For: ALL-TEST Pro
Old Saybrook, CT
Introduction
There has been a persistent misconception that there is a ‘magic bullet,’ in the form of a
Condition Based Monitoring (CBM) instrument, that will provide all of the information that
you need to evaluate the health of your electric motor system. This misconception is often
brought about by the commercial presentations of the manufacturers or sales forces of these
CBM instruments. It is the very job of the salesperson to focus on the area of strength for
their particular instrument(s) and present it as ‘the only solution you will ever need to solve
your every problem.’
In reality, there is no one instrument that will provide you with every piece of information
that you need. No ‘Holy Grail’ of CBM and reliability. However, through an understanding
of the electric motor system, and the capabilities of CBM technologies, you can have a
complete view of your system, its health and have confidence in estimating time to failure in
order to make a good recommendation to management.
The purpose of this paper is simple: Outline the components of an electric motor system;
Discuss the modes of failure of each major component; Discuss how each of the major
technologies address each component; Discuss how the technologies can be integrated for a
complete view of the system; and, Discuss the bottom-line impact of the Multi-Technology
approach. The types of CBM equipment to be reviewed are standard off-the-shelf
technologies that are used for periodic testing.
The Electric Motor System
The electric motor system involves far more than just the electric motor. In fact, it is made
up of six distinct sections, all with their different failure modes. The sections are (Figure 1):
ü The facility power distribution system which includes wiring and transformers.
ü The motor control, which may include starters, soft starts, variable frequency drives and
other starting systems.
ü The electric motor – A three phase induction motor for the purpose of this paper.
ü The mechanical coupling, which may be direct, gearbox, belts or some other coupling
method. For the purpose of this paper, we will focus on direct coupling and belts.
40
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
ü The load refers to the driven equipment such as a fan, pump, compressor or other
driven equipment.
ü The process, such as waste-water pumping, mixing, aeration, etc.
Figure 1: The Motor System
Most will view individual components of the system when troubleshooting, trending,
commissioning or performing some other reliability-based function related to the system.
What components are focused on depends upon several factors, which include:
ü What is the experience and background of the personnel and managers involved. For
instance, you will most often see a strong vibration program when the maintenance staff
is primarily mechanical or an infrared program when the staff is primarily electrical.
ü Perceived areas of failure. This can be a serious issue depending upon how the motor
system is perceived and will deserve more attention to follow.
ü Understanding of the various CBM technologies.
ü Training. But since when is training ever not an issue?
The perceived areas of failure provides an especially serious problem when viewing the
history of your motor system. Often, when records are produced, the only summary might
state something like, “fan failure, repaired,” or “pump failure, repaired.” The end result is
that the perceived failure has to do with the pump or fan component of the motor system.
This especially becomes more of an issue when relying upon memory to provide the answers
to the most serious problems to be addressed in a plant, based upon history. For instance,
when looking to determine what part of a plant has been causing the most problems, the
answer might be, “Waste water pump 1.” The immediate perception is that the pump has a
consistent problem and, as a pump is a mechanical system, a mechanical monitoring solution
might be selected for trending the pump’s health. If a root-cause had been recorded on each
failure, it might have been determined to be the motor winding, bearings, cable, controls,
process or a combination of issues.
In a recent meeting, while discussing the selection of CBM equipment, the attendees were
asked for modes of failure from their locations. The answers were fans, compressors and
pumps. When discussed further, the fans were found to have bearing and motor winding
faults being most common, pump seals and motor bearings for pumps, and, seals and motor
windings for compressors. When viewed even closer, the winding faults had to do with
control and cable problems, improper repairs and power quality. Bearing issues had to do
with improper lubrication practices.
41
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
In effect, when determining the best way to implement CBM on your electric motor system,
you need to take a system, not a component, view. The result is simple: Improved reliability;
Fewer headaches; and, An improved bottom line.
Condition Based Monitoring Test Instruments
Following are some of the more common CBM technologies in use, more detail on the
technologies can be found in “Motor Circuit Analysis”1 Details as to the components of the
system tested and capabilities can be found in Tables 1-4 at the end of this paper:
De-Energized Testing:
ü DC High Potential Testing – By applying a voltage of twice the motor rated voltage plus
1,000 volts for AC and an additional 1.7 times that value for DC high potential (usually
with a multiplier to reduce the stress on the insulation system), the insulation system
between the motor windings and ground (ground-wall insulation) is evaluated. The test
is widely considered potentially destructive.1
ü Surge comparison testing: Using pulses of voltage at values calculated the same as high
potential testing, the impedance of each phase of a motor are compared graphically. The
purpose of the test is to detect shorted turns within the first few turns of each phase.
The test is normally performed in manufacturing and rewinding applications as it is best
performed without a rotor in the stator. This test is widely considered potentially
destructive, and is primarily used as a go/no-go test with no true ability to trend.
ü Insulation tester: This test places a DC voltage between the windings and ground. Low
current leakage is measured and converted to a measurement of meg, gig or tera-Ohms.
ü Polarization Index testing: Using an insulation tester, the 10 minute to 1 minute values
are viewed and a ratio produced. According to the IEEE 43-2000, insulation values over
5,000 MegOhms need not be evaluated using PI. The test is used to detect severe
winding contamination or overheated insulation systems.
ü Ohm, Milli-Ohm testing: Using an Ohm or Milli-Ohm meter, values are measured and
compared between windings of an electric motor. These measurements are normally
taken to detect loose connections, broken connections and very late stage winding faults.
ü Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA) testing: Instruments using values of resistance,
impedance, inductance, phase angle, current: frequency response, and insulation testing
can be used to troubleshoot, commission and evaluate control, connection, cable, stator,
rotor, air gap and insulation to ground health. Using a low voltage output, readings are
read through a series of bridges and evaluated. Non-destructive and trendable readings
often months in advance of electrical failure.
Energized Testing:
ü Vibration Analysis: Mechanical vibration is measured through a transducer providing

overall vibration values and FFT analysis. These values provide indicators of mechanical
faults and degree of faults, can be trended and will provide information on some
electrical and rotor problems that vary based upon the loading of the motor. Minimum
42
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
load requirements for electric motors to detect faults in the rotor. Requires a working
knowledge of the system being tested.
ü Infrared analysis provides information on the temperature difference between objects.
Faults are detected and trended based upon degree of fault. Excellent for detecting
loose connections and other electrical faults with some ability to detect mechanical
faults. Readings will vary with load. Requires a working knowledge of the system being
tested.
ü Ultrasonic instruments measure low and high frequency noise. Will detect a variety of
electrical and mechanical issues towards the late stages of fault. Readings will vary with
load. Requires a working knowledge of the system being tested.
ü Voltage and current measurements will provide limited information on the condition of
the motor system. Readings will vary with load.
ü Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) uses the electric motor as a transducer to
detect electrical and mechanical faults through a significant portion of the motor system.
Sensitive to load variations and readings will vary based upon the load. Requires
nameplate information and many systems require the number of rotor bars, stator slots
and manual input of operating speed.
Major Components and Failure Modes
Some of the major issues from the various components of the motor system shall be
reviewed in order to provide an understanding of the types of faults found and the
technologies used to detect them. As an overview, this may not encompass all of the modes
of failure that you may experience.
Incoming Power
Starting from the incoming power to the load, the first area that would have to be addressed
is the incoming power and distribution system. The first area of issue is power quality then
transformers.
Power quality issues associated with electric motor systems include:
ü Voltage and current harmonics: With voltage limited to 5% THD (Total Harmonic
Distortion) and current limited to 3% THD. Current harmonics carry the greatest
potential for harm to the electric motor system.
ü Over and under voltage conditions: Electric motors are designed to operate no more
than +/- 10% of the nameplate voltage.
ü Voltage unbalance: Is the difference between phases. The relationship between voltage
and current unbalance varies from a few time to many times current unbalance as related
to voltage unbalance based upon motor design (Can be as high as 20 times).
ü Power factor: The lower the power factor from unity, the more current the system must
use to perform work. Signs of poor power factor also include dimming of lights when
heavy equipment starts.
ü Overloaded system: Based upon the capabilities of the transformer, cabling and motor.
Detected with current measurements, normally, as well as heat.
43
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The primary tools used to detect problems with incoming power are power quality meters,
MCSA and voltage and current meters. Knowing the condition of your power quality can
help identify a great many ‘phantom’ problems.
Transformers are one of the first critical components of the motor system. In general,
transformers have fewer issues than other components in the system. However, each
transformer usually takes care of multiple systems both in the electric motor as well as other
systems.
Common transformer problems include (oil filled or dry-type transformers):
ü Insulation to ground faults.

ü Shorted windings.
ü Loose connections, and,
ü Electrical vibration/mechanical looseness
Test equipment used for monitoring the health of transformers (within the selection of
instruments within this paper) include:
ü MCA for grounds, loose/broken connections and shorts

ü MCSA for power quality and late stage faults
ü Infrared analysis for loose connections
ü Ultrasonics for looseness and severe faults
ü Insulation testers for insulation to ground faults.
MCC’s, Controls and Disconnects
The motor control or disconnect provides some of the primary issues with electric motor
systems. The most common for both low and medium voltage systems are:
ü Loose connections
ü Bad contacts including pitted, damaged, burned or worn
ü Bad starter coils on the contactor
ü Bad power factor correction capacitors which normally results in a significant current
unbalance.
The test methods for evaluating the controls include infrared, ultrasonicss, volt/amp meters,
ohm meters and visual inspections. MCA, MCSA and infrared provide the most accurate
systems for fault detection and trending.
Cables – Before and After the Controls
Cabling problems are rarely considered and, as a result, provide some of the biggest
headaches. Common cable problems include:
44
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
ü Thermal breakdown due to overloads or age

ü Contamination which can be even more serious in cables that pass underground through
conduit
ü Phase shorts can occur as well as grounds. These can be caused by ‘treeing’ or physical
damage.
ü Opens due to physical damage or other causes.
ü Physical damage is often a problem in combination with other cable problems.
Test and trending is performed with MCA, infrared, insulation testing and MCSA.
Motor Supply Side Summary
On the supply side to the motor, the problems can be broken down as follows:
ü Poor power factor – 39%

ü Poor connections – 36%
ü Undersized conductors – 10%
ü Voltage unbalance – 7%
ü Under or over voltage conditions – 8%
The most common equipment that covers these areas include MCA, infrared and MCSA.
Electric Motors
Electric motors include mechanical and electrical components. In fact, an electric motor is a
converter of electrical energy to mechanical torque.
Primary mechanical problems:
ü Bearings – general wear, misapplication, loading or contamination.

ü Bad or worn shaft or bearing housings
ü General mechanical unbalance and resonance
Vibration analysis is the primary method for detection of mechanical problems in electric
motors. MCSA will detect late stage mechanical problems as will infrared and ultrasonics.
Primary electrical problems:
ü Winding shorts between conductors or coils

ü Winding contamination
ü Insulation to ground faults
ü Air gap faults, including eccentric rotors
ü Rotor faults including casting voids and broken rotor bars.
MCA will detect all of the faults early in development. MCSA will detect late stage stator
faults and early rotor faults. Vibration will detect late stage faults, insulation to ground will
45
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
only detect ground faults which make up less than 1% of motor system faults, surge testing
will only detect shallow winding shorts and all other testing will only detect late stage faults.
Coupling (Direct and Belted)
The coupling between the motor and load provides opportunities for problems due to wear
and the application.
ü Belt or direct drive misalignment

ü Belt or insert wear
ü Belt tension issues are more common than most think and usually result in bearing
failure
ü Sheave wear
The most accurate system for coupling fault detection is vibration analysis. MCSA and
infrared analysis will normally detect severe or late stage faults.
Load (Fans, pumps, compressors, gearboxes, etc.)
The load can have numerous types of faults depending on the type of load. The most
common are worn parts, broken components and bearings.
Test instruments capable of detecting load problems include MCSA, vibration, infrared
analysis and ultrasonics.
Common Approaches to Multi-Technology
There are several common approaches within industry as well as several new ones (See Table
3). The best use a combination of energized and de-energized testing. It is important to
note that energized testing is usually best under constant load conditions and trended in the
same operating conditions each time.
One of the most common approaches has been the use of insulation resistance and/or
polarization index. These will only identify insulation to ground faults in both the motor
and cable, which represents under 1% of the overall motor system faults (~5% of motor
faults).
Infrared and vibration are normally used in conjunction with each other with great success.
However, they miss a few common problems or will only detect them in the late stages of
failure.
Surge testing and high potential testing will only detect some winding faults and insulation to
ground faults, with the potential to take the motor out of action should any insulation
contamination or weakness exist.
MCA and MCSA support each other and detect virtually all of the problems in the motor
system. This accuracy requires MCA systems that use resistance, impedance, phase angle,
46
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
I/F and insulation to ground and MCSA systems that include voltage and current
demodulation.
The newest, and most effective, approach has been vibration, infrared and MCA and/or
MCSA. The strength of this approach is that there is a combination of electrical and
mechanical disciplines involved in evaluation and troubleshooting. As found in the Motor
Diagnostic and Motor Health Study,1 38% of motor system testing involving only vibration
and/or infrared see a significant return on investment. This number jumped to 100% in
systems that used a combination of MCA/MCSA along with vibration and/or infrared.
In one case, a combined application of infrared and vibration saw an ROI of $30k. When
the company added MCA to their tool box, the ROI increased to $307,000, ten times the
original by using a combination of instruments.
Application Opportunities
There are three common opportunities for electric motor system testing. These include:
ü Commissioning components or the complete system as it is newly installed or repaired.

This can provide a very immediate payback for the technologies involved and will help
you avoid infant mortality disasters.
ü Troubleshooting the system through the application of multiple technologies will assist
you in identifying problems much more rapidly and with greater confidence.
ü Trending of test results for system reliability, again using the proper application of
multiple technologies. Using tests such as MCA, vibration and infrared, potential faults
can be trended over the long term, detecting many faults months in advance.
Conclusion
This paper provided a brief overview of how multiple technologies work together to provide
a good view of the electric motor system. Through an understanding and application of this
approach, you will realize fantastic returns on your maintenance program.
About the Author
Dr. Howard W. Penrose, Ph.D. received his Ph.D. in General Engineering focusing on
industrial system process improvements, waste stream and energy analysis and equipment
reliability. He has 15 years experience in the electric motor and service industry leading PdM
and Root-Cause-Analysis initiatives in a large variety of commercial & industrial locations.
ALL-TEST Pro, LLC is a manufacturer of motor diagnostic equipment. For more

information go to www.alltestpro.com.
47
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 1: Motor System Diagnostic Technology Comparison

PQ Cntrl Conn Cable Stator Rotor Air Brgs Ins Vibe Align Load VFD
Gap
Off-Line Testing
High - - - - - - - - X - - - -
Potential
Testing
Surge Test - - - - X - - - - - - - -
Insulation - - - - - - - - X - - - -
Tester
Ohm Meter - - L - L - - - - - - - -
PI Testing - - - - - - - - X - - - -
MCA Test - X X X X X X - X - - - -
On-Line Testing
Vibration - - - - L L L X - X X X -
Analysis
Infrared X X X L L - - L - - L L -
Ultrasonics - L - - L - - X - - - L -
Volt/Amp L L L - L L - - - - - - -
MCSA X X L - L X X L - X X X L
Table 2: Management Considerations

Test Method Estimated Non- Requires Dedicated Included Other
Pricing Destructive Experience Personnel Software Applications
Off-Line Test
High Potential $10,000 + Potentially High Recommend No No
Destructive
Surge Test $25,000 + Potentially High Recommend Some No
Destructive
Insulation $1,000 + (NDT) Non- Some No No Yes
Tester Destructive
Ohm Meter $500 + (NDT) Some No No Yes
PI Tester $2,500 + (NDT) Medium No Some No

MCA $1,000/ $9,000 (NDT) Some No Yes Yes
+
On-Line Test
Vibration $10,000 + (NDT) High Recommend Yes Yes
Infrared $10,000 + (NDT) High Recommend Yes Yes
Ultrasonics $10,000 + (NDT) High Recommend Some Yes
Volt/Amp $500 + (NDT) Some No No Yes
MCSA $16,000 + (NDT) High Recommend Yes Yes
48
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 3: Common Approaches

PQ Cntrl Conn Cable Stator Rotor Air Brgs Ins Vibe Align Load VFD
Gap
Insulation - - - L - - - - X - - - -
Resistance
and PI
Infrared and L X X L L L L X - X X X -
Vibration
Surge and - - - - X - - - X - - - -
Hi-Pot
MCA and X X X X X X X X X X X X X
MCSA
MCA and L X X X X X X X X X X X L
Infrared /
Vibe
Table 4: Additional Considerations

Test Method Where Can You Test
High Potential Testing At Motor – Requires disconnect
Surge Test At Motor – Requires disconnect
Insulation Tester From MCC
Ohm Meter At Motor – Requires disconnect
PI Testing At Motor – Disconnect Recommended
MCA Test From MCC
Vibration Analysis At each location tested
Infrared At each location tested
Ultrasonics At each location tested
Volt/Amp From MCC
MCSA From MCC
49
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 4: Single and Three Phase Transformer

Testing; Using Static Motor Circuit Analysis
Techniques
H O W A R D W . P E N R O S E , P H . D
Old Saybrook, CT
Introduction
Field and shop testing of pole and pad mount transmission and distribution (T&D) transformers
can be costly and time consuming. With the onset of utility generation deregulation across the
country, T&D becomes a greater issue due to varying power demands and power quality. A
simple test method for quickly and accurately testing the condition of T&D equipment is a
necessity as, if a transformer fails, both the end user and generating facility will complain.
Through the use of an existing technology, originally designed for motor winding testing, an initial
transformer evaluation can be performed.
For conceptual reasons, consider that an AC induction electric motor is a transformer with a
rotating secondary. In this way, the capabilities that static Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA) provides
an electric motor can be extended to a transformer. These include detecting winding shorts, high
resistance connections, open windings and insulation to ground fault detection as well as
preliminary internal circuit impedance balance. Specific information on the transformer is not
required for most applications of MCA because the test equipment is used as a winding
comparator.
An MCA device which provides readings of resistance, impedance, inductance, phase angle
and a special test called current/frequency response (I/F) has been applied to transformers,
for the purposes of this paper. Because the test method is off-line, the MCA device
generates its own voltage and frequency output. Therefore, the ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000TM
motor circuit analyzer was selected. This unit weighs under 2 lbs, is handheld, and has a
proven track record with AC/DC motors and generators from fractional to over 10 MW.
The first set of transformers tested included pole and pad mount transmission and
distribution transformers from a few kVA to over 2500 kVA with primary voltage ratings of
480 Volts to 28.8kV. Following initial testing and analysis, procedures were developed to
allow for general testing of any type of pole and pad mount transformer with a simple
resistance greater than 0.001 Ohms. The results included the capability of testing the primary
and secondary of any type of transformer in about 5 to 10 minutes with a greater than 99%
success rate on either wet or dry-type transformers.
50
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Basic Transformer Concepts
To understand the basic concepts of a transformer, we shall start with an “ideal transformer,” or a
theoretical transformer that has no losses. The purpose of the transformer is to convert one level
of voltage and current to another level of voltage and current for distribution and application
purposes. This is achieved by having a primary winding located close to secondary winding and
allowing for mutual induction to occur between the windings.
When a sine-wave voltage is applied to the primary windings a magnetic field is established that
expands and contracts based upon the applied frequency. This field interacts with the secondary
winding producing a voltage within the secondary that is directly proportional to the turns ratio,
while current is inversely proportional to the turns ratio.
Equation 1: Voltage Turns Ratio
N1 / N2 = a
Where N1 is the number of turns in the primary and N2 is the number of turns in the secondary
Equation 2: Current Turns Ratio
N2 / N1 = 1/a
For example, an ideal transformer with 100 turns in the primary and 50 turns in the secondary,
with 480 Volts applied to the primary and a 100 amp load on the secondary would have: a voltage
turn ratio of 2; a current turn ratio of ½; a 480 V1, 50 A1 load reflected on the primary and a 240
V2, 100 A2 load on the secondary.
Equation 3: Load Impedance
ZL = V2 / I2
Equation 4: Equivalent Primary Impedance
Z1L = a2ZL
Equations 3 and 4 can be used to reference the impedance from the secondary to primary. This
can also be used inversely. Internal impedance can be matched to load impedance as found in
Equation 5.
Equation 5: Internal Impedance
ZS = a2ZL = Z1L
In a “real transformer” there are certain losses, including core losses (hysterisis and eddy-currents),
the magnetizing current, and leakage. In addition, supply voltage and load currents may have
51
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
harmonic loads and other issues that would impact the effectiveness of a transformer. The
purpose of static MCA is to reduce or eliminate these issues to isolate transformer testing.
Transformer Types and Connections
Transformers of both single and three phase have a variety of connection types for a variety of
loads. In a three-phase circuit, these connections are: Wye-Delta; Delta-Wye; Delta-Delta; and
Wye-Wye. Single-phase, pole mounted transformers normally have a single-winding primary with
a two-winding or center-tapped secondary.
Three phase transformer connections are developed for a variety of applications:
1. Delta-Delta: Lighting and power applications, normally used when power loads are
greater than lighting loads.
2. Open-Delta: Lighting and power applications, used when lighting loads are greater than
power loads.
3. Wye-Delta: Power applications, used when stepping power up in voltage (ie: 2400 to 4160
Volts).
4. Wye-Delta: Lighting and power applications.
5. Open Wye-Delta: Will allow 57% capacity if one phase is disabled.
6. Delta-Wye: Normally provides a 4-wire on the secondary which allows for balanced
single-phase loads between neutral and each phase.
Figure 1: Delta-Delta Transformer
H1 I aI
X1
V V/a
I/√3
H2 X2
H3 X3
52
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Three phase transformer connections are labeled H1, H2, and H3 on the primary and X1, X2,
X3, with X0 as the neutral, on the secondary.
Figure 2: Delta-Wye Transformer
I aI/√3
H1 X1
X2
V
X0
V/a √3V/a
H2
X3
H3
Figure 3: Wye-Delta Transformer
I √3aI
H1 X1
H2
V/√3a
H0
V V/√3
H3 X2
X3
Figure 4: Wye-Wye Transformer
H1 I aI
X1
H2 X2
H0 X0
V V/√3 V/√3a V/a
H3 X3
53
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Figure 5: Delta-Wye Transformer Connection
H1 H2 H3
X0 X1 X2 X3
Figure 6: Delta-Delta Transformer Connection
H1 H2 H3
X1 X0 X2 X3
Single-phase pole mounted transformers are often connected and labeled H1 and H2 on the
primary and X1, X2 (center tap), and X3.
Figure 7: Single-Phase Transformer Connection
54
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Motor Circuit Analysis Basics
Motor Circuit Analysis is the art of troubleshooting and pinpointing faults within an inductive or
capacitive circuit by using readings of resistance, impedance, inductance, phase angle, insulation
resistance and I/F. The ALL-TEST™ static MCA instrument puts out a low voltage, 100 to 800
Hz signal, as a true sine-wave which it then evaluates the response using a series of bridges. These
readings relate as follow:
1. Resistance (Ohms): The simple DC resistance of the circuit.

2. Inductance (Henries): The magnetic strength of a coil.
3. Capacitance (Farads): Measurement of leakage.
4. Inductive Reactance (XL): The AC resistance of a coil. XL = 2πfL
5. Capacitive Reactance (XC): XC = 1/(2πfC)
6. Phase Angle (Fi, degrees): The angle of the lag of current to voltage.
7. Impedance (Z): The complex resistance of an AC circuit. Z = R 2 + ( X L − X C ) 2
8. Current/Frequency Response (I/F): Percentage change in current when the frequency is
doubled by the instrument, as I = V / Z.
9. Insulation Resistance (Meg-Ohms): Measurement of leakage to ground, ground-wall
insulation strength.
When taken as a group, these readings can assist the analyst in determining, first, if a fault exists,
then the type of fault. Using the ATIV, these readings can be taken in less than 5 minutes per
transformer. The key to MCA testing is to compare readings between similar windings or
transformers and to look at the variations and patterns between phases.
Figure 8: Motor Circuit Analysis Instrument
55
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Transformer Field Test
The initial set of tests were performed using the same type of procedure that would be used on an
electric motor, first for the primary windings, then for the secondary windings. Table 1 represents
a sample of one of 30 transformers that were tested over a period of 90 minutes.
Table 1: Initial Transformer Test Data: 2500 kVA Transformer
Primary Secondary
H1-H2 H1-H3 H2-H3 X1-X2 X1-X3 X2-X3
Resistance 258.5 48.45 153.3 0.198 0.125 0.132
Impedance 15633 11028 11035 566 411 420
Inductance 24878 17552 17562 902 655 669
I/F -50 -23 -18 -44 -46 -44
Phase 9 90 90 90 85 90
Angle
Meg-Ohm >99 >99
An issue that became immediately apparent was the unusual and extremely unbalanced readings.
All of the tests identified similar results and it was also noticed that resistance varied from test to
test and that the impedance and inductance changed from test to test. Upon evaluation of these
phenomena, two theories were developed:
1. The sinusoidal voltage output of the ALL-TEST was inducing into the opposite set of
windings resulting in reflected impedance and inductances that would increase during
each test because of a resulting static charge.
2. Electro-Magnetic Interference (EMI) from surrounding operating equipment,
transformers, lighting, etc. would cause stray currents because the transformer windings
and core would act as an excellent EMI antennae. This scenario would explain varying
resistances from test to test.
To resolve both issues, the connections on the side opposite of the side being tested should be
grounded to a proper earth ground. The result was predicted to shunt all induced currents direct
to ground resulting in the ability to fully test just the winding being tested. This would also allow
for tighter testing tolerances. The results are found in Table 2 and test time remained under 5
minutes per transformer.
56
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 2: Final Transformer Test Data: 2500 kVA Transformer
Primary Secondary
H1-H2 H1-H3 H2-H3 X1-X2 X1-X3 X2-X3
Resistance 3.703 3.623 3.648 0.103 0.100 0.096
Impedance 220 217 218 15 14 14
Inductance 87 86 86 2 2 2
I/F -49 -49 -49 -48 -48 -49
Phase 88 88 88 75 75 75
Angle
Meg-Ohm >99 >99
These results were found to be repeatable in all cases. Transformers that tested bad tended to
have drastic variations in readings.
Table 3: Shorted Transformer
Primary Secondary
H1-H2 H1-H3 H2-H3 X1-X2 X1-X3 X2-X3
Resistance 116.1 98.2 48.5 0 0.005 0.005
Impedance 4972 1427 2237 0 1 1
Inductance 7911 2267 2237 0 0 0
I/F -33 -29 -29 0 -20 -20
Phase 23 21 20 0 5 5
Angle
Meg-Ohm 9.132 0
It was found that the 500 kVA transformer had a shorted primary with damage between the
primary and secondary windings.
57
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Transformer Testing Procedure
Figure 9: Transformer Test
The results of the study produced simple test procedures for both three phase pad and single
phase pole mounted transformers. The key to testing any type of transformer is to ground all of
the leads on all of the connections of the winding opposite of the winding being tested.
A good transformer should have unbalances less than:
1. Resistance: No more than 5% unbalance above 0.250 Ohms and 7.5% below 0.250
Ohms.
2. Impedance: < 2% unbalance
3. Inductance: < 5% unbalance
4. Phase Angle: No more than 1 degree between phases
5. I/F: No more than 2 digits difference and the readings should fall between –15 and –50.
6. A “shift” in readings should be flagged for further testing or trending. For instance, a
winding that tests as I/F: -48; -48; -46 and Phase Angle: 70o; 70o; 69o, should be checked
further.
Normally, a winding is beginning to experience inter-turn shorts when the Phase Angle and I/F
begin to shift. A corresponding unbalance in inductance and impedance indicates a severe fault.
A change in Phase Angle with a fairly balanced I/F normally indicate a phase short.
58
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The basic steps for three phase transformer testing are as follow:
1. All of the leads on the side opposite of the side being tested must be grounded to an earth
ground.
2. Test the primary from H1 to H2, then “retest” to verify that the readings are repeatable.
If they are not repeatable, check the ground and continue.
3. Test from H1 to H3, then H2 to H3, and, finally a ground insulation test.
4. Save the readings and check condition.
5. Test the secondary winding by first checking X1 to X2, then “retest” to verify that the
readings are repeatable. If they are not repeatable, check the ground and continue.
6. Test from X1 to X3, then X2 to X3, and, finally, a ground insulation test.
7. Save the readings and check condition.
Single-phase transformers are tested slightly differently and require a known reading for the
primary to be compared to, such as with a similar transformer or a past test on the same
transformer. The basic steps for single phase transformer testing are as follow:
1. All of the leads on the side opposite of the side being tested must be grounded to an earth
ground.
2. Test the primary from H1 to H2, then “retest” to verify that the readings are repeatable.
If they are not repeatable, check the ground and “retest.”
3. Ground the primary then test X1 to X2, then “retest” to verify that the readings are
repeatable. If they are not, then check the ground and “retest.”
4. Test from X2 to X3, then save readings. Compare the second and third reading to each
other and the first reading to a standard.
These procedures can be used on three phase pad mount and single phase pole mount
transformers regardless of connection type.
Conclusion:
Static Motor Circuit Analysis techniques provide an excellent method for analyzing the primary
and secondary windings of either three-phase pad and single-phase pole mounted transformers.
A simple procedure incorporating grounding the side opposite of the side being tested allow for
very accurate test results. Measurements of resistance, impedance, inductance, phase angle,
current response and insulation resistance can be compared for troubleshooting purposes and
measurement patterns for pinpointing faults.
Test equipment required for MCA testing transformers must have the following capabilities:
1. Resistance, impedance, inductance, phase angle, I/F and insulation resistance in
engineering units.
2. Sine-wave voltage output in a variety of frequencies.
3. Onboard memory with software to upload and download readings.
4. Cost effective and accurate.
The procedures described require about five minutes per transformer with a greater than 99% test
result accuracy.
59
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Bibliography
Sarma, Mulukutla S., Electric Machines: Steady-State Theory and DynamicPerformance,

PWS Publishing Company, 1994.
Nasar, Syed A., Theory and Problems of Electric Machines and Electromechanics,
Schaum’s Outline Series, 1981.
Edminster, Joseph, et.al., Electric Circuits Third Edition, Schaums Electronic Tutor,
1997.
Hammond, et.al., Engineering Electromagnetism, Physical Processes and Computation,

Oxford Science Publications, 1994.
US Department of Energy, et.al., Keeping the Spark in Your Electrical System, US DOE,
October, 1995.
Penrose, Howard W. Ph.D, “Static Motor Circuit Analysis: An Introduction to Theory and
Application” IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, July/August 2000, p. 6.
60
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 5: Synchronous Machine Testing With All-Test

Instrumentation
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE TESTING WITH ALL-TEST INSTRUMENTATION
Dr. Howard W. Penrose, Ph.D.

Introduction
In order to further understand the application of motor circuit testing and analysis on
synchronous electric motors (synchronous machines), it is important to have a brief
overview of the operation of a synchronous motor, most common faults, common test
methods, how the ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 works with large synchronous motors, basic
steps for analysis of synchronous stators and rotors, and, expected test results. In this paper,
we will discuss these various aspects, referencing other materials for additional details.
About Synchronous Machines
Large synchronous motors have two basic functions:
Ø The first is to improve the electrical power factor in a plant. In any plant with large
inductive loads, such as motors and transformers, current begins to lag behind
voltage (poor power factor). When this becomes severe enough, the plant requires
significantly larger amounts of current to perform the same amount of work. This
can cause voltage sag and overheating of electrical components. A synchronous
motor can be used in such a way as to cause little to no impact on power factor, or
can be used to cause current to lead voltage to correct power factor problems.
Ø The second method of operation is to absorb pulsating loads, such as reciprocating
compressors. Once a synchronous motor has achieved synchronous speed, it has
coils which ‘lock’ in step with the electric motor’s rotating magnetic fields from the
stator. If a torque pulse occurs (such as at the top of a reciprocating compressor
stroke), the motor may come out of synch with the rotating fields. When this
occurs, a special winding on the rotor called an amortisseur winding (see
synchronous construction below) absorbs the energy from the torque pulse, keeping
the rotor in synch.
The basic construction of a synchronous motor is straight forward. There are three sets of
windings, a stator, a rotor, bearings, and either a generator (brushless) or a ‘static exciter’
(brush-type). The windings consist of: A standard three phase winding, very similar to a
standard induction electric motor; A set of field coils, which are DC coils made of round
wire for small machines and rectangular or ribbon wire on larger machines; And an
amortisseur winding, which is similar to an induction motor rotor squirrel cage.
61
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The starting methods for both the brush-type and brushless synchronous motors are similar.
The starting circuit will be different for both. Following is a description of the basic mode
of operation, followed by a brief description of the differences:
During the starting phase of a synchronous motor, it acts much the same as a standard
induction motor. The stator receives an electrical current and a rotating magnetic field is
developed (the speed = (120 * applied frequency) / # of poles). This field generates a
current in the amortisseur winding, which is used to develop starting torque by generating its
own magnetic field which interacts with the stator magnetic field in the air gap and causes
the rotor to follow the stator magnetic fields. As the rotor starts to catch up to the stator
fields, DC current is injected into the rotor field coils, creating north and south magnetic
pairs (rotor coils are always found in pairs). These lock in step with the stator magnetic
fields and follow at the same speed as the stator fields, whereas a standard induction motor
always lags behind.
In a brush machine, the DC source for the rotor fields usually comes from a ‘static’
(electronic) starter, which converts a supplied AC power to DC. In most cases, the output
DC is varied through the starting cycle. The drive may also be set up to short out the field
coils of the machine to avoid rotor saturation and the resulting extremely high currents on
the stator. Once the rotor begins to turn, DC is supplied to assist the motor in developing
torque. The DC voltage is supplied through a pair of slip rings and brushes.
In a brushless machine, a DC generator is installed directly on the shaft of the synchronous

motor. As the synchronous motor starts, the generator provides very little DC through its
commutator. As the speed increases, the DC voltage also increases, helping the motor
generate torque then lock in step at synchronous speed. In this type of machine, the
generator is wired directly to the rotor fields.
There are also machines that have a generator mounted on the shaft of the rotor that feeds a
separate control. This is used to first short the windings and then control the amount of DC
fed to the rotor, just as the brush machine.
Most Common Synchronous Motor Faults

Large synchronous motors tend to be well built and sturdy. They are often overbuilt with
material to withstand the severe loads that are applied. The most common failures for industrial
synchronous machines, in order, are:
Ø Bearings due to general wear and contamination

Ø Rotor fields – due to high temperatures, these will often burn up from the inside out
Ø Amortisseur windings – mostly in reciprocating loads. Because of the amount of
energy absorbed, the winding bars will often crack. In particular if the rotor fields
are beginning to fail and short, making it easier for the rotor to fall out of ‘synch.’
62
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Ø Stator windings – general wear and contamination. Stator windings in synchronous

machines tend to be ‘form wound’ and heavily insulated.
Almost all of the winding faults that occur in a synchronous motor start between conductors
in the rotor or stator coils.
Common Test Methods, Strengths and

Weaknesses
Following are the traditional test methods for evaluating the condition of a synchronous
motor:
Ø Insulation resistance testing: Using applied DC voltages as specified by IEEE 43-

2000, a potential is placed between the stator windings and ground. This measures
only direct faults between the stator windings and the stator frame. Is also
performed through the slip rings on a brush type machine.
Ø Polarization Index: Is a 10 minute to 1 minute ratio of insulation resistance. This has
been traditionally used as a method to gage the condition of the insulation between
the stator windings and frame. As with insulation resistance testing, this can also be
performed through the slip rings on a brush type machine. As stated in IEEE 43-
2000, this test method is only truly valid on pre-1970 insulation systems.
Ø High Potential testing: Most common on large machines is DC high potential testing
which is performed at a value of twice the motor nameplate voltage plus 1000 volts,
times the square root of 3. On an existing insulation system, this value is often
reduced to 75% of the potential voltage. This test highly stresses the insulation
system and is potentially damaging (per IEEE Std’s 388 and 389). This type of test
should NEVER be applied to the rotor windings of a synchronous motor.
Ø Surge Comparison testing: Evaluates the turn to turn condition of the stator only by
comparing the waveforms of two windings when a fast rise time pulse of twice the
voltage plus 1000 volts. If there are correctable issues, such as contaminated
windings, this test may damage the motor windings.
Ø Partial Discharge testing: Is a non-destructive test method that measures radio
frequencies from discharges in voids within the insulation system of the motor
windings. This is effective for trending on machines that are over 6.6 kV and only
provide a brief warning from 4 kV. It does not detect any rotor faults.
Ø Motor Current Signature Analysis: Was designed for rotor testing of induction
motors.
Ø Voltage Drop Test: Requires that the motor is disassembled. A 115 AC voltage is
applied to the rotor windings and the voltage drop is measured with a volt meter
across each coil. If there is a short, the voltage drop will vary more than 3%.
The above list does not include equipment for mechanical testing of synchronous motors.
63
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
About the ALL-TEST™
The ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 is a simple electronic instrument that performs in much the
same manner as a multi-meter, except that it provides a series of readings that cover the AC
parameters of the motor circuit. It is a data collector and tester that sends a low voltage DC
signal for simple resistance testing, in the same manner as a milli-Ohm meter, and a low
voltage, high frequency AC signal for AC readings. The instrument then uses a series of
balanced electrical bridges to provide test results in engineering units of resistance,
impedance, inductance, phase angle, current/frequency response and an insulation resistance
test to ground.
The primary differences between electronic testing of power equipment versus traditional
power methods are:
Ø A more complete view of the motor circuit, including influences from changes in the
condition of rotor field coil insulation.
Ø One instrument for a large range of equipment size. The test is limited only to the
simple resistance range of the instrument (0.001 Ohm to 999 Ohms).
Ø Non-destructive – no harmful voltage is applied.
Ø Easier data interpretation – A few simple rules for data interpretation (See data
interpretation below).
Ø Hand held vs equipment that may weigh from 40 to well over 100 lbs.
Ø Internal power source for the instrument.
The ALL-TEST IV PRO™ is literally looking for changes to the electro-chemical makeup of
the materials of the insulation system as well as direct break-downs of the insulation, such as
cracks and damage. As an insulation system ages, or if the insulation system is contaminated
and it is effecting the integrity of the insulation, the electrical circuit of the motor changes.
Because the rotor is an integral part of the circuit, changes to the electrical integrity of the
rotor circuit and insulation system are directly reflected through the stator windings, as well.
This allows both immediate troubleshooting and long-term trending of the motor.
Unique test information allows the ALL-TEST™ to view enough parameters of the
insulation system to detect and isolate:
Ø Shorted stator windings
Ø Shorted rotor fields
Ø Broken amortisseur winding bars
Ø Air gap eccentricity
Ø Winding contamination (rotor and stator)
Ø Ground insulation faults
For further details on how these tests are performed and detected, see “Guideline for
Electronic Static Winding Circuit Analysis of Rotating Machinery and Transformers.”
64
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Basic Steps for the Analysis of Synchronous

Machines with ALL-TEST™
The steps for testing synchronous machines are similar to those for evaluating the condition
of standard induction motors. However, because there are field coils on the motor rotor, a
few additional steps are involved when troubleshooting a fault.
When testing a synchronous machine from the motor control center or starter:
Ø De-energize the equipment. Ensure that secondary sources of power are also de-
energized.
Ø Perform the standard ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 tests on the stator following the
menu prompts on the instrument.
Ø Evaluate the test results (See Expected Test Results)
Ø If a fault is indicated, begin troubleshooting:
o Adjust the position of the rotor, as much as possible, up to 45 degrees (any
movement will do if the rotor is difficult to turn, but no less than 5 degrees)
o Re-perform the tests and review the readings. If the fault has shifted, or
changed by more than a digit, then the fault most likely is located in the
rotor.
o If the fault remains stationary (does not change with rotor position), then
disconnect the leads at the motor terminal box and retest. If a fault is still
indicated, it is most likely in the stator, if not, it is most likely in the cable.
The average test time, other than troubleshooting, is approximately 3-5 minutes.
When testing a disassembled synchronous machine, it is important to remember that the

readings will be very different without the rotor in place:
Ø Perform the ALL-TEST IV PRO™ Auto test on the stator and evaluate the test
results. This will provide an immediate indication of any faults.
Ø For the rotor test:
o Perform the Auto test and compare to a past reading; or,
o Perform the Auto test and compare to an ‘identical’ rotor; or,
o Perform the Auto test across each field coil instead of a voltage drop test.
o All parameters for all three should meet the evaluation limits.
Because of the style of testing, these results can be trended and compared between like
machines.
Other applications for motor circuit testing include evaluation and acceptance, and predictive
maintenance.
65
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Expected Test Results
As mentioned in the last section of this paper, the test results are similar to those found in three
phase induction machines. Fault patterns are very straight-forward and apply regardless of
equipment size, within the test range of the ALL-TEST™. Following is a brief overview of the
test measurements and their results for basic troubleshooting:
Ø Simple resistance measurements: Are an indicator of high resistance connections, loose

connections or broken conductors in the circuit. This test is important, especially if the
resistance problem is in one spot as, based upon I2R, a resistive spot will put out a great
deal of heat energy (in Watts). For instance, a 0.5 Ohm resistance across a point in a
circuit that is seeing 100 Amps would give off: (100Amps2)(0.5 Ohms) = 5,000 Watts
(5kW) worth of energy. This is about the same energy used to turn 6 horsepower worth
of electric motor.
Ø Inductance measurement: Is an indicator of magnetic strength of a coil and the influence
of other coils on one coil. It is impacted by the number of turns in a circuit, the
dimensions of the coils and the inductance of other coils. This measurement, by itself, is
only a good indicator of the condition of the amortisseur winding and rotor eccentricity.
Inductance will only show a shorted winding if it is severe.
Ø Impedance measurement: Is the measurement of the complex resistance in the circuit. It
can be used, much like inductance, for checking the amortisseur winding and rotor
condition. However, when used along with inductance, it can be used to detect
overheated windings and winding contamination quickly. By viewing the relationship of
inductance and impedance between each phase: If the inductance and impedance are
relatively parallel, then any inductive and impedance unbalance is in the relationship
between the rotor and stator (rotor position); If they are not parallel, this is an indication
of an insulation problem such as insulation breakdown or winding contamination.
Ø Phase angle and I/F (Current/Frequency): Are both indicators of insulation faults
between turns in the stator or rotor.
Ø Insulation Resistance: Evaluates the insulation to ground and will only indicated when the
insulation has failed.
Ø
The test limit recommendations, as outlined in the “Guideline for Electronic Static Winding
Circuit Analysis of Rotating Machinery and Transformers,” are as follow:
66
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 1: Test Limits (peak to peak values)
Measurement Limits
Resistance 5%
Impedance ~ 5%*
Inductance ~15%*
Phase Angle +/- 1
I/F +/- 2
Insulation Resistance > 100 M-Ohms
*Can exceed this value if measurements are parallel.
Following is an overview of the troubleshooting rules:
Ø Shorted Windings:
o Shorted windings can be evaluated by viewing the phase angle and I/F readings
from the instrument on similar coils or between phases:
o Phase Angle (Fi) – The phase angle should be within 1 digit of the average
reading. For instance, a reading of 77/75/76 would be good because the average
reading is 76. A reading of 74/77/77 would be bad.
o Current Frequency Response (I/F) – The current frequency response should be
within 2 digits of the average reading. For instance, a reading of –44/-45/-46
would be good. A reading of -40/-44/-44 would be bad. However, a reading
such as -42/-44/-44 should be considered suspect.
Ø Winding Contamination and Rotor Position
o The position of the rotor within the electric motor may cause a natural phase
unbalance. Winding contamination will also cause phase unbalances. The
difference between the two can be evaluated quickly by looking at the pattern of
impedance and inductance.
o Rotor Position – Rotor position unbalances can be evaluated by looking to see if
the inductance and impedance values are fairly balanced. For instance, if there
are inductances of 17/18/19 and impedances of values 24/26/29, then the
unbalance is due to rotor position. This may also be the case if the inductances
are 5/5/5 and the impedances are 8/9/8.
67
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
o Winding Contamination – Can also be found as overheated (burned) windings.

These conditions are the result of changes to the insulation due to breakdown of
the insulation system. The faults show as a change of impedance and the
relationship between impedance and inductance result in un-parallel readings.
For instance, if there are inductances of 10/11/12 and the impedance has values
of 16/14/13, then they are not parallel and the most likely fault is in the windings
as contamination or overheated insulation.
Conclusion
Through a set of simple rules and instructions, the ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 provides an
excellent tool for troubleshooting and trending the condition of synchronous machines. The test
is performed using simple, non-destructive test measurements that allow for a more complete
view of the motor stator and rotor circuit than any other test. Test evaluation is simple and direct,
regardless of equipment size or type.
Bibliography
Ø Guideline for Electronic Static Winding Circuit Analysis of Rotating Machinery and
Transformers, BJM Corp, ALL-TEST Division, 2001.
Ø Penrose, Howard W. Motor Circuit Analysis: Theory, Application and Energy Analysis,
SUCCESS by DESIGN, 2001.
68
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 6: Servo Motor Testing, Evaluating Servo

Motors with MCA
Servo Motor Testing, Evaluating Servo Motors with MCA
In the case of both the ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000™ and the ALL-TEST PRO 31™, the key
test results used to determine the condition of the windings are the phase angle (Fi) and
current/frequency (I/F) tests. The Fi performs a timed measurement between the peak of
the AC voltage sine wave provided by the instrument and the peak current sine wave that
results. This is displayed in degrees. The tolerance for a standard electric motor, with the
rotor in place, is +/- 1 degree from the average of the three readings. The I/F involves
taking a measurement of the AC current at the supplied voltage and frequency of the
instrument, then doubling just the frequency and taking a second current measurement. The
result is shown as a percentage reduction in current, which normally falls within a range of -
15% to -50%. The tolerance for a standard electric motor, with the rotor in place, is +/- 2
digits from the average of the three readings.
The difference between many servo motors (including brushless DC) and a standard AC
motor is that most have a permanent magnet rotor. The permanent magnet interferes with
the balanced three phase winding, resulting in a repeatable, but significantly different I/F
and/or Fi result between phases. When this occurs, there are three ways to determine if the
servo is good or bad:
1. Trend: Trend the difference between the highest and lowest of each test result. The
values should not deviate by more than a digit between trended tests. Monitor the
impedance result, a sudden drop in impedance will indicate that there is an increase in
contamination, the windings are burning up (overheated) or the rotor magnets are
weakening.
2. Compare: Compare two of the same type and model servo motors. There should not be
more than a one digit deviation in either test result.
3. Rotor Compensation: Using the ALL-TEST PRO 31, which provides real-time test
results, turn the shaft of the servo until you obtain the highest impedance reading. Take
your tests. Move to the next phase, then turn the shaft until you obtain the highest
impedance reading. Take your tests. Repeat for the third phase. The result can then be
treated as a regular three phase motor (Fi +/-1; I/F +/-2).
Using either the ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000 or ALL-TEST PRO 31, you can confirm
whether a problem is related to the rotor or the stator by moving the rotor position and re-
testing. If the Fi or I/F pattern remains similar, then the problem is in the stator (for
example: if the lowest Fi result remains in phase A, then the problem is in the winding).
69
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 7: Electrical Diagnostics for Generators

ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
Introduction
Electrical Motor Diagnostics (EMD) is a term for test methods and instruments designed for
rotating and coil-wound machinery electrical and mechanical analysis. These instruments are
used for all motor system related analysis from the generator and prime mover, through the
transmission and distribution system, to the electric motor and driven load. These
technologies, for the purpose of this paper, will include Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA), a de-
energized test method, and Electrical Signature Analysis (ESA), a more advanced method of
Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA).
In this paper, we will discuss the concepts behind the testing and analysis of both salient and
turbine generators to detect some common generator faults. These faults include bearings,
winding shorts in the rotor and stator, insulation to ground faults in the rotor and stator,
exciter faults, misalignment and rotating field eccentricity.
Motor Circuit Analysis
MCA is a low voltage method for testing electric machinery cables, connections, windings
and rotor for developing faults. The technique involves individual readings of DC
Resistance (R), Impedance (Z), Inductance (L), Phase Angle (Fi), Current/Frequency
Response (I/F) and insulation to ground (MegOhm) testing. Resistance is used for detecting
loose connections and broken conductors, insulation to ground is used for detecting ground
faults, Z and L are matched to evaluate the insulation condition for winding contamination,
and, Fi and I/F are used to detect winding shorts. One of the key aspects of MCA is the
ability to detect early winding defects that can be trended over time and a time to failure can
be estimated.
As a vast majority of the rotating machinery, that MCA is used to evaluate, requires balanced
phases, pass fail criteria for individual readings can be developed for both assembled and
disassembled machines (Reference Tables 1 and 2). These values indicate a guideline and
values outside of these guides normally identify component failures that have occurred, or
are developing. These developing issues can be compared against Attachment 1 of this
paper.
In addition to the power of detecting a motor system defect, the values are trend able
without the requirement of temperature adjustments for a majority of faults. This allows for
70
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
the ability to evaluate condition and provide estimates for time to failure by monitoring
changes to the phase to phase unbalances over time.
Table 1: Pass/Fail Considerations for Assembled Machines

1
Resistance (R) <5% Used for detecting loose connections, broken
wires, direct shorts and diff wire sizes
Impedance (Z) and Similar Patterns2 Changes to impedance that cause its phase to
Inductance (L) phase pattern to appear different from
inductance are normally the result in the
change to the material condition of the
insulation system. Used for detecting winding
contamination, burned windings (overheated),
very large phase unbalances or very poor rotor
bar condition.
Phase Angle (Fi) +/- 1 digit from Indicates a winding short: 74, 75, 76 OK; 74,
average 74, 76 suspect; 73, 73, 76 failed
I/F +/- 2 digits from Indicates a winding short: -44, -45, -46 OK; -
average 44, -46, -46 suspect; -42, -45, -45 failed
Insulation Resistance >5 MegOhm3 Indicates poor insulation to ground (i.e.:
4
(MegOhm) >100 MegOhm ground fault)
When a motor does not have a rotor in place, such as in a motor repair shop with a stator
only, the tolerances change:
Table 2: Pass/Fail Criteria for Disassembled Machines

Test Result Tolerance
Resistance (R) <5%
Impedance (Z) <3%
Inductance (Z) <5%
Phase Angle (Fi) +/- 0
I/F +/- 0
Insulation Resistance (MegOhm) > 5 MegOhms3 / > 100 MegOhms4
1Above 0.250 Ohms. Otherwise look for significant differences such as 0.080 Ohms, 0.082 Ohms and 0.400
Ohms would indicate a problem.
2A motor with an inductance of 10, 11, 12 (Low reading, medium reading, high reading) should have a similar
pattern of impedance, such as 20, 23, 25 (Low, medium and high). If they are not similar, for instance if
impedance showed as 20, 15, 19 (high, low, medium), on the same motor, a fault has been detected.
3 For motors with a voltage rating less than 600 Volts
4 For motors with a voltage rating greater than 600 Volts
71
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
For trending and analysis purposes, MCA is a comparative tool using percent unbalance and
difference between tests methods. In the percent unbalance method, the difference between
like coils (i.e.: between phases in a three phase motor) is trended over time. This method is
best for resistance, impedance and inductance. While resistance values are impacted by
temperature, for instance, the relative difference between phases is not. By using the percent
unbalance method, the user or software do not have to rely upon performing temperature
correction calculations. Impedance and inductance are not significantly impacted by
temperature. Therefore, the unbalance method is the most convenient way of detecting
faults over time. The difference between tests method is used for phase angle and I/F in
which the lowest value for each is subtracted from the highest value for each.
Table 3: Reading Change Table for AC Rotating Equipment

Reading Change From Baseline Severity
R, Z, L < 3% Green
R, Z, L >3% and <5% Yellow
R, Z, L > 5% Red
Fi and I/F <1pt Green
Fi and I/F >1pt and <3pt Yellow
Fi and I/F >3pt Rd
Electrical Signature Analysis
Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) refers to the evaluation of current waveforms
only, including the demodulation of the current waveform and FFT analysis. Electrical
Signature Analysis (ESA) is the term used for the evaluation of the voltage and current
waveforms. This provides an increased advantage to diagnostics as power-related, motor-
related and load-related signals can be quickly compared. A key consideration when using
ESA is that voltage signatures relate to the upstream of the circuit being tested (towards
power generation) and current signatures relate to the downstream of the circuit being tested
(towards the motor and load).
ESA uses the machine being tested as a transducer, allowing the user to evaluate the
electrical and mechanical condition from the control or switchgear. For accurate analysis,
ESA systems rely upon FFT analysis, much the same as vibration analysis.
72
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 4: Rotor Analysis

Condition dB Rotor Condition Action
Value
1 >60 Excellent None
2 54-60 Good None
3 48-54 Moderate Trend
4 42-48 Rotor Fracture or High Resistance Joint Increase Test Intervals
and Trend
5 36-42 Two or more bars cracked or broken Confirm with motor
circuit analysis
6 30-36 Multiple cracked or broken bars and end Overhaul
ring problems
7 <30 Multiple broken rotor bars and other severe Overhaul or Replace
rotor problems
Table 5: Signature Multipliers

Type of Fault Pattern (CF = Center Frequency)
Stator Mechanical (i.e.: loose coils, stator CF = RS x Stator Slots
core movement, etc.) Line Frequency Sidebands
Stator Shorts (shorted windings) CF = RS x Stator Slots
Line Frequency sidebands with Running
Speed sidebands
Rotor Indicator CF = RS x Rotor Bars
Line Frequency sidebands
Static Eccentricity CF = RS x Rotor Bars
Line Frequency and twice Line Frequency
sidebands.
Dynamic Eccentricity CF = RS x Rotor Bars
with Running Speed sidebands
Mechanical Unbalance (and Misalignment) CF = RS x Rotor Bars
Line Frequency Sidebands, Space of four
times Line Frequency then two Line
Frequency peaks
Where RS = Running Speed
The pass/fail values of the signatures identified in Table 5 are presently based upon the
experience of the user. In the case of motor (downstream) analysis, these values relate to
current and for generator (upstream) analysis, these values relate to voltage.
The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of both current and voltage signatures are normally
calculated in dB instead of linear scale. Analysis of the differences in peaks is determined by
comparing the dB value measured down from either the peak current or peak voltage value.
73
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The Combined Use of MCA and ESA
MCA requires that the equipment is de-energized while ESA requires that the equipment is
energized. These differences offer the user specific analysis strengths for each technology
that support each other.
In the case of MCA, it has specific strengths in the areas of:
Control and other connections

Cable insulation system health to ground and between phases
Stator winding health to ground and between phases and conductors
Air gap issues between the stator and rotating assembly
Rotor winding health: wound, induction or synchronous
This includes the ability to provide early failure detection of insulation degradation.
ESA has specific strengths in the areas of:
Power quality
Severe insulation breakdown
Loose or open coils or stator
Loose or open rotor or rotor coils
Loose connections
Air gap problems, including static and dynamic eccentricity
Bearings and mechanical condition, including alignment
Attached mechanical systems
When used in combination, the technologies provide some overlapping capabilities, but
specifically they provide a complete overview of the system being evaluated, with a high
degree of accuracy.
Basic Generators
There are two basic types of generator systems. These include turbo-synchronous machines
and salient-pole synchronous machines. There are a large variety and variation of each type,
so we will cover the basic assembly of both in this paper.
The turbo-synchronous machine is most commonly used in high-speed generators (two and
four pole) used for high voltage power generation. The general assembly resembles a three
phase induction motor with the following specifics:
The stator (armature) resembles a three phase motor winding. The DC fields of the turbine
rotor cut through the conductors and generate power which is supplied to the distribution
system from this component.
The turbine rotor (fields) resembles the squirrel-cage rotor of an induction machine. This
component carries the DC power from the exciter and is driven by a prime mover such as a
jet engine or steam turbine. It tends to be long and narrow for horizontal machines.
74
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The exciter can be separate from the machine, in which brushes supply power to the rotor,
or brushless, in which a small DC generator is mounted directly to the turbine rotor shaft.
The exciter provides DC power to the turbine rotor.
The salient-pole machine is one of the more common smaller, low voltage, low-speed (1800
RPM or less, 4-pole) generation systems. The distinction is that the rotor contains a series of
individual wound-coils which also contain an amortissieur winding, in most cases.
The stator (armature) resembles a three phase motor winding. The DC fields of the salient-
pole rotor cut through the conductors and generate power which is supplied to the
distribution system from this component.
The salient rotor (fields) incorporate an even number of pole pieces that radiate out from the
rotor shaft. These poles carry the DC current that generates the rotating DC fields.
The exciter can be separate from the machine, in which brushes supply power to the rotor,
or brushless, in which a small DC generator is mounted directly to the rotor shaft. The
exciter provides DC power to the rotor.
Both machines can be evaluated in the same way that you would evaluate electric motors of
similar design. In the case of ESA, you would evaluate the signatures using voltage spectra
versus current spectra.
Conclusion
Energized testing of generators requires the ability to view the voltage signature of the
generator and this requires equipment that can perform Electrical Signature Analysis, not
just Motor Current Signature Analysis. The purpose of this first paper has been to provide a
review of MCA and ESA, as well as a discussion of the construction of turbine and salient
generators. The general analysis of generators is performed in a similar manner of any other
AC machine.
75
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Bibliography
Penrose, Howard W. Ph.D., “Electric Motor Diagnostics,” MARTS 2004 Proceedings, May,
2004
Penrose, Howard W. Ph.D., “Practical Motor Current Signature Analysis: Taking the
Mystery Out of MCSA,” ReliabilityWeb.com, December, 2003
Penrose, Howard W. Ph.D., “Estimating Electric Motor Life Using Motor Circuit Analysis,”
2003 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference Proceedings, 2003
Penrose, Howard W. Ph.D., Motor Circuit Analysis: Theory, Application and Energy
Analysis, SUCCESS by DESIGN Publishing, 2001
Sarma, Mulukutla S., Electric Machines: Steady-State Theory and Dynamic Performance,
PWS Publishing Company, 1996.
76
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Electrical Motor Diagnostics for Generators

Part 2 – Case Studies
ALL-TEST Pro, A Division of BJM Corp
Introduction
In Part 1 of this 3 Part series, the basic principles of Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA) and
Electrical Signature Analysis (ESA), and how they relate to turbine and salient-pole
generators was discussed. In Part 2, we shall discuss case studies related to marine
generators and wind turbine generators. These cases shall discuss both generators in poor
condition and in good condition. Following Part 2, Part 3 shall discuss the details of how
these analysis were performed, including how condemning criteria was formulated.
Case #1: Marine Salient-Pole Generator, Insulation Failure
A marine generator on board a military vessel was experiencing increasing over-air-

temperature faults during operation. These occurred within 24 hours of operation and
gradually worked towards occurring every 6 hours of operation during the course of eight
months. The engine and cooling temperatures were evaluated and found to be operating
satisfactorily.
Figure 1: Generator
The generator had been installed on the vessel following eighteen years of storage in an
uncontrolled environment. It was determined that Electrical Motor Diagnostics (EMD)
would be used to evaluate the condition of the system.
Figure 2: Switchgear Test Points
77
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Testing was performed at the switchgear using MCA. The first set of data identified a
problem in the circuit (Table 1). A second set of tests were performed in the connection
box at the generator (Table 2) which identified both a winding short and poor insulation
condition (unmatched Z and L).
Table 1: MCA Test at Switchgear

T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
Resistance 0.0208 0.0189 0.0373
Impedance 1 1 1
Inductance 0 0 0
Fi 22 21 20
I/F -28 -30 -35
Insulation 750 MegOhm
Table 2: MCA at Generator
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3

Resistance 0.0445 0.0348 0.0542
Impedance 1.60 1.64 1.63
Inductance 0.317 0.320 0.323
Fi 20 20 20
I/F -33 -35 -36
As it requires removal of the generator through a hole in the hull of the ship, additional
testing was performed using ESA over a period of 30 minutes.
78
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Figure 3: ESA at ‘0’ Minutes
79
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
At the end of the ESA test period, another set of MCA data was performed while the
generator was warm (Table 3).
Table 3: MCA after ESA Test
T1-
T1-T2 T3 T2-T3
Resistance 0.1514 0.116 0.0828
Impedance 1 1 1
Inductance 0 0 0
Fi 20 20 20
I/F -31 -33 -35
The reduction in insulation resistance from 750 MegOhm to 55 MegOhm indicates a

temperature rise somewhere in the insulation system of approximately 140 C.
The vessel was scheduled for work in three months following these tests, in which the time
included a cruise overseas. The question was whether the generator would be serviceable
during this time. If not, the vessel would be unable to perform its mission.
A review of loads and temperatures were performed along with the data from the EMD
analysis. Based upon historical references and estimated time to failure research, it was
determined that the generator could be operated in parallel with a second generator at 50%
load, or less. Watch standers were given instructions to observe for variations in current
unbalance as an indicator of advanced winding failure. Recommendations were provided to
the vessel’s shore engineering support group for the storage of rotating machines and
generators.
After its mission, the generator was removed for repair (Figure 7) and shipped to the
contracted repair shop.
Figure 7: Generator Removal
80
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Repair requirements included complete rewind of the stator and rotor with approved
overtime in order to meet the vessel’s shipyard schedule. Acceptance inspections were
performed at the repair center’s site under load.
Figure 8: Acceptance ESA Test
Several details on the repair were determined during the inspection:
1. The lead wire was reduced in size. This increases the heat related losses at the leads and
restrict the maximum current capability of the generator.
2. The winding conductors were increased in size. While this allows the generator to
operate slightly cooler, it affects the circuit enough that significant tuning was required to
be able to synchronize the generator.
3. The rotating fields were not rewound as was determined by the ESA analysis. This
results in a reduced reliability in the life of the generator.
Case #2: Marine Salient-Pole Generator, Poor Condition
In this generator, both MCA and ESA were performed as part of a routine maintenance.
Table 4: Case 2 Generator MCA
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3

Resistance 0.8436 0.2588 0.1070
Impedance 1.63 2.10 1.60
Inductance 0.321 0.317 0.322
Fi 19 22 24
I/F -27 -21 -27
Insulation 41.8 MegOhm
81
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The MCA analysis involved positioning the rotor to a set location and performing an
analysis. A loose connection, low insulation to ground, impedance and inductance matching
and questionable winding conditions were determined. However, as will be discussed in Part
3, the Fi and I/F primarily are used as trendable values unless specific procedures are
followed.
Figure 9: Case 2 Generator Voltage Signature
The signature found in Figure 9 indicates a relatively good rotor with the line frequency
sidebands of the number of rotor fields times the line frequency (in this case, 360 Hz +/-
60Hz) with a gradually dampening set of harmonics.
Based upon these findings, coupled with a visual inspection, the generator should be
scheduled for a cleaning. It is expected that the winding conditions (L and Z) will balance
out and the insulation resistance will improve.
82
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Case #3: Wind Turbine Generators, Good
A common issue with wind turbine generators is the passage of grit or dust through the
generator windings causing winding shorts, bearing problems, etc.
Figure 10: Good Readings
In figure 10, the peaks are dominant in current (upper spectra) which is related to the load.
The voltage signatures identify a relatively low level of rotor frequency. This identifies a
good online analysis of this system.
Case #4: Wind Turbine Generators, Loose Coils
Figure 11: Loose Coils
During a routine analysis, a signature was determined as 60Hz sidebands around the running
speed times the number of stator slots of the generator. As identified in Part 1 of this series,
this indicates ‘Stator Mechanical’ which is defined as loose coils or a loose stator. In this
case, it was determined to be, most likely, loose coils.
83
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Conclusion
The electrical motor diagnostics techniques of motor circuit analysis and electrical signature
analysis are uniquely adapted for troubleshooting and trending of developing generator
electrical and mechanical problems. Used together, they can also be used to detect potential
warranty issues in new and repaired machines prior to bringing the generators online.
84
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Electrical Motor Diagnostics for Generators

Part 3 – Analysis
ALL-TEST Pro, A Division of BJM Corp

Introduction
The purpose of this series of white papers has been to discuss the application of Motor
Circuit Analysis (MCA) and Electrical Signature Analysis (ESA) on turbine and salient pole
generators. In Part 1, the discussion related to the use and application of MCA and ESA
and the basic components of both types of generators. Part 2 discussed several case studies
related to the application of electrical motor diagnostics with generators.
In Part 3, we will discuss the full application and analysis of both MCA and ESA on
generator systems. The information can be used for motor diagnostics with the technologies
used individually or combined.
Generator Issues and Potential Failures
One of the more important parts of any type of analysis is an overview of the potential types
of failures for a system, in this case a generic generator, in order to understand what
Electrical Motor Diagnostics (EMD) technologies will detect, and at what stage. We will
have to consider the generator by itself from the coupling to the driver to the cable
connections. This leaves the following components for our review:
• Armature (Stator)
• Air Gap
• Rotor and Rotor Windings
• Shaft and Bearings
• Exciter System
With this, we can perform a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) that will provide us
with the basis for testing. The three basic failures of the system can be identified as:
1. Fails to Produce Power, Overheats or Trips Offline;

2. Fails to Meet Load Requirements; and,
3. Fails to Operate Smoothly
As the failures have been identified, we can now look into failure causes, or, what causes
each of these conditions to exist. We will explore these in Table 1.
85
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Table 1: Failure Causes and CBM Technology

Failure Causes *Condition *Failure
Testing Finding
Fails to produce Grounded winding MCA MCA
power, overheats or
trips offline
Shorted winding MCA MCA, ESA
Open winding MCA, ESA
Bearing defects ESA ESA
Failed exciter ESA
Grounded rotating fields MCA MCA, ESA
Shorted rotating fields MCA MCA, ESA
Open rotating fields MCA, ESA
Fails to meet load Grounded winding MCA MCA
requirements
Exciter failure ESA
Fails to operate Grounded winding MCA MCA
smoothly
Exciter failure ESA
Misalignment ESA MCA, ESA
Rotor eccentricity ESA MCA, ESA
Rotor unbalance ESA ESA
*Condition testing means the technology is capable of significant trending on most
machines, Failure Finding indicates that the technology will normally find the fault following
failure.
Table 2: Detection Capability

Technology Capability
MCA Grounded, Open or Shorted Windings
Grounded, Open or Shorted Rotor Fields
ESA Shorted or Open Windings
Shorted or Open Rotor Fields
Bearing Defects
Failed Exciter
Misalignment
Rotor Eccentricity
Rotor Unbalance
86
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
By understanding the failure modes and effects, the correct selection of EMD technology
can be selected to evaluate the condition of the generator. Once the EMD is selected, data
is collected and analyzed. The remainder of this paper will focus on the analysis of each type
of fault and associated procedures.
The Challenge with MCA on Generators
One of the challenges faced when analyzing assembled generators relates to the position of
the rotating fields with the stator windings and the lead location from which the signal is
generated from the instrument.
Figure 1: Rotor and Stator Relationship

Position Position
2 2
Position Position
1 1
A B C A B C
Winding: Coil Direction of Fields
The rotor windings are spaced across the rotor. When the rotor is in one position, the
relationship of the rotor coils and each of the phases, and relationship of those phases to
each other, can cause a relative unbalance in readings, including phase angle and current
frequency testing. In Figure 1, the relative position of the rotor fields in Position 1 vs.
Position 2 may impact the test results. There are two solutions to this situation: Trending
over time using a specific procedure; or, Rotor compensation testing. By trending over time,
with the rotor in the same position, the values can be tracked over time, allowing for
detection of changes to condition. The rotor compensation test allows for immediate
troubleshooting of winding condition and can also be used for trending.
Trending Procedure
Following is the procedure for trending condition over time. Its advantage is that the rotor
only has to be moved once. Some machines are able to be turned relatively simply; other
machines may have a jacking screw for turning the shaft.
1. Select a position for the shaft and mark it for future reference. The position may be
selected as simply as a shaft key located in the 12 O’clock position.
2. Set up the MCA device per instructions.
87
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
3. Place the black lead on Phase A and the red lead on Phase B and take and save data as
you would for any three phase motor.
4. Move the red lead to Phase C and take and save data.
5. Move the black lead to Phase B and take and save data.
6. Perform the insulation to ground test.
Rotor Compensation Procedure
Using a real-time inductance or impedance meter, such as the ALL-TEST PRO 31™, the
rotor may be compensated for troubleshooting purposes.
1. Set up the MCA device per instructions.

2. Place the black lead on Phase A and the red lead on Phase B and rotate the shaft until
you obtain the lowest possible inductance or impedance reading. Record the data.
3. Move the red lead to Phase C then rotate the shaft until you obtain the lowest possible
inductance or impedance reading. Record the data.
4. Move the black lead to Phase B then rotate the shaft until you obtain the lowest possible
inductance or impedance reading. Record the data.
5. Perform the insulation to ground test.
88
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
MCA Analysis of Generators
When testing a generator that is balanced or the Rotor Compensation Procedure is being
used, the tolerances found in Table 3 can be used to identify that a problem exists. Once a
problem is identified, then the condition will have to be evaluated further, in order to
identify the exact condition.
Table 3: MCA Tolerances – Compensated Rotor Test for Generators

Resistance (R) <5%5 Used for detecting loose connections, broken wires,
direct shorts and different wire sizes.
Impedance (Z) Similar Used for detecting winding contamination, burned
and Inductance Patterns6 windings (overheated), very large phase unbalances or
(L) very poor rotor condition.
Phase Angle (Fi) +/-1 digit Indicates a winding short in the stator or rotor.
from the
average
I/F +/- 2 digits Indicates a winding short in the stator or rotor.
from average
Insulation >5 MegOhm7 Indicates poor insulation to ground condition or
Resistance >100 ground fault.
MegOhm8
MCA devices have the ability to detect cable faults, as well as faults within the generator
stator and rotor fields. Therefore, several additional steps are necessary in order to pinpoint
the location of the fault(s), including testing at the generator leads directly and moving the
shaft position:
• By testing at the generator leads directly, you can determine if a fault exists in
cabling, the generator windings, or both. If the readings show a normal winding,
then the problem is in the cables; if the readings improve, then the problem exists in
both the generator and cables; and, if the readings stay the same, then the problem
exists in the generator.
• Once the generator has been identified, then the problem can be further located by
moving the shaft (within one quarter turn) and re-performing the tests. If the poor
test results remain in the same phase, then the problem is in the stator coils, if the
results change phases, then the fault resides in the rotating fields.
5 Above 0.250 Ohms. Otherwise, look for significant differences such as 0.080 Ohms, 0.082 Ohms and 0.400 Ohms would
indicate a problem.
6 A motor with a low, medium and high value of inductance on each phase should have a corresponding pattern of
impedance.
7 For generators with a voltage rating less than 600 Volts
8 For generators with a voltage rating greater than 600 Volts
89
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
If you are using the trending method, then Table 4 applies for detecting faults over time.
Table 4: Test Tolerances for Generator Trending

Reading Change from Baseline Severity
R, Z, L < 3% Good
R, Z, L >3 - < 5 % Monitor, Troubleshoot if
critical machine
R, Z, L > 5% Troubleshoot
Fi, I/F <1 pt Good
Fi, I/F > 1 - < 3 pts Monitor, Troubleshoot if
critical machine
Fi, I/F > 3 pts Troubleshoot
Rotor problems, if identified, can be the result of either a grounded or shorted coil or set of
coils. To confirm condition, perform an insulation to ground test on the rotor ensuring that
any rotating diodes are disconnected. If the insulation to ground is good, then the fault is a
shorted rotating field.
The above tests will identify the following faults in the generator:
• Grounded stator or rotor windings

• Shorted stator or rotor windings
• Open stator or rotor windings
The Challenge of ESA on Generators
The primary difference between testing rotating machines and generators is that voltage
signature analysis is used to evaluate the condition of generators, while current signature
analysis is used for rotating machines. The key is to remember that voltage is for supply
equipment and current for load equipment. All of the signatures that would normally be
used for detecting faults in current are used, instead, in voltage. In this case, as well, any
similar peaks that show in the voltage and current spectra, if the voltage peak is dominant
(greater than the current dB), then the fault is generator related, otherwise it is supply related.
90
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Fault Analysis with ESA
ESA evaluation of the generator will produce similar results as synchronous motors, except
that the results will be in voltage (reference Table 5).
Table 5: Generator Signature Analysis

Type of Fault Pattern (CF = Center Frequency)
Stator Mechanical (i.e.: loose coils, stator CF = RS x Stator Slots
core movement, etc.) Line Frequency Sidebands
Stator Shorts (shorted windings) CF = RS x Stator Slots
Line Frequency sidebands with Running
Speed sidebands
Rotor Indicator CF = RS x Rotor Slots
Line Frequency sidebands
Static Eccentricity CF = RS x Rotor Slots
sidebands.
Dynamic Eccentricity CF = RS x Rotor Slots
with Running Speed sidebands
Mechanical Unbalance (and Misalignment) CF = RS x Rotor Slots
Line Frequency Sidebands, Space of four
times Line Frequency then two Line
Frequency peaks
Grounded and shorted rotating fields and exciter faults will show as rotor indicators.
Salient Pole Rotors
One of the differences that exist in both synchronous motors and generators with Salient
Poles is the rotating field signature. The rotating field is observed as the number of rotor
field coils times the frequency +/- line frequency sidebands as the fundamental plus
harmonics with a descending pattern (Figure 2) in voltage high frequency. Variations of this
pattern indicate field faults. An additional fault indicator includes sidebands of the number
of poles squared around the line frequency (Figure 3).
Sidebands and patterns around the rotating field frequencies, in the high frequency
spectrum, normally indicate driver issues. At the time of the drafting of this paper, research
continues as to specific fault analysis of variations of the rotating field frequencies.
91
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Figure 2: Rotating Field Signature, High Frequency (Good)
6-pole machine
Figure 3: Rotating Field Signature, Low Frequency (Poor Condition)
6-pole machine
Figure 4: Rotating Field Signature, High Frequency (Poor Condition)
92
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Conclusion
The most powerful combination of tools for condition based maintenance of generators are
motor circuit analysis tools that include phase angle and current/frequency analysis and
electrical signature analysis. Combined, they are able to detect and analyze insulation to
ground condition of the rotor and stator, winding shorts in the rotor and stator, condition of
the exciter, bearings and air-gap eccentricity. Most of the data can be trended as well as
providing the ability to troubleshoot the equipment.
Bibliography
Penrose, Howard W, Ph.D., Motor Circuit Analysis: Theory, Applications and Energy
Analysis, SUCCESS by DESIGN Publishing, 2001.
Penrose, Howard W, Ph.D., Motor Diagnostics 2-Day Training Manual, ALL-TEST Pro,
2004.
“Electrical Motor Diagnostics for Generators Part 1: The Basics,” ALL-TEST Pro, 2005
“Electrical Motor Diagnostics for Generators Part 2: Case Studies,” ALL-TEST Pro, 2005
93
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 8: DC Current Motor Electrical Evaluation

Using Motor Circuit Analysis
Howard W. Penrose, Ph.D
Old Saybrook, CT
Introduction
Electrical testing of Direct Current (DC) electric motors is a challenge within industry,
manufacturing and repair centers alike. The key issue has to do with the ability to compare one
coil to the next, should exact information not be provided. In this article, the issue of simple tests
to increase the confidence of testing and analysis conclusions using Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA)
shall be discussed.
The term MCA is derived from a test method that provides information on the basic
components of an AC or DC electric motor. These basic components include: resistance,
measured in Ohms; impedance, measured in Ohms; inductance, measured in Henries; the
induction winding phase angle, measured in degrees; and, insulation resistance, measured in
Meg-Ohms. The instrument that will be referred to in this article provides these readings by
generating a low voltage, true sine-wave, alternating current (impedance, inductance, phase
angle), signal at frequencies from 100 to 800 hertz, a low voltage DC signal for resistance,
and 500 or 1,000 volts DC for the insulation resistance test. In addition, a special test called
I/F is performed in which the applied frequency is doubled and a ratio results from the
change in the winding impedance. This test is introduced to identify early winding shorts
that may exist in the winding. Using the applied data, the condition of a DC motor winding
can be evaluated through coil comparisons, comparisons to known readings, or by trending
changes to the windings over a period of time.
The DC electric motors that will be included in this article are: series, shunt, and compound
DC motors. Some of the basic tests described can be performed on permanent magnet, DC
servo, DC machine tools, and others (although brushless DC motors are evaluated in a
similar fashion to AC motors). The types of DC electric motors can be described by their
windings and connections.
94
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
DC Motor Theory
Direct Current electric motors operate under a basic principle of electricity: interaction
between two magnetic fields positioned at an angle from each other will attract/repel
resulting in movement. In the case of a DC electric motor, power is provided to a stator
field and an armature creating magnetic fields that are, electrically, about 90 degrees from
each other. The resulting attraction/repulsion of the armature from the field generates a
torque and the armature turns.
The basic components of a DC electric motor include:
Ø Frame – Makes up the outer structure of the machine. It is used to mount most of
the other components of the motor.
Ø Fields – Are coils mounted on field pole pieces that generate a stationary magnetic
field.
Ø Interpoles – Are coils that are placed between the field coils that generate a field that
is used to prevent excessive sparking of the brushes.
Ø End shields – Also called bearing housings, are used to house the brushes, brush
rigging, and to house the shaft bearings, holding the armature centered in the frame.
Ø Brush rigging – Holds and positions the brushes above the armature commutator.
Usually, a tension device is used to maintain a constant pressure on the brushes.
Ø Brushes – Are used to provide DC to the armature. The brushes ride on the
commutator.
Ø Commutator – Consists of many copper bars that are separated by mica. Each bar is
connected to coils in the armature.
Ø Armature – Is the rotating portion of the motor that contains coils.
Unlike most AC motors, DC motors require separate power to be provided to both the
fields and the armature. The DC provided to the stator fields generate a constant North and
South set of fields. DC provided to the armature generates North and South fields that are
90 electrical degrees from the stationary field. As the armature generates a torque and moves
towards the appropriate North or South pole, the brushes change position on the
commutator, energizing another set of coils 90 electrical degrees from the stationary field.
This actually makes the armature an Alternating Current component as the current will travel
in one direction, based upon brush position, then in another direction as the motor operates.
The brushes are set in such a position that they are electrically “neutral” (no induced current
from the stator fields) in order to reduce sparking. In most DC motor connections, by
varying the armature voltage, the operating speed may be changed. One general danger that
is inherent in DC motors is that if field current is lost while armature current is maintained,
the motor may take off and the speed increase until the armature self-destructs.
95
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The three basic winding types that can be used to identify the type of DC motor include:
Ø Series: Normally found in applications that need a high starting torque. They consist
of a set of field windings of large wire and relatively few turns, marked S1 and S2,
that are connected in series to the interpoles and armature, marked A1 and A2 (See
Figure 1). Series connected motors are normally used as traction motors and have a
very low basic resistance.
Figure 1: Series Motor
A1 A2 S1 S2
Ø Shunt: Normally found in applications that require constant speed. They consist of a
set of field windings of smaller wire with many turns, marked F1 and F2 for single
voltage and F1, F2, F3 and F4 for dual voltage, and A1 and A2 for the interpoles and
armature (See Figures 2). Shunt connected motors are normally used as crane and
machine tool motors and have a relatively high basic resistance.
Figure 2: Shunt Wound Motor
F1 A1 A2 F2
96
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Ø Compound: Combine the benefits of both the series and shunt wound motors.
They provide a relatively high torque with a basic resistance to a change in operating
speed. The connections combine both the series and shunt connections (See Figure
3). Compound motors are the most common and are commonly found in industrial
manufacturing.
Figure 3: Compound Wound Motor
F1 A1 A2 S1 S2 F2
As it can be seen, there are few coils to compare to each other in an assembled DC machine.
However, procedures can be developed for winding testing that provide a high level of test
result confidence.
Common DC Motor Electrical Faults
There are a number of common DC motor electrical faults of which the most common will
be described here. These result from issues specific to DC motor design as a result of
temperature, friction and internal contaminants such as carbon or graphite.
One of the most common causes of winding faults in a DC motor is from winding
contamination from carbon or graphite (carbon) dust from the brushes. The fine powder
permeates all of the stationary and rotating windings and will create a path between
conductors or between conductors to ground. Carbon is often trapped and problems
aggravated further through cleaning and maintenance practices when the carbon is blown
with compressed air or the armature is cleaned and baked. In either case, the carbon may
become tightly packed in corners, usually just behind the commutator. This will end as a
ground fault or shorted turns right at the commutator connection.
Another common fault, that is often not considered, is cooling of the DC machine. This
may occur because cooling passages are blocked, the armature is turned too slow with no
additional cooling, or from dirty filters (the most common cooling-related fault).
Temperature is the greatest enemy of electrical equipment, particularly the insulation system,
of which the life will be reduced by half for every 10 degrees centigrade increase in
temperature (accepted rule of thumb). As the insulation weakens, its reliability decreases
until winding faults between turns occur. In addition to the insulation system degrading,
brushes also degrade faster, causing increased wear on the commutator and additional
carbon contamination of the windings.
97
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
Another fault that is related to heat is generated from practices that have the fields energized
with the armature at rest (de-energized). This is a common mode of operation that requires
a separate blower to provide cooling to the motor that normally has filters that must be kept
clean. This type of fault normally results in shorted shunt coils, reducing the motor’s ability
to produce torque and may end with the dangerous condition of armature overspeed if not
maintained properly.
The commutator also provides opportunities for faults, as well as an indicator of motor
operation and condition. A properly operating DC motor will have a fine glaze of carbon on
the commutator with the bars looking uniform. Burned commutator bars, streaked glazing,
heavy carbon, or overheated commutator conditions indicate potential problems that should
be addressed.
Armature Testing
DC armatures are the most time consuming but easiest component to test. There are three
basic methods that will be introduced: trending; assembled; and, disassembled. In the case
of trending, all measurements are used, however, in the case of assembled and disassembled
testing a bar to bar impedance measurement will be used. Impedance is viewed because the
armature is an AC component and simple resistance measurements may miss some faults
including shorts and grounds. Trending will be reviewed in an overall trending procedure
for DC motors later in this article.
When testing an assembled DC motor armature, the best method is to perform what’s
commonly known as a bar-to-bar test using the motor brushes. In the case of a DC motor
that has two brushes, none of the brushes needs to be raised, in the case of a DC motor that
has four or more sets of brushes, all but two sets 90 degrees from each other need to be
raised, which takes them out of the testing circuit. Make sure that good contact is
maintained on the commutator by ensuring that 90%+ of the brush is in contact with the
commutator bars and that the commutator bars are clean. If they are not clean, polish the
armature gently, using an approved method, before testing. If the commutator is badly
worn, it will need to be disassembled and the commutator “turned and undercut,” in which
case a disassembled bar to bar test would be appropriate. Once set, mark the position of
one bar on the commutator, then bring the bar to a position where it is just under the
leading edge of one of the brushes. In the assembled test, you will probably be covering at
least one and a half bars with the brush. Perform an impedance test, mark down the
reading, and move the armature so that the leading edge of the brush is over the next
commutator bar. Take the next impedance reading and continue until each bar has been
tested. A good result will show a consistent pattern, while an inconsistent pattern will
identify a poor armature.
Disassembled bar-to-bar testing is similar to assembled testing, other than the armature is
out of the frame and the tester has full access to the commutator. In this case, the tester will
use an armature fixture or test leads to connect from bar to bar. The spacing between each
impedance reading should be constant and about 90 to 180 degrees from each other. The
first bar should be marked and testing continue until one leg of the testing fixture or test lead
98
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
has made it 360 degrees around the commutator. Mark the impedance for each bar-to-bar
test then look to ensure that there was a consistent pattern.
Series Motor Testing
Series electric motors are very challenging to troubleshoot as they do not provide sets of fields to
compare to. Readings may be taken from S1 to S2 and A1 to A2 then trended over time or
compared to other similar machines.
When trending the readings over time, simple resistance readings must be corrected for
temperature, usually relative to 25oC. Impedance and Inductance normally has limited
change due to temperature while the phase angle and I/F readings will remain constant,
regardless of temperature. Variations in the I/F and phase angle will indicate shorted turns,
while changes in Impedance and Inductance will normally indicate dirty windings.
Comparing like motors will require additional information. The operator will have to ensure
that the motor is of the same manufacturer and design, as well as speed, power, etc. The
“model” motor must be new or rebuilt to original manufacturer’s specifications. When
performing comparative readings, the testing temperature should be similar from motor to
motor, however, the I/F and phase angle readings can be directly compared. These readings
should not change more than +/- 2 points for I/F and +/- 1 degree for phase angle. A
common error when series field windings are rebuilt, although less common that shunt coils,
is an incorrect replacement of wire size, which will impact the ability of the motor to
generate torque.
Shunt Motor Testing
Dual voltage shunt motors provide the ability to compare two sets of windings while single
voltage motors will have the same test procedure as testing series motor windings, using F1
to F2 as opposed to S1 to S2. With dual voltage, the shunt windings are labeled F1 to F2
and F3 to F4 allowing the analyst to test and compare these two sets of windings.
When testing and troubleshooting the readings over time, simple resistance readings must be
corrected for temperature, usually relative to 25oC. Impedance and Inductance will change
more than a series wound motor because of the higher simple resistance of the circuit. The
phase angle and I/F will remain constant, within 1 to 2 points, regardless of temperature.
Variations in the I/F and phase angle will indicate shorted turns, while changes in
Impedance and Inductance will normally indicate dirty windings. Comparisons between F1
to F2 and F3 to F4 should be less than 3% in resistance, inductance and impedance and no
more than 1 point different in I/F or phase angle.
Like motors can be tested and compared the same as series wound motors. When possible,
the motors should be tested, when trending readings, at the same temperature as the
99
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
previous tests. For instance, within minutes of shutting down operating equipment or
before starting equipment, this allows for the tests to be performed at like temperatures.
Compound Motor Testing
In place testing, trending and troubleshooting is much simpler with a compound motor.
Single voltage compound motors are normally labeled A1 to A2, S1 to S2 and F1 to F2, dual
voltage compound motors are normally labeled A1 to A2, S1 to S2, F1 to F2 and F3 to F4.
A key additional point to a compound wound motor is that the series winding is normally
wound on top of the shunt winding, allowing for possible faults between these two
windings.
Trending a compound motor, the tests are normally taken from the DC drive terminals.
Standard MCA tests using the ALL-TEST involve low voltage, higher frequency signals that
will not harm the output electronics of the equipment, reducing the need to disconnect the
leads from the drive while testing. However, if the analyst wishes to check insulation
resistance between the series and shunt windings, the leads must be disconnected from the
drive. When trending from the DC drive, test A1 to S2 and the two field leads then perform
a 500 Volt insulation resistance test between the S2 and F1 leads and compare to previous
tests or similar motors, in either case, insulation resistance readings should remain above 100
Meg-Ohms. The ALL-TEST unit allows the analyzer to immediately compare the past to
present readings as a quick check allowing the analyzer to make a quick decision to test the
windings further. As mentioned in series and shunt motor testing techniques, the I/F and
phase angle readings should not change more than 1 point between tests, over time, the
series and field windings will vary dramatically from each other, however.
Troubleshooting compound motors should be performed at the motor, itself. Disconnect

all motor leads and separate them. Test the series and field windings as outlined in the series
and shunt winding instructions, then perform an insulation resistance test between the series
and shunt windings, the insulation resistance should be greater than 100 Meg-Ohms.
General DC MCA Testing Notes
Several key points can be made using MCA testing on any type of DC motor:
1. Any I/F reading outside the range of –15 to –50, for instance, -56, indicates a
winding fault.
2. If the test shows an infinite resistance between leads of the same circuit indicates an
open winding.
3. An increase in simple resistance between tests, when corrected for temperature,
indicates a loose connection, in particular when impedance and inductance readings
change. A reduced simple resistance, when corrected for temperature, may indicate a
short, usually accompanied by changes in impedance, inductance, phase angle and
I/F.
4. When testing like motors, the I/F and phase angle should not change more than 2
points, any difference greater than this should prompt a full analysis.
100
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
5. Changes when testing through the armature circuit should prompt a bar to bar test.
By following these simple instructions, using an MCA device, will allow you to capture early
faults long before the equipment fails during operation. If performing tests as part of a
predictive maintenance program, the interval should be at least those shown in Table 1.
Table 1: DC Motor Test Frequency

Test Type Non-Critical General Critical
General Maintenance 1 year 6-9 months 3-6 months
Predictive 6 months 3 months 1 month
Maintenance
Armature Test 1 year 6 months 3 months
General maintenance tests are those that are not trended over time. Usually accompanied with
vibration, bearing greasing, commutator inspection and brush inspection. Predictive maintenance
testing normally involves trending readings over time looking to detect potential faults then to
determine the best time to remove the motor for corrective maintenance. Once a potential fault
is detected, the testing frequency should increase until it is determined that the motor needs to be
removed. A complete armature test should be performed either in conjunction with a general or
predictive maintenance test due to the high stresses at the commutator and carbon contamination.
Conclusion
General electrical testing of direct current electric motors is made much easier with new
techniques available with static motor circuit analysis. For the first time, early turn faults can
be detected in series, shunt and armature windings before they take equipment out of
operation. Predictive maintenance tests can be performed from the drive with
troubleshooting tests being performed at the motor. In general, the tests are relatively quick,
requiring less than five minutes per motor for predictive maintenance testing, with additional
time required for troubleshooting. Overall, MCA testing dramatically improves DC motor
testing over the traditional methods of continuity tests.
101
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 9: Case Study - Phase Unbalance at Vermont

Yankee Nuclear
ALL-TEST Pro, LLC™ Case Study: Phase Unbalance 012002

Theme: Case Study - Phase Unbalance at Vermont Yankee
Nuclear
Description
Location: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Equipment: 50 HP, 3600 RPM, 480 Volt,
Open Drip Proof, Cooling pump motor Effected Systems: 500 MW Generator Bearing
Cooling Failure Cost: $1,000,000 Savings: >$1,000,000
A 50 HP, 3600 RPM, delta connected electric motor was installed and rotation checked on
the Vermont Yankee generator bearing cooling pump. It was one of two motors and would
only be brought into operation if the primary motor failed. When the primary failed, the
motor was brought online. It was noticed that there was an 11% (p-p) current unbalance
with a less than 0.5% voltage unbalance. The motor was also exhibiting a 120Hz vibration
(electrical) and had an excessive operating temperature, although the peak current identified
the motor as operating at 90% load.
Initial Readings
An ALL-TEST III™ was used to determine the phase unbalance, with results of 000, -016
and -016 (% unbalance) phase to phase when the rotor was shifted to the peak unbalance on
each phase. Two additional motors of the same model and similar serial numbers were
selected for review and tested using both the ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 and ALL-TEST
III™. The resulting phase unbalances and rotor tests were evaluated (Figure 1 and Table 1
are examples of the common results):
Figure 1: Rotor Test (Inductance) Table 1: Winding Analysis
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3

Resistance 0.163 0.175 0.168
Impedance 30 49 44
Inductance 6 9 8
Phase
77 77 77
Angle
I/F -44 -44 -45
Insulation >99M
102
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The unbalance was found to be striking, and related to the unbalanced current, vibration and
heating of the motor. Possibilities were explored ranging from power quality to test
equipment calibration. All were satisfactory.
Next Step
The motor manufacturer was contacted and noted that process changes were made at a
particular location for larger concentric wound machines. In a motor of this size and speed,
the first set of concentric coils (one phase) curls under the following phases, reducing the
equipment‘s winding appearance and mechanical strength. In order to combat that issue, the
manufacturer made a decision to significantly increase the size of the first set of coils in their
automated process (first phase) that also happens to be the furthest from the rotor. This
allows the coil ends to appear without having to make post-winding modifications to the
coils. No dynamometer testing, full load testing, or otherwise was performed on the motor
design other than an applied voltage impedance test that ‘met design requirements.’
Electrically, inductance is directly impacted by distance from the rotor, number of
conductors and dimension of the coil. The motor manufacturing process improvement
caused the unbalance.
Motors from other manufacturers were evaluated and found to have balanced windings.
However, several new motors were found to have rotor casting voids that would impact the
motor‘s ability to produce torque.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear has now implemented a program to test all incoming critical
electric motors prior to acceptance using a combination of the ALL-TEST III™ and ALL-
TEST IV PRO™ 2000.
Cost Avoidance
The generator would have had to shut down within two minutes of the second motor
failure. The emergency generator shutdown may have caused damage to the generator
bearings and an unplanned electrical outage. Cost avoidance was estimated at well over
$1,000,000 through the detection of the fault. Subsequent detection of similar motor
conditions through new and repaired motors has continued to justify the incoming test and
inspection program.
Lessons Learned
New and repaired electric motors are not immune to defects. These defects may be the
result of production/repair mistakes or design errors. A program of incoming inspection
using both the ALL-TEST III™ and ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 will identify these
potentially costly failures prior to installation of the equipment.
103
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
APPENDIX 10: Case Study: Dynamometers 012002
ALL-TEST Pro, LLC™ Case Study: Dynamometers 012002

Theme: Case Study - Dynamometer at Automotive Plant
Description
Location: Mid-Western Truck Transmission Manufacturing Facility Dynamometer Motor:
200 Horsepower, Special Motor and Dynamometer Drive, 480 Volts Effected Systems: Final
In-Process Inspections, 8% of capacity effected Failure Cost: >$125,000 in equipment, not
including production, delivery and manpower Savings: >$500,000 in equipment, not
including production, delivery and manpower
A special dynamometer system failed at a mid-Western truck transmission plant in the final
test stage of their process line. The fault damaged over $125,000 in sensitive drive equipment
during production, causing an unplanned outage of 8% of the final test production area.
Initial Readings
The ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 was applied to determine the cause of the fault. The first
test was performed at the Motor Control Center (MCC) and indicated a severe short (I/F
and Phase Angle) and loose connections (Resistance):
Table 1: Test at MCC
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
Resistance 0.013 8.255 8.253
Impedance 7 10 10
Inductance 1 2 2
Phase
62 20 21
Angle
I/F -43 -16 -18
Insulation >99M
104
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
As per standard practice, the motor was tested at the motor connection box with the
following good results:
Table 2: Test at Motor Connection Box
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3

Resistance 0.034 0.024 0.006
Impedance 8 9 7
Inductance 1 1 1
Phase
64 64 63
Angle
I/F -43 -43 -43
Insulation >99M
This indicated that the fault was in the cabling. When inspected, it was found that the
connections had been incorrectly crimped causing a loose connection that caused the cable
insulation to break down and fail. The fault was a direct short that caused catastrophic
damage to the drive. Note that the cable did not ground.
Next Step
Motor Circuit Analysis (MCA) had not been performed on the dynamometer system prior to
the cable fault. The system was added to the plant‘s reliability program and several other
dynamometer cables were found to be in the same condition. One dynamometer motor
(150 Horsepower) was found to have a coil short:
Table 3: 150 Horsepower Dynamometer at MCC
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3

Resistance 0.022 0.022 0.022
Impedance 7 7 9
Inductance 1 1 1
Phase
60 62 64
Angle
I/F -43 -43 -42
Insulation >99M
105
MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL
The final test stage is very critical, so the Reliability Department added an acceptance test
stage to all new and repaired dynamometer motors. An example of a good new 200
Horsepower dynamometer motor test is as follows:
Table 4: 200 Horsepower Dynamometer Acceptance Test
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3

Resistance 0.012 0.011 0.010
Impedance 8 7 8
Inductance 1 1 1
Phase
64 63 64
Angle
I/F -43 -43 -43
Insulation >99M
Cost Avoidance
Early detection and correction of the other faults generated cost avoidance, in equipment
only; of at least $500,000 should the failures occur the same way as the first 200 horsepower
dynamometer. Each dynamometer failure reduces the production capability of the plant by
8% during the final test stage.
Lessons Learned
A review of critical motors in the plant would identify critical equipment that must be
included in the reliability program. Motor Circuit Analysis, using the ALL-TEST IV PRO™
2000, can be used to provide incoming inspection, trending analysis and troubleshooting
capabilities rare in predictive maintenance equipment. Identification of loose connections,
cable faults and winding faults will often provide a very quick simple payback for the
program.
106
APPENDIX 11: Utilizing the ALL-TEST PRO 31™ To
Detect Pin-Hole Shorts
Utilizing the ALL-TEST PRO 31™
To Detect Pin-Hole Shorts
The ALL-TEST PRO 31™

(AT31) is the most advanced hand-held go/no-go motor tester available. We have created an
instrument that outperforms surge comparison testers and other competitor equipment that
sell for an average of $26,000 USD plus Note: Baker has just released a ‘baby surge tester’
that costs $12,000 USD, but is limited to only smaller 480 Volt motors and still weighs over
36 lbs.
The AT31 has the ability to detect winding shorts, perform rotor tests visually, check
insulation to ground and perform an EMI (Electro- Magnetic Induction) test on the circuit,
all for under $1,500. One of the advances of the AT31 is the ability to adjust the test
frequency to 100 Hz and below. This is very important, as lower frequencies will ‘amplify’
winding shorts for improved sensitivity. (Reference “Motor Circuit Analysis Concept and
Principle” article – available upon request, for the technical description).
We have found that the AT31 is very sensitive when we get to 100 Hz and below. For this
reason, the AT31 should default to 200 Hz when started. The purpose of this ‘short’ article
is to describe how to use the AT31’s hypersensitivity effectively at these lower frequencies.
What is a pin-hole short?

A Pin-Hole short is a very small short that generally occurs in the end-turns of a motor
winding. These were uncommon prior to the 1990’s, but became common following the
increased application of Pulse-Width Modulated (PWM) drives.
The shorts occur in a very small area between individual turns in a coil. They can cause the
motor to trip on a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) but often operate OK across the line
(standard 50 or 60 Hz power). These shorts are often the diameter of a pin, hence the term
pin-hole short.
The ALL-TEST IV PRO™ 2000 and ALL-TEST III™ are both able to detect these type of
shorts. However, the results are sometimes borderline, requiring some experience to detect
them, in particular with the ALL-TEST III. As a result, the replacement for the ALLTEST
III has been designed to be more sensitive.
Case in point: In an effort to show that high voltage surge testing could outperform low
voltage motor circuit analysis (ALL-TEST Pro technology), a pin-hole short was induced
into a 2 horsepower motor winding (using a surge-tester, I might add) by a potential
customer.
107
The short was designed so that it would take 1750 volts before the latest surge test
technology could detect the fault.
The AT31, at the 200 Hz test frequency, saw a test result just out of range, as did the ALL-
TEST IV PRO 2000. This may have been seen as a ‘gray area’ finding (a gray area is when
the test result looks unbalanced or is just out of the test spec). The Test technicians selected
a lower test frequency of 60 Hz on the AT31. The result was a separation of over 5 digits
between phases. In the meantime, several of the surge-test manufacturer personnel tested
the motor and only one of their engineers caught the fault using their most advanced analyzer!
How to use this new power?

The default frequency of 200 Hz was selected, based upon experiment, to reduce the
chances of false-positives. When testing, you now have the opportunity to confirm the
condition of a motor by taking
a more sensitive look at ‘gray area’ test results. For instance, if you have test results that
appear (at 200 Hz):
Test 1
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
Fi 66 67 69
I/F -44 -44 -45
You can adjust the frequency down (100, 60, 50, 30 or 25 Hz) and re-test. If the test results
remain similar (the actual readings will change by a few digits, but the difference between
readings remains the same), then the winding is good.
Test 2
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
Fi 70 71 73
I/F -44 -44 -45
If the results separate more, as shown in Test 3, then the winding is in poor shape.
Test 3
T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-T3
Fi 70 71 75
I/F -45 -45 -47
108
Conclusion
The ALL-TEST PRO 31 is the most powerful go/no-go winding tester on the market. The
advancement of our technology allows us to readily outperform our competitors and their
technologies with simple, hand-held instruments, and simple test results.
The AT31 quickly, and accurately, removes all doubt as to the condition of questionable
motor windings and commission new or repaired motors in minutes.
We will be continuing to provide information on the capabilities of the ALL-TEST PRO 31

as we move forward.
Contributed by
Dr. Howard Penrose
109
DISCLAIMER, COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARKS
Notice of Service/Trademark Rights
The trademarks, service marks and logos (collectively, the "Marks") set forth below are
registered and unregistered trademarks and/or service marks owned by ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
in the United States and certain other countries throughout the world. Nothing contained in
this manual should be construed as granting, by implication, estoppel or otherwise, any
license or right to use any of the Marks without the written permission of ALL-TEST Pro,
LLC. Any misuse of the Marks or any Content, except as provided in this Statement, is
strictly prohibited and may violate trademark laws.
Other brands or product names used in this manual are trademarks and/or service marks of
their respective owners, should be treated as such, and may be registered in various
jurisdictions.
1) ALL-TEST PRO® is a Registered Trademark of ALL-

TEST Pro, LLC
2) EMCAT PRO 2005 ™ , ALL-TEST Pro™, ALL-TEST
IV PRO 2000™, TREND 2005™, are all Trademarks of
ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
Disclaimer:
Documents published by ALL-TEST Pro, LLC are provided "as is" without
warranty of any kind, either expressed, implied or statutory, including, but not
limited to any warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-
infringement.
ALL-TEST Pro, LLC shall not under any circumstances be liable to any person for
any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages, including, without
limitation damages resulting from use of or reliance on the information presented,
loss of profits or revenues or costs of replacement goods, even if informed in advance
of the possibility of such damages.
Reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented.
However, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the
information. Product information is subject to change without notice. ALL-TEST Pro, LLC
may make improvements and/or changes in the products and/or the programs described in
these publications at any time without notice.
110
Copyright:
Information in this document is:
© 2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC. All rights reserved.
You may cite or refer to information published in this manual, except as provided below, but
you may not reproduce or distribute such information in whole or in part without the prior
written permission of ALL-TEST Pro, LLC. You may not reproduce or distribute any image
from the MCA Analysis Manual, without securing advance written consent from ALL-TEST
Pro, LLC. To request such permission, send email to info@alltestpro.com, including your
name, address and a description of the purpose of your intended distribution and the
information you would like to distribute.
You may print, reproduce and use the information in, and retrieve files containing software
or images from ALL-TEST Pro, LLC for non-commercial, personal, or educational purposes
only, provided that you (i) do not modify such information, and (ii) include any copyright
originally included with such information and this notice in all such copies.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication or otherwise any
license or right under any patent or trademark of ALL-TEST Pro, LLC or any third party.
No other rights under any copyrights of ALL-TEST Pro, LLC or any other party are granted
herein, except as expressly stated above.
111

Motor Circuit Analysis Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Motor Circuit Analysis Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ALL-TEST Pro, LLC

MOTOR CIRCUIT ANALYSIS MANUAL

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL

MCA ANALYSIS MANUAL

Use of this Manual

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 1

ALL-TEST Pro Instrument Philosophy

• are easy and safe to use

• light weight and portable

• shows fault(s) immediately

• shows any change over time

• makes several different measurements for analysis

ALL-TEST Pro Analysis Philosophy

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 2

Motor Diagnostic Theory

Basic Electrical Theory

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 3

Self-Inductance is the property of a circuit where a change of current in the circuit

Basic Electrical theory states that:

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 4

INS- Insulation (to Ground) Test. Measured in Meg-Ohms.

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 5

1) The ATIV automatically tests the condition of the motor windings.

Motor Testing Procedure

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 6

Performing Motor Diagnostics

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 7

Sample Test Results

Reading T1-T2 T1-T3 T2-

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 8

Data Analysis Tips

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 9

2) Generally, never condemn a motor based on an unbalanced inductance or impedance

4) Winding shorts are first indicated by unbalances in Current/Frequency response (I/F)

5) Loose connections are indicated by unbalances in winding resistance measurements.

6) Winding contamination or overheated windings are indicated when Impedance Pattern

Unassembled Motor Analysis

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 10

Test Result Tolerance

Resistance (R) <5%

Impedance (Z) <3%

Inductance (Z) <5%

Phase Angle (Fi) +/- 0

Current frequency Response (I/F) +/- 0

Insulation Resistance < 600 Volts > 5 Megohms

Insulation Resistance >600 Volts > 100Megohms

This table is only applicable to motors with the rotor removed

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 11

Data Interpretation Basic Rules and Tolerances

Assembled Motor Analysis

Test Result Tolerance Detail

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 12

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 13

ANALYZING MEASUREMENTS AND CHANGE

Current Frequency Response (I/F) – The current frequency response should be

Winding Contamination and Rotor Position

©2008, ALL-TEST Pro, LLC 14

Insulation Resistance Readings

Type of Insulation Insulation Resistance Values

All insulation systems prior to 1974 1 Meg-Ohm + 1 Meg-Ohm/kV

Random Wound Motors > 5 Meg-Ohms

Form Wound Motors and DC > 100 Meg-Ohms

This maintenance philosophy, referred to as Predictive Maintenance (PdM), has escalated

Predictive maintenance instruments should be :